ML17333A450
| ML17333A450 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 05/10/1996 |
| From: | Reinhart M NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Fitzpatrick E AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP., INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17333A451 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-M92589, TAC-M92590, NUDOCS 9605170404 | |
| Download: ML17333A450 (5) | |
Text
May 10, 1996 Mr. E.
E. Fitzpatrick, Vice President Indiana Michigan Power Company c/o American Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza
- Columbus, Ohio 43215
SUBJECT:
D.C.
- COOK, UNITS 1
AND 2, ASME SECTION XI RELIEF FOR REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM BRANCH CONNECTION WELDS (TAC NOS.
H92589 AND H92590)
Dear Hr. Fitzpatrick:
The staff reviewed and evaluated the information provided by Indiana Michigan Power Company (IHPCo) in its letters dated June 5,
1995 and January 19,
- 1996, related to relief from IHPCo's Inservice Inspection (ISI) program.
Based on the information submitted, the staff has concluded that compliance with the Code examination requirements contained in Request for Relief No.
RCSBCW, Part I (preservice inspection (PSI)) would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increa'se in the level of quality and safety.
Therefore, Part 1 (PSI) of Request of Relief No.
RCSBCW is authorized pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii).
The staff has concluded that for Part 1 (first ISI interval) and Part 2
(second ISI interval) the proposed alternatives contained in Request for Relief No.
RCSBCW provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.
Therefore, Part 1 (first ISI interval) and Part 2 (second ISI interval) of Request for Relief No.
RCSBCW are authorized pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i).
The staff's evaluation and conclusions are contained in the enclosed safety evaluation.
Sincerely, Docket Nos.
50-315 and 50-316 Original Signed By:
Hark Reinhart, Acting Director Project Directorate III-I Division of Reactor Projects - III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
1.
Safety Evaluation 2.
Technical Letter Report cc w/encl:-
See. next page DISTRIBUTION:
See next page DOCUMENT NAME:
G:)WPDOCStI,DCCOOK)C092598.REL
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE To receive e copy of this document, tndlcete In the boxu C
~ Copy without ettechment/enclosure E" a Copy with ettechment/enclosure N
a No copy OFFICE NAME DATE CJamerson S'/7/96 JHickman.
~/ 7 /96.
MYoun 05/01/96 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY LA:PD31 E
PM:PD31 E
- OGC (A)D: PD31 MReinhart 5 /y/96 fi ~ g PgP PP)gm gQPV 9605i70404 9605i0 PDR ADOCK 050003i5 P
'DR
I 4
'i CF
~
~
DISTRIBUTION FOR D. C.
COOK RELIEF RE UEST DATED:
May 10, 1996 7D'ocke.t. File g
PUBLIC PD3-I R/F JRoe EAdensam(EGAI)
HReinhart CJamerson JHickman OGC GHill(2)
- BMcCabe, EDO,(017G21)
WKropp, RIII cc:
Plant Service list
~
~
lr, I.
H
~P,A II500
+4 PO 0O
.r, 9 r Y.
4y
+~
~0~
++*++
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 May 10, 1996 Mr. E.
E. Fitzpatrick, Vice President Indiana Michigan Power Company c/o American Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza
- Columbus, Ohio 43215
SUBJECT:
D.C.
- COOK, UNITS 1
AND 2, ASHE SECTION XI RELIEF FOR REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM BRANCH CONNECTION WELDS (TAC NOS.
M92589 AND H92590)
Dear Hr. Fitzpatrick:
The staff'reviewed and evaluated the information provided by Indiana Michigan Power Company (IHPCo) in its letters dated June 5,
1995 and January 19,
- 1996, related to relief from NPCO's Inservice Inspection (ISI) program.
Based on the information submitted, the staff has concluded that compliance with the Code examination requirements contained in Request for Relief No.
RCSBCW, Part 1 (preservice: inspection (PSI)) would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety.
Therefore, Part 1 (PSI) of Request of Relief No.
RCSBCW is authorized pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(ii).
The staff has concluded that for Part I (first ISI interval) and Part 2
(second ISI interval) the proposed alternatives contained in Request for Relief No.
RCSBCW provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.
Therefore, Part 1 (first ISI interval) and Part 2 (second ISI interval) of Request for Relief No.
RCSBCW are authorized pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i).
The staff's evaluation and conclusions are contained in the enclosed safety evaluation.
Sincer ly, Docket Nos.
50-315 and 50-316 Hark Reinhart, Acting Director Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Projects III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
1.
Safety Evaluation 2.
Technical Letter Report cc w/encl:
See next page