ML17339A850
| ML17339A850 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/02/1980 |
| From: | Oncavage M ONCAVAGE, M. |
| To: | Grotenhuis M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004080550 | |
| Download: ML17339A850 (56) | |
Text
REGULATORY '4FORlvr ATION DISTRIBUTION SY E~ (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8004080550 DOC ~ DATE; 80/04/02 NO TAB IZED: NO DOCKET ¹ FACIL:~25 Turkey Point Plantg Unit 3i Florida Power and Light C 05000250 50 F91 urkey Point Plant~ Unit 4i Florida Power ance Light C 05000251 AUTHOR AFF IL I A T I Oi4 Otkv AYAGE~H ~ PE Oncavagei'clark HECIP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION GROTEr4HUIS>M ~ Di vi sion of Oper at ing Reactor s
SUBJECT:
Requests temporary suspension of 800301 petition for leave to interveneipending informal resolution of safety issues re time extensions between steam generator insps.Provides list of terms 8 questions for NHC review ~
OISTHIBUTIOi4 CODE'E03S COPIES RECEIVED:LTH ENCL SIZE:
TI TLE: 2 ~ 206 F i ings 1
N0 r=c E= ~
~
REC IP IENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAilE lTTR ENCL ID CODE/r4A'4E LT TR ENCL
. "5 ~+ ~~ ~ggA i AC T I ON:
1 BC PN~, %CLCrT'C~ge ERTTERgG ~
~1 GR OFF g i~ r4/OH I G 1 MURRAYeJ ~ 1 r4 1 OELD 1 EG FIlE 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 12 ENCL
- O.
ELQRIDIANS UNITED for SAFE ENERGY Mark P. Qncavage 12200 S.M. 110th Ave.
Miami, Florida 33176 OFFICERS Nrry Br orrru Per.O.
Presdent April 2, 1980 Normo C. Net lrnt, Fh.O Vres Preerdent Vw. Marshall Grotenhuis, Tlrummty. Bron Secretory Treesurer
Ãailstop 316 Reererd A Merenett,Jr Ceterel Counsel Division of'perating Reactors CITIZEN/INTERVENER Mat I'. Oncerets U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission washington, D. C., 20555
Dear Air. Grotenhuis:
Please temporarily suspend the Petition For Leave to Intervener filed Llarch 1, 1980r pending informal resolution of safety issues concerning time extensions between steam generator inspections, requested by Florida Power and Light, Co. for Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 and 4.
I have not been able to locate definitions of'he necessary following terms. Mould you define or list 1 rh hP, ~ rh parameters and f'actors that explain the following:
r 15% hoop strain.
2 17.5$ hoop strain contour 3 F equals 1.99 q
4 P/1 99
- 5. tube. lane area 6 wedge area 7 patch plate. region
- 8. periphery
- 9. full closure of tube support plate flow slots
- 10. Zen X am concerned with the scope of the inspection recently performed on the steam generators in Unit no. 3.
+t-03 5
%~a~ "
)/o P.o. Box 161018, Miami, Florida 33116 / 305 667-1227 00408O
ll. How many tubes were not inspected for .650", .610",
and .540" restrictions in:
a 3A hot side
- b. 3A cold side.
- c. 3B hot side d 3B cold side e 3C hot side 3C cold side 12 Ii all tubes in each area were not inspected during the most recent inspection, please specify the longest time interval, for any unplugged-tube, between inspections for .650", .610", and .540" restrictions in areas:
- a. 3A hot side
- b. 3A cold side
- c. 3B hot side 3B cold side
- e. 3C hot si;de,.
3C cold side
- 13. During the. most recent inspection, how many tubes lost previously inserted plugs in areas:
- a. 3A,'hot side b- 3A cold side
- c. 3B hot side
- d. 3B cold side
- e. 3C hot side 3C cold side The following questions concern the status of steam generator 2A at Surry Unit no. 2,, when it developed an 80 gpm primary to secondary leak on September 15, 1976.
- 14. )'(hat plugging criteria was in effect for 2A when the leak occurred 7
15 What percentage of the tubes in 2L were plugged, when the leak occurred ?
- 16. In which area was the tube that leaked located ?
- 17. What was the interval of time between the inception of'he leak and Unit no. 2 achieving cold shutdown ?
The. following questions concern the status of'afe operation in regard to the present condition of'urkey Point Unit. nos. 3 and 4.
18 Describe the operation of'IMS.
19 Explain the value of MIMS if it cannot detect metal fragments or shattered tube plug skirts in the steam generators.,
- 20. Will the plant be shuC down until MALS is redesigned, rebuilt, and proven reliable 7 21 Will MIMS be redesigned, rebuilt, and proven reliable at the next outage. for steam generator inspection and repair 7 22 Is a malfunctioning MIMS an unreviewed safety question ?
23 Is a malfunctioning MIMS an unresolved safety issue 7 24 What is the bursting strength (in psi) for new inconel tubes at:
- a. normal operating temperatures b highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience 7 25 What is the. bursting strength for inconel tubes that are unable to pass the .650" probe at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered.'n unit 3's operating experience 7
- 26. What is the bursting strength for inconel tubes that are unable to pass the .610" probe at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered
in unit 3's operating experience '?
- 27. ',Yhat is the bursting strength for inconel tubes that are unable to pass the .540" probe at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience ?
- 28. )Yhat is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating 205 wastage at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience ?
- 29. Y<'hat is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating 40$ wastage at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience '?
- 30. What is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating severe stress corrosion cracking at:
a normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience ?
- 31. What is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating leakage at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience '?
- 32. Provide calculations and a description of an event where shattered tube support plate pieces, resulting from islanding, cause loss of tube integrity.
- 33. Provide calculations and a description of an event where the loss of appropriate support (tsp), due to islanding, causes loss of tube integrity.
- 34. What is the lowest calculated secondary side pressure as a result of a postulated main steam line break '?
- 35. Provide calculations demonstrating the pressure (psi)
ZCCS coolant may enter the reactor considering (singly):
- a. optimum performance of i'.CCS
- b. mechanical failure of ZCCS components
- c. instrumentation malfunction
- d. operator error
- 36. Provide calculations demonstrating the maximum pressure that may be generated in the primary loop due to (collectively):
- a. multiple tube ruptures
- b. core partially uncovered
- c. water hammer
- d. inadequate or untimely response of "CCS
- 37. Provide calculations and data or an ZCCS model that involves all the following factors simultaneously:
- a. 22$ tubes plugged
- b. lost plugs
- c. all operating tubes experiencing various degrees of wastage, denting, and stress corrosion cracking
- d. full closure of tube support plate flow slots
- e. islanding one leaking tube
- g. water hammer
- h. main steam line break
- 38. Does the model represented in questi'on represent:
- a. an unreviewed safety cuestion
- b. an unresolved safety issue ?
Thank you for your cooperation, very tru~ yours, Mark P. Oncavage cc: Steven Goldberg, >>sq.
Darrell Zisenhut, DOR
Rf(gggf gil Ill)30~i):,et. 0- 0@5w/encl.
CSParrish, w/encl.
UNITED STATES MGrotenhuis, w/encl.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, O.C. 20555 Docket No. 50-250 and 50-251 See Attached List
Subject:
FLORIDA POMER Afio LIGHT COMPANY (Turkey Point 3 and 4) e The following documents concerning our review of the subject facility are transmitted for your information:
Notice of Receipt of Application.
Draft/Fntal Environmental Statement, dated Safety Evaluation, or Supplement No., dated Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.
Application and Safety Analysis Report, VOL Amendment No. to Application/SAR, dated Construction Permit No. CPPR- dated Cl Facility Operating License No. DPR- , NPF- , dated Amendment No. to CPPR- or DRR-, dated y, O,h<<. Order Relative. to Notion to Anend Contentions A ril 9 19SO .
Division of Operating Reactors, 08881 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated CC:
OR-:-ORM sURNAME y 5 Parr jQ>ph DArE Inn Nnc 21 (6 76 I
- r. Robert E. Uhrig Fl-rida Power and Light Company cc: Honorable Dewey Knight County Hanager of Hetropolitan Dade County I!iami, Florida 33130 Bureau of Intergovernmental Relations 660 Aoalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32304 llr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Dr. David B. Hall 400 Circle Drive Santa Fe, t!ew!mexico 87501
!michael A. Bauser, Esquire Lowenstein, newman, Reis, Axelrad and Toll 1025 Connecticut Avenue, !i.M.
Washington, D. C. 20036 i'ir. hark P. Oncavage 12200 S.V,. 110th Avenue
!miami, Florida 33176 Hormal A. Coll, Esouire Steel, Hector and Davis 1400 S. E. First, !iational Bank Building Yiiami, Florida 33131 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. )!uclear Regulatory Commission
'washington, D. C, 20555
'Counsel for HRC Staff Office of the Executive Legal .Director U. S. !fuclear Regulatory Commission washington, D. C. 20555
UNITED STATES t DISTRIBUTION, Docket 50-250/
ORB81 Reading, w CSParrish. wgencl.
-25 ,w/encl.
encl.
tlGHotenhuis, w/encl.~
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, O.C. 20555 Docket No. 50-250 MAR 21 f9ItO and 50-251 See Attached List
Subject:
FLORIM POWER AND LIGHT CONPANY (Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4)
The following documents concerning.our review of the subject facility are transmitted for your information."'otice of Receipt of Application.
Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated Safety Evaluation, or Supplement No.. dated Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.
Notice of Consideration oi'ssuance of Facility Operating License.
1 Application and Safety Analysis Report, VOL Amendment No. to Application/SAR, dated Construction Permit No. CPPR- dated Facility Operating License No. DPR- , NPF- , dated Amendment No. to CPPR- or DRR- , dated other Harch 1 1, 1 980 Or der Grantin tiation to Nthdraw from Richard A. Marshall Jr.
DVvision of Operatinq Reactors, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ORB81
Enclosures:
As stated CC:
OFFICE K DOR-:ORRfl-SUIINAME 0 CSPar-r-is h:-ph DATE . tjfj NRC-Zl I6 76)
play 2 1 1980 Dr. Robert E. Uhrig F 1 or i da Power and Light Company CC: Honorable Dewey Knight County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County Miami, Florida 33130 Bureau of Intergovernmental Relations 660 Apal achee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Hr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Dr. David B. Hall 400 Circle Drive Santa Fe, Hew Mexico 87501 Michael A. Bauser, Esquire Lowenstein, Newman, Reis, Axelrad and Toll 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036 Yir. Mark P. Oncavage 12200 S.W. 110th Avenue Miami, Florida 33176 Normal A. Coll, Esquire Steel, Hector and Davis 1400 S.E. First National Bank Building Miami, Florida 33131 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Counsel for HRC Staff Office of the Executive Legal Director U. S. Nuclear.Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
Usa;-,c UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION tfAR ) g je8O>
Ofi!N of Qgg@~
ATOMIC SAFETY 'AHD LICENSING BOARD
'~>>~~
006,"icttiig 5 iiiQ Elizabeth S. Bowers, Chairman (p Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke, Member Dr. Oscar H. Paris, Member In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-250-SP
) 50-251-SP FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY ) (Proposed Amendments to
) Facility Operating (Turkey Point Nuclear Generating ) License to Permit Steam Units 3 and 4) ) Generator Repairs)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW FROM RICHARD A. MARSHALL 'R.
A Motion to Withdraw was serviced by Richard A. Marshall, Jr.
on February 29, 1980. Mr. Marshall is one of several attorneys representing Intervenor Mark P. Oncavage and he states that he accepted employment as an Assistant United States Attorney on February 25, 1980.
THE MOTION IS GRANTED.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
- Eli abeth S. Bowers, Chairman Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 11th day of March 1980.
L~
j ~
UNITED STAT"S OP A~KRICA h"~CLE>R REGULATORY CO".~ZSS ION in the Hatter o-ELORIDA PO~i~R PXD LIGHT CO:PAR'Y ) Docket No.(s)50-250SP
)50-251SP (Turkey Po'nt, Units 3 and 4) )
)
)
)
)
~
- CERTIFICATE OP SERVICE A
I he eoy certify that ~I have this day served the oregoing doci ment(s) upon each person des 'nated on the of icia1 service list co-piled by the Office of the Secretary of the Cour ission in this proceeding in L. "::
a "corcance vith the eauirements of Section 2.712 of 10 C:R Part '2- C':::::
Rules o Pract'ce, o= the Nuclear Regulatory Co=ission's Rules and
~ ~ ~ ~~~
Regulations.
V Datec a" Washington, D.C. this
/~n ~P- cay of i~A&/)
19'fficei'of 4he Secretary of the C8 ission
FLORTDA PO! =R .~AD LIGHT CO'.O'Y D==:".et . o. ( )50-250SP 50-251SP
.(Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4)
C=R ~: C- L.s ST Elizabeth S. Bowers, Esq., Chairman Mr. Hark P. Oncavage Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 12200 Southwest 110th Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co~~ ission '~miami, Florida 33176 li'ashington,. D. C. 20555 llo ~n A. Coll, Esq.
eth A. Luebke St el, .".ec'ter and Davis Atom'c S fety and Licens'..g Boarc 1400 S.E. First National Bank Building
.U.S. Nuc ear Regulatory Co .'ssio.. '.!ia. ', .lor'da 33131
',~~ashington, D. C. 20555 Bruce S. Rogow, Esq.
Dr, Osca" H. Paris '.love University Center "or the Atomic.=Safety and Licensing Board Study of Lani U. S. Kt clear Regulatory Co~ission 3301 College Avenue 4'ashingtcn, D.C. 20555 'Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314 Counsel for ÃRC Staff Joel V. Lumer, Esq.
0 ice o the Executive Legal Director 245 Catalon"'a Avenue U. S. Nuc'ar Regulatory Co~ission Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Vash ngton, D. C. 20555 P'chare A. Y~rsnall, Jr,, Esq.
Florida Power and Light Co" pany 18450 Southwest 212th Street ATTN: Dr. Robert E. Uhhig ."iam', Florida 33187 Vice, President P.O. Box 529100 lfiami, Florida 33152
>lichael A. Bauser, Fsq.
Lowenstein,'ewsman, Reis, melrad & Toll 1025 Connecticut Avenue, K.P..
Masningto , D.C. 20036
REGULATORY ORMATION DISTR'IBUT.ION SYS M (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8000080550 DOC ~ DATE; 80/OQ/02 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET Turkey Point Plant~ Unit 3i Florida Power and Light C 05000250A'ACIL:50-250 50 251 Turkey Point Plant~ Unit 0i Florida Power and Light BYNAME C 05000251 AUTH AUTHOR AFFILIATION ONCAYAGEiM,PE OncavageiMark REC IP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION GROTENHUISiM ~ Division of Operat,ing Reactors
SUBJECT:
Requests tempo ary suspension of 800301 petition for leave to interveneipending informal resolutiop of safety issues re time extensions between steam generator insps,Provides list of terms 8 questions for NRC review, DISTRIBUTION CODE: XE03S TITLE: 2,206 COPIES RECEIVED:LTR, Filings
~ ENCL SIZE:
C0 N OTES ~
~
RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL" ACTION:
. ~%%~Q ~'P BC ~QQM PM~. %A,VP~g~
0 1 Q es: (
INTERNAL: DIR 1 ERTTERgG ~ 1 g-'4~&~G 1 MURRAYiJ ~
1 OELO 1 1
EXTERNAL: LPDR TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES'EQUIRED: LTTR 12 ENCL
~ . ~
659 FLORIDIANS UNITED for SAFE ENERGY Mark P. Qncavage 12200 S.W. 110th Ave Miami, Florida 33176 OFFICERS Jerry Brown, Pir.O.
President April 2, 1980 N<<ms LWstlins, Ftr O, Vice Pres dent Mr. Marshall Grotenhuis Ttrornss W. Br ort Secretory Tressurer Mailstop 316 RCIrerd A. MertrrdI, Jr.
Contest Counsre Division of'perating Reactors CITIZENIINTERVENER Mere P. Oncersse U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr. Grotenhuis:
Please temporarily suspend the Petition For Leave to Intervenes filed March 1, 1980, pending informal resolution of safety issues concerning time extensions between steam generator inspections, requested by Florida Power and Light Co. for Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 and 4.
I have not been able to locate definitions of the necessary following terms. Ylould you define or list parameters and factors that explain the following:
I. 15$ hoop strain 2 17 '@ hoop strain contour
- 3. F equals 1.99 q
- 4. P/1. 99
- 5. tube lane area 6 wedge area 7 patch plate region
- 8. periphery
- 9. full closure of tube support plate flow slots
- 10. ~e I am concerned with the scope. of the inspection recently performed on the steam generators in Unit n P.O. Box 161018, Miami, Florida 33116 / 305.667-12 8 08
ll. How many tubes were not. inspected f'r .650", .610",
and .540" restrictions in:
- a. 3A hot side b- 3A. cold side.
- c. 3B hot side,
- d. 3B cold side
- e. 3C hot side 3C cold side
- 12. If.'ll tubes in each area were not inspected during the most recent inspection, please specif'y the longest time interval, f'r any unplugged tube, between inspections for .650", .610", and .540" restrictions in areas:
- a. 3A hot side
- b. 3A cold side
- c. 3B. hot side
- d. 3B cold side
- e. 3C hot side f'- 3C cold side.
13 During the. most recent inspection, how many tubes lost previously inserted plugs in areas:
- a. 3A'ot side,
- b. 3A cold side
- c. 3B hot side
- d. 3B cold side
- e. 3C hot side 3C cold side The f'ollowing questions concern the status oX steam generator 2A at Surry Unit no. 2, when it developed an 80 gpm primary to secondary leak on September 15, 1976.
- 14. Yhhat plugging criteria was in eff'ect f'r 2A when the leak occurred 7
- 15. Yfhat percentage of'he tubes in 2A were plugged, when the leak occurred '?
- 16. In which area was the tube that leaked located '?
- 17. )Yhat was the interval of time between the inception of'he leak and Unit no. 2 achieving cold shutdown '?
The f'ollowing questions concern the status of'af'e operation in regard to the present condition of'urkey point Unit. nos. 3 and 4 18 ~ Describe the operation oi'IMS.
- 19. Explain the. value of'IMS if't cannot detect metal f'ragments or shattered tube plug skirts in the steam generators.
- 20. )Yill the plant be shut down until MIMS is redesigned, rebuilt, and proven reliable '?
21 Y/ill MIMS be redesigned, rebuilt, and proven reliable at the next outage. for steam generator inspection and repair '?
22 Is a malfunctioning NIMS an unreviewed safety question '?
23 Is a malfunctioning MIMS an unresolved safety issue '?
- 24. What is the bursting strength (in psi) for new inconel tubes at:
- a. normal operating temperatures b highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience 7 25 7/hat is the. bursting strength f'r inconel tubes that are unable to pass the .650" probe at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience 7 26 ~ )Yhat is the bursting strength f'r inconel tubes that are unable to pass the .610" probe at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered
in unit 3's operating experience '?
- 27. What is the bursting strength for inconel tubes that are unable to pass the .540" probe at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience '?
- 28. >Yhat is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating 20$ wastage at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience '?
- 29. What is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating 40$ wastage at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience 7
- 30. What is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating severe stress corrosion cracking at:
a.. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience '?
- 31. What is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating leakage at;
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience ?
- 32. Provide calculations and a description of an event where shattered tube support plate pieces, resulting from islanding, cause loss of tube integrity.
- 33. Provide calculations and a description of an event where the. loss of appropriate support (tsp), due to islanding, causes loss of tube integrity.
- 34. What is the lowest calculated secondary side pressure as a result of a postulated main steam line break 7
- 35. Provide calculations demonstrating the pressure (psi)
ECCS coolant may enter the reactor considering (singly):
- a. optimum performance of ECCS
- b. mechanical failure. of ECCS components
- c. instrumentation malfunction
- d. operator error
- 36. Provide calculations demonstrating the maximum pressure that may be generated in the primary loop due to (collective'):
- a. multiple tube ruptures
- b. core partially uncovered
- c. water hammer
- d. inadequate or untimely response of ECCS
- 37. Provide calculations and data or an ECCS model that involves all the following factors simultaneously:
- a. 22$ tubes plugged
- b. lost plugs
- c. all operating tubes experiencing various degrees of wastage, denting, and stress corrosion cracking
- d. full closure of'ube support plate flow slots
- e. islanding
- f. one leaking tube.
- g. water hammer
- h. main steam line break
- 38. Does the model represented in question represent:
- a. an unreviewed safety question
- b. an unresolved safety issue 7 Thank you f'r your cooperation, very tru yours, Mark P. Oncavage cc: Steven Goldberg, Zsq.
Darrell Eisenhut, DOR
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DistribUtion:
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 lDaeket files R. Ingram K. Parrish Apri1 22, 198OORBy4 Rdg Docket No. 50-25 50-'251 50-335 Addressees: See next page
Subject:
TURKEY POINT PLANT, UNITS NOS. 3 AND 4 ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 The following documents concerning our review of the subject facility are transmitted for your information:
Notice of Receipt of Application.
r Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated Safety Evaluation, or Supplement No.. dated Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.
Application and Safety Analysis Report, VOL
.Amendment No. to Application/SAR, dated Construction Permit No. CPPR- , dated dated Facility Operating License No. DPR- e ,
Amendment No. to CPPR- or DRR- . dated Kl Other: uary 1980.
Divison of Operating Reactors, ORB84 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated cc:
OFFICE ORBImI4:OOR 8
SUANAME p R. Ingram nnr Inn DATE NRC-,2I (6 76)
~ ~1 lol 1da Pote. K Light Company
~ivis'.-. o-. "-
co1ogical Services B-'"ea" o= S- or: Fisheri s K l'ildli=e i.'ashi ngton, D. C. 20240 raphic Data Center ta,Sel vice 'iati ona l 0cean'.- h A I'spheri c Ad. ~inistl =t1on C o= Co-aerce nash1ng o (, D. C 2023'r Ja...es l . I anne?
~ 1>> =iona l ~.reau o= Standards o BJ1 I c' ~ >
233
- -:".:: ng=ori, D. C. 20234 Direc.or, lechnical Assessm nt D i v1 s1on O~=ic o= media-.ion Programs (A:(--'.593
- nvi ron-..,en
"-"<:- l f'=1'"> ta Protect1on 1 Aoency I-.g i IngcOn, iirc in1a 20460 ll C nvir=n;enta1 Protection /-.oency 4,2"-ion l~
r.. l>x.
I
~
< "O-.j A OP voU IC IC>>
~
-2" r"-' 3" 3QP P ~ ~
Distribution Docket Files R. Ingram UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION K. Parrish WASHINGTON, O.C. 20555 ORB(4 Rdg.
Apri1 21, 1980 Docket No. 5p-85pl 50-251 50-335 Addressees: See next page
Subject:
TURKEY POINT PLANT, UNITS NOS 8 AND 4 ST L'ECIE PLANTs UNIT NO 1 The following documents concerning our review of the subject facility are transmitted for your information:
Q Notice of Receipt of Application.
Q Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated Safety Evaluation,- o'r Supplement No., dated Notice of Hearing on A'pplication for Construction Permit.
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.
Q Application and Safety Analysis Report, VOL r
Amendment No. to Application/SAR, dated Construction Permit No. CPPR- dated Operating License No. DPR- , atPF-, 'acility dated Amendment No. to CppR- or DRR- . dated Division of Operating Reactors, ORB%
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated CC:
OFFICE Io ORBA4:DOR
)
SURNAME R. Ingram Ia 4/ Q/80 OATE NRC-Zt $ 6-76)
~
I'lo ida Po"e. E Light Company Chi =- s Dii isio.". o-. ico)o ical Services B ~ea o= Spor- Fisheri s K Mildl'~e U. S. De-a. t-.en: .o. th= i,nt rio;.---
4'ashington, D. C. 20240 ~ A ~~~~~ ~
D'<<re:tor Ha 'o. a'i G:=an"graphic Data Center
- .nvi. on;,:en-.a'. Da a Service t~ational G= =-ric E Atmospheric Administration O'. S. De@ rt;ent o Co-..~ rce i'ashington, D. C. 20235 James I ~ tanner ional ~"rear o= Standards r,e" "~ or Ui IC i I
~ 230
~
h I
- ".inoton, D. C. 20234 Director, Technical Assessment Division Of=ice o> ?adiation Programs (r; -~vs)
I'. S. Environ-..iental Protection Aoency r~i)s-'- 1 f(- ( i Arl incton,",irc.',nia 20460 U. ~ nv il n i-" i al Protection Aoency c ion '~' <<c=
DIcTRIa 0 0- 51,w/encl.
OR 81 Reading, w/encl.
CSParrish, w/encl, UNITED STATES MGrotenhuis, w/encl.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 Docket No. 50-250 APR l g fgeo and 50-251 See Attached List
Subject:
FLORIDA POMER AND LIGHT COMPANY (Tur key Point 3 and 4)
The following documents concerning our review of the subject facility are transmitted for your information:
Notice of Receipt of'pplication.
Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated Safety Evaluation, or Supplement No., dated Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.
Application and Safety Analysis Report, VDL Amendment No. to Application/SAR, dated Construction Permit No. CPPR- dated Facility Operating License No. DPR- , NPF- , dated Amendment No. to CPPR- or DRR-, dated X Othe,. Order Relative to Motion to Amend Contentions A ril 9 1980 Division of Operating Reactors, OBM1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated CC:
OFFICE i R tQBBIL1 SUANAME i CS P-arri.s.h DATE III /+ <SO NRC 21 I6 76)
. Dr. Robert E. Vhrig
, Florida Power and Light Company cc: Honorable Dewey Knight County blanager of lletropoli tan Dade County 1'iiami, F orida 3313.0 1
Bul cau of Intergovernmental Relations 660 Apalachee Parki ay Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Yir. Jack Shreve Office of'the Puolic Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Dr. David B. Hall 400 Circle Drive Santa,"-e, Hew )cmexico 87501 Michael A. Bauser, Esquire Lowenstein, Newman, Reis, Axelrad and Toll 1025 Connecticut Avenue, H.M.
h'ashington, D. C. 20036 l'ir. hark P. Oncavage 12200 S.l'. 110th Avenue miami, Florida 33176
'I t>ormal A. Coll, Esouire Steel, Hector and Davis 1400 S.E. First Hational Bank Building Ni ami, Fl ori.da 33131 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. nuclear Regulatory Commission 1'ashington, D. C. 20555 Counsel for HRC Staff Office of the Executive Legal Director U. S. t/uclear Regulatory Commission washington, D. C. 20555
REGULATORY I "DEFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SY TE 4 (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8004080550 DOC,DATE: 80/04/02 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-250 Turkey Point Planti Unit 3E Florida Po~er and Light C 05000250 50-251 Turkey Point Plantp Unit 4E Florida Power and Light C ,05000251 AUTH INANE AUTHOR AFF II IA i'ION ONCAVAGEEH ~ PE OncavaqesNark REC IP ~ NAKE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION GROTENHUISE'4 ~ Division of Operating Reactors
SUBJECT:
Req'uests temoorary suspension of 800301 petition for leave to interveneioending informal resolution of safety issues re time extensions between steam generator insps.Provides list of terms 8 questions for NRC reviews OISTiiISUTIOi4 CODE: XE03S TITLE: 2 COPIES
'06 Filings i4ECEIYED:LT44 g E<ICL '0 SIZE:
NOTES; RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL I0 CODE/NTA'lE LT TR ENCL ACT ION: AO
'Q. C l% +~/ ~~ Bc ~g,@A i N~. We Org~~ ~~
i owe,er i P INTERNAL: 0 IR NRR 1 ERTTERsG ~ 1 GROFFPM ~ 8/ORIG 1 ~'lURRAYEJ ~ 1 OELD 1 EG FII E EXTFRNAL: LVDR 8 880 TOTAl NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 12 ENCL
>> ~
ec 'p.
C>>k
+4 '>> s c
FLORIDIANS UNITED for SAFE ENERGY k 1, SC>> ky>>
Mark P. Oncavage 12200 S.W. 110th Ave.
Miami, Florida 33176 OFFICERS Je>>sy B>>o>>>>m. Ph. 0, Pses>>dens April 2, 1980 No>>o>> e l Week 1OS, Vee Pseooeos Ph D Ww. Marshall Grotenhuis T>>>>seeks See1eSSSy W, Or os I T>>eeS>>sees Kailstop 316 Reesesd A. Me>>shell.
Oeocses Co>>>>oses sh Division of'perating Reactors CITIZEN/INTERVENER Mhk P. 0 ouveee U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr.. Grotenhuis:
- C Please temporarily suspend the Petition For Ieave to, Intervene, filed March 1, 1980, pending informal resolution of'afety issues concerning time extensions between steam generator inspections, requested by Florida Power and Light Co., f'r Turkey Point Nuclear Units 3 and 4.
I have not been able to locate def'initions of the necessary f'ollowing terms. Tz/ould'ou define or list parameters and f'actors that explain the following: y's I. 15$ hoop strain 2 17.5% hoop strain contour 3 P equals 1.,99 4 P/1.,99
- 5. tube lane aria 6 wedge area '>>
7 patch plate region 8 periphery
- 9. full closure of tube support plate f'low slots 10- ZIMS I am concerned with the scope. of'he inspection recently performed on the steam generators in Unit no. 3.
gt=cE 5
I/O
+S~Qg se P.O. Box 161018, Miami, Florida 33116 / 305.667-1227 O OO4DBO
ll. Eow many tubes were not inspected for .650", .610",
and .540" restrictions in:
- a. 3A hot side
- b. 3A cold side.
- c. 3B hot side
- d. 3B cold side
- e. 3C hot side 3C cold side
- 12. If all tubes in each area were not inspected during the most recent inspection, please specify the longest time interval, for. any unplugged tube, between inspections for .650", .610", and .540" restrictions in areas:
- a. 3A hot side
- b. 3A cold side
- c. 3B hot side d 3B cold side.
- e. 3C hot side 3C cold side
- 13. During the. most recent inspection, how many tubes lost previously inserted plugs in areas:
- a. 3A hot side
- b. 3A cold side
- c. 3B hot side
- d. 3B cold side
- e. 3C hot side
- f. 3C cold side, The following questions concern the status of steam generator 2A, at Surry Unit no. 2, when it developed an 80 gpm primary to secondary leak on September 15, 1976.
- 14. )'Ihat plugging criteria was in effect for 2A when the.
leak occurred 2
- 15. Nhat. percentage of'he tubes in 2A were plugged, when the leak occurred ?
- 16. In which area was the tube that leaked located ?
17'hat was the interval of'ime.. between the inception of'he leak and Unit no. 2 achieving cold shutdown ?
The following questions concern the status of'afe operation in regard to the present condition oi'urkey Point Unit, nos. 3 and 4.
18.'escribe the operation oi'IMS.
- 19. Explain the. value of MIMS if,'it. cannot detectmetal fragments or shattered- tube -plug skirts in the steam generators
- 20. Nill the plant be shut down until MIMS is redesigned, rebuilt, and proven reliable ?
- 21. Nill MIMS be. redesigned, rebuilt, and proven reliable.
at the next outage. for steam generator inspection and repair ?
22 Is a malfunctioning MIMS an unreviewed safety question ?
- 23. Is a malf'unctioning MIL!S an unresolved safety issue ?
- 24. Nhat is the bursting strength (in psi) f'r new inconel tubes at:
- a. normal operating temperatures b highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit,3's operating experience ?
25 Nhat is the. bursting'trength i'or inconel tubes that are unable to pass the .650" probe at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest,=historical transient temperature encountered in,,unit 3's operating experience ?
- 26. Nhat is the bursting strength f'r inconel tubes that are unable to pass the .610" probe at;
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encount'ered
in unit 3's operating experience 7
- 27. )ghat is the bursting strength for inconel tubes that are unable to pass the .540" probe at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience '?
- 28. Yjhat is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating 205 wastage at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience 7
- 29. 7,'hat is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating 40$ wastage at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience '?
- 30. Yfhat is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating severe. stress corrosion cracking at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience 7
- 31. 7ilhat is the bursting strength for inconel tubes indicating leakage at:
- a. normal operating temperatures
- b. highest historical transient temperature encountered in unit 3's operating experience 7 32., Provide calculations and a description of .an event where shattered. tube support plate pieces, resulting from islanding, cause loss of tube integrity.
- 33. Provide calculations and a description of an event where the loss of appro'priate support (tsp), due to islanding, causes loss of tube integrity.
- 34. IYhat is the lowest calculated secondary side pressure as a result of a postulated main steam line break '?
35 Provide calculations demonstrating the pressure (psi)
ZCCS coolant may enter the reactor considering (singly):
- a. optimum performance of ZCCS
- b. mechanical failure of 7CCS components c.. instrumentation malfunction
- d. operator error
- 36. Provide calculations demonstrating the maximum pressure that may be generated in the primary loop due to (collectively):
- a. multiple tube ruptures
- b. core partially uncovered
- c. water hammer
- d. inadequate or untimely response of ZCCS
- 37. Provide calculations and data or an ZCCS model that involves all the following factors simultaneously:
- a. 22$ tubes plugged
- b. lost plugs c.. all operating tubes experiencing various degrees of wastage,. denting, and stress corrosion cracking
- d. full closure of tube support plate flow slots
- e. islanding one leaking tube
- g. water hammer
- h. main steam line break
. 38. Does the model represented in question represent:
- a. an unreviewed safety cuestion
- b. an unresolved safety issue ?
Thank you for your cooperation, very tru yours, Mark P. Oncavage cc: Steven Goldberg, -sq.
Darrell Eisenhut, DOR
DISTRIBUTION: ~
"ocket 50- /50-251,w/encl.
~
ea ing, w/encl. t CSParrish, wgencl.
NGr.'otenhui s, w/encl .--
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 MAR 8 1 1980
~ c4' Docket No. 50-250 and 50-251 See Attached List
Subject:
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CONPANY (Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4)
The following documents concerning our review of the subject facility are transmitted for your information:
Notice of Receipt of Application Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated CI 'Safely Evaluation, or Supplement No., dated Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.
Q Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.
. Application and Safety Analysis Report, VoL Amendment No. to Application/SAR, dated Construction Permit No. CPPR- dated Facility Opeiating License No. DPR- ~
NP"-
AmendmentNo. to CPPR- or DRR-, dated g oth<< )larch 1 1 1980 Order Grantin nation to ltithdraw from Richard A. blarshall Jr.
DVvision of Operatinq Reactors, ORB01 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated CC:
.OFFICE %
DOR:ORBietl SURNAME y CSParrish yh OATE 03+ 4~ /80 NRC 21 I6 76)
MAR 2 1 1980 Dr. Robert E. Uhrig Florida Power and Light Company CC: Honorable Dewey Knight County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County Miami, Florida 33130 Bureau of Intergovernmental Relations 660 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Dr. David B. Hall 400 Circle Drive Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 Mi'chael A. Bauser, Esquire Lowenstein, Newman, Reis, Axelrad and Toll 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036 Mr. Mark P. Oncavage 12200 S.W. 110th Avenue Miami, Florida 33176 Normal A. Coll, Esquire Steel, Hector and Davis 1400 S.E. First National Bank Building Miami, Florida 33131 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Atomic Safety and Licensing Board=
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Counsel for NRC Staff Office of the Executive Legal Director U. S. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
UNITED STAMS OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SA'FETY AND LICENSING BO'ARD Elizabeth S. Bowers, Chairman Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke, Member Dr. Oscar H. Paris, Member In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-250-SP
) 50-251-SP FLORIDA POWER 6c LIGHT COMPANY ) (Proposed Amendments to
) Facility Operating (Turkey Point Nuclear Generating ) License to Permit Steam Units 3 and 4) ) Generator Repairs)
ORDER GRAHTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW FROM RICHARD A. MARSHALL JR.
A Motion to Withdraw was serviced by Richard A. Marshall, Jr.
on February 29, 1980. Mr. Marshall is one of several attorneys representing Intervenor Mark P. Oncavage and he states that he accepted employment as an Assistant United States Attorney on February 25, 1980.
THE MOTION IS GRANTED.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AHD LICENSING BOARD Eli abeth S. Bowers, Chairman Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 11th day of March 1980.
< ~ \
h
~
~ %v UhIT:-D STAqr,S 0." >~AFRICA ~ ~ ~~~
hUCL" AR R:-GUI='.TORY CO".~~~ISS ION In the Matter of )
)
FLORIDA POISE R AND LIGHT CO:PINY ) Docket No. (s) 5Q-250SP
)50-251SP (Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4) )
)
)
)
)
C:RTxrICATZ 0:- SERVICE
I hereby certify that iI have this day served the forego'ng document(s)
,upon each person designated on the of icial service list compiled by the Of "ice o" the Secretary of the Co~ission in this proceeding 'n accordance ~ith the require ents of Section 2.712 of 10 C"R Part 2-Rules of Practice, of the huclear Reg latory Co~ission's Rules and Regulations.
~' ~
Datec a" Vashington, D.C. this Gay oz ~+L~Mj ) 1976 I
.y,"/')C j" . ~~/ - 7 /'~f Office/of <he Secretary of the C8~ission
FLO IDA PO'. "R AXD LIGHT CF.PALY D"cket ';
o;(s)59-250SP 50-251SP (Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4) c o.-C LIST Elizabeth S. Bowers, Esq., Chairman Hr. Nark P. Oncavage Ato~c Safety and Licensing Board 12200 Southwest 110th Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Coaaaission ~
Niami, Florida, 33176 Vas..ing ton, D. C. 20555
- loran A. Coll, Esq.
Nr. "=~eth A. Lueoke Steel, Hector and Davis Ato-'c Safety and Licens'ng Boarc 1400 S.E. First liational Bank Building
. U. S. ~uclea Regulatory Co~~~ ssion 'lia-,..i, Florida 33131 Mashi..gton, D.C. 20555 Bruce S. Rogow, Esq.
Dr. Oscar H. Paris :nova Un.'versity Center "or the Ato=.ic;-.Safety and Licensing Board Study of Law U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co~ission 3301 College Avenue Aas .
ington p D. C. 20555 Fort Lauderdale, Florida. 33314 Counsel for XRC Staff Joel V. Lerner, Esq.
0 fice o'he Executive Legal Director 245 Catalon'a Avenue U.S. !nuclear Regulatory Coenission Coral Cables, Florida 33134 Vashir.gton, D.C. 20555 P'chare A. Ywrshall, Jr.,'sq.
Florica Power and Li ht Company 18450 Southwest 212th Street ATT'..: Dr. Robert E, Uhhig 'iar..i, Florida 33187 Vice, President P.O. Box 529100 Niar-', Florida 33152 Nichael A. Bauser, Esq.
Lowenstein,'e~~an, Reis, Axelrad & Toll 1025 Connecticut Avenue, K.V.
Vasnington, D.C. 20036
~AS Aftra 0 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
.Q ~
ill ~ '.
V V'Q
"~u! "
4 ~*~+
OFFICE OF THE February l6, l980 I
SEC RETAAY Director
--'.Office of the Federal Register
- National Archives and Records Service
- Washington, D.C. 20403 I 1 ~ I ~
Dear Sir:
1 Enclosed for publication in the Federal Register. are an original and two certified copies of a document entitled:,< $
t FLORIDA POINTER AND LICHT COMPANY H
Docket No. 50-250 NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE.
Publication of the above document at the earliest possible date would be appreciated. I This material is to be charged to requisition number F-13l. ~ I g
Si erely,
'Samuel J. Chilk Secretary of;- the Commissioh I
Enclosures:
Original & 2 certified copies
, bc~Rec.o,rds FmMity Branch Office of Public Affair Executive Legal Director Office of Congressional Affiars Office of the General Counsel SECY - C&R Branch
7590-01 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKET NO. 50-250 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has issued Amendment No. 52 to Facility Operating License No. DPR-31 issued to Florida Power and Light Company (the licensee), which revised Technical Specifications for operation of the Turkey Point Nuclear Generating, Unit
'No. 3 (the facility) located in the Dade County, Florida. The amendment is effective as of the date of issuance.
The-amendpont permits continued operation of Turkey ~iR.".Plant- '
Unit No. 3 for six equivalent full power months from January 24, 1980 at which time the steam generators shall be inspected.
The application for the amendment complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the li'cense amendment. Prior public notice of this amendment was not required since this amendment does not involve a significant hazards consideration.
7590-01 The Commission has determined that the issuance of this amendment will not result in any significant environmental impact and that pursuant to 10 CFR 551.5(d)(4) an environmental impact statement or negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with issuance of this amendment.
For further details with respect to this action, see (1) the application for amendment dated January 10, 1980, as supplemented by letter dated January 18, 1980, (2) Amendment No. 52 to License No. DPR-31, and (3) the Commission's related Safety Evaluation. All of these items are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Documen~R<om, 171,7.H Street,
( J N.M., Mashington, D.C. and at the Environmental and Urban Affairs Library, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199. A copy of items (2) and (3) may be obtained upon request addressed to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mashington, D.C. '20555, Attention: Director, Division of Operating Reactors.
Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 25th day of January, 1980.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGuLATORY CON1ISSION
~)~<~ 4"w A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch Pl Division of Operating Reactors
I BBO Docket, II< enc 0 g IRI/encl.
UNITED STATES CParrfsh NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION MGrotenhui s WASHINGTON D,C. 20555 February 72, 1980 Docket No, 50-257 See Attached List FLDRRDA POFJER ND LIGHT CONPANY Thc following documents concerning our review of the subject facility arc transmitted for your information:
Notice of Receipt of Application Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated 0 Safety Evaluation, or Supplement No.,dated Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.
Notice of Consideration of issuance of Facility Operating License.
Application and Safety Analysis Rcport, Vol.
Amendment No. to Application/SAR, dated Construction Permit No. CPPR- ,dated Facility Operating License No. DPR- , NPF-,=date L
Amendment No. to CPPR- or DRR-,dated o~v~n The Con troller General 'a 0 Inlon Relative to prooedvral Assistance $n Ad udfcator Llcensfn Proceed)n s Deceaber l6, 1980).
DC4)sfon of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated cc:
OFFICE ~ NRBB:00R SURNAME m CParr ash OATE e- RI. Ilt81 IIRC 2 I (6'16) t
Dr; Robert E. Uhrig Florida Power and Light Company cc: Honorable Dewey Knight County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County Miami, Florida 33130 Bureau of Intergovernmental Relations.
660. Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Mr. Jack Shreve Office of"the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304
/ Q~
~ ~st gr
~ag ~
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA fg~~
~r
. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ~ )ha') eg if
))fan~
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD I / Co.
Before Administrative Judges: J Elizabeth S. Bowers, Chairman Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke '<o Dr. Oscar H. Paris Ppg 8 j'p~
In the Mat ter o f: )
)
FLORIDA POLWR 6 LIGHT COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-250-SP 50-251-SP (Turkey Poirit Nuclear Generating )
Unit Nos. 3 and 4)
) December 16, 1980
,THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL'.S OPINION RELATIVE TO PROCEDURAL ASSISTANCE IN ADJUDICATORY LICENSING PROCEEDINGS On July 25, 1980, the Commission published the notice of "Procedural Assistance in Adjudicatory Licensing -Proceedings" (45 Fed. R~e . 49535). On December 3, 1980, the Comptroller General issued an opinion that this aid was not permitted under the law. i A copy of. the Comptroller General's opinion and his letter 'to Chairman Ahearne is enclosed for your convenience.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND L ICE NS INCr'OARD MINISTRATIVE JUDGE
COHpTROLLKR GCHtpg,I oF rKK UN w&skwcToH. D.c. X~l IK fC$7 Y ltCFClt %Os 3>>200585 December'3, 1980 The iionorzble John .. Pkearne Cha" ~n, Nuclear Regulatory Co 'ssion
Dear Mr. Chai=-n:
Ve zre en"los ng for your irido .a=ion ou= letter of . his dzte. to the Chz ~n, Subco~ttee on =nergy Research and Production,'o 'tee on Science and Technology, House of
.Represen atxves. Tn our let=er ve conc'uoe ti.-"
hai ": i 1 tne ?nuclear Re"-ulatory Co ='ssion may not lz>>fu" lv use fundssa zpp- '-
appropriated c oy the rner-.y ~nd Vater Develop-ent =".pproo=iztion act Pub. L. Yo.96-367, 94 Stat. 1331, to i~ple~~nt the procedural cost reduct on progran announced'y the Co='ssion in the
- ederal Register on July 25, 3.980 (45:ed. Rag. 49535).
Sincerely yours,
/~I ~ g C Co~ptro ler Cwneral o the U-.'ted States
"-nclosure
COMPTRO~R GEHERAL OF THE UH!TEO STA~s whsH)HcTDHe o c xc54$
3-200585 ". December'3; 1980 ne Honorable 'Flake McCormack Cnair~, Subcommittee on Znergy Research
- and Production
.Zo~ttee on Science and Technolo~
- .ouse'f Representatives Dezr Mr. Chairm n:
You have requested our opinion on the propriety of the procedural cos- reduction program for intervenors being rstituted by tne Nuclear Regu atory Com-ission. Tnis program is'esigned to ease the econo"ic ourden on inta tenors in tne Commi ssion's adjudica"ory proceedings oy provid"'ng free copies- oi transcripts and by copying and serving without chz=ge certain oi the documents tne 'ntervenors need to participate in "he proceedings. Under the program the Commission has also reduced
, f"o 20 to 2 tne number .of copies of f lings required of all parties.
."or the reasons ind'cated below', ~e conclude -hzt, vith the
~a:ception of the reduction of requ" red copies, the Commission may not lz.=fully use its fiscal year 1981 appropriation to implement the cos" reduct'on program.
The Commission s adopt'on of the program vas announced in the
- ederzl Register" on July '25, 1980, (45 ".ec. Beg. 4 535) ~ The prog"am
-zs e=fectec by means o~ three am ndments te the Commission's regula-
=='o..s re zting to adjudicztory licensing proceedings in 10 C:"R Par-
- 2. "-'rst, Section 2.708(d) of that par" ~zs amended by reducing fro 20 to 2 the nu-ber of cop"'es of pleadings or other documents that.
eve y pa ty to the proceeding is equired to file. Second, Section 2.712 was amended by adding a provision thzt, except in antitrust proceedings, the Commission ~all copy znd serve, at no cost to the pzrty, the pa"ty s tes"imony, proposed ndings of fact and con-c" sions o 1"w, and responses to d'covery requests.'nis free copyng znd service is available= to all pa"ties to the proceeding except the appl'cant for the 'icense. n'rd, Section 2.750 ~vs z ended by adding.a provision ~lo-'~ng the presiding o=ficer at he proceeding to p ovide a ree transcript of tne proceeding to any party, other. than the zpplicznt, zt the same time that the Cozr~ssion-st-=f receives its copies.
B-200585 funds -for czrrying-out--the <omission's-functions for fiscal veer 1981, were appropriated by the =nergy -nd Vzter Development Appropriation Act, 1981, Pub. L. No.96-367, 94 Stat. 1331.
Section 502 of this Act provides:
"Hone of. the funds in 'thi's Act shall be used to pay
~
the expenses of, or otherwise compensate parties intervening in regulatory or adjuc catory proceedings
~
funded in th s Act,." (94 Stzt . 1345)
It is clea>> from th' lzngua'ge that f the procedural cos" reduction program will pay the expenses of intervenors in the Commis sion '
ad j udicato y proceedings the Co "'s on =ay not use funds appropriated
~
by the fisczl year 1981 Appropriation 'Act to implement the program.
Qbv'iously the cost reduction program ~~~1 apply to the Commission' adj udicatory proceedings Tne ve~'t" tie o tne st.
~
"=ed eral Regis t'er announcement Proceedings"
( Proc edu=zl j Assistance in Ad udica tory Licensing ) znd .tne .<<ederal .".egister ("9RC' s amending its re@ atio.w, in order to provide
~ 'a one-yezr pilot.
p"o gram o~ procedural assistance in zd jucicatory proceec.'gs ---")
make this clear.
lt is'cually 'nclear that tne beneficiaries of the progrzm are intevenors the Commission's p"oceecings. The --ended
'o oe regulations state tnat the ree transc ilats, copies, and service, are to be p".ovided to parties "other than tne zppl cant." The ep janztory ~" erial in the Pederal Register announcemenr indicates that procedurzl assistance v'l oe offered "to all intervenors thout aual <<icat ion" (4 5 Fed . Reg . 4 4535), that cop ies o= transc ipts
""1 be "-~iled to intervenors" (Id. -" 49536), and that, the free copies of documents will reduce costs "to intervenors"'Xd.) .
Finally, it is certain that the pro gra will "pay tne expenses o f" the inte venors . Clea'rly if t'ne Co ' sion did ao t adopt the cost. reduction pro g zm then the costs of purchzsing transcripts and copying and serving documents would be expenses that the intervenors would hzve to bear if they were to p-rtic 'pz" e in the Com~'sion's proceedings'y bearing these costs i"sel=, the Commission is necessarily pay 'ng expenses of the inte ~eno'"s even "hough the Comm ssion is not mak"'g any cash pay ents directly to the intervenors .
Although tne Com ssion ' zmended regulations speak of copies "without cost" to the intervenor, and o " ree" transc ipts, these conies and znsc ipts ~~&1 not. be "without cost" or "free" to the
~
"-""200583 Co ssion.The moneys to ale Conzission ~
copies fo A
doc@vents ll have to expend i"s appropriated and to pay he reporta s tha pz ca oz he transcripts.
The Cow: ssion itself, in i"s =ederal Reg ste announcement
.recogn"'as thai it w&3. Oe paying intervenor expenses.
nouncenent indicates that intezveno=s ~'ht orcina ly pay The as mcn as $ 1,000 pa oay to obta n transcripts and th" t oy prov". ding them to the intevenors a" 's o-z expense the Co ission "s p oviding "~n expensive sem ica," 45 Fed. Rag. 49533 ~ Fur hez, oy provid "ng f".ae copies o ce-."ain documents end by serving tham on behalf of the. intervenozs, the Com=ssion wou d be perfor 'ng "a service which would have h gh payo f in te~w of reduc'g co sts Commission
. to intervenors *<*" Id at 49536 .~
narefore, wa 'aust conclude tha" i: t'e
-s proceQuza1 cost reduction Drog KD using its f iscal->ear 1981 implements appzopr" at" ons i" will be vio~ @ting Section 502 of tne Aoproo 'tion
)
s C ~
The. Co-.-'s 'on s legal analysis, sub~trad with the request for ou" opia on, ciscussas language 'n the :.ouse report on tne fiscal yea= 1980 Co~~ s sion ~ppzopri ations Act that "~ he buogat request and tna- co .ittee recon ndation do no" inclu e uncs
=o: intervanors." (H .R. Repo. t No .96-243,,96th Cong.,
sess'on 136 (June 7, 1979) . ne lang 'aga o
't uD L Ho 96 367)
~
quc ed above...o-ever) st orgar be" ause precluaes paying tna expanses of o" othe ise co-pensating 'n=erveno s in addition ci"ect prov'ion o= 'ncs to interveno s .
~
egp '.
to ozac uding the intervenor f lalysls a'o asserts that ou". 1976 cec's"'on unding ) 3-92288):"abzuary 19, 1976, fourd "no legal on one Co...~ssion prob ass" with procadu al cost zaduct 'ns o f the sort nov proposed.
)
however, the context o~ the discussion o cos- reduction in the.<
Qecis. on was li=ited Lo 'si~li y ng procedures and el inating
'e unnecessary o- undu y ou densoaa requ nts" rather than shifting tna cos t buzaen o" unchanged procedures ana req irewrts fzom inta venors to the Co "'sion..
Our conc3.usion Qoes no t apply "o the C" 'sion s amended regulation whicn s" ates that all pa=ties to "he proceeding need
-'a only the orig='nal and 2 copies; o f 'pleacings and othe coeur)ants instead oi the'rigi".zl and 20 cop
's which =as fowazj.y
-aouirad. In our opinion by a"king this andnent tne Co~ssion
' no t pay'g intezveno zs expanses, but ra "haz -' e>> inat inp acjuQica ion cost fo. all oi the pa=t'es by modifying its p"ocacura require'ants. P 'ndicatea 'n th prev" ous paragraph, c) wa jete: ined in ou 1 . 76 deci;sion that the Comiss ion does have author tv 0 5" L1D if) pzoceaures o" el.'-'nate unnecessary o-
~-200585 undu1y burdensome requi aunts munich incroase pz ias'osts in Participating 'n the Co~ss on s proceedings. 3-92288,'-abruary 19, 3.976.
The Pedera3. Register announcement. 'ndicates that the 20 copy reouireaani vzs "for'tha Co 'ssion's convenience for ntarna1
-'nfor~tiona1 distr'bution ="*-" 45 :ad. Bag. 49536. :urther these 20 copies oa .-.
pa=-ia11y mt tne Cc 'ssicn's needs and tne Comission therefore prod ced addit"'cnz1 ccpies. Therefore, "ne cost of produc'rg ihe 20 copies ~as not z necessary emense
'oi pzr icipating in tNe Co~ss on's procea ngs, but ratner vas zn 'nstznce oi "Be Co~ssioa eauiring the parties to b "= part Q is "art~as, oman axoa"'..ses.
nc1ucxng 'ntavenors, 0
Sy e=nz." ng he this reouirauent for a11 Cc~-'ssicn 's no" paying
'nte renor ' azwanses.
n your W
~etta" vou posec auestiors conce=".'"g whether tha o... 'ss~on s progrz -as cons"'stent with =ha wishes of tha Con~ress as a:impressed at r..~. Bapor" Hc.96-243, 96th Cong., 1st Sess.
( 97 ); v h the 4
ncepencent 0=.- cas Ap rcorizt cn Act cf 1952 0~
C.
P.-25.
R 8" , nc w 0 c 0 ..znage~ant
~ne enactment of Pub. L. Y~o.96-367, a=ter vou sent zna Bucket C'=c '=
ycv.= 3.atter, zkes ='" unnecessary, n ou- op'n'on,'o adc"ass
=ne other auestions po'sad " your 1atier. Va have. c'sc ssad this
- itn a mercer o" tne subccmttee staf= ho incicatad that :" =na interest o zvo'a=ng ~ 'I ~
uwnecassa~ aa1ay ve naad not ans"e" -ha I
ether ouast'ons " you= 1atta=.
Sincere v vou"s, of the Un.'tad States
~ UHITH) STATES, O.. AMERICA HUCLEAR REGULATORY CO~~GSS IOH In the Matter of )
)
FLORIDA POiKR AHD LIGHT CO".PAHY ) Docket Ho. (s)50-250SP
)50-251SP (Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4) )
)
)
)
)
CERTI:"ICATE 0:<<SERVICE I hereby certify that ~I have this day served the forego'ng document(s) upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Office of the Secretary of the Commission in this proceeding in accordance vith the requirements of Section 2.712.of 10 CrR Part 2-Rules of Practice, of the Huclear Regulatory Commission's Rules and Regulations.
Dated at Vashington, D, this lgl': .
Office"of i6he Secretary of the Co~ission
- rv ig >~r Di M>> it 'VA
~ ~ ~
~ V nps~r, qq~giS ~
te-
-LORTDA POl'ER AND LIGHT COMPANY Docket No. (s)50-250SP 50 251SP (Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4)
)
)
).
S:-R ZC:. L ST
- -'.'abeth S. Bowers, Esq., Chairman Mr. Mark P. Oncavage Ato='c Safety and Licensing Board 12200 Southwest 110th Avenue U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission <<H.ami, Florida 33176 Fiashington, D. C. 20555 Norman A. Coll, Esq.
"<<mmeth A. Luebke Steel, Hector and Davis Atomic Safety and Licensing Board lL;00 S.E. First National Bank Building
~
~ U. S. ljuclear Regulatory Commission Miami, Flozida 33131 washington, D. C. 20555 Neil Chonin, Esq.
Dr. Oscar H. Paris Law Offices of Neil Chonin, P.A.
A"o=ic;".Safety and Licensing Board New World Tower Bldg., 30th ."loor U. S.. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission 100 North Biscayne Boulevard 4'as.-.ington, D. C. 20555 Florida 33132 'iami, Counsel for NRC Staf f Henry H. Harnage, Esq.
0=fice of the Executive Le~al D rector Peninsula Federal Bldg., 10th Floor U.S. '.nuclear Regulatory'ommission 200 S.E. First Street ii'as.". 'ngton, D. C. 20555 Miami, Florida 33131 F o"'a Power and Light Company Rober t A, Gznsburg, Esq.
A T".: Dr. Robert E. Uhhig Dade County Attorney Vice President 1626 Dade County Courthouse P.O; Box 529100 Miami, Florida 33130 MiaM, Florida 33152 Y~~cnael A. Bauser, Esq.
Lo- e"'stein, Newman, Reis, Axelrad & Toll 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.l~'.
v'as'.".ington, D:C. 20036
'tion:
Doc w/enc.
UNITED STATES ORBIII1 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CSParrish "
WASHINGTON, O.C. 20555 MGrotenhuis" February 5, 1980 Docket No ~
-251 See Attached List
Subject:
FLORIDA P011ER AND LIGHT COMPANY The following documents concerning our review of the subject facility are transmitted for your information:
Notice of Receipt of Application.
Draft/Final Environmental Statement, Evaluation, or Supplement No.. dated'afety dated Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.
Application and Safety Analysis Report, Vol.
Amendment No. to Application/SAR.'ated Construction Permit No. CPPR- dated X
Facility Operating License No. DPR-Amendment No.
Other Januar to CPPR - or DRR -,
, NPF-24, 1980 Order Re1atiye tp InterrpqatprieS in DiSpute dated
, dated Between F'londa Polk>er 'and Li ht and Intervenor Nark P. Oncavage.
, Division of Operating Reactors, ORBIVl.
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated CC:
OFFICE %
ORBS'1:DOR SUIIItdAME i CSParrish 2/5/80 OAJE NBc 21 I6 76)
Dr. Robert E. Uhrig Florida Power and Light Company CC: Honorable Dewey Knight County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County Miami, Florida 33130 Bureau of Intergovernmental Relations 660 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Dr. David B. Hall 400 Circle Drive Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 Michael A. Bauser, Esquire Lowenstein, Newman, Reis, Axelrad and Toll 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036 Mr. Mark P. Oncavage 12200 S.W. 110th Avenue Miami, Florida 33176 Normal A. Coll, Esquire Steel, Hector and Davis 1400 S.E. First National Bank Building Miami, Florida 33131 I
Dr. Oscar H. Paris Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Counsel for NRC Staff Office of the Executive Legal Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
IIzg~[)I~I,/'1)j[i'li(8 gtL~JQ.ILti )'II-I gl)III D' ution:
UNITED STATES Docket /enc.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON> D.C. 20555 C. S. Parrish w/enc M. Grotenhuis February 5, 1980 Docket No ~ 50-250 lee Attached List subject: FLORIDA P01'JER AND LIGHT COMPANY The following documents concerning our review of the subject facility are transmitted for your information:
Notice of Receipt of Application.
Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated Safety Evaluation, or Supplement No. , dated Notice of Hearing on Application for Construction Permit.
Notice ot'onsideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License.
Application and Safety Analy'sis Report, Vol.
Amendment No. to Application/SAR, dated Construction Permit No. CPPR- dated Facility Operating License No. DPR- , NPF- , dated AmendmentNo. to CPPR- or DRR-, dated X O,h<<. Januar 22, 1980 Order Re1ative tol:the NRC Staff's htotion to Com e1 Discover .
Division of Operating Reactors, ORB81 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated cc:
oFFlcf i ORBII 1: DOR svANAME CSParri sh 2/5/80 OATE NRC 21 I6 76)
~~
P w vi I
Dr. Robert E; Uhrig Florida Po~er and Light Company cc: Honorable Dewey Knight County Manager of Metropolitan Dade County Miami,. Florida 33130, Bureau of Intergovernmental Relations 660 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Dr. David B. Hall 400 Circle Drive Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 Michael A. Bauser, Esquire Lowenstein, Newman, Reis, Axelrad and Toll 1025.Connecticut Avenue, N.W, Washington, D. C. 20036 Mr. Mark P. Oncavage 12200 S.W. 110th Avenue Miami, Florida 33176 Normal A. Coll, Esquire Steel, Hector and Davis 1400 S.E. First National Bank Building Miami, Florida 33131 Dr. Oscar H. Paris Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Counsel for NRC Staff Office of the Executive Legal Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
0 '0 I
gp -m5O
~ tXOt>>>>
ec X SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
+CIIII~ WAsHINGTQN, D.C. 20549 DIVISION OP CORPORATION FINANCE PPB Og '1980 Samuel Chilk, Secretary of the Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Clmnission Washington, D.C. 20555 k Re: Florida Power 6 Light Company File No. 2-66524 and 22-10256
Dear Mr. Chilk:
Enclosed is a copy of a registration statement filed with this Commission on January 29, 1980 by the above-named company.
Since this Company is subject to your Agency's review, we would apppreciate having the pros~tus examined by your staff and receiving their comments, to page 18.
if any. Particular attention is directed Although this Commission does not pass upon the merits of a security, it is concerned with compliance by a registrant with the statutory requirements of fair and accurate disclosure of information to public investors. We would be interested in any comments regarding the accuracy of tne information set forth in the prospectus. Also please advise us of any facts or additional information wnich should be included in the prospectus to make the disclosure more meaningful to a potential investor.
We anticipate ccznpleting our review of this Company's regis-tration statement in the near future and we would appreciate any coments by February 13, 1980.
If you have any questions with regard to this matter, please call me at 272-3273 or Mr. Anthony Kolker at 272-3306.
Sincerely, hn C. 'Soycro Branch Chief Enclosure