ML17325A626

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-316/88-02 on 871203,880115 & 0204-05.No Violations Noted
ML17325A626
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/1988
From: Harrison J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Alexich M
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
Shared Package
ML17325A627 List:
References
NUDOCS 8802260179
Download: ML17325A626 (7)


See also: IR 05000316/1988002

Text

(,I

U.

S.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Report

No. 50-316/88002(DRS)

Docket No. 50-316

License

No.

DPR-74

Licensee:

American Electric Power Service Corporation

Indiana

and Michigan Power

Company

1 Riverside

Plaza

Columbus,

OH

43216

Facility Name:

D.

C.

Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2

Inspection At:

D.

C.

Cook Site,

Bridgman, Michigan

Inspection

Conducted:

December

3,

1987, January

15,

and February 4-5,

1988

Inspector:

Ja

obson

Date

Approved By:

D. H. Danielson,

Chief

Materials

and Processes

Section

Date

Ins ection

Summar

Ins ection on December

3

1987

Januar

15

Februar

4-5

1988

Re ort No. 50-316/88002

DRS

Areas Ins ected:

Routine,

unannounced

safety inspection of the procedures,

personnel

qualifications,

and results of the Unit 2 eddy current examination

of the

Steam Generators

(73755)

and the Auxiliary Building crane

upgrade for

steam generator

replacement

(37702).

Results:

No violations or deviations

were identified.

8802260i79

o 0316

PDR

ADOCK 0500

G

DETAILS

Persons

Contacted

American Electric Power Service

Cor oration

AEPSC

Indiana

and Michi an

Power

Com an

IEM

J. Rutkowski, Assistant Superintendent

- Production

"J. White, Site Project Manager

S.

Hodge,

Engineering

Manager

W. Modry, Supervising

Designer Structural

T. McElroy, Plant Project Engineer

R. Rickman, Supervisor,

ISI/NPRDS

T. Postlewait,

Technical

Engineering

Supervisor

J. Droste,

Maintenance

Supervisor

"T. Ossmundsen,

Construction Supervisor

E. Morse,

NDE Supervisor

J. Steinhauser,

Assistant

NDE Supervisor

J. Winckel,

QA Coordinator

Construction

C.

Rapp, Site Manager

R. Perks,

Construction/Engineering

Manager

MK - Fer uson

A. Walcutt, Site

QA Manager

R.

Wilkerson, Assistant Project Manager

M. Cepkauskas,

Project Engineer

  • Attended the exit meeting

on February

5,

1988.

Steam Generator

Re air Project

The upcoming replacement

of the Unit 2 Steam Generators

requires

modifications to the exi sting Auxiliary Building crane.

The modification

includes replacing the existing

150T/20T trolley with a 150T trolley

designed to Single-Failure-Proof

(SFP) requirements,

and installation of

a

new

SFP crane with 150T and

20T trolleys.

Additionally, the existing

crane rail girder will be upgraded to accommodate

the higher design

wheel

loads

and

a second

holding brake

and

an inching mechanism will be added

to the bridge drive.

The modifications are being performed to meet the

requirements

of NUREG-0612

and 0554 and to permit the movement of the Steam

Generators

in and out of the Auxiliary Building.

The

NRC inspector

reviewed the

AEP design drawings

S-SGR-12-3123-1,

Revision 2,

and S-SGR-12-3128-0,

Revision

1 for the crane rail girder

upgrade

and visually inspected

the in-process

work on several

occasions.

During the installation of the web stiffener plates,

cracking of some

attachment

welds occurred.

The cracking

was caused

in part by improper

weld preheat

and the highly restrained

nature of the weld joint design.

Cracked welds were

removed

and rewelded utilizing proper preheat

and weld

peening

techniques.

To lessen

the chance of cracking additional welds,

the joint design

and attachment

techniques

were modified.

The

NRC

inspector

reviewed the

AEP design sketch

S-SGR-SSk

112187

and inspected

the installation

on several

occasions.

As

a result of the

new design

and

installation techniques,

no further weld cracking occurred.

Several

Condition Reports,

issued to resolve girder base

metal linear indications

and other construction

problems of a minor nature were reviewed

and found

to be adequately

resolved.

The

NRC inspector

reviewed the following welder qualifications

and

associated

radiographs:

Welder No.

C-68

C-133

C-136

C-148

C-158

C-163

C-169

C-177

Film No.

R 2310

R 2059-60

R 2136

R 2152

R 2164

R 2169

R 2279

R 2310

All qualifications

and associated

radiographs

were found to be

acceptable'nd

in accordance

with the

AWS Dl. 1 Structural

Code.

In addition, the

contractor's

Welding Procedure

CS-1004

was reviewed

and found acceptable.

The

AEP "Welder Performance Qualification" Specification

DCC NE 154

QCN,

Revision

3 was reviewed

by the

NRC inspector

and found to lack sufficient

detail with regard to the qualification and record keeping of both

in-house

maintenance

welders

and construction contract welders.

This

issue will remain

an unresolved

item pending review of a forthcoming

administrative procedure

(316/88002-01).

The

NRC inspector

reviewed the following MK-Ferguson procedures

to be

utilized on the Steam Generator

Repair Project:

Design Control

Receipt Inspection

Qualification and Certification of

Inspection

Personnel

ANSI N45.2.6

SQP-3.1,

Revision

0

FQP-7.1,

Revision

0

FQP-2.1,

Revision

0

In addition, the

NRC inspector

reviewed the following D. C. Cook Project

Procedures:

SGRP Site Technical

Document

Control

SGR Project Organization

SGRP

Work Package

System

SGR

PP 06-02, Revision

1

SGR

PP 01-01, Revision

0

'GR

PP 05-04, Revision

1

All procedures

reviewed were found to comply with applicable

codes,

standards

and licensee

commitments.

Unit 2 Polar Crane

A walkdown survey of the Unit 2 polar crane

was performed

by the licensee

in October

1,

1987.

This walkdown 'disclosed

several

structural

deviations including the following:

Loose or missing rail plate hold down nuts

Rail splice weld cracks

(two locations)

Bottom rail flange crack

Rail plate hold

down bolts cut off (two locations)

The structure is designed

as

Class I and

was analyzed

by the licensee

in

the as-found condition.

The structure

was analyzed

using the natural

frequencies for the crane derived

by the crane manufacturer.

The

calculation

(3195-170-FC)

demonstrated

that the deviations

do not affect

the shear capacity of the anchorage

and therefore,

the seismic

qualification remains

unchanged.

With regard to the uplift load from the

wheel truck up-kick-plate, the rail is capable of transferring

the load

from the cut-off bolts locations,

to adjacent

elements.

The shear

capacity of the structure

was found to be unaffected

by the cracked rai 1

splices

and bottom flange.

Though the seismic qualification remains

unchanged,

the licensee

has elected to weld repair the cracks

and repair

the cut-off bolts.

All loose or missing hold down nuts will be tightened

or replaced

as required.

/

The

NRC inspector

reviewed the walkdown surveillance report and the

calculations

supporting

the as-found condition.

The calculations

were

found to be acceptable

and

a review of the repairs will be performed

upon completion.

This will remain

an

open item pending review of the

repairs

(316/88002-02) .

Unit 2 Edd

Current Examination

During September

1987,

Combustion Engineering

(CE) conducted

eddy current

examinations of Unit 2 Steam

Generators

21, 22, 23,

and 24.

All

unplugged

tubes

were examined

from the hot leg tube end,

through the hot

leg seventh

support plate.

All tubes

examined received

an analysis

by

Conam in addition to the

CE analysis.

Indication resolutions

were

performed

by both

CE and

Conam Level III personnel.

Multifrequency testing equipment

was utilized to allow filtering of tube

support signals

and to permit limited dent assessment

in a single

pass of

the probe through the tube.

A 2etec

MIZ-18 and

a digital data cartridge

recorder

was utilized with a differential bobbin coil probe.

The

recorded

data

was analyzed with the aid of a Zetec

DDA-4 digital data

analyzer.

A total of 3229 tubes

were examined, resulting in the required plugging

of the following:

SG 421

14 tubes

SG

IIi22

17 tubes

SG 823

17 tubes

SG 824

30 tubes

To date,

Unit 2 has

a total of 951 tubes or 7.02K taken out of service

due to tube degradation.

The

NRC inspector

reviewed the following CE procedures:

Cook-410-004,

Revision

0 - Procedure for Multifrequency Eddy Current

Examination of Non-ferromagnetic

Steam Generator

Tubing Using Zetec

MI2-18 Equipment.

Cook-410-005,

Revision

0 - Eddy Current Data Analysis Procedure

Evaluation of Westinghouse

Steam Generator

Tubing.

NgAI 2.4, Revision

4 - Certification Program for Nondestructive

Examination Personnel.

The procedures

were found to be in accordance

with the

ASME Boiler and

Pressure

Vessel

Code,Section XI, 1983 Edition with Summer

1983 Addenda

and the intent of USNRC Regulatory

Guide 1.83.

A sample of personnel

qualifications were reviewed

and found to comply

with SNT-TC-lA, 1980 Edition and

ANSI N45.2.6 - 1978.

5.

~0en Items

Open items are matters

which have

been discussed

with the licensee,

which

will be reviewed further by the inspector,

and which involves

some action

on the part of the

NRC or licensee

or both.

Open items disclosed

during

this inspection

are discussed

in Paragraph

3.

6.

Unresolved

Items

An unresolved

item is

a matter about which more information is required

in order to ascertain

whether it is acceptable

item,

an open item,

a

deviation, or a violation.

Unresolved

items disclosed during this

inspection

are discussed

in Paragraph

2.

7.

Exit Interview

The Region III inspector

met with licensee

representatives

(denoted

in

Paragraph I) at the conclusion of the inspection.

The inspector

summarized

the purpose

and findings of the inspection.

The licensee

representatives

acknowledged this information.

The inspector also

di scussed

the likely informational content of the inspection report with

regards

to documents

or processes

reviewed during the inspection.

The

licensee

representatives

did not identify any such documents/processes

as

proprietary.