ML17345B024
| ML17345B024 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/18/1983 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17345B023 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8303290122 | |
| Download: ML17345B024 (5) | |
Text
~
~p,S Racy (4
4 0
Cy O
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION I
RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO: 94 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO.
DPR-31 AND AMENDMENT NO.
'88.TO.=FACIL'ITY OPERATING LICENSE NO.
DPR-41 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT PLANT UNIT NOS.
3 AND 4 DOCKET NOS. 50-250 AND 50-251 I.
INTRODUCTION By letter to the NRC dated August 12, 1982, as supplemented by'letter dated December 30, 1982, Florida Power and Light Company (FPL or the licensee) has proposed changes to the Technical Specifications for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 to reflect changes to its offsite management organization.
FPL states that this August 12, 1982, submittal supersedes a February 16, 1982, change request in its entirety.
II.
EVALUATION A.
Organization and Title Changes The licensee proposes to modify Figure 6.2-1, "Offsite Organization for Facility Management and Technical Support":to show that a Nuclear Energy Department (NED) has been formed to manage the nuclear activities that were previously managed by the Power Resources Department.
The new NED is headed by a Vice President who reports directly to the FPL Executive Vice President.
Reporting to the new.Vice President-NED is a Manager-NED, a position that was previously titled Manager-Power Resources-Nuclear and that previously reported to the Vice President-Power Resources.
The Site Manager and the Manager-Nuclear Engineering Services (title changed from Manager-Power Resources Nuclear Services) and a new position titled Assistant Manager NED report to the Manager-
'NED.
The licensee also proposed to modify Figure 6:2-2 to reflect the title changes in the offsite organization.
The titles in the two boxes currently listed as Power Resources Staff will change to Nuclear Energy Services Staff.
We conclude that the organization structure changes as discussed above does not diminish FPL's ability to safely operate the Turkey Point Units 3
8 4 and the proposed modifications to Figures 6.2-1 and 6.2-2 to reflect these changes are acceptable.
, 8303290122 830318
'oR *oooo ooooo2h
- PDR, f
B.
Nuclear Rev'iew Board Membership Changes The licensee also proposes to modify the composition of the Company Nuclear Review Board (CNRB) as described in current Technical Speci-fication Section 6.5.2.2.
The licensee proposes to replace the four member titles currently listed as:
Vice President-Power Resources; Manager of Power Resources-Nuclear; Power Plant Engineering Manager; and Power Plant Engineering Supervisor with five new member titles:
Vice President, Nuclear Energy; Manager, Hue~ear Energy; Manager, Nuclear Fuel; Power Plant Engineering Principal Engineer; and Power Plant Engineering Senior Project Manager.
We currently require that each
- member, including the.chairman':.and alternate members, of review groups that perform the independent review functions described in Section 4 of ANSI H18.7 Standard and in Section 6.5.2.1 of the Turkey Point Technical Specifications, as a minimum, have a bachelors degree in engineering of related science or its equiv-alent and five years of professional experience in his/her specialty.
The CNRB is a company wide board serving both Turkey Point and St.
Lucie plants.
The corporate position titles of designated CtlRB members are such that the incumbents would be expected to at least meet the minimum require-ments as specified in the ANSI standard.
- Further, the qualifications of the present incumbents have recently been reviewed and approved as part of the St. Lucie Unit 2 operating license review.
We conclude that the board members meet the minimum qualifications specified above.
III.
SUMMARY
We have determined that the update of the off-.site management organization reflects the current corporate structure and the proposed changes to Section 6.5.2.2 are acceptable.
IV.-
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION We have determined that the amendments do not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level and will not result in any significant environmental 'impact.
Having made this determination, we have further concluded that the amendments involve an action'hich is insignificant fran the standpoint of envirornental impact and, pursuant to 10 CFR $51.5(d)(4), that an environmental impact statement or negative declaration and environ-mental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with the issuance of these amendments.
1
V CONCLUSION Me have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) because the amendments do not in'volve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, do not create the possibility of an accident of a type different from any evaluated previously, and do not involve a significant reduction fn a margin of safety, the amendments do not involve a significant hazards consideration, (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed
- manner, and (3) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
pate:
March 18, 1983
I