ML17320A417

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Justification for Continued Operation,In Response to 821230 SER on Environ Qualification of safety-related Electrical Equipment
ML17320A417
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 03/04/1983
From: Hunter R
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
AEP:NRC:0775B, AEP:NRC:775B, AEP:NRC:77B, IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, NUDOCS 8303080348
Download: ML17320A417 (7)


Text

ACCKSSIONi iVBR:

FACILITY50~315 50 316 AUTHeNAiilEI HUiVTERiR'

~,

REC I Pi, N AAEI DKNTOViH ~ RE REGULA RY, I,VFORiiATlON DIISTRIBUTI SYSTEM (BIDS) 830 30 80 348'DCL D'ATE': 8'3/03/0 4 'OITIARI ZEOI; NOr.

DOCKER'I re" Dona(id Cr., Cbees iVucl ear

- Power Pil anti U'nj ti li'ndjahai L 05000315r Donaild Cr., Cbook.iViucl eaf'oider Pil anti U'ni ti 2i'Indi anal L

05000316'U J'rlOR AFFrILlIATION Indi aher 3 ~lichigan EIlectr.ici Co<.'ECKPiIE<ViTI AFFZLIIAT'IQNi Qtf fiice oifi Nuc l ea'r Reac tor; Reoul'a't i oni Dti r ectori SUBJECITi:

Pr ov<'des Justi fiice'tion" for cont jnued ooer altloniin response tor 821230 SER'n>> envi r oni zualii f i cat i oni olfr salfetv r el a'ted el ec tc l c~ilr equi oment>>.

DiISTRI BUTiIOiVi,.COOEI:. A0 485.

COPilES RECK'I VED: LITR; 4ENCLl TiITLE: OR/Lliceheinq Suomi t talli: Efqui omenti Q4ail,i f i'ca'tii oni NOTKSt SIZEi R EC IIPiIKNiTr IO COQEr/iVAblEI VRR ORB1. BCl 12:

COPiI E5 Lfl'rTR. ENCLt lr 0

RECiIP IEN Tl IOl CODE'/iVANKI AIGGINGTON Ol 01.

COPIKS LiTTR EiVCLI 1

IiVTERiVALI: KLO/H963 IKI FiILKI NRR/D~'/KQBr ABr REG! FiILKI 12; 09 0

7i'6OQ'.

1, l.

1' 2

l.

1 ir 1

GCl 13>>

iVRR C'ALiItrOiJl NRR'/DLI D IR 10'RR'/DSI/AEBr RGiV3 1

1 1-'.

1.

1 1.

1 EXTERNALl: ACRS iVRCi POR:

iVT IS 15>>

02.,

31 Bi 8

1 1

1 1.

LPOR iVSICI 03 05i 2.:

2'.

TOTALl iVU~iBER OFr CDPCEG" REQUIRED:

LITTR 26 ENCLI 25r

W I fli

'> fh.

II f 9

~ '

rr h

"ll>

v W

4 vv C f I, r

f r

ll' U

r Ic'~W' rt r

'+

(

qir KK II II full rv rrr f ~f' W

f<< fW; 'it

.1:,. <eljr Ur

  • > ".f r

I IIW't rv jjr tv tv ~ 'I

,. U.

Ji II f

f l

'i W

U rW* I ir h'r t.'W'K l'hl'i

'v N

U i~

,0 INDIANA II MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O.

BOX 18 BOWLING GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 March 4, 1983 AEP:NRC:0775B Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos 1 and 2

Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos.

DPR-58 and DPR-74 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Mr. Denton:

This letter provides a response to Mr. S. A. Varga's letter of December 30, 1982, which transmitted to Indiana 6 Michigan Electric Co.

(I&MECo) the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) for the Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment at the Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos.

1 and 2.

In particular, Mr. S. A. Varga requested that we review the associated Technical Evaluation Report (TER) prepared by Franklin Research Center (FRC),

and provide justification for continued operation of the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant for those items of equipment which FRC classified as being in NRC Category I.B., "Equipment Qualification Pending Modification," Category II.A., "Equipment Qualification Not Established,"

and Category II.B.,

"Equipment Not Qualified."

We have reviewed the NRC SER and its associated TER, and have concluded that the continued safe operation of the D. C.

Cook Nuclear Plant is adequately assured.

We note that the results of FRC's review, as presented in the TER, have not identifi'ed any equipment items in NRC Category II.B., "Equipment Not Qualified."

Furthermore, our review of those equipment items which FRC identified as belonging in NRC Categories I.B. and II.A. indicates that justification exists for continued plant operation.

Our review findings which support this conclusion include, but are not limited to, the following:

(1)

On June ll, 1982, we transmitted to the NRC our AEP:NRC:0578B submittal.

That letter and its attachments provided a response to the SER on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment transmitted via Mr. S. A. Varga's letter to Mr. J.

E. Dolan (ISMECo), dated May 26, 1981.

Although the cover letter to our AEP:NRC:0578B submittal stated that the response superseded all of our previous submittals, our review of the FRC TER indicates that 8303080/4g gp(jgog P

.'DR ADOCK 050003g5 PDR

k c

P)

't J

J L

e ~

e Mr. Harold R.

D n

e ee

(

e AEP C:0775B FRC-identified equipment deficiencies in NRC Categories I.B. and II.A.

have been based upon our earlier transmittals regarding equipment qualification.

(However, the June ll, 1982, submittal did not include all of the missing documentation identified by FRC's TER as necessary to establish equipment similarity.

See Item (2) below).

We note that the TER review of certain equipment items includes System Component Evaluation Worksheets (SCEWS) reproduced from our AEP:NRC:0578 submittal of September 23, 1981.

Revised worksheets were included in Attachments 4 and 5 of the AEP:NRC:0578B letter.

Certain equipment items which appear in the TER have, in fact, been deleted in our June ll, 1982 submittal (e.g., item //62, Unit Nos.

1 and 2; item //84, Unit Nos.

1 and 2).

Furthermore, equipment items which we added to our AEP:NRC:0578B submittal do not appear in the TER.

To the best of our knowledge, the attachments to our June 11, 1982, submittal provide additional technical information which addresses many of the outstanding NRC concerns and FRC-identified deficiencies which appear in the TER.

As an example, we note that Section 4.3.2 of the TER requires that we verify that the containment spray system is not subjected to a disabling single-component failure.

This information is provided in Attachment 8 to our AEP:NRC:0578B submittal.

Additional information on chemical spray characteristics, flood-up tubes, submergence outside containment, etc.,

may be found in our June 11, 1982, submittal.

(2)

The FRC TER identifies numerous equipment items for which qualification has not been established owing to a lack of documentation available to FRC.

Although in the past we have submitted some test reports and engineering analyses to the NRC or FRC in support of our equipment qualification, we have retained additional documentation in-house.

We believe that we can support the information contained in the attachments to the AEP:NRC:0578B submittal.

Furthermore, we note that documentation not presently available to FRC will establish qualification for many of our electrical equipment items.

We do not believe that a lack of submitted documentation constitutes an indication of equipment inability to function after an accident.

We trust that we can resolve these documentation concerns with the NRC staff as part of our schedule for proposed corrective actions, to be submitted by May 20, 1983, in accordance with the final environmental qualification rule 10 CFR 50.49, "Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety in Nuclear Power Plants,"

retently published in the Federal

~Re ister (Vol. 48, No.

15, dated 1/21/83).

(3)

The FRC TER identifies numerous deficiencies in equipment item qualified life, aging evaluation, and replacement/maintenance schedules.

As noted in Attachment 7 to our AEP:NRC:0578B submittal, we have committed to establish an aging program which will include aging analyses and the establishment of a surveillance/maintenance/

replacement schedule.

We have, in fact, recently contracted with EDS Nuclear Inc. of Melville, New York, to perform this aging evaluation program.

Our upcoming May 20, 1983, submittal will further inform the NRC staff of the status of the aging program, and should address the outstanding aging-related deficiencies identified in the FRC TER.

+~~ ~

Mg. Harold R.

D n

AEP:0775B In summary, we believe that our AEP:NRC:0578B submittal dated June ll, 1982, the documentation available in our files, and our review of the FRC TER indicate that there is justification for safe continued plant operation.

This document has been prepared following Corporate Procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure=its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.

Very truly yours, RSH/md R.

S. Hunter Vice President cc.

John E. Dolan Columbus M. P. Alexich R.

W. Jurgensen W. G. Smith, Jr.

Bridgman R.

C. Callen G. Charnoff NRC Resident Inspector at Cook Plant Bridgman

~~

J