ML17328A317

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Informs That Util Response to Bulletin 89-003, Potential Loss of Required Shutdown Margin During Refueling Operations, Acceptable
ML17328A317
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 06/29/1990
From: Giitter J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Alexich M
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
References
IEB-89-003, IEB-89-3, TAC-75417, TAC-75418, NUDOCS 9007160297
Download: ML17328A317 (6)


Text

June 29, 1990 Docket Nos.

50-315 and 50-316 Hr. Hilton P. Alexich Indiana Hichigan Power Company c/o American Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza

Columbus, Ohio 43216

Dear Hr. Alexich:

SUBJECT:

D. C.

COOK UNITS 1 AND 2 - RESPONSE TO BULLETIN 89-03 (TAC NOS.

75417 AND 75418)

On November 21, 1989, the NRC staff issued Bulletin 89-03, "Potential Loss of Required Shutdown Hargin During Refueling Operations."

The bulletin requested that all PWR licensees and PWR construction permit holders take the actions described in the bulletin to ensure that an adequate shutdown margin is maintained during all refueling operations.

To accomplish this, three actions were described:

1.

Assure that any intermediate fuel assembly configuration (including control rods) intended to be used during refueling is identified and evaluated to maintain sufficient refueling boron concentration to result in a minimum margin of approximately 5X.

2.

Assure that fuel loading procedures only allow those intermediate fuel assembly configurations that do not violate the allowable shutdown margin and that these procedures are strictly adhered to.

3.

Assure that the staff responsible for refueling operations is trained in the procedures recommended in Item 2 above and understand the potential consequences of violating these procedures.

This training should include the fundamental aspects of criticality control with enriched fuel assemblies.

By letter dated January 26, 1990 (AEP:NRC:1111), your response to Bulletin 89-03 indicated that programs will be implemented to address all three action described above.

Therefore, the staff considers your response to Bulletin 89-03 to be satisfactory and TAC Nos.

75417 and 75418 to be closed.

Sincere ly,

/s/

Joseph G. Giitter, Project Hanager Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V 5 Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION RRETTIEl NRC 8 LOCAL PDRs OGC EJORDAN PD31 R/F ACRS(10)

PSMUTTLEllORTM JZWOLINSKI JGI ITTER DLABARGE PH 1:DRSP R

z. /90 ypgygh0257 900629 g

PDC PDR ADO'< <>~<>~~

(A)

D31-DRSP RPI SON 6h.g 90 (u(

l(g COOK B89-03 TAC 75417/8

f C

h l

.i S

1 II I

1

gp,R IlECy D$

++*++

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 3une 29, 1990 Docket Nos.

50-315 and 50-316 Mr. Milton P. Alexich Indiana Michigan Power Company c/o American Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza

Columbus, Ohio 43216

Dear Mr. Alexich:

SUBJECT:

D. C.

COOK UNITS 1

AND 2 - RESPONSE TO BULLETIN 89-03 (TAC NOS.

75417 AND 75418)

On November 21, 1989, the NRC staff issued Bulletin 89-03, "Potential Loss of Required Shutdown Margin During Refueling Operations."

The bulletin requested that all PWR licensees and PWR construction permit holders take the actions described in the bulletin to ensure that an adequate shutdown margin is maintained during all refueling operations.

To accomplish this, three actions were described:

1.

Assure that any intermediate fuel assembly configuration (including control rods) intended to be used during refueling is identified and evaluated to maintain sufficient refueling boron concentration to result in a minimum margin of approximately 5X.

2.

Assure that fuel loading procedures only allow those intermediate fuel assembly configurations that do not violate the allowable-shutdown margin and that these procedures are strictly adhered to.

3.

Assure that the staff responsible for refueling operations is trained in the procedures recommended in Item 2 above and understand the potential consequences of violating these procedures.

This training should include the fundamental aspects of criticality control with enriched fuel assemblies.

By letter dated January 26, 1990 (AEP:NRC:1111), your response to Bulletin 89-03 indicated that programs will be implemented to address all three action described above.

Therefore, the staff considers your response to Bulletin 89-03 to be satisfactory and TAC Nos.

75417 and 75418 to be closed.

Sincerely, seph G. Giitter, Project Manager Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V 5 Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

J'

~

I

1 4

Mr. Milton Alexich Indiana Michigan Power Company Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant CC:

Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Attorney General Department of Attorney General 525 West Ottawa Street Lansing, Michigan 48913

,Township Supervisor Lake Township Hall Post Office Box 818 Bridgman, Michigan 49106 Al Blind, Plant Manager Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant Post Office Box 458 Bridgman, Michigan 49106 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors Office 7700 Red Arrow Highway Stevensville, Michigan 49127 Gerald Charnoff, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 2300 N Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20037 Mayor, City of Bridgman Post Office Box 366 Bridgman, Michigan 49106 Special Assistant to the Governor Room 1 - State Capitol Lansing, Michigan 48909 Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section Office Division of Radiological Health Department of Public Health 3500 N. Logan Street Post Office Box 30035 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Mr. S.

Brewer American Electr,ic Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza

Columbus, Ohio 43216

0 Cj k