Similar Documents at Cook |
|---|
|
text
iiitC FORH 366 (5-92)
LXCENSEE EVENT REPORT
{LER)
PPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150.0104 EXP IRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER
RESPONSE
TO COMPLY WITH THI INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
FORWAR COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO TH INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEHENT BRANCH (MNB 7714),
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWOR REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104),
OFFICE 0
HANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON DC 20503.
FACILITY NAME (1)
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 DOCKET NUMBER (2) 50-315 Page 1 of 3 TITLE (4)
Reactor Coolant Pump Fire Protection Inoperable For Extended Period Without Compensatory Actions Due to Im ro erl Fabricated Gasket inS a Header Line MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR
'EQUENTIAI.
NUHBER REVISION NUMBER MONTH DAY FACILITY NAHE YEAR DOCKET HUMBER 03 13 97 97
005 01 10 23 FAC I LI I'Y NAME DOCKET NUHBER OPERATING MODE (9)
POWER LEVEL (10)
(jqg)$;tt>$$~)cPPg4$g@k".6~rP 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(I) 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 20.2203(a)(3)( I) 20.2203(6)(4) 5D.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(l) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 50.73(a)(2)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 50.73(a)(2)(x) 73.71(b)
OTHER (Specify in Abstract below
,and in Text,NAME Mr. John Boesch, Maintenance Superintendent tELEPHONE NUMBER (include Area Code) 616 465-5901, )g634
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO NPRDS
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO NPRDS YES X
NO EXPEC'IED SUBMISSION DATE 15 ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)
On March 5, 1997, with Unit 1 in cold shutdown, it was discovered that gaskets in the Fire Protection water spray system for the ¹13 Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) had not been properly fabricated prior to installation during the 1995 refueling outage.
The improper configuration of the gaskets rendered the Fire Protection system for the ¹13 RCP inoperable from the time of installation, without compensatory actions being taken. This event is reportable under 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), as operation prohibited by Technical Specifications.
Although the Fire Protection requirements were removed from the Technical Specifications in March of 1996, at the time the gaskets were installed the Fire Protection Technical Specifications were still in effect.
The root cause of this event is personnel error. The personnel involved did not properly incorporate into their actions the information contained in the Job Order Activityregarding fabrication of the gaskets, and did not perform an adequate part serviceabiiity inspection.
To restore the system to operable status, the old gasket material was removed and new gaskets were installed.
Pre-fabricated gaskets willbe stocked to prevent this from occurring in the future.
This condition has been evaluated, and it has been concluded that the defense-in-depth fire protection for this area adequately protected the fire safety of the plant. Therefore, this event did not constitute a significant hazard to the health and safety of the public.
97i0300i23 97i023 PDR ADQCK 050003i5 8
PDRU.
'CLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIOH PROVED BY OMB HO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES 5/31/95 LICENSEE EVENT CONTZNUATZON ESTIMATED BURDEH PER
RESPONSE
TO COMPLY WITH TKI INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
FORWAR COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO TH INFORMATIOH AND RECORDS MANAGEMEHT BRANCH (MHB 7714),
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWOR REDUCTIOH PROJECT (3150-0104),
OFFICE 0
MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.
Cook Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 50-315 YEAR SEQUENTIAI.
97
005 REVISION 01 2OF3 TEXT (if cere space is required.
use addit>ooal NRC Fore 366A's) (IT)
Condition Prior to Event
Unit 1 was in Mode 5, Cold Shutdown.
The Reactor Coolant Pump (RCP) motor Fire Protection is a dry pipe, manually actuated system.
Normally the systemhas 35 to 40 psi supervisory air in the system, and the spay heads are closed.
When the fusible link in the spray head is melted, air pressure in the piping is reduced, sounding alarms in both the Control Room and the Containment AuxiliarySubpanel.
Operators then manually open the isolation valve to admit water to the header around the RCP motor.
On March 5, 1997, while installing the blank side of a spectacle flange for 1-ZFP-391-3, RCP ItI3 deluge valve, it was discovered that the rubber gaskets installed during the 1995 refueling outage had not been properly fabricated.
The gaskets were to have been fabricated out of a sheet of red rubber by the installer, with the center of the gasket cut out to provide a flow path for the water spray. The gasket material, when discovered, had been installed as a solid sheet of red rubber. The center area, which should have been cut away during installation, was found to be tom. The tom gaskets are attributed to the pressure of the supervisory air.
C use of Even The root cause of this event is personnel error. The personnel involved did not properly incorporate into their actions the information contained in the Job Order Activityregarding fabrication of the gaskets.
In addition the personnel did not perform an adequate part serviceability inspection.
This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B),
" operation prohibited by Technical Specifications.
Although Fire Protection were removed from the Technical Specifications in March of 1996, at the time that the improperly fabricated gasket was installed, the Technical Specifications were still in effect.
The configuration of the gasket material would have impacted only the flow characteristics of the RCP fire protection system.
The system was capable of being actuated, but the tom gaskets would have restricted the flow, resulting in some reduced capability. The associated system components - detection, Control Room notification, deluge valve operation and the RCP oil collection system - would have operated.
Based on this, it has been concluded that the defense-in-depth fire protection for this area adequately protected the fire safety of the plant. Therefore, this event did not constitute a significant hazard to the health and safety of the public.
This condition was discovered on March 5, 1997.
During the investigation of this condition it became apparent that the gaskets had been in place since the previous refueling outage, in the fall of 1995.
Based on this information, and the fact that the Fire Protection Technical Specifications were in effect from the time of installation until March of 1996, the condition was determined to be reportable on March 13, 1997.
AU UCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT CONTINUATION PROVED BY OMB NO. 3150.0104 EXPIRES 5/31/95 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER
RESPONSE
TO COMPLY WITH THI IHFORMATIOH COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS.
FORHAR COMMENTS REGARDIHG BURDEN ESTIMATE TO TH INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (MHB 7714),
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, UASHINGTON, OC 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWOR REDUCTIOH PROJECT (3150-0104),
OFFICE 0
MAHAGEMENT AHD BUDGET MASHIHGTON, DC 20503.
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION Cook Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 50415 97
005 01 3OF3 TEXT (if more space is required.
use additional tRC Form 3664's)
(17)
Corrective Actions
The old gasket material was removed and properly configured gaskets were installed.
Properly configured gaskets will be purchased or pre-fabricated and set up in stock, thus eliminating the need for the installers to fabricate the gasket.
Information on this event will be presented to personnel in the groups which install these gaskets to illustrate the need to followwritten instructions and to reinforce the need to pay attention to details.
The gaskets for the other Unit 1 RCP Fire Protection headers were also checked.
AIIwere found to have been properly fabricated and installed.
Failed Com onent Identificatio None
Previous Similar Events
None
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000316/LER-1997-001-01, :on 970311,automatic Reactor Trip Signal Initiated by Reactor Protection Sys.Caused by Failure of Controller for 2-FRV-210,due to Static Discharge.Taylor Controller for 2-FRV-210 Replaced |
- on 970311,automatic Reactor Trip Signal Initiated by Reactor Protection Sys.Caused by Failure of Controller for 2-FRV-210,due to Static Discharge.Taylor Controller for 2-FRV-210 Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-001, :on 970112,while in Mode 1 at 99.8% Rated Thermal Power,Si Pump Discharge cross-tie Train B Shutoff Valve Was Closed to Support Filing SI Sys Accumulators. Caused by Incorrect Sequence of Procedure Step |
- on 970112,while in Mode 1 at 99.8% Rated Thermal Power,Si Pump Discharge cross-tie Train B Shutoff Valve Was Closed to Support Filing SI Sys Accumulators. Caused by Incorrect Sequence of Procedure Step
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000316/LER-1997-002, :on 970508,shutdown of Unit 2 Occurred, Resulting from Inability to Return 2 AB EDG to Svc within 72 H Allowed by TS Lco.Appropriate Administrative Actions Have Been Implemented for Individual Involved |
- on 970508,shutdown of Unit 2 Occurred, Resulting from Inability to Return 2 AB EDG to Svc within 72 H Allowed by TS Lco.Appropriate Administrative Actions Have Been Implemented for Individual Involved
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-002, :on 970128,stresses for Piping Was Found to Exceed Allowable Valves During Postulated Dba.Caused by Inadequate Analysis During Original Design.Review Completed as Part of 120 Day Response to GL 96-06 |
- on 970128,stresses for Piping Was Found to Exceed Allowable Valves During Postulated Dba.Caused by Inadequate Analysis During Original Design.Review Completed as Part of 120 Day Response to GL 96-06
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000316/LER-1997-003, :on 970826,determined That Inadequacy of Manual Actions Were Outside Plant Design Basis Due to Performance of Dual Train CCW Outage During 1996 Refueling Outage. Revised Outage Review Process |
- on 970826,determined That Inadequacy of Manual Actions Were Outside Plant Design Basis Due to Performance of Dual Train CCW Outage During 1996 Refueling Outage. Revised Outage Review Process
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-003, :on 970205,determined That Safety Injection Pumps Could Potentially Experience Runout Conditions.Cause Indeterminate.Revised Plant Operating Procedures Re Safety Injection Pump |
- on 970205,determined That Safety Injection Pumps Could Potentially Experience Runout Conditions.Cause Indeterminate.Revised Plant Operating Procedures Re Safety Injection Pump
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000316/LER-1997-003-01, :on 970826,determined That Unit Operated Outside Design Basis During Unit 2 1996 Refueling Outage. Investigation Into Event Continuing.Update to Interim LER Will Be Issued by 971117 |
- on 970826,determined That Unit Operated Outside Design Basis During Unit 2 1996 Refueling Outage. Investigation Into Event Continuing.Update to Interim LER Will Be Issued by 971117
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000316/LER-1997-004-01, :on 970826,change to CCW Temperature W/O Rev to FSAR Resulted in Condition Outside Design Basis. Investigation Into Event Is Continuing.Administrative Limit of 90 Degrees F Was Imposed on Both Units |
- on 970826,change to CCW Temperature W/O Rev to FSAR Resulted in Condition Outside Design Basis. Investigation Into Event Is Continuing.Administrative Limit of 90 Degrees F Was Imposed on Both Units
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000316/LER-1997-004, Re Analysis Which Demonstrates Design Basis Impact of Inadequate Refueling Outage SE Negligible.Ler 97-004-01 Retracted | Re Analysis Which Demonstrates Design Basis Impact of Inadequate Refueling Outage SE Negligible.Ler 97-004-01 Retracted | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000315/LER-1997-004, :on 970228,main Steam Safety Valve Exceeds Allowable Lift Setpoint.Caused by Setpoint Drift.Valve Was Reset to Proper Setpoint |
- on 970228,main Steam Safety Valve Exceeds Allowable Lift Setpoint.Caused by Setpoint Drift.Valve Was Reset to Proper Setpoint
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000316/LER-1997-005-01, :on 970908,discovered That Under Certain Scenarios Vol of Water Resident in Active Sump Vol of Containment May Not Be Adequate to Support Long Term Eccs. Cause Unknown.Analysis Being Performed |
- on 970908,discovered That Under Certain Scenarios Vol of Water Resident in Active Sump Vol of Containment May Not Be Adequate to Support Long Term Eccs. Cause Unknown.Analysis Being Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000316/LER-1997-005, :on 970908,condition Outside Design Basis Resulted in TS Required Shutdown.Caused by Lack of Thorough Review.New Analyses Have Been Completed & Containment Has Been Validated |
- on 970908,condition Outside Design Basis Resulted in TS Required Shutdown.Caused by Lack of Thorough Review.New Analyses Have Been Completed & Containment Has Been Validated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-005-01, Forwards LER 97-005-01 Which Corrects Area Name & LER Number Incorrectly Identified on Pages 2 & 3 of LER | Forwards LER 97-005-01 Which Corrects Area Name & LER Number Incorrectly Identified on Pages 2 & 3 of LER | | | 05000315/LER-1997-005, :on 970313,discovered That Gaskets in Fire Protection Water Spray Sys Had Not Been Properly Fabricated Prior to Installation.Caused by Personnel Error.Removed Old Gasket Matl & Installed New Gaskets |
- on 970313,discovered That Gaskets in Fire Protection Water Spray Sys Had Not Been Properly Fabricated Prior to Installation.Caused by Personnel Error.Removed Old Gasket Matl & Installed New Gaskets
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-006, :on 970327,interim LER Equipment in Containment Rendered Inoperable Due to Cracked Floodup Tubes.Damaged Unit 1 EQ Futs,Replaced |
- on 970327,interim LER Equipment in Containment Rendered Inoperable Due to Cracked Floodup Tubes.Damaged Unit 1 EQ Futs,Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000316/LER-1997-006, :on 971010,rendered Equipment in Containment Inoperable,Due to Faulted Floodup Tubes.Caused by Welding in Vicinity of Floodup Tubes.Damaged Tubes Will Be Replaced |
- on 971010,rendered Equipment in Containment Inoperable,Due to Faulted Floodup Tubes.Caused by Welding in Vicinity of Floodup Tubes.Damaged Tubes Will Be Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000316/LER-1997-007-01, :on 971014,contract Worker Received Exposure in Excess of 10CFR20.2202 Limits.Caused by Hot Particles in Right Shoe.Collected Particles from Shoe & Performed Analysis for Activity |
- on 971014,contract Worker Received Exposure in Excess of 10CFR20.2202 Limits.Caused by Hot Particles in Right Shoe.Collected Particles from Shoe & Performed Analysis for Activity
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-007-01, :on 970405,determined That SG Pressure Indications in CR Had Been Isolated Since 970329.Caused by Procedure Inadequacy.Revised SG Isolation Methodology Contained in Refueling Integrity Surveillance |
- on 970405,determined That SG Pressure Indications in CR Had Been Isolated Since 970329.Caused by Procedure Inadequacy.Revised SG Isolation Methodology Contained in Refueling Integrity Surveillance
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000316/LER-1997-007, :on 971014,contract Worker Received Exposure in Excess of 10CFR20.2202 Limits.Cause of Contamination Is Unknown.Particles Were Removed from Workers Shoe.Attachment 1 Withheld |
- on 971014,contract Worker Received Exposure in Excess of 10CFR20.2202 Limits.Cause of Contamination Is Unknown.Particles Were Removed from Workers Shoe.Attachment 1 Withheld
| | | 05000315/LER-1997-007, :on 970405,TS Surveillance Requirements Not Met.Caused by Personnel Error.Instrument Isolation Valves Were Opened on 970405 |
- on 970405,TS Surveillance Requirements Not Met.Caused by Personnel Error.Instrument Isolation Valves Were Opened on 970405
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000316/LER-1997-008, :on 971024,unplanned ESF Actuation Occurred. Caused by Equipment Failure.Replaced Detector,Interface Box & Computer Components |
- on 971024,unplanned ESF Actuation Occurred. Caused by Equipment Failure.Replaced Detector,Interface Box & Computer Components
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-008, :on 970404,cycle 15 Operation of SGs Outside TS Tube Degradation Acceptance Criteria Occurred.Caused by Inadquate Analysis of Cecco-5 Eddy Data in 1995.Use of Cecco-5 Probes Discontinued |
- on 970404,cycle 15 Operation of SGs Outside TS Tube Degradation Acceptance Criteria Occurred.Caused by Inadquate Analysis of Cecco-5 Eddy Data in 1995.Use of Cecco-5 Probes Discontinued
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-009, :on 970415,radiation Monitor Particulate Channels Inoperable Due to Use of Incorrect Calibration Constant,Discovered.Caused by Personnel Error.Ts Action Statement for Channels W/Tss Were Entered |
- on 970415,radiation Monitor Particulate Channels Inoperable Due to Use of Incorrect Calibration Constant,Discovered.Caused by Personnel Error.Ts Action Statement for Channels W/Tss Were Entered
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(B) | | 05000316/LER-1997-009-01, :on 971126,blockage of Containment Air Recirculation Inlet Line Was Noted.Caused by Concrete Which Entered Line During Repair.Blockage Was Removed & Procedures Were Implemented to Preclude Future Blockages |
- on 971126,blockage of Containment Air Recirculation Inlet Line Was Noted.Caused by Concrete Which Entered Line During Repair.Blockage Was Removed & Procedures Were Implemented to Preclude Future Blockages
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000316/LER-1997-010-01, :on 971210,use of Teflon Packing on Containment Airlock Door Interlock Shaft Resulted in Potentially Degraded Condition.Caused by Unclear Written Work Instruction.Teflon Rings Were Replaced |
- on 971210,use of Teflon Packing on Containment Airlock Door Interlock Shaft Resulted in Potentially Degraded Condition.Caused by Unclear Written Work Instruction.Teflon Rings Were Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000315/LER-1997-010-01, Forwards LER 97-010-01,IAW 10CFR50.73.LER Submitted Contrary to Expected Submittal Date of 971117,which Was Stated in LER 97-010-00,dtd 970909 | Forwards LER 97-010-01,IAW 10CFR50.73.LER Submitted Contrary to Expected Submittal Date of 971117,which Was Stated in LER 97-010-00,dtd 970909 | | | 05000315/LER-1997-010, :on 970808,unit Operation W/Lake Temperature in Excess of Design Basis Value,Was Determined.Caused by Failure to Recognize UFSAR Value & Other Design Aspects. Placed Restrictions on Plant Operation |
- on 970808,unit Operation W/Lake Temperature in Excess of Design Basis Value,Was Determined.Caused by Failure to Recognize UFSAR Value & Other Design Aspects. Placed Restrictions on Plant Operation
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-011, :on 970822,operation Was Noted Outside Design Bases for ECCS & CSP for Switchover to Recirculation Sump Suction.Caused by Ineffective Change Mgt.Revised Procedure for Switchover 01(02) Ohp 4023.ES-1.3 |
- on 970822,operation Was Noted Outside Design Bases for ECCS & CSP for Switchover to Recirculation Sump Suction.Caused by Ineffective Change Mgt.Revised Procedure for Switchover 01(02) Ohp 4023.ES-1.3
| 10 CFR 50.73(b)(1)(ii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-011-02, Forwards LER 97-011-02,re Operation Being Outside Design Bases for ECCS & Containment Spray Pumps for Switchover to Recirculation Sump Suction.Commitments Made by Util,Listed | Forwards LER 97-011-02,re Operation Being Outside Design Bases for ECCS & Containment Spray Pumps for Switchover to Recirculation Sump Suction.Commitments Made by Util,Listed | | | 05000315/LER-1997-012, :on 970826,potential Operation of CCW Sys Above Design Basis Value for Heat Exchanger Outlet Constituted Condition Outside Design Basis.Cause Not Determined.Revised CCW Operating Procedure |
- on 970826,potential Operation of CCW Sys Above Design Basis Value for Heat Exchanger Outlet Constituted Condition Outside Design Basis.Cause Not Determined.Revised CCW Operating Procedure
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000315/LER-1997-012-01, :on 970826,determined That Both Units Had Operated Outside Basis for CCW Max Temperature.Caused by Procedural Error.Procedures Have Been Revised to Delete Ref to 120 Degrees F |
- on 970826,determined That Both Units Had Operated Outside Basis for CCW Max Temperature.Caused by Procedural Error.Procedures Have Been Revised to Delete Ref to 120 Degrees F
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-013, Re Control of RWST Level in Modes 5 & 6.LER 97-013-00 Retracted | Re Control of RWST Level in Modes 5 & 6.LER 97-013-00 Retracted | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-014, :on 970829,potential for Operation in Unanalyzed Condition,Was Determined.Caused by Postulated Elevated Control Room Temperatures.Placed Restrictions on Plant Operation |
- on 970829,potential for Operation in Unanalyzed Condition,Was Determined.Caused by Postulated Elevated Control Room Temperatures.Placed Restrictions on Plant Operation
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-014-01, Forwards LER 97-014-01,IAW 10CFR50.73.LER Submitted Contrary to Expected Submittal Date of 971117,which Was Stated in LER 97-014-00,dtd 970929 | Forwards LER 97-014-01,IAW 10CFR50.73.LER Submitted Contrary to Expected Submittal Date of 971117,which Was Stated in LER 97-014-00,dtd 970929 | | | 05000315/LER-1997-015, :on 970902,discovered That 609 Drumming Room Did Not Meet FSAR Criterion for Monitoring of Fuel & Waste Storage.Interim LER 97-015-00 Retracted |
- on 970902,discovered That 609 Drumming Room Did Not Meet FSAR Criterion for Monitoring of Fuel & Waste Storage.Interim LER 97-015-00 Retracted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-016, :on 970912,operation of RHR Was Contrary to Usfar Section 9.33.Cause Not Determined.Revised Procedures 1/2 Ohp 4021.017.001 |
- on 970912,operation of RHR Was Contrary to Usfar Section 9.33.Cause Not Determined.Revised Procedures 1/2 Ohp 4021.017.001
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-017, :on 970908,condition Outside Design Basis Resulted in TS Required Shutdown.Caused by Lack of Thorough Review.New Analyses Have Been Completed & Containment Has Been Validated |
- on 970908,condition Outside Design Basis Resulted in TS Required Shutdown.Caused by Lack of Thorough Review.New Analyses Have Been Completed & Containment Has Been Validated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-018, :on 970905,failure to Maintain 1/4 Inch Particulate Retention Requirement for Containment Recirculation Was Noted.Caused by Incomplete Design Change RFC-12-2361.Modifications Made |
- on 970905,failure to Maintain 1/4 Inch Particulate Retention Requirement for Containment Recirculation Was Noted.Caused by Incomplete Design Change RFC-12-2361.Modifications Made
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-019, :on 970911,operation Contrary to Design Bases W/Rhr Suction Valves ACI Defeated in Modes 4 & 5.Caused by Inadequate Safety Review.Requested TS Amend to Remove Surveillance Re ACI on RHR Valves |
- on 970911,operation Contrary to Design Bases W/Rhr Suction Valves ACI Defeated in Modes 4 & 5.Caused by Inadequate Safety Review.Requested TS Amend to Remove Surveillance Re ACI on RHR Valves
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-020, :Has Been Canceled |
- Has Been Canceled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-021, :on 970910,potential Loss of All Medium & High Head Injection Occurred to Single Failure Which Could Have Prevented Fulfillment of Safety Function of Sys.Caused by Personnel Error.Revised Ohp 4023.ES-1.3 |
- on 970910,potential Loss of All Medium & High Head Injection Occurred to Single Failure Which Could Have Prevented Fulfillment of Safety Function of Sys.Caused by Personnel Error.Revised Ohp 4023.ES-1.3
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-022, :on 970911,determined That Conditions Had Not Been Properly Established in CCW Sys to Meet Plant Piping Design Code Requirements.Caused by Manual Valves Installed in CCW Sys Piping.Revised Procedure |
- on 970911,determined That Conditions Had Not Been Properly Established in CCW Sys to Meet Plant Piping Design Code Requirements.Caused by Manual Valves Installed in CCW Sys Piping.Revised Procedure
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-023, :on 970916,design Change Introduced Possibility of Single Failure Which Could Result in Loss of Both Trains of ESF Ventilation.Caused by Failure to Identify Adverse Impact.Revised Design Change |
- on 970916,design Change Introduced Possibility of Single Failure Which Could Result in Loss of Both Trains of ESF Ventilation.Caused by Failure to Identify Adverse Impact.Revised Design Change
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-024-03, Forwards LER 97-024-03,re Matl Discovered in Containment Degrades Containment Recirculation Sump & Results in Condition Outside Design Basis.Addition of Info Increased Length of LER to 6 Pages | Forwards LER 97-024-03,re Matl Discovered in Containment Degrades Containment Recirculation Sump & Results in Condition Outside Design Basis.Addition of Info Increased Length of LER to 6 Pages | | | 05000315/LER-1997-024, :on 970917,matl Discovered in Containment Degrades Containment Recirculation Sump.Caused by Inadequate Specifications & Procedures.Specifications & Procedures Revised |
- on 970917,matl Discovered in Containment Degrades Containment Recirculation Sump.Caused by Inadequate Specifications & Procedures.Specifications & Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-025, :on 970923,unplanned ESF Actuation Occurred. Caused by Small Expected Oscillation in SG Levels During Filling Operation.Deadband on SG Low Level Bistables Will Be Changed |
- on 970923,unplanned ESF Actuation Occurred. Caused by Small Expected Oscillation in SG Levels During Filling Operation.Deadband on SG Low Level Bistables Will Be Changed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-026, :on 970925,potential for Overpressurization of Control Air Headers Was Determined to Be Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Lack of Overpressurization Protection. Redundant SR Relief Valves Were Installed |
- on 970925,potential for Overpressurization of Control Air Headers Was Determined to Be Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Lack of Overpressurization Protection. Redundant SR Relief Valves Were Installed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(A) | | 05000315/LER-1997-027-01, :on 971028,potential for Unit to Be Outside Design Basis & Possibly in non-compliance w/10CFR50.46(b)(2) Was Noted.Caused by Use of Ifba Fuel Rods.Evaluation Is Ongoing & Will Be Completed by 980116 |
- on 971028,potential for Unit to Be Outside Design Basis & Possibly in non-compliance w/10CFR50.46(b)(2) Was Noted.Caused by Use of Ifba Fuel Rods.Evaluation Is Ongoing & Will Be Completed by 980116
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-027, :on 971028,both Units Had Potential to Be Outside Design Basis & Possibly in Noncompliance W/ 10CFR50.46(b)(2).Cause Is Under Investigation.Comprehensive Plan Developed |
- on 971028,both Units Had Potential to Be Outside Design Basis & Possibly in Noncompliance W/ 10CFR50.46(b)(2).Cause Is Under Investigation.Comprehensive Plan Developed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000315/LER-1997-028, :on 971107,failure to Comply w/10CFR50,App R Requirements Resulted in Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Misunderstanding of Need to Request Exemption for Use of Fire stops.Re-established Fire Watch |
- on 971107,failure to Comply w/10CFR50,App R Requirements Resulted in Unanalyzed Condition.Caused by Misunderstanding of Need to Request Exemption for Use of Fire stops.Re-established Fire Watch
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) |
|