ML17321A882
| ML17321A882 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 08/30/1985 |
| From: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Dolan J INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| References | |
| CAL-RIII-85-13, NUDOCS 8509060116 | |
| Download: ML17321A882 (6) | |
Text
C +~y,S Il66p pp+
Cy pN
+4*4+
CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER
. UNITEo sTATEs NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 799 ROOSEVELT ROAO GLEN El LYN, ILLINOIS 60137 AUG5p g@
CAL-RIII-85-13 2 E 5 E~cdiD~)
Docket No. 50-315 Docket No. 50-316 Mr. John E. Dolan Vice Chairman, Engineering and Construction 1 Riverside Plaza
- Columbus, OH 43216 Gentlemen:
This letter confirms the telephone conversation between Mr. C.
E. Norelius of this office and Mr. M. P. Alexich of your staff on August 30, 1985.
Duri'ng an IE Headquarters Team Inspection conducted August 19 through August 28,
- 1985, several findings in the area of surveillance. testing were identified.
Based on this conversation, we understand that you will:
1.
Conduct a review by both corporate guality Assurance and plant organizations of all survei llances which,are contained in tabular form in the Technical Specifications to ensure that the surveillance scheduling meets the Technical Specification requirements.
2.
Conduct a review by all departments of the sur veillances which are contained in tabular form in the Technical Specifications to determine, for tests which are not the sole responsibility of a single department, that no omissions of test requirements exist and to determine which documents show how that responsibility is established.
3.
Conduct a review of Technical Specification surveillances which involve calibration and time response testing of process
- sensors, and take actions to ensure that Technical Specification surveillance requirements are satisfied.
II We understand that the actions in Items 1, 2, and 3 above will be completed prior to entering a plant mode. in wh'ich the specific Technical Specification requirement applies, unless interim relief is granted by NRR to specific Technical Specification requirements.
Further, in terms of a longer range commitment, we understand that you will expand by October 31, 1985, your corporate gA Audit Program for surveillance testing as specified in your January 20, 1984 letter (AEP:NRC:0858) to two survei llances per week on an ongoing basis.
Please let us know immediately if your understanding differs from that set forth above.
pg py@G/l4 CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER
]FBb I(8
Mr. John E. Dolan 2
AUG50 ~
We will gladly discuss any questions you may have concerning these matters.
Sincerely, C(t'~md 0-~~
~
~
~James G. Keppler Regi'onal Administrator cc:
J.
A. Axelrad, IE W.
G. Smith, Jr., Plant Manager DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commission EIS Coordinator; USEPA Region 5 Office Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER
C
CAL-R III-85-1 AUG 5 0
@gal Docket No. 50-315 Docket No. 50-316 Mr. John E.
Dolan Vice Chairman, Engineering and Construction 1 Riverside Plaza
- Columbus, OH 43216 Gentlemen:
This letter confirms the telephone conversation between Mr. C.
E. Norelius of this office and Mr. M. P. Alexich of your staff on August 30, 1985.
During an IE Headquarters Team Inspection conducted August 19 through August 28,
- 1985, several findings in the area of surveillance testing were identified.
Based on this conversation, we understand that you will:
1.
Conduct a review by both corpora'te guality Assurance and plant organizations of all survei llances which are contained in tabular form in the Technical Specifications to ensure that the surveillance scheduling meets the Technical Specification requirements.
2.
Conduct a review by all departments of the survei llances which are contained in tabular form in the Technical Specifications to determine, for tests which are not the sole responsibility of a single department, that no omissions of test requirements exist and to determine which documents show how that responsibility is established.
3.
Conduct a review of Technical Specification surveillances which involve calibration and time response testing of process
- sensors, and take actions to ensure that Technical Specification surveillance requirements are satisfied.
We understand that the actions in Items 1, 2, and 3 above will be completed prior to entering a plant mode in which the specific Technical Specification requirement applies, unless interim relief is granted by NRR to specific Technical Specification requirements.
- Further, in terms of a longer range commitment, we understand that you will expand by October 31, 1985, your corporate gA Audit Program for surveillance testing as specified in your January 20, 1984 letter (AEP:NRC:0858) to two survei llances per week on an ongoing basis.
Please let us know immediately if your understanding differs from that set forth above.
PDR o Oiib 850830 880iOe g,
~~~0K QSPg()gg~j FOR CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER
Mr. John E. Dolan AUG 5 0 185 We will gladly discuss any questions you may have concerning these matters.
Sincerely, Original signed bf A. Bert Davis James G. Keppler Regional Administrator cc:
J.
A. Axelrad, IE W.
G. Smith, Jr., Plant Manager DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commission EIS Coordinator, USEPA Region 5 Office Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section RI C
issotimos Pap 08/30/85 iello N
g
- Schule, g gb CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER RIII RIII RIII
~A RI I RIII
</36
el