ML17338A252
| ML17338A252 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 09/11/1978 |
| From: | Gibson G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17338A250 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-250-78-16, 50-251-78-16, NUDOCS 7811010411 | |
| Download: ML17338A252 (7) | |
See also: IR 05000250/1978016
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303
Report Nos.:
50-250/78-16
and 50-251/78-16
Docket Nos.:
50-250
and 50-251
License Nos.:
and DPR-41
Licensee:
Florida Power and Light Company
P. 0.
Box 529100
Miami, Florida
33152
Inspection at:
Turkey Point Facility, Homestead,
Florida and
FPEcL Corporate Offices, Miami, Florida
Inspection
conducted:
July 24-27,
1978
Inspector:
G. T. Gibso
~
~
Reviewed by:
J
W. Huf a
E
ironment
F l Facili
hief
nd Special Projects
Section
nd Materials Safety Branch
(l
ate
Ins ection
Summa
Ins ection
on Jul
24-27
1978
(Re ort Nos. 50-250/78-16
and 50-251/78-16)
inspection
and emergency planning followup meeting, including:
review of
environmental
sampling results,
examination of the environmental monitoring
program,
inspection of selected
monitoring equipment,
review of audit
results,
and discussions
with licensee
personnel
on emergency planning
pre-planned
decisional aids.
The inspection involved
8 inspector-hours
onsite
and
12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> offsite by one
NRC inspector.
Results:
Of the five areas
inspected,
no apparent
items of noncompliance
or deviations
were identified.
RII Report Nos. 50-250/78-16
and 50-251/78-16
DETAILS I
Prepared
by:
G. T. Gib on
Environmen
Section
Fuel Facility
Branch
Ra iation Specialist
Date
and Special Projects
and Materials Safety
Dates of Inspection:
J ly 24-27,
1978
Reviewed by
I/ 77
J
E
W. Hufham,
hief
ironmental
d Special Projects
Date
ection
Fuel Facility and Materials Safety
Branch
1.
Persons
Contacted
H. Yaeger, Plant Manager
+J. Hays, Plant Superintendent,
Nuclear
-R. Spooner,
gA Supervisor
S. Kingsbury, Radiological Emergency Plan Coordinator
(FP&L)
F. Green,
Power Resources
Engineer
(FP&L)
W. Johnson,
Director, Florida Div. of Health and Rehabilitation
Services
(DHRS), Orlando Radiological
Laboratory
+Denotes
those present at exit interview.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous
Ins ection Findin
s
No previous
enforcement
items were within the scope of this inspection.
3.
Unresolved
Items
Unresolved
items are matters
about which more information is required
in order to ascertain
whether they are acceptable
items,
items of
noncompliance,
or deviations.
Two unresolved
items disclosed
during
the inspection are discussed
in paragraphs
6.b and 7.b of this report.
4.
Environmental Monitorin
a.
The inspector
reviewed all the licensee's
results of the environ-
mental radiological monitoring program for the period July 1977
through March 1978.
The inspector
observed that the licensee
has
met the sampling requirements
of Technical Specification 4.12.
The inspector
has
no further questions
regarding this item.
RII Report Nos. 50-250/78-16
and 50-251/78-16
I-2
b.
The inspector
reviewed the analytical results to ascertain
whether
any anomolous results
or unexpected
trends not reported
by the
licensee
were present.
No unusual or unexpected
results
were
identified.
The inspector
has
no further questions
regarding
this item.
c ~
The inspector
examined selected air monitoring stations
and
observed their operability.
The inspector
examined
the ther-
moilluminescent dosimetry
(TLD) material
and the charcoal air
sampling filters.
The inspector noted the equipment
was
installed
and operated
as required by Technical Specification
Table 4.12.1.
5.
Audits
a
~
The inspector
reviewed the records of FPM corporate audit No.
08.03.FLS.78.1
dated July 6,
1978.
The audit encompassed
a
review for compliance to Technical Specification 4.12.
The
inspector noted the audit was performed in accordance
with
Technical Specification 6.5.2.8.a.
The audit revealed
no
unacceptable
areas.
b.
The inspector discussed
with licensee
personnel
the adequacy of
the audit program.
The inspector noted that
a review of the
adequacy of the analytical procedures
and techniques
by qualified
radiochemists
had not yet been performed.
This item shall be
examined during subsequent
inspections.
6.
~k
a
~
The inspector
reviewed the results of a dairy census
report
conducted
by the State of Florida, Department of Agriculture.
The inspector discussed
the census with the Southeast
Regional
Agriculture Inspector, Division of Daries.
The inspector deter-
mined the census
was limited to commercial
dai~i
herds
and did
not address
individual users in the vicinity of the Turkey Point
facility.
b.
Technical Specification 4.12 requires
the licensee to conduct
a
semi-annual dairy survey.
The adequacy of the previous commercial-
dairy-only survey shall be considered
an unresolved
item pending
a complete
census
of all dairy animals within a ten to twelve
mile radius of the facility (78-16-01).
A0
4
RII Report Nos. 50-250/78-16
and 50-251/78-16
1-3
7,
Emer en
Plannin
a.
The inspector met with licensee
representatives
on the open item
from the previous
emergency planning inspection
(78-10-02).
The
inspector resolved calculational questions
regarding the preplanned
decisional aids
and the FSAR.
Therefore,
the open item 78-10-02
is closed.
b.
The inspector,
however,
determined
the licensee
does not presently
transmit source-term information (Ci/sec) to the State of Florida
in the event of an unplanned
gaseous
release,
in accordance
with
the State of Florida, Radiological Emergency
Response
Plan,
Reporting Form for Radiological Accidents.
In addition,
10 CFR 50, Apppendix E,Section IV.C, requires
the licensee
to have the
means to determine
the magnitude of an unplanned
release.
The
development of a method to utilize the Auxiliary Building Ventila-
tion System
(ABVS) plant vent monitor to delineate
the magnitude
of possible
releases,
shall be considered
an unresolved
item
~
~
(78"16-02).
8.
Exit Interview
The inspector
met with licensee
representatives
(denoted in para-
graph
1) at the conclusion of the environmental inspection at the
plant on July 26,
1978.
The inspector
summarized
the purpose
and
scope of the inspection,
and the findings.
Cj