ML17319B331
| ML17319B331 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 05/06/1982 |
| From: | Varga S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17319B330 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8205190112 | |
| Download: ML17319B331 (3) | |
Text
~p,s IlEgo s ~C"
~o ooo 0 Q v,
<<0 oi UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 8205190ii2 82050b PDR ADOCK 05000315 P
~
~
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE'OF NUCLEAR REACTOR'REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT HO.
" TO FACILITY-OPERATING'LICENSE NO.
DPR-58 AND AMEHDMEHT NO.
4 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-74:
INDIANAAND MICHIGAN'LECTRIC COMPANY DONALD C.
COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT NOS.
1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-315 AND 50-316
==
Introduction:==
~. " By letter dated November 4, 1981, as supplemented January 18, 1982, the Indiana and Micfugan Electric Company (the licensee) proposed to amend Appendix 8 to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-58 and DPR-74 for the Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos 1
and 2 (the Plant).
The proposed amendment would delete the Appendix 8 Environmental Technical Specifications in their entirety and replace it with new Appendix B Environmental Technical Specifj-cations consisting of two parts; part I Radiological and Part II Nonradiological, Environmental Protection Plan.
part I represents a restructuring of the Radiological Environmental Technical Specifications (RETS) in a manner that facilitates revising it during the ongoing review 5ased on Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50.
Among other things, this review would relocate the Radiological Environmental Technical Specifi-cations in Appendix A to the licenses.
part II represents a revision of the nonradiological Technical Specifications (NRETS) which would eliminate all water quality related items in favor of an Environmental Protection Plan (EPP).
Ourevaluation of the January 1&, 1982 submittal is not complete therefore items 4.1.1.3 Erosion and 4.1.1.4 Scour Studies will remain.
They will
'be retained in the old A'ppendix B now called Environmental Technical Specificafions Part III Hon Water guality, Non-Radiological.
Evaluation The RETS have been under review for compliance with Appendix I to 10 CFR
'art 50 for some time.
When.his review is complete the new RETS wil'1 be incorporated into Appendix A Technical Specifications This current review is merely to determine that the requirements of the existing RETS have'-not been changed by.the restructure into a section separate from Appendix.B NRETS.
The res.ructure into a separate section is for convenience, both now for concurrent review of Appendix B non-radiological matters and for later relocation of the RETS.
We have reviewed Part 1 of Appendix B Technical Specifications and find that the requirements have not been reduced in ef,ectiveness
DELETED
. 5,5-1 Amendment Hos.
54 5 40
I