ML17339A431
| ML17339A431 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1979 |
| From: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001040109 | |
| Download: ML17339A431 (6) | |
Text
DISTRIBUTION:
HOVEthBER 80, Docket ACRS (l6)
.ORB¹l Rdg VNerses NRR Rdg File DEisenhut RTedesco WGammill RVollmer Dr. Robert E.
Uhr ig, Vice President BGrimes Advanced Systems and Technology JMi 1 1 er Florida Power and Light Company LShao Post Office Box 529100 OELD Miami, Florida 33152 OI8IE (3)
ASchwencer Dear Dr. Uhrig Cparrish MGrotenhuis On July 5, 1979, we sent you a letter regarding the Turkey Point Unit No. 4 revised valve test program.
In this letter we said that your August 23, 1978 submittal transmitting a proposed cycling test for check valves had been reviewed and found to be unacceptable.
Docket Nos.
0-250 and 5th&5 On August 10, 1979 we received two letters from you, L79-219 and L79-220.
Letter L79-219 responded to our phone conversation on July 13. 1979 and transmitted revisions to the August 23, 1978 program.
Letter L79-220 responded to our letter of July 5, 1979 and our July 13, 1979 phone call and concluded by saying that all outstanding issues were dispositioned as a result of that conversation and letter L79-'219.
It is,true that all issues of the July 13, 1979 phone call were dispositioned in letter L79-219.
The staff position regarding the cycling requirements for check valves, which we discussed with your staff in a number of phone calls dating from tray 12, 1978 through June 6, 1979 was presented formally in our letter dated July 5, 1979.
These requirements were not dispositioned in L79-220 and therefore the review is still not completed.
Please respond to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter.
Sincerely, Therefore, letter L79-220 incorrectly stated that all matters were dispositioned.
Consequently, we reiterate our request of July 5. 1979.
We ask that you review our position and either indicate that you will accept it or demonstrate that it is impractical to full stroke these valves.
94inaf Signed By A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch Pl Division of Operating Reactors ORB¹1 RS MGroieohui s.:.ar... VHe ses..
ll/ PI
/79f11/ 2,1/./79 OP.Bgl OFFICE/
SURNAME DATEf er ASchwen l.l./.+../79....
NRC FORM 318 l9.76) NRCM 02<9
- ll,S GOVERN><EIGHT PRINT'ING OFFICE: 1979-289Q69 SO Oio4 leg
~, I 1
~
~
I ~
~ P/
~
H p
P' I
f I
I I
~
~
I P
P I I PI P
A I ~
'I I
I P
I
-I
~
I I
I f
I I
I
~
~
I It
\\
1 I
~ rl F
fl I
~ ~ I P,*
=
S
c+ P'g RK0I 0
Cy
'"~c Cl A': J 4b qO
~+*+~
Docket Nos.
50-250 and 50-251 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 November 30, 1979 Dr. Robert E. Uhrig, Vice President Advanced Systems and Technology Florida Power and Light Company Post Office Box 529100 Niami, Florida 33152
Dear Dr. Uhrig:
On July 5, 1979, we sent you a letter regarding the Turkey Point Unit No. 4 revised valve test program.
In this letter we said that your August 23, 1978 submittal transmitting a proposed cycling test for check valves had been reviewed and'.found to be unacceptable.
On August 10, 1979 we received two letters from 'you, L79-219 and L79-220.
Letter L79-219 responded to our phone conversation on July 13, 1979 and transmitted revisions to the August 23, 1978 program.
Letter L79-220 responded to our letter of July 5, 1979 and our July 13, 1979 phone call and concluded by saying that all outstanding issues were disposi+ioned as a result of that conversation and letter L79-219.
It is true that all issues of the July 13, 1979 phone call were dispositioned in letter L79-219.
The staff position regarding the cycling requirements for check valves, which we discussed with your staff in a number of phone calls dating from May 12, 1978 through June 6, 1979 was presented formally in our letter dated July 5, 1979.
These requirements were not dispositioned in L79-220 and therefore the review is still not completed.
Therefore, letter L79-220 incorrectly stated that all matters were dispositioned.
Consequently, we reiterate our request of July 5, 1979.
l<e ask that you review our position and either indicate that you will accept it or demonstrate that it is impractical to full stroke these valves.
Please respond to this request within 30 days of the receipt of this letter.
Sincerely, A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 81 Division-of Operating Reactors cc:
see next page
~)
Robert E. Uhrig Florida Power and Light Company November 30, 1979 CC:
Mr. Robert Lowenstein, Esquire Lowenstein,
- Newman, Reis and Axelrad 1025 Connecticut
- Avenue, N.M.
Suite 1214 Mashington, D. C.
20036 Environmental and Urban Affairs Library Florida International University Miami, Florida 33199 Mr. Norman A. Coll, Esquire
- Steel, Hector and Davis 1400 Southeast First National Bank Building Miami, Florida 33131 Mr. Henry Yaeger, Plant Manager Turkey Point Plant Florida Power and Light Company P.
0.
Box 013100 Miami, Florida 33101 Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Builaing Tallahassee, Florida 32304