ML17331A237
| ML17331A237 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 10/31/1980 |
| From: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Dolan J INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8011180194 | |
| Download: ML17331A237 (8) | |
Text
Ki~@III:"xi<lI Kf<W<
Distribution Docket Fi 1 e 50-315 and 50-316 NRC PDRs (2)
Local PDR TERA NSIC NRR Reading ORB1 Reading T. Novak S. Varga Miner C. Parrish OCTOBER 3 1 1980 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316
Dear Mr. Dolan:
Mr. John Dolan, Vice President Indiana and Michigan Electric Company Post Office Box 18 Bowling Green Station New York, New York 10004 8E (3)
- Attorney, OEQL J.
RdK J.
HeCtemes~
B. tIhnili G.Mgprkl~
x5 4
~~ca~
By letters of January 8 and June 30, 1980 and during a telephone discussion with members of your staff on August 5, 1980, you were requested to revise I ~hihfff Ii I* f I I Idd..d Idfd d I II III Specifically, interrelationshi'ps of actions in responding to safeguards con-tingencies require further clarification.
Me recognize that the enclosure to your letter of April 21, 1980 does identify organization elements which are assigned responsibilities for decisions and actions under the contingencies.
However, the tabular format of that enclosure provides insufficient linkage between decision-making and action-taking entities to present a clear enough picture of the interrelationships upon which to base plan approval.
Adoption of a matrix format more closely resembling that of Regulatory Guide 5.54 is therefore needed.
It is our understanding that you believe youp present plan to be sufficiently comprehensive since the additional information appears in on-site procedures in support of the plan.
Me do not have access to these detailed procedures nor do we desire the submission of that level of detail required for on-site use.
- However, we do require sufficient infor-mation in the plan to provide a clear understanding of the interrelationships
,- between decision-making and action-taking.
Me therefore cannot accept-your Safeguards Contingency Plan in the absence of this additional infor-mation.,please revise the Responsibility Matrix to your plan and submit it along with'. your response to our June 30, 1980 request for additional information within 30 days of receipt of. this letter.
Sincerely, cc:
See next page O'Qll~
,Original signed by':
S. A. Varga Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 81 Division of Licensing OFFICE/
SURNAME DATE P DL:ORB1
...SNioar.:ih...
./.80 92,2260 NRC FORM 318 {9 76) NRCM 0240 AU.S. GOVERNMENT pRINTING OFFICEt 1979.289-369
'I I gt(
a L
H 4
tV gi)
A t/
9 h
Distribution Docket Files 50-315 I8E (3) and 50-316 Attorney, OELD NRC PDRs (2)
J.
Roe Local PDR J.
Heltemes Docket Nos. 50-315 TERA P.
guniIt'nd 50-316 NSIC NRR Reading ORBl Reading T. Novak Nr. John olan, Yice President Indiana andiMichigan Electric Comp Post Office Box 18 Bowling Green Station New York, New York 10004
Dear fir. Dolan:
'S By letters of January 8 and June 30, 1980 and during a telephone discussion with members of your',staff on August 5, 1980, you were requested to revise the Res onsibilit Natrix of the Donald C. Cook Safeguards Contingency Plan.
Specs hca y, eterne atsonshIps of actIons In responding to safeguards con-tingencies requit e further clarification.
Me recognize that the enc @sure to your letter of April 21, 1980 does identify organization elements which are assigned responsibilities for decisions and actions under 0 e contingencies.
However, the tabular format of that enclosure prov es insufficient linkage between decision-making and action-taking entiti to present a clear enough picture of the'interrelationships upon which to base plan approval.
Adoption of a matrix fqrmat more closely resembl g that of Regulatory Guide 5.54 is therefore needed.
It is our understanding that you believe your present plan to be sufficiently comprehensive since the addit'i nal information appears in on-site procedures in support of the plan.
e do not have access to these detailed procedures nor do we desire th isubmission of that level of detail required for on-site use.
ife therefore cannot accept your Safeguards Contingency Plan in the absence of thi's additional information.
Please revise the Responsibility tlatrix to your pit and submit it along with your response to our June 30, 1980 request for dditional information within 30 days of receipt of, this letter.
Sincerely, cc:
See next page Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch Division of Licensing OFFICE $
SURNAME
...SN! n e..
DATE/
I g/IEI/gg.
NRC FORM 318 {9.76) NRCM 0240
/80 AV.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1979.289'369
0 I'
J l
I k
JI
/I
~l(
~
REqII 0
0
+~
~O aI***4 Docket Nos.
50-315 and 50-316 UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 October 31, 1980 Mr. John Dolan, Vice President Indiana and Michigan Electric Company Post Office Box 18 Bowling Green Station New York, New York 10004
Dear Mr. Dolan:
By letters of January 8 and June 30, 1980 and during a telephone discussion with members of your staff on August 5, 1980, you were requested to revise 1 ~lid'
<<1 Id C
d C
1 11 Specifically, interrelationships of actions in responding to safeguards con-tingencies require further clarification.
We recognize that the enclosure to your letter of April 21, 1980 does identify organization elements which are assigned responsibilities for decisions and actions under the contingencies.
However, the tabular format of that enclosure provides insufficient linkage between decision-making and action-taking entities to present a clear enough picture of the interrelationships upon which to base plan approval.
Adoption of a matrix format more closely resembling that of Regulatory Guide 5.54 is therefore needed.
lt is our understanding that you believe your present plan to be sufficiently comprehensive since the additional information appears in on-site procedures in su'pport of the plan.
We do not have access to these detailed procedures nor do we desire the submission of that level of detail required for on-site use.
- However, we do require sufficient infor-mation in the plan to provide a clear understanding of the interrelationships between decision-making and action-taking.
We therefore cannot accept your Safeguards Contingency Plan in the absence of this additional infor-mation.
Please revise the Responsibility Matrix to your plan and submit it along with your response to our June 30, 1980 request for additional
'nformation within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
Sincerely, een~i.
- Varga, C
ef ev Operating Reactors anch 81 Division of Licensing cc:
See next page h
h MPH
Mr. Jchn Dolan Indiana and Michigan Electric Compare October 31, 1980 cc:
Mr. Robert W. Jurgensen Chief Nuclear Engineer American Electric Power Service Corporation 2 Broadway New York, New York 10004 Gerald Charnoff, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 Citizens for a Better Environment 59 East Van Buren Street Chicago, Illinois 60605 Maude Preston Palenske Memorial Library 500 Market Street St. Joseph, Michigan 49085 Mr. D. Shaller, Plant Manager Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Plant P. 0.
Box 458 Bridgman, Michigan 49106 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors Office 770 Ped Arrow Highway Stevensvi lie, Michigan 49127 William J. Scanlon, Esquire 2034'auline Boulevard Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103
NOV 6 1980