ML17321A558
| ML17321A558 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 04/08/1985 |
| From: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17321A559 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8504180041 | |
| Download: ML17321A558 (9) | |
Text
pe REGS
+~ 'o Cy 0O
+
gO
+R*++
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 INDIANA AND MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-316 DONALD C.
COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT NO.
2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No.
67 License No.
DPR-74 1.
The Nuclear Regulatory ComIission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Indiana and Michigan Electric Company (the licensee) dated August 28, 1984, supportal by Exxon Nuclear letters dated July 7 and August 7, 1984, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act) and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No.
DPR-74 is hereby amended to read as follows:
8504180041 850408 PDR ADOCK 05000316 P
PDR (2)
Technical S ecifications The Technical Speci ficati ons contained in Appendi ces A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 67, are hereby incorporated in the license.
The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
3.
This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance.
FO THE NU EA EGULATORY COMMISSION
Attachment:
Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:
April 8, 1985 ven k'ra, C
f Operating Reactors nch ¹I Division of Licensing
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT AMENDMENT NO.
67 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO.
DPR-74 DOCKET NO. 50-316 Revise Appendix A as follows:
Remove Pa es 3/4 2-9 3/4 2-10 8 2-2 8 3/4 2-1 8 3/4 2-4 8 3/4 2-4a 8 3/4 2-4b Insert Pa es 3/4 2-9 3/4 2-10 8 2-2 8 3/4 2-1 8 3/4 2-4
3.2.3 The combination of indicated Reactor Coolant System (RCS) total flow rate and R shall be maintained within the region of allowable operation shown on Figures 3.2-4 and 3.2-5 for 4 and 3 loop operation, respectively.
For: Westinghouse Fuel N
AH 1.48 I:1.0 + 0.2 (1.0-P)]
for: Exxon Nuclear Company Fuel FNAH R=-
1 ~ 49 t 1.0 + 0.2 (1.0>> P) 3 where:
RATED THERMAL POWER and F
N
= measured values of F "<
obtained by using the movable incore detectors to obtain a power distribution map.
The measured values of F
< H and flow, without additional uncertainty allowance, shall be used.
MODE 1.
kQXZQE:
With the combination of RCS total flow rate and R outside the region of acceptable operation shown on Figure 3.2-4 or 3.2-5 (as applicable):
a.
Within 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />s:
l.
Either restore the combination of RCS total flow rate and R
to within the above limits, or 2.
Reduce'THERMAL POWER to less than 50$ of RATED THERMAL POWER and reduce the Power Range Neutron Flux - High trip setpoint to g 55$ of RATED THERMAL POWER within the next 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
D.C.
COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 2-9 AMENDMENT NO.
67
(Continued) b.
C ~
Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of init'ially being outside the above limits, verify through incore flux mapping and RCS total flow rate comparison that the combination of R and RCS total flow rate are restored to within the above limits, or r eduoe THERMAL POWER to less than 55 of RATED THERMAL POWER within the next 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.
Identify and correct the cause of the out-of-limit condition prior to incr easing THERMAL POWER above the reduced THERMAL POWER Limit required by ACTION items a.2 and/or b above; subsequent POWER OPERATION may proceed provided that the combination of R
and indicated RCS total flow rate are dermnstrated, through incore flux mapping and RCS total flow rate comparison, to be i
within the region of'coeptable operation as shown on Figure 3.2-4 or 3.2-5 (as applicable) for RCS flow rate and R prior to exceeding the following THERMAL POWER levels:
1.
A nominal 50$ of RATED THERMAL POWER, 2.
A nominal 75$ of RATED THERMAL POWER, and 3.
Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of attaining P 95$ of RATH) THERMAL POWER.
4.2.3.
1 The provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable.
4.2.3.2 The combination of indicated RCS total flow rate and R shall be determined to be within the region of acceptable operation of Figure 3.2-4 or 3.2-5 (as applicable):
a.
Prior to operation above 75$ of RATED THERMAL POWER after each fuel
- loading, and b.
At least once per 31 Effective Full Power Days.
4.2.3.3 The RCS total flow rate indicators shall be sub)ected to a CHANNEL CALIBRATION at least once per 18 months.
4.2.3.4 The RCS total flow rate shall be determined by measurement at least once per 18 months.
D.C.
COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 2-10 AMENDMENT NO.
67
The curves are based on a nuclear enthalpy rise hot channel factor, F C >, of 1.99 ann a reference coelne e1th a Peak of $ 55 for an1al Pacer N
shape.
An allowance is included for an increase in F <H at reduced power based on the expression:
N F ~H
=
1.48
[1 + 0.2 (1-P)]
(Westinghouse Fuel)
N F A=
1.49
[1 + 0.2 (1-P)]
(Exxon Nuclear Company Fuel) where P is the fraction of RATED THERMAL POWER.
These limiting heat flux conditions are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance is within the limits of the f
( AI) function of the Overtem'perature trip.
When the axial power imbalance i3 not within the tolerance, the axial power imbalance effect on the Overtemperature A T trips will reduce the setpoints to provide protection consistent with core safety limits.
2.1.2 The restriction of this Safety Limit protects the integrity of the Reactor Coolant System from overpressurization and thereby prevents the release of radionuclides contained in the reactor coolant from reaching the containment atmosphere.
The reactor pressure vessel and pressurizer are designed to Section IIIof the ASME Code for Nuclear Power Plant which permits a maximum transient pressure of 110$
(2735 psig) of design pressure.
The Reactor Coolant System piping, valves and fittings, are designed to ANSI B 31.1 1967 Edition, which permits a maximum transient pressure of 120$
(2985 psig) of component design pressure.
The Safety Limit of 2735 psig is therefore consistent with the design criteria and associated code requirements.
The entire Reactor Coolant System is hydrotested at 3107 psig, 125$ of design pressure, to demonstrate integrity prior to initial operation.
D.C.
COOK - UNIT 2 B 2-2 AMENDMENT NO.
67
The specifications of this section provide assurance of fuel integrity during Condition-I (Normal Operation) and II (Incidents of Moderate Frequency) events by: (a) maintaining the calculated DNBR in the core at or above.design during normal operation and in short term transients, and (b) limiting the fission gas release, fuel pellet temperature and cladding mechanical properties to within assumed design criteria.
In addition, limiting the peak linear power density during Condition I events provides assurance that the initial conditions assumed for the LOCA analyses are met and the ECCS acceptance criteria limit of 2200 F is not exceeded.
The definitions of certain hot channel and peaking factors as used in these specifications are as follows:
Fq(Z)
Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor, is defined as the maximum local heat flux on the surface of a fuel rod at core elevation Z
divided by the aver age fuel rod heat flux, allowing for manufacturing tolerances on fuel pellets and rods.
FAH
'uclear Enthalpy Rise Hot Channel Factor, is defined as the ratio of the integral of linear power along the rod with the highest integrated power to the average rod power.
The limits on F (Z) and FA for Westinghouse supplied fuel at a core average power of 3401 Hut are 1.II7 aad 1.tg, respeotdvely, whdoh assure consistency with the allowable heat generation rates developers,for a core average thermal power of 3391 MWt.
The limits on F (Z) and F ~A for ENC supplied fuel have been established for,a core thermal power of 3411 MWt.
The limit on F (Z) is 2.04.
The limit on F~
is 1.49.
The analyses supporting the Exxon IIuclear Company limits are valid for an average steam generator tube plugging of up to 5$ and a maximum plugging of one or more steam generators of up to 10$.
In establishing the limits, a plant system description with improved accuracy was employed during the reflood portion of the LOCA Transient.
With respect to the Westinghouse supplied fuel the minimum projected excess margin of at least 10$ to ECCS limits will more than offset the
-'mpact of increase steam generator tube plugging.
The limits on AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE assure that the F (Z) upper bound envelope is not exceeded during either normal operation oP in the event of xenon redistribution following power changes.
The F (Z) upper bound envelope is 1.97 times the average fuel rod heat flux for Weskinghouse supplied fuel and 2.04 times the average fuel rod heat flux for Exxon Nuclear Company supplied fuel.
Target flux difference is determined at equilibrium xenon conditions.
The full length rods may be positioned within the core in accordance with their respective insertion limits and should be inserted near their normal position for steady state operation at high power levels.
The value of the D.C.
COOK - UNIT 2 B 3/4 2-1 AMENDMENT NO.
67
The limits on heat flux hot channel factor, RCS flowrate, and nuclear enthalpy rise hot channel factor ensure that
- 1) the design limits on peak local power density and minimum DNBR are not exceeded and 2) in the event of a LOCA the peak fuel clad temperature will not exceed the 2200 F ECCS acceptance 0
criteria limit.
Each of these is measurable but will normally only be determined periodically as specified in Specifications 4.2.2 and 4.2.3.
This per iodic surveillance is sufficient to ensure that the limits are maintained provided:
a.
Control rods in a single group move together with no individual rod insertion differing by more than
+ 12 steps from the group demand position.
b.
Control rod groups are sequenced with overlapping groups as described in Specification 3.1.3.6.
The axial power distribution, expressed in terms of AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE, is maintained within the limits.
c.
The control rod insertion limits of Specifications 3.1.3.5 and 3.1.3.6 are maintained.
d.
F AH will be maintained within its limits provided conditions a. through d.
above are maintained.
As noted on Figures 3.2-4 and 3.2-5, RCS flow rate and F
may be "traded off" against one another (i.e.
a low measured RCS flow N
~
~ f ra%I is acceptable if the measured F>H is also low) to ensure that the calculated DNBR will not be below the design DNBR value.
The relaxation of F H
as a function of THERMAL POWER allows changes in the radial power shape for all permissible rod insertS, on limits.
The form of this relaxation for DNBR limits is discussed in Section 2.1.1 of the basis.
When an F measurement is taken, both experimental error and manufacturing tolerance musk be allowed for.
5$ is the appropriate allowance for a full core map taken with the incore detector flux mapping system and 3$ is the appropriate allowance for manufacturing tolerance.
When RCS flow rate and F AH are measured, no additional allowances are necessary prior to compar ison with the limits of Specification 3.2.3.
Measurement errors of 3.5$ for RCS flow total flow rate and 4$ for F
>H have N
been allowed for in determination of the design DNBR value and in the determination of the LOCA/ECCS limit.
D.C.
COOK - UNIT 2 8 3/4 2-4 AMENDMENT NO, 67