ML17342B013
| ML17342B013 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point |
| Issue date: | 11/06/1987 |
| From: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8711130081 | |
| Download: ML17342B013 (26) | |
See also: IR 05000250/1987019
Text
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION
NBR: 8711130081
DOC. DATE: 87/11/Ob
NOTARIZED:
NO
DOCKET 0
FACIL:50-250 Turkey Point Plant.
Unit 3i Florida Power
and Light
C
05000250
50-251 Turkey Point Planti
Unit 4i Florida Power
and Light
C
05000251
AUTH. NAME
AUTHOR AFFILIATION
GRACE> J. N.
Region
2i
Ofc of the Director
RECIP. NAME
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
WOODY> C. O.
Florida Poeer
5 Ligh't Co.
SUBJECT:
Foreards
summary of 870730 meeting e/util re discussion
of
SALP Repts
50-250/87-19
5 50-251/87-19
5
NRC response
to
util 870921
comments. Meeting slides also encl.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
IE40D
COPIES
RECEIVED: LTR
ENCL
SIZE:
TITLE: Systematic
Assessment
of Licensee
Performance
(SALP) Report
NOTES:
REC lP IENT
ID CODE/NAME
PD2-2
LA
McDONALDs D
INTERNAL:
AEOD BAILEY'
AEOD/DSP/TPAB
DEDRO
NRR/DEST/SIB
NRR/DLP6/PEB
NRR/DREP/EPB
NRR/DRIS DIR
OE~I IEBE
ANs J
REQ ML
02
EXTERNAL:
H ST LOBBY WARD
NRC
COPIES
LTTR ENCL
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
REC IP IENT
ID CODE/NAME
PD2-2
AEOD/DOA
COMMISSION
MORISSEAUi D
NRR/DLPG/HFB
NRR/DOEA/E*B
NRR/DREP/RPB
NRR/PMAS/ILRB
OGC/HDS2
RQN2
FILE
01
LPDR
COPIES
LTTR ENCL
1
1
1
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TOTAL
NUMBER OF
COP IES REQUIRED:
LTTR
29
ENCL
27
Florida Power and Light Company
ATTN:
Mr. C. 0.
Woody
Group Vice President
Nuclear Energy Department
P. 0.
Box 14000
Juno
Beach,
FL
33408
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT
OF LICENSEE
PERFORMANCE
REPORT
NOS. 50-250/87-19
AND 50-251/87-19
This refers to the
NRC's Systematic
Assessment
of Licensee
Performance
(SALP)
Board Report for your Turkey Point facility which was sent to you on July 17,
1987;
our meeting of July 30,
1987, at which we discussed
this report;
and your
written comments
in letter serial
L-87-392 dated
September
21,
1987, relative
to the report.
The enclosure
contains
the meeting
summary of July 30,
1987,
and the
NRC response
to your written comments of September
21,
1987.
We will continue to schedule
management
meetings
to discuss
your progress
in
improving the Category
3
SALP ratings at your Turkey Point facility in the
areas
of Security
and
Safeguards,
Training and qualification Effectiveness,
and Engineering
Support,
and to discuss
progress
in your third party appraisal
of site
and
corporate
organizations
and your continuous on-shift oversight
program.
No reply to this letter is required;
however,
should you have
any questions
concerning
these matters,
I will be pleased
to discuss
them with you.
Sincerely,
Enclosures:
1.
July 30,
1987 Meeting
Summary
and
NRC Response
to Written Comments
2.
July 30,
1987
SALP Slides
cc w/encls:
J.
S.
Odom, Vice President
Turkey Point Nuclear Plant
C. J.
Baker, Plant Manager
Turkey Point Nuclear Plant
L.
W. Bladow, Plant
gA Superintendent
J. Arias, Jr., Regulatory
and Compliance
Supervisor
bcc w/encls:
(See
page
2)
8711130081
871106
ADOCK 05060250
8
J.
Nelson
Grace
Regional Administrator
Florida Power and Light Company
NOy
P 6
$981
bcc w/encls:
NRC Resident
Inspector
Document Control
Desk
State, of Florida
HChristensen:cdg
10~/87
8 ilson
DVerrelli
10/w /87
10/y/87
RII
VBro4nlee
10/. 3/87
R II
)p
LReyes
10/8 i/87
10/
/87
il)"lJY
)
A , ~
~ I
~
NOV p g
]gory
ENCLOSURE I
I.
Meetin
Su@ear
A.
B.
A meeting
was held at 9:00 a.m.
on July 30,
1987, at the Turkey Point
Nuclear Plant,
in
Homestead,
Florida, to discuss
the
SALP Board
Report for the Turkey Point facility.
Licensee
Attendees
C.
R.
E. Talion, President
E. A. Adomat, Executive Vice President
C. 0.
Woody, Group Vice President,
Nuclear Energy
J.
W. Dickey, Vice President;
Nuclear'Operations
J.
S.
Odom, Executive Assistant to Vice President,
Nuclear Operations
J.
H. Dager,
Vice President
Engineering
H.
E. Yaeger,
Manager,
Nuclear Maintenance
C.
M. Wethy, Vice President,
Turkey Point
C. J. Baker, Plant Manager,
Turkey Point
R. J. Acosta, Director of guality Assurance
J.
K. Hays, Director of Nuclear Licensing
W. H. Rogers,
Chief Engineer
J.
W. Kappes,
Performance
Enhancement
Program Manager,
Turkey Point
The list of licensee
attendees
above
does
not include the large
number of FPL employees
that were present at the
SALP presentation.
The
personnel
were
supervisors,
plant
operators,
maintenance
personnel
and various plant staff.
This large turnout was beneficial
to
the
process
and
is
highly
recomnended
for future
presentation.
NRC Attendees
D.
J.
N. Grace,
NRC Regional Administrator
M. Ernst,
Deputy Regional Administrator
L. A. Reyes, Director, Division of Reactor
Projects
(DRP), RII
L. S. Rubenstein,
Director, Directorate II-2, NRR
G. C. Lainas, Assistant Director for Region II Reactors,
B. A. Wilson, Chief, Reactor Projects
Section
1C, RII
J. Lieberman, Director, Office of Enforcement,
D.
M. Verrelli, Chief, Reactor Projects
Branch I, RII
R. V. Crlenjak, Senior Resident
Inspector,
St. Lucie,
DRP, RII
D.
R. Brewer, Senior
Resident
Inspector,
Turkey Point,
DRP, RII
SALP Meetin
Clarification
The Licensee
wanted to
know what was
meant
by the word
imprudent"
with regard to the boric acid corrosion
problem.
Region II was not
making
an
economic
prudence
determination;
that is
not
NRC's
regulatory function.
The
synonym "not wise" would be the context
for the use of the word "imprudent."
ROV 06
<gg~
E.
SALP Neetin
Slides
See Enclosure
2
II.
NRC Res
onse to Licensee's
Se tember 21,
1987
S ecific Written Cotanents
The
NRC has reviewed your letter dated
September
21,
1987, concerning
the
NRC Systematic
Assessment
of Licensee
Performance
(SALP) for
Turkey Point Units
3 and 4,
and
acknowledges
your comnents.
Your
continued
comoitment to the Performance
Enhancement
Program
and your
improved efforts
on upgrading
the performance
of personnel
should
result in improvements
in overall plant operations.
COMMISSION
KJNITED STATES
-=NtJCLEAR REGt~LATORY
asC
C9
c'
c
~~O
g
~lQ
m
~~
m
~
Le0)
E
o'
a
8. u
O
O
SY STEMATIC ASSESSMENT
OF
LICENSEE PERFORMANCE
(SALP)
O
E
Ll
c
0
~pIcI
lg g
I
)U
~
4
~ I
MAY 1, 1986 MAY 31, 198V
TURKEY PQINT UNITS 3 &'4
JULY 30,
198V
HOMESTEAD, FLORIDA
bUUivL 'l
no.
SALP PROG
A
OBSECTIV
S
I. IMPROVE LICENSEE PERFORMANCE
z.
PROVIDE A BASIS FOR ALLGCATIGN
.".:..!I/PROVE NRC REGULATORY PROGRAM
. sUbject
no.
f
L~'ERFORMANCE
ANALYSIS AREAS
FOR OPERATING REACTORS
1. PLANT OPERATIONS
2. RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS
3.
MAINTENANCE
4. SURVEILLANCE
5. FIRE PROTECTION
6.
7. SECURIIY
8.
OUTAGES
9. QUAUIY PROGRAMS
10.
LICENSING ACTIVITIES
11. TRAINING
12.
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
su opec<
na.
~
~
~ ~
~
CATEGORY 1
REDUCED NRC ATKNllON MAY BE APPROPRIATE.
LICENSEE MANAGEMANTATTENllON AND INVOLVEMENT
ARE AGRESSIVE AND. ORIENTED. TOWARD NUCLEAR
I
SAFEIY; UCENSEE RESOURCES
ARE AMPLE AND
EFFECTIVELY USED SUCH THAT A HIGH LEVEL OF
PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL
SAFER OR CONSTRUCTION IS BEING ACHIEVED.
. subject
no.
~
~
4. ~'
CATE60EY2
NRC ATTENTION SHOULD BE MAINTAINEDAT NORMAL
LEVELS. UCENSEE MANAGEMENTATTENTION AND
INVOLVEMENTARE EVIDENT AND ARE CONCERNED WITH
NUCLEAR SAFElY; UCENSEE RESOURCES
ARE ADEQUATE
AND ARE REASONABLY EFFECTIVE SUCH THAT SA)SFACTORY
PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECT
TO OPERATIONAL SAFEIY OR
CONSTRUCTION IS BEING ACHIEVED.
BOTH NRC AND UCENSEE ATTENTION SHOULD BE
INCREASED. LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENllON OR
INVOLEMENT IS ACCEPTABLE AND CONSIDERS
NUCLEAR
SAFEIY, BUT WEAKNESSES ARE EVIDENT; UCENSEE
RESOURCES
APPEAR TO BE STRAINED OR NOT EFFECllVELY
A
USED SUCH THAT MINIMALLYSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE
WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL SAFElY OR CONSTRUCTION
IS BEING ACHIEVED.
t. MANAGEMAENT INVOLVEMENT IN ASSURING QUALIlY
2. APPROACH TO RESOLUTION OF TECHNICAL ISSUES
FROM THE SAFEIY STANDPOINT
3. RESPONSIVENESS
TO NRC INIATIVES
4. ENFORCEMENT HISTORY
5. REPORTING PD ANALYSIS OF REPORTABLE EVENTS
6. STAFFING (INCLUDING MANAGEMENT)
Z. TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS AND QUAuFICATION
Scotch
!
S V aa a &et ~ewtnw
> )II
. subject
na.
~
~
0
~
~
~ ~
VOLATON SUMMARY
.
hfAY 1, 1986 HAY 3i, iSFl
I
II
Ill
IV
V
TURKEY POINT 5
TURKEY POINT 4
29
27
I REGION
II AVE
0
0
1
11
3
OPERATIONS PHASE VIOLATIONS/'OPERATING REACTOR
MAY 't, 'l986 MAY 9't, 1987
DUKE
GPC
APC
Itll AVE MP'L SCIL
UTJUTY
, ALLEGATIONS PER
UTILITY/SITE
MAY 1, 1986 MAY 31, 1987
n
C
c
0
~~
lO
m
~~)
~~0
p
lU
~~
PeQ
CL
GPC
CPdcL VEPl 0! FPL
DUKE
MPL
SCE8cG
APC
All hVE
C/)
LK
1.R
CD
C)
CD
AVERAGE NLr IVI
R
OF
HEAC
I QR
PER
1 OOO
CRITICAL HOURS
MAY '1,
't 986 MAY 31,
't 987
't .21
.84
a
.
}
lQ
~~Q
E
NATIONAL AVE (CY 86)
TURKEY POINT 3
TURKEY POINT 4
E
CQ
lln
C
~
~
O
<o
c
CO )
I t. K i) I'4 I
I
MAY I 986 MAY
1 987
~~pe0
~tU
lU
Q
Ol
E
E
TURKEY POltff
WEST.
PLANT TYPE
6
E
Lt
Cl
C
C
O
J
co
TURKEY PD NT LER~
MAY 1,
1 986 MAY 31,
1 987
22
LEGEND
OTHER
MAlNTENANCE
D OPKRATlNG
Ioem / ovv oAL.
COMPONENT FAILUR
DESlGN
CONST
PERSONNEL
PERSONNEL
TURKEY PO NT LERs
MAY 1,
198.6 MAY 31, 1987
PERSONNEL
c
~~0
)
~~th
~~
}
C$
~~V
LQ
CL
38.6%
I
COMPQNENT FAILURE
33o 370
14%
14%
OTHER
DESIGN
L,
CO
C
c
O
m
OC
f
TURKEY PO NT LERs
Personne
MAY 1, 1986 MAY 31,
1987
TEST
Bc CAUBRATION
~~
V)
m
~~
Cl
g Z
~~
L
Ql
CL
50Fo
OPERATING
13.6X
27e 370
OTHER S.l X
6$L
Ul
C
C
O
>a
Py I
4 f
I-y
FUNCTIONAL AREA COMPARISON
FOR
REGION
II FACILITIES
LEGEND
CATEGORY
1
CATEGORY 2
~
~
~
V
O
~0
~~
V)
c
~~
~s
~~
m
~~
E
CL
FUNCTIONAL AREA
I
(
i
lO
Cle
C
OX
+a
Py I
CO g
g evIj
1.
PLANT OPERATIONS
2.
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS
3.
MAINTENANCE
)
4. SURVEILLANCE
5.
OUTAGES
6.
QUALITY PROGRAMS
7.
LICENSING ACTIVITIES
1.
FUNCTIONAL AREA COMPARISON
FO R
R EG I0 N
I I
FAC I LITIES
LEQEND
CATEGORY
CATEGORY
O'AT Et.'. AY
p)
~ III
C0
'g
~mO
V)
ca
~~
~~
Cl
P
LQ
65
~e6
L
tD
CL
FUNCTIONAL AREA
E
cl
CO g
CL
e
J g)n
g O
I- g
sutject
no.
1
~
lp W~
~
CATEGORY 3 AREAS
1I
SECURTY
2. TRANNG
3.
ENG NEER NG SUPPORT