ML17329A026

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 910320-0430.Violation Noted:Inadequate post-maint Testing Performed on Chemical & Vol Control Sys cross-tie Valve 1-CS-536
ML17329A026
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 05/16/1991
From: Beverly Clayton
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17329A027 List:
References
50-315-91-10, NUDOCS 9105290146
Download: ML17329A026 (1)


Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Indiana Michigan Power Company

Columbus, Ohio Docket No. 50-315 During an NRC inspection conducted on March 20 through Apri 1 30,
1991, a

vio1ation of NRC requirements was identified.

In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, as implemented by the D.

C.

Cook Updated gua1ity Assurance Program Description, Section 1.17.11

{Test Control), requires that post-maintenance test prerequisites be specified in test procedures and in the post-maintenance tests that are performed in accordance with established programs to demonstrate that 'structures,

systems, and components will perform satisfactorily in service.

Contrary to the above, on December 21,

1991, inadequate post-maintenance testing was performed on the Unit 1 Chemical and Volume Control System Cross-Tie Valve 1-CS-536, in that a necessary post-maintenance test prerequisite, to pressurize the body-to-bonnet region and verify Code pressure boundary integrity, during valve cycling, was not'ccomplished.

This is a Severity Leve I IV vio1ati on (Supp 1 ement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Indiana Michigan Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region III, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).

This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason for the vio1ation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation,

{2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results

achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked,

'r why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Date 9>0S290SOS 9S05j.e PDR ADQCK 050003i5 8

PDR rent ayto se Reactor Projects Branch 2A