ML17326A902

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-316/81-09 on 810501-04 & 19.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test.Insp Involved 29 Manhours
ML17326A902
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/1981
From: Dubry N, Jackiw I, Spessard R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML17326A903 List:
References
50-316-81-09, 50-316-81-9, NUDOCS 8106300531
Download: ML17326A902 (4)


See also: IR 05000316/1981009

Text

U.S.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFI ICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION III

Report No. 50-316/81-09

Docket No. 50-316

License

No. DPR-74

Licensee:

American Electric Power Service Corporation

Indiana

and Michigan Power

Company

2 Broadway

New York, NY

10004

Facility Name:

D; C.

Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2

Inspection At:

D.

C.

Cook Site, Bridgman,

MI

Inspection Conducted:

May 1-4 and 19,

1981

Inspectors:

I. N. Jac'kiw~

~~c~

Approved By:

R. L. Spes ard, Chief

Engineering Inspection Branch

>>/zr

Ins ection

Summar

Ins ection on Ma

1-4 andl9

1981

(Re ort No. 50-316/81-09)

Areas Ins ected:

Routine,

announced

inspection of the containment integrated

leak rate test.

The inspection involved a total of 29 inspector-hours

onsite

by two NRC inspectors

including'14'inspector-hours

during off-shifts.

Results:

No items of noncompliance

or deviations, were identified.

DETAILS

1.

Persons

Contacted

N

D. Shaller, Plant Manager

A. Blind, Performance

Engineering,

Supervisor

C. Litwinski, Performance

Engineer

2.

D.

C.

Cook Unit 2

Containment Inte rated Leak Rate Test

a

~

Procedure

Review

The inspector

reviewed Procedure

12

THP 4030

STP.

202,

"Con-

tainment Integrated

Leak Rate Surveillance Test,"

and verified

that the procedure

was technically adequate

and consistent with

regulatory requirements.

b.

Instrumentation

The inspector

reviewed the calibration data associated

with

performing the CILRT. All the instruments

used in the

CILRT

had been calibrated

as required.

The instrument calibration

coefficients,

RTD weighting factors,

and volume weighting

factors

were placed into the ILRT Computer Program

as required.

The following instrumentation

was used in the CILRT:

uantit

RTD's

Flowmeter

Pressure

Gauge

Dewcells

46

1

6

6

During pressurization,

problems

were encountered

with the hygro-

meters.

The hygrometers

were found to be wired incorrectly to

the test points on the data logger.

This problem was

corrected,,'nd

the licensee

continued

containment pressurization.

c

~

Witness of Test

The inspector witnessed portions of the CILRT on May

1 and 3,

1981,

and noted that:

Appropriate revisions of the procedure

were in use by test

personnel.

Test, prerequisites

were met.

Proper plant systems

were in service.

- 2-

The inspector also noted that following pressurization,

the

stabilization period was begun

and the weighted average

tem-

perature in the Upper,

Lower and Ice Condenser

compartments

did not vary more than 0.1OF/hr.

over the last four (4) hour

period.

This met the stabilization criteria established

by

the licensee.

The inspector verified that the valve lineups

were conducted

and documented in accordance

with the approved test procedure.

In addition, the resident inspector verified, by direct obser-

vation, proper valve lineups in accessible

areas.

Blowdown and Containment

Ins ection

The inspector verified, that blowdown was within technical

specification radioactivity release limits, analysis

and

calculations

were completed before the release

started,

and that required environmental monitoring equipment

was

functional before the release

began.

The inspector also

conducted

an independent

post CILRT containment inspection

for equipment degradation after blowdown and did not iden-

tify any degradation.

CILRT Data Evaluation

The 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> CILRT was started

on May 2,

1981.

The'nspector

~

independently

monitored

and evaluated

leak rate data to verify

the 1icensee's

calculation of the leak rate.

There

was ac-

ceptable

agreement

between the inspector's

and licensee's

leak

rate calculations

as indicated in the following summary (units

are in weight percent per day):

Measurement

'icensee

~Ins ector

Leakage rate measured

(Lam)

during CILRT

0. 05287

0.05478

0.07115

Lam at

95% confidence level

0. 05748

I

Appendix J Acceptance Criterion at

95% confj.dence level =

0.75 La = 0.75

(.25%/day)

= 0.1875%/day.

As indicated

above,

the adjusted

Iam at the

95% confidence level was less

than

the maximum allowable by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J.

Su

lemental Test Data Evaluation

After the satisfactory

completion of the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> test

on

May 3,

1981,

a

known leakage of 0.2006 weight percent per

day was induced.

The inspector independently monitored

and

evaluated

leak rate data to verify the licensee's

calcula-

,tion of the supplemental

leak rate.

There

was acceptable

agreement

between

the inspector's

and the licensee's

leak

'

3-

rate calculations

as indicated in the following summary

(units are in weight percent per day):

Measu'rement

Measured

leakage

(Lc) rate

during supplemental test

Licensee

0.2463

~Ins ector

0.2538

Induced leakage rate

(Lo) = 3 scfm (0.2006//day)

Appendix J Acceptance Criteria:

I,o + Lam - 0.25

La 4Lc g

Lo + I,am + 0.25 La.

As indicated

above,

the supplemental

test results satisfied

the requirements

of 10"CI'R Part 50,

Appendix J.

No items of noncompliance

or deviations

were identified-.

3.

Exit Interview

The inspector

met with Mr. D. Shaller on May 19,

1981,

and

sum-

marized the findings of the inspection.

4