Text

Forwards Corrected Page 2 to Ltr Transmitting Insp Repts 50-315/85-13 & 50-316/85-13 Due to Typos
	ML17326A976
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	09/11/1985
From:	Paperiello C; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Dolan J; AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP., INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
References
	NUDOCS 8509160231
	Download: ML17326A976 (4)
	v • d • e

SEP ~11995

Docket No. 50-31

American Electric Power Service

Corporation

Indiana

and Michigan Electric Company

ATTN:

Mr. John

E. Dolan

Vice Chairman

Engineering

and Construction

1 Riverside Plaza

Columbus,

OH

43216

Gentlemen:

We recently transmitted to you Inspection Report Nos.

50-315/85013(DRS)

and

50-316/85013(DRS)

which contained

minor typographical

errors.

Please

replace

page

2 of the original cover leter with the attached

page to

this letter.

Please

contact

me if you have

any questions

regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

Enclosure:

As stated

cc w/enclosure:

W. G. Smith, Jr., Plant Manager

DMS/Document Control

Desk

(RIDS)

Resident

Inspector, RIII

Ronald Callen, Michigan

Public Service

Commission

EIS Coordinator,

USEPA

Region

5 Office

Nuclear Facilities

and

Environmental

Monitoring

Section

Carl J.

Pa eriello, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

RIII

Gu demond/lc

eye

0

9/P/85

RII

a

iello

Vn

8509i6023i 8509ii

PDR

ADQCK 050003i5'

PDR

A~~ I

~ I'

y li

lt

I

1

14

American Electric Power Service

Corpokation

SEP 11 1985

As discussed

in Paragraph 2.r of the enclosed report, it was identified that

a

difference of opinion exists

between your staff and that of the

NRC over your

commitments relative to sealing certain fire barrier penetrations.

In order

to provide expeditious resolution of this issue,

we understand

that you will

provide your position

on this matter to the Region III Office two weeks

following your receipt of this inspection report.

During the course of this inspection it was determined that

a number of previously

identified issues

requiring action

on your part and impacting your implementa-

tion of 10 CFR 50.48

and Appendix

R remain

open

(Paragraphs

2.p, 2.t(16),

2.t(17), 2.t(10), 2.t(24), 2.t(25), 2.t(26),

and 2.v).

In addition, several

new issues

were identified which require action

on your part and which impact

your implementation of 10 CFR 50.48 and Appendix

R (Paragraphs

4, 5.a, 6, 7, 8,

and 9.d).

These

issues

must be resolved consistent with your currently

approved fire protection implementation

schedule

(two months following the

1985 Unit 2 refueling outage).

In accordance

with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's

regulations,

a copy of

this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the

NRC Public Document

Room.

The response

requested

by this letter is not subject to the clearance

procedures

of the Office of Management

and Budget as required

by the

Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980,

PL 96-511.

We will gladly discuss

any questions

you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

Enclosure:

Inspection

Report

Nos. 50-315/85013(DRS);

and 50-316/85013(DRS)

cc w/enclosure:

W.

G. Smith, Jr., Plant Manager

DMB/Document Control