ML17334B762

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-315/98-04 & 50-316/98-04 & CAL-3-97- 011 on 980109-27.No Violations Noted.Insp Validated Corrective Actions Initiated to Address Significant Safety Issues Revealed Through NRC Ae Insp in Aug & Sept 1997
ML17334B762
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 05/07/1998
From: Grobe J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Fitzpatrick E
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO., INC.
Shared Package
ML17334B763 List:
References
50-315-98-04, 50-315-98-4, 50-316-98-04, 50-316-98-4, CAL-3-97-011, CAL-3-97-11, EA-98-150, EA-98-151, EA-98-152, EA-98-186, NUDOCS 9805180108
Download: ML17334B762 (12)


See also: IR 05000315/1998004

Text

~ F ~~.

PW

S

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9805180108

DOC.DATE: 98/05/07

NOTARIZED: NO

DOCKET

ACIL:50-315 Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana

M

05000315

50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana

M

05000316

AUTH.NAME

AUTHOR AFFILIATION

GROBE,J.A.

Region

3

(Post

820201)

RECIP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

FITZPATRICK,E.

American .Electric Power Co., Inc.

SUBJECT:

Forwards insp'repts

50-315/98-04

Ec 50-316/98-04

S CAL-3-97-

011 on 980109-27.No violations noted.Insp validated

'orrective

actions initiated to address

significant safety

issues

revealed

through

NRC AE'nsp in Aug

Ec Sept

1997.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEOIF

COPIES

RECEIVED:LTR

ENCL

(

SIZE: 5 +

TITLE: General

(50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Vio ation Response

NOTES:

'

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD3-3

PD

INTERNAL: AEOD/SPD/RAB

DEDRO

NRR/DRCH/HHFB

NRR/DRPM/PERB

OE DIR

RGN3

. FILE

01

ERNAL: L1TCO BRYCE,J H

NRC PDR

COPIES

LTTR,ENCL

1

1

'1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

STANG, J

AEOD/TTC

FILM CEETER

R/DRPM/PECB

NUDOCS-ABSTRACT

OGC/HDS3

'OAC

NUDOCS FULLTEXT

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

1

'1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1'

~w $$~0~<"

gpQ@~

pp~d

59G 7~0

E

N

NOTE TO ALL "RZDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS

OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL

DESK

(DCD)

ON EXTENSION 415-2083

C

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES

REQUIRED:

LTTR

17

ENCL

17

+7

fu,

(

Ifl

'f

May 7,

1998

EAs98-150, 98-151,98-152, 98-186

Mr. E. E. Fitzpatrick

Executive Vice President

Nuclear Generation Group

American Electric Power Company

500 Circle Drive

Buchanan, Ml 49107-1395

'UBJECT:

INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-315/98004(DRS); 50-316/98004(DRS) AND

CONFIRMATORYACTION LETTER (CAL) NO. RIII-97-011 VALIDATION

Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick:

On January 27, 1998, the NRC completed an inspection at your D. C. Cook, Units 1 and 2

reactor facility. The purpose of the inspection was to validate the corrective actions you

initiated to address significant safety issues revealed through the NRC Architect/Engineer (AE)

insp'ection conducted in August and September 1997. Those corrective actions are

documented

in Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) No. Rill-97-011. We determined that you

made satisfactory progress on the CAL commitments, but also identified a number of apparent

violations of NRC regulations.

The results of the inspection are documented in the enclosed

report.

The corrective action commitments documented in the CAL included actions to address specific

AE inspection issues and the completion of a short term assessment

to provide reasonable

assurance

that similar issues did not adversely impact the operability of other safety systems

at the Cook nuclear facility. While a number of items willcontinue to be reviewed by our staff,

the results of our inspection indicate that you have made satisfactory progress in completing the

actions specified in the CAL. Specifically, our inspection confirmed: the completion of physical

modifications to the Unit 1 and Unit 2 recirculation sumps and compressed

air systems; the

completion of calculations and analyses that demonstrate the capability to safely shutdown and

cooldown the plant in the event of a design basis accident; the revision of emergency and

operating procedures to address single failure criteria and other concerns; the submittal of

Technical Specification amendment requests to your facilitylicenses; the conduct of training for

your staff; and the adequate completion of a short term assessment

to bound the impact of the

engineering deficiencies on equipment operability. We discussed your actions taken in

response to the CAL during a number of public meetings conducted in late 1997 through

January 1998.

In the long term, your corrective action plans include implementation of an expanded instrument

uncertainty program, which is scheduled to be completed by the end of 1998.

Further, the

inspectors considered your staffs efforts good in identifying other avenues that could bypass

the design control process.

980Si80i08 980S07

PDR

ADGCK OS0003iS

8

PDR

1

<

II

0

li)I'

During review of engineering activities to asses the adequacy of your response to the CAL

issues, twelve apparent violations were identified that could be considered for escalated

enforcement action in accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for

NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement Policy), NUREG-1600.

Three apparent violations of 10 CFR 50.59(b)(1) were identified concerning the failure to

perform a safety evaluation for proposed changes to the plant design basis.

These apparent

violations resulted from your staff's failure to recognize that the implemented changes

constituted a change to the plant's design basis.

Additionally, seven apparent violations of 10 CFR 50.59(b)(1) were identified pertaining to inadequate safety evaluations.

This issue is of

particular concern as two of the deficient evaluations had recently been reviewed as part of

your self-assessment

and found acceptable by your staff.

One apparent violation of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion III, "Design Control," was identified

pertaining to the failure to assure that the containment spray heat exchanger room heat gain

calculation incorporated design input values that were consistent with the UFSAR. This was of

concern because the nonconservative input values used allowed temperatures

to exceed

design for the containment spray heat exchanger room under accident conditions.

'ne

apparent violation of 10 CFR Appendix B, Criterion XVI,"Corrective Action," was identified

concerning the failure to implement effective corrective actions.

Specifically, corrective actions

taken for previous occurrences

did not prevent the installation of leak collection devices prior to

performing an engineering review.

In addition, our inspection identified weaknesses

in your

quality assurance

(QA) organization audit methodology which contributed to your inability to

self-identify AE inspection findings.

No Notice of Violation is presently being issued for these apparent violations. The actions

necessary to correct the above apparent violations would be similar to planned or completed

actions that you willdiscuss during the predecisional enforcement conference currently

scheduled for May 20, 1998. Therefore, you willbe advised by separate correspondence

of the

results of our deliberations on this matter.

No response regarding these apparent violations is

required at this time.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

~l

E. Fitzpatrick

l

We willgladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

original /s/ by J. A. Grobe

John A. Grobe, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos:

50-315; 50-316

License Nos:

DPR-58; DPR-74

Enclosure:

Inspection Report Nos. 50-315/98004(DRS);

50-316/98004(DRS)

cc w/encl:

John Sampson,

Site Vice

President

A. A. Blind, Vice President

Nuclear Engineering

Douglas Cooper, Plant Manager

Richard Whale, Michigan Public

Service Commission

Michigan Department of

Environmental Quality

Emergency Management

Division, Ml Department

of State Police

DocuMENT NAME: G:)DRS<DCC98004.DRS

<(See Previous Concurrence)

To receNe a cop of this document, Indicate In the born 'C ~

wtthoul attachment/cndosure

'E'

wtth attadunenVendosure

'N'

No cop

OFFICE

Rill

NAME

Butler:sd

Rill

Gardner

Rill

Rill

Burgess

P

Clayton

Rill

Gro e

DATE

5/

/98

5/

/98

5/

/98

5/

/98

OFFICIALRECORD COPY

5/

/9

lg

l~

C>>

We willgladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

John A. Grobe, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos.:

50-315; 50-316

License Nos.:

DPR-58; DPR-74

cc w/encl:

John Sampson, Site Vice

President

A. A. Blind, Vice President

Nuclear Engineering

Douglas Cooper, Plant Manager

Richard Whale, Michigan Public

Service Commission

Michigan Department of

Environmental Quality

Emergency Management

Division, Ml Department

of State Police

Dis~tr'tio:

Project Mgr., NRR w/encl

A. Beach w/encl

J. Caldwell w/encl

B. Clayton w/encl

SRI DC Cook w/encl

DRP w/encl

TSS w/encl

DRS w/encl

Rill PRR w/encl

PUBL'IC IE-01 w/encl

Docket File w/encl

GREENS

IEO (E-Mail)

DOCDESK (E-Mail)

DOCUMENT NAME: G:iDRSttDCC98004.DRS

To receive s co

of thIs document, Indlcste In the born 't. ~

wtthout sttschmenl/endosure

'E'

wtth attachment/enctosurs

'N ~ No

OFFICE

Rill

Rill

E

Rl I

Rill

Rill

NAME

Butler:sd~

Gardnerg

B

e s

Clayt

Grobe

DATE

5/+ /98

5/

/98

st~ 5/

/98

5/

/

5/

/98

OFFICIALRE ORD COPY

Ir p

E. Fitzpatrick

~Dt

t'ai utton

J. Liebermaa, OE w/encl

J. Goldberg, OGC w/encl

B. Boger, NRR w/encl

Project Mgr., NRR w/encl

A. Beach w/encl

J. Caldwell w/encl

B. Clayton w/encl

SRI DC Cook w/encl

DRP w/encl

TSS w/encl

DRS w/encl

Rill PRR w/encl

PUBLIC IE-01 w/encl

Docket File w/encl

GREENS

IEO (E-Mail)

DOCDESK (E-Mail)

,) II

I

~1