ML17334A671

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 980209-13.Violation Noted: on 971106,two Radiation Workers Entered RCA W/O Confirming That Electronic Dosimeter (ED) Was On,When in Fact,Ed Was Turned Off
ML17334A671
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 03/05/1998
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17334A670 List:
References
50-315-98-06, 50-315-98-6, 50-316-98-06, 50-316-98-6, NUDOCS 9803100102
Download: ML17334A671 (4)


Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Indiana Michigan Power Company Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Docket Nos. 50-315; 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58, DPR-74 During an NRC inspection conducted from February 9, 1998, through February 13, 1998, violations of NRC requirements were identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violations are listed below:

1.

Technical Specification 6.11 requires that procedures for personnel radiation protection be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and shall be approved, maintained and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation protection.

A.

Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Procedure No. 12 THP 6010 RPP.120, Revision 0, "Issue and Control of Dosimetry", a procedure for personnel radiation protection, step 5.3.3.a. requires, in part, that care must be exercised by the individual using an ED (electronic dosimeter) to confirm that it is operating properly by ensuring that it is ON prior to RCA (radiologically controlled area) entry.

Contrary to the above, on November 6, 1997, two radiation workers entered the RCA without confirming that their EDs were on, when in fact, the EDs were turned off.

This is a Severity Level IVViolation (Supplement IV).

B.

Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Procedure No. PMP 6010 RPP.006, revision 7, "Radiation Work Permit Program," a procedure for personnel radiation protection, step 4.1.1 requires, in part, that all personnel are responsible for understanding and complying with the requirements of the posted revision of the RWP (radiation work permit).

RWP Number 981040, revision 02, "U1F98 8 U2F99/ U-1 8 U-2 Upper Containment Maintenance," task 2, describes anti-contamination clothing requirements including wearing double gloves in the ice condenser area.

Contrary to the above, on February 12, 1998, radiation workers signed onto RWP 981040 were performing work in the Unit 1 lower ice condenser area without wearing double gloves.

This is a Severity Level IVViolation (Supplement IV).

Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that procedures be established, implemented and maintained covering activities referenced in the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix "A"of Regulatory Guide 1.33, revision 2, February 1978.

Appendix "A"of Regulatory Guide 1.33, revision 2, February 1978, step 7.e.(4) recommends that procedures be established governing contamination control activities.

9803100102 980305 PDR ADOCK 050003i5 G

PDR

Notice of Violation Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Procedure No. 12 PMP 6010 RPP.300, revision 8, "Contamination Control Program," a Regulatory Guide 1.33 recommended procedure, step 5.3.4, describes how to use a walk through portal-monitor, and requires, in part, that ifa contamination alarm is received a second (validation) count can be performed; and ifa second (VALID)contamination alarm is received then notify RP (radiation protection) and wait in the immediate area until RP arrives.

Contrary to the above, on November 10, 1997, an individual alarmed a walk through portal-monitor twice, but did not notify radiation protection or wait in the immediate area until radiation protection personnel arrived.

This is a Severity Level IVViolation (Supplement IV).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Indiana Michigan Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region III, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, ifcontested, the basis for disputing the violation or severity level, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, ifthe correspondence adequately addresses the required response.

Ifan adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Ifyou contest this enforcement action, you should also provide a copy of your response to the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction.

Ifpersonal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. Ifyou request withholding of such material, you~

specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.790(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.

Dated at Lisle, Illinois this 5th day of March 1998

,l(,

K

)(I

,i C5