ML17329A208

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-315/91-24 & 50-316/91-24 on 910916-19. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program,Including Changes,External & Internal Exposure Control,Contamination Control,Surveys & Monitoring
ML17329A208
Person / Time
Site: Cook  
Issue date: 10/08/1991
From: Louden P, Paul R, Schumacher M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17329A206 List:
References
50-315-91-24, 50-316-91-24, NUDOCS 9110170068
Download: ML17329A208 (7)


See also: IR 05000315/1991024

Text

U.S.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Report Nos.

50-315/91024(DRSS);

50-316/91024(DRSS)

Docket Nos. 50-315;

50-316

Licensee:

Indiana Michigan Power

Company

1 Riverside Plaza

Columbus,

OH

43216

License

Nos.

DPR-58;

DPR-74

Facility Name:

D.

C.

Cook Nuclear Plant, Units

1 and

2

Inspection At:

D. C.

Cook Site,

Bridgman, Michigan

Inspection

Conducted:

Se tember 16-19,

1991 (On-site)

~

~

~

Inspectors:

R. A.

aul

yrl

P. L. Louden

Approved By:

M. C. Schumacher,

Chief

Radiological Controls

and

Chemistry Section

ic j'yy

/%/g/'

e

i~i/pr

ate

Ins ection

Summar

Ins ection

on Se tember 16-19

1991

(Re ort Nos.

(50-315/91024(DRSS);

~d:

d

.

dd

d

d

f

d

dd 'd

protection program,

including:

changes

( IP 83750); external

exposure

control

(IP 83750); internal exposure

control

( IP 83750); contamination control,

surveys,

and monitoring;

ALARA ( IP 83750); plant tours;

and licensee

actions

for previous inspection findings

( IP 92701).

Results:

During the course of the inspection,

one apparent violation was

identified for failure to follow procedures

while exiting the Radiation Control

Area (RCA).

The licensee's

Radiation

Work Permit

(RWP) program, plant

cleanliness,

and facility upgrades

were identified as strengths.

The radiation

protection group is well staffed,

however; Radiation Protection Technician

station experience

is limited.

Management

support for the radiological

control

and

ALARA programs is continuing to improve.

Weaknesses

were

identified in radiological access

controls

and in poor follow up of

identified contaminations

of modesty garments.

9fi0170068 9i2008

PDR

ADOCK 050003%5

G

PDR

Persons

Contacted

DETAILS

'.

  • A. Blind, Plant Manager,

D.C.

Cook (DCC)

.

  • S. Colvis, Radiation Support

NOD, American Electric Power Service

Corporation

(AEPSC)

  • S. DeLong, Supervisor,

Production Engineering,

DCC

  • E. Fitzpatrick, Vice President,

Nuclear Operations,

AEPSC

  • J. Fryer,

TPS/RMC Supervisor,

DCC

  • K. Haglund,

TPS/Chemistry Supervisor,

DCC

  • D. Loope, TPS/Plant Radiation Protection Supervisor,

DCC

  • D. Noble,.TPS/Health

Physicist,

DCC

  • L. Umphrey, Administrative Compliance Coordinator,

DCC

  • D. Williams, TPS/Health Physicist,

DCC

  • J. Wojci k, TPS/Superintendent,

DCC

The inspectors

also interviewed other licensee

personnel

in various

departments

in the course of the inspection.

  • Present at the Exit Meeting on September

19,

1991.

General

This inspection

was conducted

to review the licensee's

radiation

protection

program.

The inspectors

toured the licensee's facility to

observe posting,

labeling and access

control.

Independent

measurements

included direct radiation readings

and co~tamination

smear

measurements;

no smears

were in excess

of 100 dpm/100cm

and all direct measurements

were comparable

to posted radiation levels.

Licensee Action on Previous

Ins ection Findin

s (IP 92701)

(Open)

Open Item (315/91015-02;

316/91015-02):

Onsite disposal

of

low level radioactive sludge.

The licensee is continuing to prepare

information for submittal to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

to request

disposal

pursuant to

a

10 CFR 20.302 approval.

Completion

of the submittal is expected

in the near future.

(Closed)

Open Item (315/91008-01;

316/9100-01):

Installation of control

devices for EHRA gates.

Automatic closure devices

have

been installed

and tested

on all

EHRA gates,

several

of which were verified installed

and working by the inspectors.

In addition to these

devices,

automated

control access

devices

readers

(ACADs) with associated

strobe lights

are installed

on several of the

EHRA gates.

Installation of the strobe

lights and

ACADs on the remaining

EHRA gates is expected

to be completed

during the first refueling outage

in 1992.

(Closed)

Open Item (315/91015-01;

316/91015-01):

Error in airborne

release

calculations.

The licensee

has reviewed

and submitted corrections

for those

semi-annual

effluent reports written since the

1983 inception of

the

MIDAS code.

In addition, the licensee

has

implemented corrective

actions including,

a comparison

between

the

MIDAS code

and the

ODCM on

both

an annual basis,

and following any change to either

MIDAS or the

ODCM.

These actions

appear

adequate

to correct the discrepancy;

this

item is considered

closed.

Chan

es (IP 83750)

The inspectors

reviewed

changes

made since the last inspection

in the

organization,

equipment,

procedures, facilities, and implementation

of the licensee's

radiological protection

program.

The health physics staff has lost six technicians

in the past year, three

of which were promotion transfers

to other departments.

Although this is

about

a ten percent

turnover, it does not appear

to have

had

a significant

impact on staff stabi lity.

Forty-three of the fifty-three house

technicians

and all twenty-six contractor technicians

are

ANSI 3.1

qualified.

The junior technicians,

technicians,

and senior technicians

average

three years,

six years,

and nine years

industry experience

respectively

and

one year,

one

and

a half years,

and six years station

experience

respectively.

The technician

supervisors

average

about

fourteen years

industry experience

and about nine years station

experience.

Station experience f'r the junior and regular techs

appeared

to be limited.

The licensee

has recently encouraged

the technicians

to participate

in an

in house training program for National Registry of Radiation Protection

Technology

(NRRPT) certification.

Currently there are twenty four in

house technicians

and nine contractor technicians participating.

In

addition, the licensee

has also purchased

contractor

health physics

and

mathematics

cour se material for interested

technicians

and staff.

Overall,

the staff is comprised of a sufficient number of professionals

and

technicians with good support

from upper management.

The licensee is currently constructing

a

new hot tool crib storage

and

distribution facility.

The new facility, which includes

space for

tool/equipment

surveys

and storage,

appears

to be

a considerable

improvement over. the old facility in which several

radiological control

problems

had been identified.

The licensee is also modifying all of the frisker booth monitoring

stations

in the auxiliary building.

The new booths will house

hand

and foot monitors

and be seismically qualified.

External

Ex osure Control (IP 83750)

I

The inspectors

reviewed selected

standing

and special

Radiation

Work

Permits

(RWPs) for appropriateness

of the radiation protection

requirements

based

on work scope,

location,

and conditions

and found

the

RWPs to be thorough

and complete.

The inspectors

found- the manner

in which information was presented

to be easy to follow and special

requirements

wer e clearly understandable.

The inspectors

ident ified

the methods of conveying dress

requirements for specific jobs and the

itemization of jobs covered

by

RWPs to be

a program good practice.

'nternal

Ex osure Control

( IP 83750)

Through reviews of whole body count

and dosimetry records,

the inspectors

determined that

no licensee

personnel

received greater

than the 40

NPC-hour regulatory limit since the last inspection.

The inspectors

reviewed recent calibration

and daily energy

gC checks for the

FASTSCAN

whole body counter.

All checks

were well documented

and performed

according to procedures.

The inspectors

reviewed the licensee's

program for respiratory protection.

A selective

review of wearer qualification records

indicated

no

discrepancies.

Respirator fit testing,

usage,

issuance,

accountability,

storage,

deconning,

and maintenance

progr'ams

were reviewed

and appeared

to be performing adequately.

An internal surveillance of the respiratory protection

program performed

in August 1991 identified the licensee

does not use unique fittings for

respiratory protection equipment.

The "Chicago" fitting

is used

for service air, breathing air, plant water,

and nitrogen spargers.

This practice is inconsistent with NUREG-0041 which specifies that all

fittings and

components

shall

be standardized

so that the introduct'ion

of nonrespirable

gases

and materials into the respirator

system is

impossible.

The licensee

indicated that corrective actions

were underway

to standardize

the fittings for respiratory

equipment.

This matter

was

identified as

an open

item until the corrective actions

were completed

and was discussed

at the exit interview.

(Open Item 315/91024-01;

316/91024-01)

7.

A review of analyses

and tests for breathing air quality indicated all

supplies

met the Compressed

Gas Association

Grade

"D" requirements.

Control of Radioactive Materials

and Contamination,

Surve

s

an

on> orsn

The inspectors

reviewed routine surveys

performed in the

RCA, and found

them to be properly documented

and reviewed.

Additionally, the inspectors

reviewed calibration records for selected

portable

survey instruments

and

found all records to be current

and complete.

The licensee

maintains

a sufficient inventory of survey instruments

and those

in need of

repair/calibration

are clearly labeled.

A review of Condition Reports

indicated

an incident involving contaminated

material discovered

outside the

RCA.

In a letter to the

NRC dated July

16, 1991, the licensee detailed events

and investigations

surrounding

the

discovery of contaminated

material in the licensee

s scrapyard.

The

material

was traced to the 1970's

and to the Steam Generator

Repair

Project of 1988.

All the material discovered

was fixed, with levels at

2,000

dpm or below.

The inspectors

noted the thorough investigation,

notification to the

NRC, and plans to perform surveys of the entire

scrapyard for additional

contaminated

material.

The inspectors

reviewed records for required

sealed

source

leak tests,

and found all tests to be current

and complete.

All calibration sources

reviewed were traceable

to National Institute of Standards

and Technology

specifications.

The licensee

had recorded

56 personnel. contaminations

(PERCONs) for the

year.

The inspectors

noted that approximately

80 percent of the

PERCONs

were attributed to "clean areas"

of the plant.

The licensee

provides

modesty

garments

(MGs) for workers entering the

RCA which are

recommended

for use under Anti-contamination clothing (Anti-C's).

PERCONs are not

recorded for contamination

detected

on the

MGs.

However, all particle

detections

are recorded

and skin doses

assigned.

The licensee

does

not

track modesty

garment contaminations,

and when queried

by inspectors for

numbers

associated

with MG contaminations

a number could not be provided.

The licensee

indicated that

some of the

MG contaminations

are investigated

by technicians.

This item was discussed

at the exit interview with the

inspectors

noting that an aggressive

contamination control program

typically follows up on all contaminations

to accurately

assess

potential

undetected

contamination.

The licensee

commented that

an evaluation

would have to be conducted

to determine

the extent of changes

necessary

to implement tracking and investigating of MG contaminations.

Maintainin

Ex osure Control

ALARA ( IP 83750)

During a previous inspection

(IR91008), the licensee

indicated they were

considering installing permanent

scaffolding structures

in the containment

and possible

removal of the Resistance

Temperature

Detector

(RTD) Bypass

Loop Line during the next refueling outage

scheduled for 1992.

Both

initiatives would save considerable

dose during future outages.

The

licensee

indicated that although these initiatives are still being

considered, it appears

more likely that during the next refueling outage

installation of the permanent

scaffolding will occur and less likely

that the

RTD line will be removed

because

of cost/benefit considerations.

However, the licensee

plans

on

a contractor performing

an

RTD line

decontamination

as

an experiment during the next Unit 2 refueling

outage with the hopes of achieving

a significant decontamination factor.

Significant initiatives to reduce radia'tion fields during the next

refueling outage

include; experimental

RTD line chemical

decontamination

(vendor provided);

and controlling

RCS temperature

and

pH during shutdown

to solubilize

crud from the system

and recover it on the demineralizers.

The later initiative was used during

a forced outage

in early

1991

and the

licensee

c'1aims that approximately

400 curies of cobalt was

removed from

the system.

The scheduling of work outside the initial scope during previous

outages

resulted

in poorly planned work and work without adequate

ALARA review.

This was

a weakness

identified during

a maintenance

team inspection.

To

correct that weakness

the licensee

plans

on performing the scope of the

next refueling outages

without making other than necessary

changes

during

the course of the outage.

The station goal for 1991 is about

85 person-rem.

Through August 1991,

the licensee

was at about

75% of the goal.

Although there were

no

refueling outages

in 1991 there were

4 weeks of outage activities from

the 1989 refueling outage

and

6 weeks of forced outage activities.

The

licensee's

projected three year average

dose

per reactor is about

200

person-rem;

the national

average for the

same perjod was about 300.

The

inspectors

noted the licensee

is continuing to strengthen

the

ALARA

program.

Tours

The inspectors

made several facility tours throughout

the inspection

period to observe

posting

and labeling, radiological controls

and to

observe

personnel

performing various jobs.

During the tours it was

noted that plant cleanliness

was good.

During one tour, the inspectors

noted

a contaminated

area

improperly

posted.

The area

had

a step off pad in place but did not have tape or

a sign to clearly designate

the boundary of the contaminated

area.

HP

Production supervisors

were informed of the inadequate

posting,

agreed

with the inspectors

observations,

and corrected

the problem in a timely

manner.

On another tour, the inspectors

observed

three individuals alarm the

personnel

contamination monitors

(PCMs) at the turbine building exit;

no

RP technicians

were in the immediate

area at the time and

no acknow-

ledgment of the alarms

was

made

by the

RP staff.

The workers proceeded

to attempt decontamination efforts

on the areas

indicated

by the monitors

(head

and hand).

These efforts involved the cleaning of their respective

hard hats

and either wiping or washing their hands.

After deconning,

the

individuals cleared

the

PCMs and exited the area.

No attempt

was

made

to notify RP of the alarms to request

assistance

as required

by procedures

and posted instructions.

During

a previous inspection,

(IR-91008) similar

weaknesses

were noted in the access-egress

controls at the

same control

point, and were discussed

with the licensee.

To strengthen

the controls

the licensee

posted written instructions for workers to follow after

alarming the

PCM, and installed

a telephone for use to inform RP.

However,

no significant measures

were taken to provide sufficient

RP

coverage/observance

of this control point.

These events

were continuing

examples of failure to follow procedures for exiting the

RCA. (Violation:

315/91024-01;

316/91024-01).

Overall, the general

housekeeping

of the

RCA appeared

very good.

~0en Items

Open items are matters

which have

been discussed

with the licensee,

which

will be reviewed further by the inspectors,

and which involve some action

on the part of the

NRC or licensee,

or both.

Open

items disclosed

during

the inspection

are discussed

in Section 5.

Exit Interview

The scope

and findings of the inspection

were reviewed with licensee

representatives

(Section

1) at the conclusion of the inspection

on

September

19, 1991.

The licensee

did not identify any documents

as

proprietary.

The following matters

were specifically discussed

by the

inspectors:

a.

The violation of procedural

requirements

(section 9).

b.

Followup of modesty

garment

contaminations

(section 7).

c.

Plant cleanliness,

upgrade of facilities, improvement in the

ALARA

program,

and initiatives to certify technicians

in NRRPT (Sections

9, 4,

and 8).

d.

The Open Item concerning

the installation of unique fittings for

respiratory protection equipment

(Section 6).