ML17319B547
| ML17319B547 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 09/29/1982 |
| From: | Hunter R INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| REF-GTECI-A-36, REF-GTECI-SF, RTR-NUREG-0612, RTR-NUREG-612, TASK-A-36, TASK-OR AEP:NRC:0514E, AEP:NRC:514E, NUDOCS 8210050138 | |
| Download: ML17319B547 (28) | |
Text
C REGULATORY ORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYw,M (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8210050138 DOC,DATE: 82/09/29 NOTARIZED:
NO DOCKET FACIE:-50 315 Donald C+
Cook Nucl ear Power Plantr Unit 1 r Indiana 8
05000315 50-316 Donald C.
Cook Nuclear power PlantE Unit 2r Indiana R
05000316 AUTH BYNAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION HUNTERER ~ ST Indiana 8 Michigan Electric Co ~
REC IP ~ NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONrH ~ RE Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulationi Director
SUBJECT:
Forwards documents as Phase I.b of r esponse to Section 2s 1 of Encl 3 to DG Eisenhut 801222 ltr re control of heavy loads.Nestinghouse analysis of lifting arrangement for reactor vessel head 8 upper interpa]s expected by 830315, DISTRIBUTION CODE:
A033S COPIES RECEIVED:LTR g ENCL /
SIZE:
TITLE:
OR Submittal:
USI A>>36 Control of Heavy Load Near Spent Fuel NOTESS RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR ORB1 BC INTERNAL: NRR REQUAEG 09 NRR/DSI/ADCCS11 NRR/DSI/RA8 10 RGN3 COPIES LTTR ENCL 7
7 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRR CLEMENSON01 NRR/DL/ORAB 12 I/AEB REG 04 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 EXTERNAL: ACRS 13 NRC PDR 02 NTIS 6
6 1
1 1
1 LPDR NSIC 03 06 r,:e TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIREDS LTTR 29, ENCL 29
'tF~. ~:!
ll f
~ i 'f~t'fl~ ~II l I)
'>,ll'>
'IF t wII"I' 'lf" f ')l'jul OF'I tFw
't ')'~ ~ 1llw i
's'g lI t$ g k,(
f/)') )f
[
ll'hler g
li>>,
Il't" ill il "I
lJ iit,r,I 'l
>ng,Fi f ~II l 4,i t,ting F t
,, f)
I Fl
'~p,~g i
1 jg
'+i~,>A 1 L ~,1 Vvr 4$ F'I t
t't Ig I
lI ii tk Itti) l~'~J
)
l
)
"ll t'i g w" I (
T I',
I."
I(
tt la t
I It
- ll E$
Q J
'will I)/'ti l tl i I
Iwt /II Wtw I
w
'i w wwwQ!Xttw tw'ww
)gw li)t '
i "0
t"I
'IF i
)
Itit'f l j I
t IL i
wll g I'It Ftt g
t WWIX gg wW i',
l 'I'g) i]'
p h
ll,l "i "i
))
I'I, 5Z, j Ij,
)
gl Fii II'F I'
3' 3
I t/
IF
INDIANA It MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. BOX 18 BOWLING GREEN STATION NEW YORK, N. Y. 10004 September 29, 1982 AEP:NRC:0514E Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos.
1 and 2
Docket Nos.
50-.315 and 50-316 License Nos.
.CONTROL OF HEAVY LOADS - PHASE I.b Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555
Dear Mr,
Denton:
This letter and its Attachments provide Phase I.b.of our response to Enclosure No.
3 to Mr. D. G. Eisenhut's letter of December 22, 1980.
We committed to sending you this letter in our submittal No.
AEP:NRC:0514D, dated July 12, 1982.
Phase I.b addresses those cranes and hoists encompassed by Section 2.1 of the above mentioned Enclosure which were not included in our letter No. AEP:NRC:0514C dated July 18, 1982.
Westinghouse's analysis of the lifting arrangement for the reactor vessel head and upper internals, also part of the response required by Section 2.1, will be submitted by March 15, 1983.
Our response to Sections 2.2 and 2,3 of Enclosure No.
3 to Mr.
Eisenhut's letter, was contained in our letter No, AEP:NRC:0514A, dated August 27, 1982.
Our letter addressed those cranes which handle loads in close vicinity to the spent fuel pool or to the reactor vessel (see our response to Section 2.1-3 in the Attachment to this letter).
The cranes and hoists discussed in detail in this letter (Phase I.b),
are considered excluded from the requirements of Sections 2.2 and 2,3 of Enclosure No. 3 to Mr. Eisenhut's letter since they do not handle loads in close vicinity to the spent fuel pool or the reactor vessel.
We are preparing our response to Section 2.4 of Enclosure No.
3 to Mr. Eisenhut's letter.
As indicated in our letter No. AEP:NRC:0514D this response will constitute Phase II.b of our overall response to the "Control of Heavy Loads" issue. If analysis being performed now concerning Section 2.4 has an impact on information contained in this letter, appropriate modifications will be included with our Section,2.4 response.
8210050138 820929 PDR ADQCK 05000315 P
~
<>>> f It) 4) f.)'f, I i,'
)
f I )
f>> II',
~ I'I l
)f>>I" FI
~
I I
h b
4!
> )
'"')
Chb'lN g
fg )'W I"
>>I l '
I'
~ ')')
I,
~ ~
~
~
I
)
)>>
4 N
F II I
f 4
Hf<< 'I y>>)
T I
I H
)j 4
K '<<l) IF- >>
-= ~
) Jj>>
I il<<F')IH "I)a', i.
i
..l '
P) h I!
I ~
N ~ ',
')<<<< ')
"");
",'H~
i i I
~
h!)3 tl
( Itl'lh
'. )
f l),N )
I
)I'fI
) f i P i
~
~
It' ll ~
N tg(
I
)
,I l,till N ~) fth
! f 4
)
lt I
ATTACHMENT TO AEP:NRC:0514E DONALD C.
COOK NUCLEAR PLANT CONTROL OF HEAVY LOADS NUREG-0612 2.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR OVERHEAD HANDLING SYSTEMS "NUREG 0612, Section 5.1.1, identifies several general guidelines
'elated to the design and operation of overhead load-handling systems in the area where spent fuel is stored, in the vicinity of the reactor
- core, and in other areas of the plant where a load drop could result in damage to equipment required for safe shutdown or decay heat removal.
Information provided in response to this section s1iould identify the extent of potentially hazardous load-handling operations at a site and the extent of conformance to appropriate load-handling guidance".
2.1-1.
"Report the results of your review of plant arrangement to identify all overhead handling systems from which a load drop may result in damage to any system required for plant shutdown or decay heat removal (t'aking no credit for any interlocks, technical specificationsy operating procedures, or detailed structural analysis)",
2.1-2.
"Justify the exclusion of any overhead handling system from the above category by verifying that there is sufficient physical separation from any load-impact point and any safety-related component to permit a determination by inspection that no heavy load drop can result in damage to any system or component required for plant shutdown or decay heat removal".
~Res sess:
All cranes and hoists in the Plant are listed in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1 is a listing of cranes and hoists which travel above safety-related equipment.
Load drops from these cranes and hoists may result in damage to safety-related equipment (taking no credit for any interlocks, operating procedures, or detailed structural analyses)
For their location see Drawings 12-5166, 12-5167, 12-5168, 12-5169, and 12-5170 (attached)
Table 2 is a listing of additional cranes and hoists which cannot damage safety-related equipment.
We have verified that for these cranes and hoists, there is physical separation by distance or by physical barriers such that no heavy load drop can result in damage to systems required for plant shutdown or decay heat removal.
For their location see Drawings 12-5160, 12-5167, 12-5168, 12-5169, 12-5170, and 12-5170A.
l~
ss rr' 1
r
~
2.1-3.
"With respect to the design and operation of heavy-load-handling systems"in the containment and the spent-fuel-pool area and those, load-handling systems identified in 2.1-1, above, provide your evaluation concerning compliance with the guidelines of NUREG-0612, Section 5.1.1.
The following specific information should be included in your reply".
- a. "Drawings or sketches suffici.ent to clearly identify the location of safe load paths, spent fuel, and safety-related equipment".
~Res ense:
Except for the Containment Polar Cranes, the Auxiliary Building
- Crane, the Circulating Water Pump and Screen House Crane, and the Diesel Generator Cranes, all-other overhead lifting devices listed in Table 1 are monorail hoists.
The Containment, Polar Cranes, the Auxiliary Building Crane, the Manipulator Cranes, the New and Spent Fuel Cranes, safety-related equipment and spent fuel are not addressed'here as they were previously discussed in our letters No. AEP:NRC:0514C, dated June 18,
- 1982, and No. AEP:NRC:0514A, dated August 27, 1982.
The Ice Condenser Crane is included in Table 2'or the following reasons:
The heaviest load lifted by this crane is a full ice basket'(2,000 lbs. maximum).
However, since there i.s approximately a
15 foot clearance between the top of the crane hook's travel and the top of the ice basket array and the ice basket is 48 ft long, the only credible load drop of the full basket is within it' assigned position.
A 15 foot drop of a full basket would be stopped by,,the ice basket support structure.
2)
In order to remove a basket from the Ice Condenser all the ice must first be removed or melted.
Then the basket is disassembled into 12 foot sections.
These sections weigh approximately 60 lbs. each.
Therefore, no damage is anticipated due to the dropping one of these sections.
3)
The next heaviest loads in the Ice Condenser are the air handling units.
These units weigh 1,150 pounds approximately.-If one of these units is dropped over the Ice Condenser, it would be stopped by the ice basket support structure.
These units would not be handled outside of the ice condenser simultaneously with any fuel transfer operations, A
drop of an air handling unit in the'vicinity of the fuel transfer canal would have no effect on decay heat removal/or safe shutdown of the plant.
The Circulating Water Pump and Screen House Crane has within its operating area only one set of safety related equipment, the Essential Service Water Pumps.
These pumps are located inside their own enclosed room.
The crane's safe load path covers the entire area except that portion over the Essential Service Water Pumps Room.
The Diesel Generator Cranes are small cranes used to perform maintenance on the Diesel Generators.
Because of their function these cranes cannot have assigned a safe load path.
However, since the cranes are only used during maintenance, the maintained diesel is out of service and,cannot be operated.
The monorail hoists are used during equipment maintenance.
Their function is similar to that of the Diesel Generator Cranes.
These cranes and monorail hoists handle heavy loads only over components"'of one train of safety-related equipment.
The component in the redundant train will not be affected by a load drop event and should be operable if so required by the Plant's Technical Specifications.
Furthermore, as pointed out above, these devices are used mostly during maintenance periods in which no credit ishtaken for the equipment being worked on.
Lastly, the loads, none of which exceeds 2 Tons, are handled in a careful manner and in accordance with standard plant practices.
These considerations make the dropping of a heavy load an unlikely event which will, at worst, impact only one train of safety-related equipment.
b.
"A discussion of measures taken to ensure that load-handling operations remain within safe load paths, including procedures, if any, for deviation from these paths".
~Res ense:
The Circulating Mater Pump and Screen House Crane does not need to carry any load over the Essential Service Water Pumps Room.
In fact, except for the lift of a Circulating Water Pump from the Unit 1 area to the Unit 2 area (or vice versa),
a liftpertaining to the Essential. Service Water Pumps or for storage on the Essential Service Water Pumps Room roof, there is no need or reason for a lift.to pass over the Essential Service Mater Pumps Room.
With respect to a Circulating Water Pump liftover the Essential Service Water Pumps Room, there would have to be several ma)or deviations from the normal lifting methodology.
First, special shortened rigging would have to be used;
- second, the railings around the top of the Essential Service Mater* Pumps Room would have to be removed and, third, special precautions would have to be taken to assure that the crane did not two-block and that the pump did not strike the room.
These difficulties make it very unlikely that a heavy load would travel over the Essential Service Water Pumps Room.
Lastly, this room was designed to withstand the impact of the crane falling on it while carrying a 30T load. Therefore, the Essential Service Water Pumps are protected from all credible load drops..
hh hS hh~
~
I h S
h
~
h h
The Diesel Generator Cranes and the monorail hoists are not covered by any specific procedures for the 'reasons outlined in the response to 2.1-3-a.
c.
"A tabulation of heavy loads to be handled by each crane which includes the load identifi.cation, load weight, its designated lifting device, and verification that the handling of such load is governed by a written procedure containing, as a minimum the information identified in NUREG-0612, Section 5,1.1(2)."
~Res esse:
For the Circulating Water Pump and Screen House Crane the three heaviest loads are given in Table l.
For the Diesel Generator Cranes and the remaining hoists only the heaviest load is given in Table"1.
This was done since only one path exists for these cranes and hoists and the heaviest load is bounding.
Each Essential Service Water Pump is accessed through the roof via its own hatchway.
Since the exposed pump is already out for maintenance there would be no change in system status if it was damaged.
Therefore, there is no need for special procedures with respect to the Circulating Water Pump and Screen House Crane.
For the remaining cranes and hoists, the loads are lifted using routine lifting devices.
Again, we feel that there is no need for special procedures for the reasons given in our response to Section 2.1-3-a.
In addition, since the Diesel Generator Cranes and all the hoists are manually powered, it is reasonable to assume that loads willnot be lifted any higher than is necessary to clear any obstructions.
This would tend to further minimize the effects of a load drop.
d.
"Verification that lifting devices identified in 2.1-3-c,
- above, comply with the requirements of ANSI N14.6-1978, or ANSI B30,9-1971 as appropriate.
For lifting devices where these standards, as supplemented by NUREG-0612, Section 5.1.1(4) or 5.1'.1(5),
are not met, describe any proposed alternatives and demonstrate their equivalency in terms of load-handling reliability."
~
V
~Res ense:
Sections 5.1.1(4) and 5.1.1(5) of NUREG-0612 require that the load rating of the lifting device include dynamic as well as static loads 'in lieu of the guidelines provided in the ANSI Standards N14.6-1978 and,B30e9-1971.
I&MECo does not believe that it is practical in the field to account for a dynamic load factor or that such a factor is necessary.
Presumably, if such a factor was a real safety concern, the universally accepted ANSI standards would require it.
We base our belief on several factors.
First, the hoisting speeds at the Cook Plant are relatively slow and any contribution from a dynamic effect would not be significant.
Also, any critical lifts, (e.g.
reactor head lift, reactor missile shield, etc".) are always done at
'ery slow speeds.
In addition, the following question was asked of the ANSI B30 Committee (AEP letter, to W. Berger, from T. J. Seery, dated December 18, 1981):
"How are dynamic loads factored into the Rated Capacity Tables stated in ANSI Standard B30,9-1971, in particular, Tables 3 through 13 of this standard2".
The reply (ASME Letter, from W. Berger to T. J. Seery, dated February 11, 1982), stated:
"This standard and the tables included (using a design factor of 5) were developed over many years and have been found to be adequate for operating conditions where normal dynamic loading is encountered.
Dynamic-loads, as quantified numbers, are not factored into the tables, but have been found to be within limits which are covered by using a design factor of 5, when used in con5unction with the inspection requirements specified by the standard."
Finally, superimposing a dynamic load factor in addition to the existing safety factors would not be consistent with other safety factors used in crane design.
For example, the hoisting rope requires a safety factor of 5 with no dynamic contribution, (Crane Manufacturers Association of America', Specification 870, Section 4.2).
Routine lifting devices (slings, ropes, chains, etc.) follow the guidelines set forth in 'Handbook for Ri ers by W. G. Newberry, revised edition 1977.
This handbook meets the intent of ANSI B30.9-1971.
Presently, at the Cook Plant, slings are checked out of one of the two tool cribs after the rigg'er has estimated the load weight to be picked and the rigging arrangement that is to be used.
The gob that is to be performed determines the type of sling used, wire rope', Tuflex, or nylon strap slings.
The wire rope slings are identified;-as to their lifting capacity by-the diameter of rope and lifting arrangement charts provided at each crib, The Tuflex slings are color coded and-the nylon straps are rated by width for their lifting capacities, The remaining ropes and slings throughout the plant are generally used for one particular gob (i,e.. turbine work, vertical walls; missile blocks, etc.).and are stored in the general area close to the equipment that is lifted.
Marking of these slings would require a great deal of time and effort and would not completely eliminate the possibility of picking an incorrect sling. 'Markings on nylon slings would become obscured
-as they accumulated grease.
We consider that any further marking of the slings will not provide further assurance of the proper sling being chosen for a particular task.
In summary, we feel that the present method for sling selection is adequate and that'marking is unnecessary.
Special lifting devices are evaluated in Table 3.
'~Res esse:
e.
"Verification that ANSI B30,2-1976, Chapter 2-2', has been invoked with respect to crane inspection,'esting, and maintenance.
Where any exception is taken to this standard, sufficient information should be 'provided to demonstrate the equivalency of proposed alternatives."
This item was responded to in letter No. AEP:NRC:0514C, dated June 18, 1982.
In addition, all cranes and hoists are now classified as in Standby Service ("special or infrequent service" per ANSI B30.2-1976). This reclassif ication supercedes that of AEP:NRC:0514C which stated that several cranes were classified as in Regular Service ("normal 'service" per ANSI B30.2'1976).
f.
"Verification that crane design complies with the guidelines of CMAA Specification 70 and Chapter 2-1 of ANSI B30.2-1976, including
'he demonstration of equivalency of actual design requirements for instances where specific compliance with these standards is not provided,"
~Res ense:
The Circulating Water Pump and Screen House Crane was designed and manufactured in 1969-1970 by the Whiting Corporation according to the guidelines of E.O.C.I Specification 61 and, ANSI B30.2-1967.
These two standards were the predecessors of CMAA Specification 70 and ANSI B30.2-1976, respectively.
In order to determine compliance, studies were made comparing the specifications under which the crane was designed and manufactured, against the more recent versions of the specifications on a item by item basis.
The crane was then analyzed in those areas where a, change in the specifications had occurred.
The study comparing the ANSI standard and the resulting analysis of the crane in the areas of difference indicated that the crane was in compliance.
'The study comparing CMAA Specification 70 with
. E.O.C.I. Specification 61 was,performed by the Whiting Corp.
and indicated several areas where detailed calculations were required, to verify compliance.
These calculations showed that there were four areas in which the crane did not meet CMAA Specification 70-Revision 75, design standards, These four areas are discussed below:
1.
The hoist sheave materials is ASTM A48 Class 35 cast iron instead of steel or ASTM A48-64 or later Class 40 iron, as specified in CMAA-'0.
Disposition A design change wiU. be initiated to install new sheaves.
Please note that the reason why the
-sheaves are being replaced on this crane but not on the Containment Polar Cranes or on the Auxiliary Building Crane (see letter No. AEP:NRC:0514C, Section 2.1-3-f, Items 3 and 7), is that the sheaves on the Circulating Water, Pump and Screen, House Crane are smeller and thus the compression stress is larger.
2.
The horsepower and torque, rating of the hoist motor is exceeded by 4.75% when handling a rated load of 30 tons.
Disposition - The motor has a 60 minute 70 C temperature 0
ri'se rating at the rated 40 hp.- At the required 41.9 hp, the motor has a
77 C temperature rise at 60 minutes.
0 The CMAA standards for Class F insulation allow a 105 C
temperature rise.
Therefore, the motor willmeet the temperature rise limitations and is adequate.
3.
The required hoist brake torque exceeds the rated torque by 2%.
Disposition A design change will be initiated to modify the existing brake so that it willmeet the required torque rating.
4.
The longitudinal stiffeners do not meet the moment of inertia requirements.
Disposition A design change will be initiated to add longitudinal stiffeners to meet the moment of
'nertia requirements, Table 4 identifies compliance of the Circulating Water Pump and Screen House Crane with certain areas of concern in Specification CMAA-70.
This table is similar to Table 2.1.3.P.l in our letter No. AEP:NRC:0514C
.dated June 18, 1982.
The two "No" entries in the compliance column have been addressed in the preceding item descriptions.
g, "Exceptions, if any, taken to ANSI B30.2-1976 with respect to operator training, qualification, and conduct."
'~Res oese:
This item was responded to in our letter No. AEP:NRC:0514C, dated June 18, 1982.
AEP: NRC: 0514E TABLE 4 Circulating Water Pump and Screen House Crane AREA OF CONCERN REFERENCE IN CHAA-70 REVIEWED BY WHITING CORP.
IS COMPLIANCE INDICATED?
1.
Impact Al 1 owances 2.
Calculations-Torsion 3.3.2.1.1.3 3.3.2.1.3 YES YES YES YES 3.
4.
Longitudinal Stiffeners Allowable Compressive Stress 3.3.3.1.2 3.3.3.1.3 3.3.3.3 3.4.3 YES YES NO*
YES 5.
Fatigue 6.
Hoist Rope 7.
Drum Design 8.
Drum Design-Groove Pitch 9.
Gear Design 10.
Bridge Brake Design 11.
Hoist Brake Design 12.
Bumper Stops 13.
Rules for Static Control System 14.
Restart Position 3.10 3.3.3.1.3 4.2 4.4.1 4.4.3.1 4.4.3.2 4.5 4.7.2 4.7.4 4.12 5.4.6 5.6.2 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES NO*
YES Not Applicable YES
- See the response to Item 2. 1-3-f.
Mr. H. R. Denton AEP:NRC: 0514E This document has been prepared following Corporate procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to ensure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
/sag Attachment R.
S.
Hunter Vice President cc'.
John E. Dolan - Columbus M. P. Alexich R.
W. Jurgensen W. G. Smith, Jr.
Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Charnoff Joe Williams, Jr.
NRC Resident Inspector at Cook Plant - Bridgman
~
~
4
, 4 Vl',)
gC)
~ )')
V 4 ~
'. )
4 I
K
- f )
I I
.1 '
) ")') ) ) '
S "4 >>
afV) )
, tht,j<)
, ) ) i j
,)
0()" T<)D'I ).
ig,",,'f )
~ 4
)+4V )
'(V)
> '1>tl) ~ 1) )ttf f gf I') ') ))Ig
~, ( Vg>)4 f4,(
)
4 I ft I"J 4
~ t 1444 ~
O'J>>
V )
.!)
);)Lo'.) -;)r.; <.).'.. )
";. ).)L 4 )
I }
4 1
4 4
))4)f","P);
)'4th
~
~ tfk VVI
't 1
~
C4>
g V
!4
~
) )1.)tv )
~.)
~
A<id') f4 4
~: -3 <,."J 4
4 ~ QC>)VII' "Q
4 4) 4 F
4
' f',.
J 4th
~4
ANE AND H
'T WH lt A L TABLE 1 OR C
N OA S r R
A E
P N
~AEP:llRC:
14)
SHEtT 1 OF 2
)TFH CltANK Olt NOISE N
CAI'TY'OCAT)ONANO ORAVING ELtCTRIC Olt t)ANU*L PvRO
)IKAVIKSTLOAo & Wc)CHT REHARKS 1
AVX)L)AI)YBUILD)HC CltANK 150T/20T 2
CONTAINHKNT POLAR CRANE 250T/35T AVXILI AltY BUILD)HO 12-5170 CONTAINHKNT BUILDINCS 12-5170 ELECTRIC ELECT)t IC SKE TABLE 2 1 3 C.1 or LcTTFR AEP)t)RC)0514C SKK TAsLE 2 1 3 C 2 or LETTER AEPINRC)0514C t)A )H Hoox 150T AUX HOOK 20T t)*IN HooK 250T Aux ltooK 35T 3
CIRCVLATINC WATER PVHPANO SCREEN House CRANE - 30T 4
OICSEL OKNCRATOR CRANK 2T CIRCVLATINC WATER PUMP ANO SCREEN HOUSE 12-5167 AND 12-5168 AUX)I IARY BUILD)Ho 12-5167 ELccTR)c t)ANUAL
~ 0 ~
0 IKSKL CKHERATOR PARTs t)AX)HUH 4,000 Ls.
5 RECIPltoCAT)ON CHARCINC PUMP Ho)sT - 2T AUXILI ARY BVILDINC 12-5167 t)AHVAL PVHP E'LUID BLCOK 3)500 LB~
6 CENTRIFUCAL CHARD INC PUHP Ho)sT 2T SAFKTY INJECT)OH PUMP Ho I sT 1-1/2T CONTA IHHKNT SPRAY PUHP t)o I ST 4T AUXILIARYBUILD)NO 12-5167 Aux)LIAltY BUILD)HC 12-5167 AUXILI AIIY BUILDING 12>>66 t)ANVAL t1AHUAL t1ANUAL PUMP CASINO (BARREL) 4,950 I.s.
PUHP RTOR 2)450 LS ~
PUMP ANo t)OTOR 7)575 9
RESIDUAL t)KAT REMOVAL PUMP Ho)sT 3T 10 tIAIN STEAH VALVE Ho)sT - 5T f
11 RECIRCULATION VALVE ~CIST 3T 4
Aux ILIARY Bv)LDIHO 12-5166 CONTAINMENT BUILOIHCS 12-5169 AUX)LIARYBVILOIHC 12-5167 t)ANUAL t)ANVAL t)AHUAL PVHP PULLOUT ASSEHOLT 3,865 Ls.
VALVE P)sTON ANO SHAFT 5)250 Lso YALVE ANO OPcltATOR 2)530 LSo 12 AUXILIA)tTPEED)IATKR PVHP <<)DIST 2T TURS INK Bu Il D INC 12-5167
)1ANUAL TURB INK 3)360 Ls ~
NOTES:
wIT)t RKSI KCT To THE HOISTS)
QUAN)TT RKFKRS To THK NVMSKlt OF MONORAILS PhtSKNTo tN SOME CASKS)
THE SANK HOISTINC HECHANISH IS USED ON SEVERAL DIFFERENT )IOHORAILso THK CIIANE AND Ho I ST SCHKOVLK (OltAMIHCS 12 3891 ANO 12 3891A)
DEL INATKS ))HAT HOIST)Ho HECHANISHS SHALL Bt USED ON EACH MONORAILo
~ ~
tN SOHE CASKS CENKRAL AREAS KNCOHPASSINC THE CRANK OR HOIST CROUP ARE SHOVN AHO THUS THE AREA MAY ENCOMPASS HOIIE THAN ONE CRANK OR HOIST IN A CROUP ALSO) THK PLACKHENT SHO)IH IS APPROX IHATK
TaBLE 1 (coNTINUEO)
CR H
AN HO T
WH RC A LO O
ORO 0
H 0 HAC SAF T
R C
E PEE H
~AEP:RRCI 14E SHtcT 2 or 2
>OTCSI " THt roILovINC ARC THC THREE HEAvICST I.oAos I.IrTao BY THC 0IRCULATINC WATER PUHP AHO SCREEN House 0RAHC.
ALL THRCC LOAOS ARC PAEIT Of'HC 0 I RCULAT INC WATER PUHP W
ACTOR - - - - 314000 I.B
%TOR SUPPORT ANO 16,000 Lo ~
TURHINC UALVES ROTATIHC ELCHCHTE f64000 LB'HROUO AHO CASINO (PULL-OUT ASSEHBLY)
C Ho TABLE 2 W
R A LO DR C
N O
0 H
G S
F R
T O E II N AEP IHRG10514E SHKCT 1 or 3
<<TCN CRANC Olt Ho 1 ST H
N C
P QTT LOCATION AHD oltAVINC ELCCTR IC OR <<1ANUAL PO>l R
RKNARKS 13
<<1AIH TURBINE BUILDING c RANK 24oT/5oT 1
TURBINE BUILOINC 12-5169 AHD 12-5170 ELECTRIC
<<IAIH Hoox - 240T Avx Hoax 50T 14 15 16 AUXILIARYTURB>NK Bult.DING CRANE 10T/4T
<<IACHINE SNOP CRANK 10T 0RVHNIHC AltCA CRANK 5T TURB INC BUILDINC 12-5169 AND 12-5170 SERVICK BUILD>HO 12-5170A AUXILIARY BUILDING 12-5167 ELCcTRlc ELKcTR>c ELECTRIC
<<"AIM HOOR 10T AUx~
HOCK 4T 17 18 HK'll ANO SPKNT PVCL HANOLINC CRANK 1T/1T ICE CONDENSER CRAHF.
3T AUXILIARY BUILDING 12-5170 CONTAINNENT BVILDINCS 12-5170 ELECTRIC ELCCTRIC 2
SCPARATK 1T HOOKS OH A Blt>DGK BRIDGE STRUCTURC CAPABLK OF SVPPoltTINC 2T LOAD 19
<<1AN>PULATOR CRANC 1-1/2T/1-1/2T CONTA IHIIKNT BUILDINGS 12-5170 Et.CcTR>c FUEL CR IPPCR 1-1/2T AUX~
HOOK 1-1/2T 20 TURB INC 0IL TANK CltANE 5T TURB INC BUILDING 12-5169
<<1ANVAL 21 22 24 Bo ILElt PEED PVNP CHANC 10T SPENT FUEL PILTER Ho>sT 5T RCACTOR COOPLANT ANO SCAL WATER PILTERS Ho>sT 5T RKFVELINC WATER PVR IF ICATION F ILTKlt
<<<<o>sT - 5T TURBINE BUI>.DINC 12-5168 Avx>LIART BUILDING 12-5168 AUXILIART BUILDING 12-5167 AUXILIARY BUILDING 12-5167
'ANVAL Et.cc TR>c ELCCTR I C ELKCTltI C 25 COHCCNTRATKsl SCAL WATClt AND
<<ON ExCHANGE PILTCRS Ho>sT 5T AUXIt.>ART BUILDING 12-5167 ELECTRIC 26 LOADING oocK Hol sT - 10T SERVICK BVILOINC 12-5170A ELCCTR I C TURB INC 01L TANK E>IKRCKNCY PUNP Ho>sT 1-1/2T TVRB INC BUILD>HO 12-5169 ELKCTltlC
S
Sheet 2 of 3 TAOLE 2 (CONTIIIUEO}
CRAllES lQIO I<<OISTS N<<ERE A LOAD DROP CAID<<OT DAIIAOE SAFETY RELATED E IPIIE<<IT AEP:I<<RC:0514E I 'Tcn II CRANE Olt llo I ST HOG
'QTT
+
LOCATION ANO DRAM INC ELECTRIC OR MAHVAL Pou RcnARKs 28 TltASH OASKCT 51 2
GIRCVLATINC WATER Punp ANO SCRKCH HOUSE 12-5167 ELECTRIC 29 GHLoltlnK GONY*IHKR Ilo I s T 2T 1
PLANT YARD 12-5160 ELECTRIC STEEL STORACC Ilo t sT 2'T MACHIHC SHOP llolsT - 4T Tuna<<HE OUILolno 12-5168 2
SERVICE OVILDINC 12-5170A ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ICE MAKINC MAClllNC llolsT 5T GONTAlnnENT PVRCE SUPPLT UNIT llolsT 1/2T 1
AUKILIARYOUILDINC 12-5'170 2
Aux<
- MANUAI, MANUAL 44 MACHINE SNOP IlolsT - 1T SCRYICK OVILOINC 12-51'70A 8LKCTRI C