ML17341B610
| ML17341B610 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 01/13/1983 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17341B609 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301240185 | |
| Download: ML17341B610 (3) | |
Text
~pg BEG'yi~p
+
0 I
UNITED STATES 1
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, O. C. 20555 SAFETY EVAL'UATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO.
91 TO FACILITY OpERATING LICENSE NO.
DpR 31 AND AMENDMENT NO.
B5 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO.
DPR-41 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TURKEY POINT PLANT UNITS NOS.
3 AND 4 DOCKET NOS. 50-250 AND 50-251 I.
Introduction The Turkey Point Plant, Unit Nos.
3 and 4
containment design, is a prest-ressed concrete structure with ungrouted tendons.
Sample tendons from each major type (dome, verticle and loop) are selected for surveillance.
The selected tendons are subject to various environmental exposures.
One of the horizontal tendons for Turkey Point Unit No.
3 surveyed during the first, third and fifth year surveillance was identified as 64H50.
The licensee reported during the fifth year surveillance for Unit No.
3 that horizontal tendon 64H50 was incorrectly identified and the Technical Speci-fications were revised to indicate the tendon as 64H51.
The licensee has determined that the original identification of the tendon,
- 64H50, was in fact, correct.
III.
Evaluation During the tenth year surveillance and upon careful inspection, the licensee has determined that tendon 64H50 is the tendon which was examined during the first, third, fifth and tenth year surveillance periods.
Both tendons 64H50 and 64H51 are located at the same azimuths (between 226'nd 346')
and at elevations within 4" of each other.
These tendons experience the same environmental conditions.
In addition, it ha's been determined that no wires have been removed from tendon 64H51 for wi re inspection samples.
IV.
~Summar Both tendons are in the same location and subjected to the same environmental exposures.
The detailed iinspection and examination during the tenth year surveillance of Unit No.
3 tendons has indicated that one of the tendons surveyed during each of the previous surveillances was in fact 64H50.
Revising the Technical Specifications to reflect the correct identification of the tendon surveyed is acceptable to the staff.
8301240185 8301 13
'PDR ADOCK 05000250 i
P,
...P,DR j
-2 y.
fnvi ronmenta 1
C ons ide rat i on We have determined that the amendments do not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level and will not result in any significant environmental impact.
Having made this determination, we have further concluded that the amendments involve an action which is insignificant frcm the standpoint of enviroanental impact and, pursuant to 10 CFR
$51.5(d)(4), that an environmental impact statement or negative declaration and environ-mental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with the issuance of these amendments.
VI.
C one 1 us i on We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) because the amendments do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, do not create the possibility of an accident of a type different from any evaluated previously, and do not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety, the amendments do not involve a significant hazards consideration, (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed
- manner, and (3) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Date:
.January 13, 1983
0 4
j