ML17335A468
| ML17335A468 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook |
| Issue date: | 01/07/1999 |
| From: | Grobe J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Powers R AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO., INC. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9901120396 | |
| Download: ML17335A468 (95) | |
Text
,
CATEGORY 2 0 REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9901120396 DOC.DATE: 99/01/07 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET I FACIL:50-315 Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M
05000315 50-316 Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M
05000316 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ZypN GROBE,J.A.
Region 3
(Post 820201)
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION POWERS,R.P.
American Electric Power Co., Inc.
4
SUBJECT:
Provides summary of 981222 meeting with staff of D Cook NPP re issues related to results of recent engineering assessments. List of meeting sttendees,licensee handout 6
addi info provided by NRC re restart insp schedule status.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
IE45D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: Summary of Significant Meeting with Licensee (Part 50)
NOTES:
E RECIPIENT XD CODE/NAME PD3-3 PD INTERNAL: DEDRO NRR/DRPM/PERB RES/DET/EIB EXTERNAL: NOAC COPXES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME STANG,J PILE NTE RGN3 PILE 01 NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 D
0 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK tDCD)
ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF 'COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 10 ENCL 10
gr
<pa REC~+,
~c"
+
0 Cy A.n
'DQ gO
++*++
UNITEDSTATES LEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 801 WARRENVILLEROAD LISLE, ILLINOIS60532-4351 January 7,
1999 Mr. R. P. Powers Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation Group American Electric Power Company 500 Circle Drive Buchanan, Ml 49107-1395
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF THE DECEMBER 22, 1998, PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS DONALDC. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Dear Mr. Powers:
This letter summarizes the meeting held on December 22, 1998, between staff members of the NRC and the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant to discuss issues related to the results of recent engineering assessments.
This meeting was held at the Donald C. Cook training facility in Bridgman, Michigan, and was'conducted from 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. This meeting was open for public observation.
Enclosure 1 provides a list of meeting attendees and Enclosure 2 provides the licensee handout for this meeting. Additional information provided by the NRC concerning the restart inspection schedule'status is provided in Enclosure 3.
The licensee presented information related to the recently conducted engineering assessments.
The licensee discussed and summarized the results of the Engineering Issues Review Group's assessment, the Design Engineering Assessment, the Engineering Skills Survey, and the Engineering Program Reviews.
AIIof the assessments conducted by the licensee resulted in the identification of strengths and weaknesses in the licensee's engineering program.
In response to the weaknesses identified by these assessments, the licensee committed to conducting expanded system readiness reviews to evaluate the readiness of safety-related systems.
In addition, corrective actions were to be initiated to improve the engineering organization, engineering personnel training and qualification, and engineering programs and processes.
The licensee stated that due to the recent completion of the assessments, assimilation of all findings was still in progress and that corrective action plans were in various stages of development.
The licensee committed to presenting to the NRC at a future meeting a more detailed plan and timeline for completing the corrective actions, including the expanded system readiness reviews.
The NRC discussed the status of NRC inspection activities at the Donald C. Cook plant as described in Enclosure 3. The NRC noted that based on recent changes in the Donald C. Cook plant commitments, as of December 16, 1998, the majority of the NRC Manual Chapter 0350 case specific inspection items were not ready for inspection.
The licensee stated that in approximately 30-45 days, an updated schedule would be provided to the NRC which willreflect the recent engineering initiatives with revised ready for inspection dates for the 0350 Manual Chapter checklist items listed in Enclosure 3.
P90ii2039'6 990i07 PDR ADQCK 050003i5,
8 PDR
'T
R. Powers In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in NRC's Public Document Room.
Sincerely, ohn A. Grobe, Director Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-315; 50-316 License Nos.: DPR-58; DPR-74
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Meeting Attendees 0350 public meeting and technical briefing
- 3. NRC Inspection Schedule Matrix cc w/encls:
J. Sampson, Site Vice President M. Rencheck, Vice President, Nuclear Engineering D. Cooper, Plant Manager R. Whale, Michigan Public Service Commission Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Emergency Management Division Ml Department of State Police D. Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists
R. Powers Distribution:
RRB1 (E-Mail)
RPC (E-Mail)
Project Mgr., NRR w/encls J. Caldwell, Rill w/encls C. Pederson, Rillw/encls B. Clayton, Rill w/encls SRI DC Cook w/encls DRP w/encls TSS w/encls DRS (2) w/encls Rill PRR w/en ls PUBLIC I -0 w/encls Docket File
/encls GREENS IEO (E-Mail)
DOCDESK (E-Mail)
R. Powers In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in NRC's Public Document Room.
Sincerely,
/s/ John A. Grobe John A. Grobe, Director Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-315; 50-316 License Nos.: DPR-58; DPR-74
Enclosures:
cc w/encls
- 1. List of Meeting Attendees 0350 public meeting and technical briefing
- 3. NRC Inspection Schedule Matrix J. Sampson, Site Vice President M. Rencheck, Vice President, Nuclear Engineering D. Cooper, Plant Manager R. Whale, Michigan Public Service Commission Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Emergency Management Division Ml Department of State Police D. Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientists DOCUMENT NAME: G:iCOOKiDCC12228.SUM To receNe e of this Ocuunerx, irxficste in the boxW ~
without sttschrnentlendostxe p e C with sttchhrnent/endosrxe ff ~ No OFFICE RIII NAME Ve el:nh DATE 01/
/99 Rill Holmber en 01/ </99 NRR Rill a
enter Grob 01/
/99 "'"'~
01/
/9 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY~
l
Enclosure 1
December22 1998 Meetin Attendance List
~ 9901)PP39~
NRC J. Caldwell C. Carpenter J. Grobe A. Vegel B. Bartlett J. Maynen B. Fuller M. Farber M. Holmberg AEP R. Powers D. Cooper J. Sampson M. Rencheck D. Kunsemiller R. Kerr F. Pisarsky D. Powell J. Durham E. Ecktein J. Kingseed J. Euto J. O'eill P. Gora L. Weber J. Schrage B. Wallace T. Quaka P. Schoepf G. Weber M. Rauckharst T. Wagoner B. Nichols
Enclosure 1
December 22 1998 Meetin Attendance List NRC J. Caldwell C. Carpenter J. Grobe A. Vegel B. Bartlett J. Maynen B. Fuller M. Farber M. Holmberg AEP R. Powers D. Cooper J. Sampson M. Rencheck D. Kunsemiller R. Kerr F. Pisarsky D. Powell J. Durham E. Ecktein J. Kingseed J. Euto J. O'eill P. Gora L. Weber J. Schrage B. Wallace T. Quaka P. Schoepf G. Weber M. Rauckharst T. Wagoner B. Nichols
4S
ENCLOSURE 2 h
1 ~
~
I I
I Engineering Assessment Meeting 12/22/98
~ 'MERICAN EI.ECTRIC POWER
o Powers enior ice Presi ent
Completed Engineering Assessment Findings Are Being Reviewed Assessing Impact on Restart Schedule I
Developing Methodical Approach to Resolve Issues
i e enc ec ice Presi ent uc ear En ineering
gll
Engineering Assessments and Findings Expanded System Readiness Reviews Vision for the Future Engineering Leadership Plan Conclusion
Ill
Time ine-
~
~
~
I
~
~
I I
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
I
~
~ -
s i I
~
~
I
~
I I
~
4$
En ineerin Issues Review Grou EIRG Complete Critical Assessment Team Composition Operations Manager 3rd Party Experienced Personnel Industry Peers and INPO
~
~
A A
A y
~
4$
Ck
En ineerin Issues Review Grou EIRG 4
Provide an independent review of the actions being taken to address and bound engineering issues.
I
~
I I I
~
~
I I
~
~ I
~
I
~ I I
~
~
I ~
~
I
~
~
~
I
~ I
~
~
I I
I
~
I ~
I I
~
I I
I
~
~
~
I r
~
~
~ I
Cl 4S
Stren ths
~ Open, Positive Attitude Do the Right Thing Culture Changing More Conservative Decision Making More Intrusive Questioning Attitude Pride of System Ownership Improving
Cl
Challen es System Readiness Review Rigor, Scope, and Consistency
~ Operability Determination Identification and Control Open Regulatory Issues Review and Follow-up
8
Challen es
~ Operating Experience Review and Implementation Design and Licensing Basis Information Availability
~ Design Change and Safety Evaluation Bypass Processes
Ill
Challen es Personnel Knowledge, Attention to Detail, Accountability, and Follow-through
~ Issue Evaluations Extent of Condition Issue Elevation to Management Insufficient Standards
Desi n En ineerin Complete Critical Assessment Team Composition 3rd Party Experienced Personnel Industry Peers INPO A ~
~
A A
A g
~
A g A ~
~ I I; IINJEltIAlN
'~ Nkvd:CAtl4; t'i')M/M 14
4S 45
Challen es Design Authority Dilution Fragmented Over Organization Lack of Qualified People Design Authority Not Recognized as Vital Production Orientation Transition to Single Design Authority Cultural Shift (Station-wide)
Design Basis Integrity
4S
En ineerin Skills
~ Complete Critical Assessment Team Composition A ~
~
~
r
~
Performance Improvement International (PII)
~ ~
Engineering Quality Index (EQI)
Engineering Judgement Index (EJI)
Problem Solving Skills Index (PSKI)
Technical Capability Index (TCI)
Stren ths i Professional Integrity Good Judgement Potential Challen es Training Problem Solving Knowledge Technical Knowledge
En ineerin Pro rams In-progress Critical Assessment Team Composition 3rd Party Experts A
A ~
~
A A ~
~
~
~
Lessons Learned Need to Establish Clear Ownership/Succession Plan
~ Appendix R, HELB Need to Formalize Some Programs HELB, GL 89-13, Containment Coatings Need to Increase Staffing MOV, ISI/IST Programs l,;t I; jLA1Elllciihf'.
'-'I KLAN.'fHA; t&WKli 20
EQ Program Weak Programmatic Controls
.WalkdownsNeeded Some Maintenance Certifications Lapsed ISI Compliance Demonstrated IST Poor Administrative Procedures Bases Definition Weak
~ ~
GL 89-10 MOVProgram No New Inoperable Valves 21 Valves InitiallyDeclared Inoperable
~ 6 Dispositioned Through Testing 15 Require Hardware Changes 22
Expanded System Readiness Reviews
~ Organization Training and Qualification Programs and Processes
~
~
Benchmarking.
System Readiness Review Manager SERB Enhanced Membership Teams Industry Experience I
Tlalnlng
~ Information Management Formal Procedure Deep Vertical Slice Four Phases
/1>t,'lg~ ~]:1r'i -1'i,r,rl-~<r
,vg )r
- I 1;( v,un'~(e)<rs
""-'-" kP,,F.C'AfK t"VMfflE 24
4I
Initial System Readiness Review Restart Activities Monitoring Final System Readiness Reviews Startup and Power Ascension Phase 2 Phase 3
Phase 4
~ Expanded System Readiness Review Program Phase 1
//j t~ lr'f
) /
25
4$
PLANT
,.., ENGINEERING Apply Design Basis Engineering Excellence DESIGN ENGINEERING Develop, Control &;
Maintain Design Basis
- FUEL R SAFETY ANALYSIS Bounds Design Basis
- Safe, Reliable, Economic Plant Operation 26
Engineering Organza ion:.':--':;=,::=-:::::;=".;:::---::'
~
~
I
~
I -
~
~
~
~ I I
~
~ -
~
a.
~
~
~
0
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
Principles Simplicity Intensity Accountability Tenacity Positive Attitude 28
~
~
'f@.lfyl'~ffii)'f-illI-).d'>>Jlf<f~fj7~III;fjJ~1li) f'--Ij/ipl' Attributes Identify, Analyze, and Solve Problems Rigorous Application of Engineering Principles Effective Technical Communication Design and Licensing Basis Strategic Application of Technology Safe Operating Conscience Effective Management Attention to Detail Professionalism ffP I<>>.NIa~ae~nr pg gg'pygmy POMfK'8'
Comprehensive End State "Future Vision" Assessments Focus:
People, Processes, and Equipment
~ Performance Indicators "Living"Plan
~ Restart and Beyond
Elements Organization Expanded System Readiness Reviews Training and Qualification Continuous Improvement/Self Assessment Root Cause Analysis Design Authority Engineering Programs and Processes
Where we were Course ofaction Where we willbe
~ Expectations, Roles, and Responsibilities Not Clearly Defined or Understood
~ Define and Communicate Expectations Roles Responsibilities
~ An Engineering Organization That Understands and Fulfills Expectations Roles Responsibilities
~ Interfacing Organizations Understand Engineering Role Measurements ofeffectiveness
~ Self Assessments
~ Organization Functional Area Assessments
~ PA and Customer Feedback 32
g Where we were Course ofaction Where we willbe
~
~
~ Lack of System Ownership
~ Processes Do Not Facilitate Intrusive Performance Monitoring
~ Inconsistent System Readiness Reviews
~ Inconsistent Programs
~ Expanded System Readiness Review Program
~ Improve System Engineering Processes and Programs
~ Improved Engineering Programs and Processes
~ System Readiness Affirmed and Maintained
~ Pride in System Ownership
~ Systems Operated and Maintained Per Design Basis 9f Ii~1 4f~'I=:
f>$~r'Ij 'ti'P; ":.::::.
Measurements of effectiveness
~ System Availabilityand Reliability
~ System Readiness Review Findings
~ System Team Walkdown Observations
~ Independent Oversight
Plan Assessments Expanded System Readiness Reviews Engineering Leadership Plan Implementation Systematic Method Industry Proven Reasonable Assurance Systems Perform in Accordance with Design Basis Organization and Infrastructure to Support Restart and Enhance Post Restart
4S
35
I 4$
S
ENCLOS 3
DC COOK INSPECTION MATRIX-HISTORY CASE SPECIFIC CHECKLIST ITEM NUMBER Programmatic Breakdown in Surveillance Testing INSPECTION TYPE &
STATUS Resident.
Inspections ORIGINAL SCHEDULE PROPOSED BY DC COOK (SEPTEMBER, 29, 1998)
RFI - 11/1 6/98 81/04/99 SCHEDULE REVISED WITH NEIt DC COOK COMMITMENTS
{DECEMBER 2, 1998)
RFI - 11/1 6/98 81/04/99 TBI - ASAR SCHEDULE REVISED TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGES IN DC COOK COMMITMENTS (DECEMBER 16, 1998 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 2.
Corrective Action Program Breakdown GATI ON HOLD RFI - 12/15/98 TBI - 1/11/99 UNKNOWN RFI - 12/24/98 UNKNOWN 3.
Programmatic Breakdown in the Maintenance of the Design Basis ETI ON HOLD RFI - TBD RFI - 1/16/99 TBI - TBD UNKNOWN UNKNOWN
4 0
R
~
S R
P 8
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
r ~
~
~ ~ -
~
r 0 S
~
8
~
~ ~
0
~
~
~ ~
'I
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
r
~
~ r r
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~ ~
~ 0
~
~
~
L 4$
CASE SPECIFIC CHECKLIST ITEM NUMBER INSPECTION TYPE 8 STATUS ORIGINAL SCHEDULE PROPOSED BY DC COOK (SEPTEMBER, 29, 1998)
SCHEDULE REVISED WITH NEW DC COOK COMMITMENTS (DECEMBER 2, 1998)
SCHEDULE REVISED TO ACCOMMODAT.E CHANGES IN DC COOK COMMITMENTS (DECEMBER 16, 1998 7.
Resolution of Non-Safety Related Cables Going To Shunt Trip Coils.
ETI ON HOLD RFI - 11/2/98 RFI - 1/13/98 TBI - TBD NO CHANGE NO CHANGE 8.
Resolution of Hydrogen Recornbiner Operability Issues Resident Inspections TBI - ASAR UNKNOWN RFI -10/19/98 RFI -12/24/98 UNKNOWN 9.
Resolution of Distributed Ignition Technical Specification Issue Resident Inspections RFI - 10/9/98 RF I - 1/07/99 TBI - ASAR UNKNOWN UNKNOWN
CASE SPECIFIC CHECKLIST ITEM NUMBER 10.
Resolution of Containment Spray System Operability Issues INSPECTION TYPE 8.
STATUS Resident Inspections ORIGINAL SCHEDULE PROPOSED BY DC COOK (SEPTEMBER, 29, 1998)
RFI - 12/7/98 SCHEDULE REVISED WITH NEW DC COOK COMMITMENTS (DECEMBER 2, 1998)
RFI - 12/7/98 TBI - ASAR SCHEDULE REVISED TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGES IN DC COOK COMMITMENTS (DECEMBER 16, 1998 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 11.
Hydrogen Mitigation System Operability and Material Condition 12.
Resolution of Containment Liner Pitting Resident Inspections Regional Inspections RFI - 11/30/98 RFI - 10/12/98 RF I - 11/30/98 UNKNOWN TBI - ASAR UNKNOWN RFI - 12/1 5/98 UNKNOWN TBI - 12/1 6/98 UNKNOWN
45
Q
~4 S 8 ~ 5 ~
~
0
~
~ ~
5 S
l
~
~ ~
S 0
I
~
~
~ ~ '
~ ~ ~
0 ~
~ ~ ~
~ a A ~
~
~
~
~
I
~ ~
~
~
I
~
~ ~
~
~
~
s s ~
0
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
r S
0 ~
0 Q
~
~ Q
~ 5 ~ J ~
j 0
~
~ ~
S S
~
~ ~ ~
l l
~ ~
0 0
~ ~
~
~
~ ~ '
~
QR
~ ~ ~
~ ~
Q ~
~
l a
~
~
~
a ~
~ ~
s a ~
8 S
~ ~
~ ~
l a
l a
~
~
~
a s ~
Cll
ASAR - As soon as ready CATI - Corrective Action Team inspection - On hold due to ongoing licensee self assessments and changes to the corrective action program.
ETI - Engineering Team Inspection - On hold pending additional licensee reviews and actions to bound engineering issues.
OLREI - Operator Licensing Requalification Examination inspection RFI - Ready for inspection RRATI - Restart Readiness Authorization Team inspection - On hold due to additional licensee assessments and corrective actions.
TBI - To be inspected