ML17341B510

Forwards SER of Proposed Tech Spec Amends Re Offsite Mgt Organization.Final Review & Suppl Will Be Issued Following Resolution of Item Re Review Board Qualifications.Response Requested within 45 Days

ML17341B510
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	11/16/1982
From:	Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8211240448
Download: ML17341B510 (12)

Text

~-

Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Dr. Robert E. Uhrig, Vice President Advanced Systems and Technology Florida Power and Light Company Post Office Box 529100 Miami, Florida 331 52

Dear Dr. Uhrig:

NV 16 1982 D/STQBUTION Docket NgC PDR L PDR Nslc ORB¹1 Rdg DEisenhut OELD JMTaylor ELJoI'dan ACRS-10 CParrish DgcDonald GRiyenbark Gray RE:

Pr pposed License Amendments to Turkey Point Plant, Units 3 and 4-Update of Offsite Organization Your,'etter dated August 12, 1982 proposed changes to the Technical Specifioo cations for Turkey Point Plant, Units 3 and 4, to reflect changes in its offsite management organization.

This submittaIl superseded the February 9, 1982 sulmittal in its entirety.

The enclosed Safety Eva".uatior. (SE) concludes that the proposed changes are acceptable.

However, we are unable to determine if the Company Nuclear Review Board (CNRB) members meet the qualification requirements identified in our Safety Evaluation.

Me therefore require that the follokiqg statement be added to Section 6.5.2.2 of the proposed Technical Specifications:

"Members, including the Chairman and alternate members of the CNRB shall, as a minimum, have a bachelor's degreesin engineering or a related science or its equivalent and five years of profess ional level experience in the field of his/her specialtyoe He will finalize our review and issue a supplement to the SE upon resolufionrr of the above item.

This response is requested within 45rdyys from the date of this letter.

This letter affects fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required uhder P.L.96-511.

~Sincerely, 82ii240448 82iii6 PDR ADOCK 05000250 P

PDR E;jclosure:

Safety Evaluation Origim'igned by<

S. A. Varge Steven A.. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch ¹1 Division of Licensing OFFICE/

SURNAME/

cc w enc osu See-sext-pag e:

o ~ e ~ e ~ ~ oeeo ~ eeeo ~ o ~ o ~

~ o ~ o

~ o ~

o

~

~

D

d RB¹1: D DATEf

~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 0 ~ e e ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ e ~ 00 ~ o ~ o ~ o

~ ee 0 (014/oNe

~ o ~ ~ ~ ~

1]

~

1 e

Io8 Re eel eeeeooo

~ ~ o ~ oooooeeoeoeoo NRG FORM 318 (1040) NRCM 0240 OFFjClAL R ORD COPY USGPO: 1881~060

ii 1

v-r

~

R

0 Robert E. Uhri g Florida Power and Light Company cc:

Harold F. Reis, Esquire Lowenstein, Newman, Reis and Axelrad 1025 Connecticut

Avenue, N.W.

Suite 1214 Washington, D.

C.

20036 Norman A.,Coll, Esquire

Steel, Hector and Davis 1400 Southeast First National Bank Building Miami', Florida 33131 Mr. Henry Yaeger, Plant Manager Turkey Point Plant Florida Power and Light Company

.P.

0.. Box 013100 Miami, Florida 33101 Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Administrator Department of Environmental Regulation Power Plant Siting Section State of,Florida 2600'Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Resident Inspector Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 1207 Homestead, Florida 33030 James P. O'Reilly

'egional Administrator - Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street - Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

IQ lt

0 EVALUATION OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO TURKEY POINT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS By letter to the NRC dated August 12, 1982, Florida Power and Light Company (FPL) has proposed changes to the Technical Specifications for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 to reflect changes in its offsite management organization.

FPL states that this August 12, 1982, submittal supersedes a February 9,

1982, change request in its entirety.

Or anization and Title Chan es The licensee proposes to modify Figure 6. 2-1, "Offsite Organization for Facility Management and Technical Support" to show that a,'Nuclear Energy Departme'nt (NED) has been formed to manage the nuclear activities that were previously.managed by the Power Resources Department..

The new NED is headed by a Vice President who reports directly to the FPL Executive Vice President.

Reporting to the new Vice President-NED is a Manager-NED, a position that was previously titled Manager-Power Resouces-Nuclear and that previously reported to the Vice President-Power Resources.

The Site Manager and the Manager-Nuclear Engineering Services (title changed from Manager-Power Resources Nuclear Services) and a new position titled Assistant Manager NED report to the Manager-NED.

Proposed new Figure 6.2-1 and current Figure 6.2-1, respectively, are shown in Attachments 1

and 2.

The licensee also proposed to modify Figure 6.2-2 to reflect the title changes in the offsite organization.

It proposes to change the titles in the two boxes currently listed as Power Resources Staff to Nuclear Energy Services Staff.

We conclude that the organization structure changes as discussed above should not diminish FPL's ability to safely operate the Turkey Point Units 3 5 4 and the proposed modifications to Figures 6.2-1 and 6.2-2 to reflect these changes are acceptable.

Nuclear Review Board Membershi Chan es The licensee also proposes to modify the composition of the Company Nuclear Review Board (CNRB) as described in current Technical Specification Section

6. 5. 2.2.

The -licensee proposes to repl'ace the four member titles currently listed as:

Vice President-Power Resources; Manager of Power Resources-Nuclear; Power Plant Engineering Manager; and Power Plant Engineering Supervisor with five new.member titles:.

Vice President, Nuclear Energy; Manager,,

Nuclear energy;

Manager, Nuclear Fuel; Power Plant Engineering Principal Engineer; and Power Plant Engineering Senior Project Manager.

r We currently require that each member, including the chairman and alternate

members, of review groups that perform the independent review functions described in Section 4 of (NSI N18.7) s'tandard and in Section 6.5.2.1 of the Turkey Point Technical Specifications, as a minimum, have the following qualifications:

0

<I 4'

A bachelors degree in engineering or related science or its equivalent and five years of professional level experience in the field of his/her specialty.

We are unable, based on the information provided by the licensee, to determine if the CNRB members meet these qualifications requirements.

In oral discussions with the licensee concerning this problem, we suggested that the licensee pr ovide a written statement to the effect that all of the CNRB members meet the qualification requirements as discussed above.

We also suggested that if the licensee did not wish to make such a written statement, it could submit the individual qualifications for each CNRB member for our review, and we would determine if they meet these requirements.

The licensee informed us that it did not plan to submit this information in response to our oral request and suggested that we complete our evaluation of their proposed Technical Specification change on the basis of the infor-mationn it provided in its August 12, 1982 submittal.

We believe that, under the circumstances, as discussed above, that it is necessary to specifically state the qualifications requirements in the Technical Specifications.

We therefore require that the following state-ment be added to Section 6.5.2.2 of the -Technical Specifications:

Members, including the chairman and alternate members of the CNRB shall, as a minimum, have a bachelors degree in engineering or related science or its equivalent and five years of professional level experience in the field of his/her specialty.

With this addition, we conclude that the proposed changes to Section 6.5.2.2 are.acceptable.

IQ

VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR ENLItGX DEPART<<EHT VICE PRESIDENT ADVANCED SYSTEMS TECI II'IOLOGY VICE Pltl',SIOI'.tJT 5:NGIHEI,"ItI IIG PltOJl"CT <<GT 6 CONS'fltUC'fION tlhNAGElt HUCLFAR ENERGY nEVhrn<<ENT CNRD ASS ISThtl7 MhtlhGER IUCl.l.Alt I'.HERG Y

~) 'I'AA'

~

SITE <<ANAGER PTP DIRECTOlt NUCLEAR AF'1 AIltS PLANT MANhGER P

r.

PLANT MANAGER NUCLEAR-P'fP

~

MANAGER QUALITY ASSUBANCI'LAINT MANAGElt EOSSIL PTP MANAGER NUCLEhlt LXCEHSING Hhtt/Gl R ljUCLEAB ENERGY SERVICES IUCIgl'.Alt EIPEltGY vl',RVICES STAF'.

~ I SUPEItINTEHOI'.HT QA-PSL PROJECT EXGUlu: 6.2-a Or'ESITE'ORGANIZATION Volt EACXLITY MANnGEI<ENT AND TLCIINXCALSul PORT

0 ab

.I

$ er C

I'CI CUTICLE TICE flESIDENT

~

I I

~

g e

~

e

~

I I

I C4 B

CD i C/I cn 4

• Vl

,.Ca r

SC C5

'W M

lllfCIOI NOCLEIS lffAlI5 VICE lAKSIDENC ADYANCED STSTEHS AND TECMNOLOOT IIIECIOI EXI I IIMH54fhL lfI AI 55 I

I TICK tAE5IDENT fOVKI lfSOVACES HANAOEI IANACEI I

OVEN IESOVICf tilll IESOISCE t NVCLEAI.

5EIIICEI TICE tIESIOENT ifVEL IE50VICES I Coltoll'IE DETELotHENT HANAOKN NVCLEAI ANALTSIS e

I

~

e I

I I

CPMrANT NUCLEAI IETIEV IOAIP

~

~

e TIC( rlflllfll IIII If KIIIC,tillIC I 5 l CllllllCIlll Ce NI ~ ACEI IICLEII LICEISIII NAIACII lllflI'I IISIIIICE HANAOEN rohfx NE50VICE5 NUCI,EAI SKNTICES Chlff EN0lxffl tOVEI tLANT EXCINEEIINI SITE

~ ~ Alllfl 0

tOVEI IESOV!CKS

~lllffNUCLEAI I

5EE fIOVIE lel 2 CONTIXUEO OX tlOUIE l.2 2 INCLUPK5 NEALTN tNTSIC5 IADIOCNKHI5TITe tLANT SUitoIT~

filltIDIEC'llox ADHINISllAIOI~

EHKACefNCT tLANIIxle EIC ~

fIOVIE l.2-I OffSITE OlolxlllllONfOl fACILITfHANAOEHENTill TKCNNICAL SottOI) i I I I I I I

4 il

~t t