ML17313A826

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Refers to NRC Insp Repts 50-528/98-14,50-529/98-14 & 50-530/98-14 on 980526-0721.NRC Reviewed Comments of Util & Revised Insp Repts Where Appropriate for Accuracy & Clarification.Revised Insp Repts Encl
ML17313A826
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 03/03/1999
From: Howell A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: James M. Levine
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
Shared Package
ML17313A827 List:
References
50-528-98-14, 50-529-98-14, 50-530-98-14, EA-98-382, NUDOCS 9903090121
Download: ML17313A826 (20)


See also: IR 05000528/1998014

Text

CATEGORY 2

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

G

05000528

050005290

05000530 R

NOTES: STANDARDIZED PLANT

Standardized plant.

Standardized plant.

ACCESSION NBR:9903090121

DOC.DATE: 99/03/03

NOTARIZED: NO

DOCKET ¹

FACIL:STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Arizona Publi

05000528

STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Arizona Publi

05000529

STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 3, Arizona Publi

05000530

AUTH.NAME

AUTHOR AFFILIATION

HOWELL,A.T.

Region

4 (Post

820201)

RECIP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

LEVINE,J.M.

Arizona Public Service

Co.

(formerly Arizona Nuclear Power

C

SUBJECT: Refers to NRC insp repts 50-528/98-14,50-529/98-14

&

50-530/98-14

on 980526-0721.NRC

reviewed comments of util

A

6 revised insp repts where appropriate for accuracy

&

clarification. Revised insp repts encl.

T

DISTRIBUTION CODE, IE45F

COPIES

RECEIVED-LTR

ENCL

SIZE

E

TITLE: Summary of Significant Meeting with Licensee

(Part

50)

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD4-2

PD

INTERNAL: DEDRO

NRR/DRPM/PERB

RES/DET/EIB

EXTERNAL: NOAC

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

FIELDS,M

F1LE CENTER

OG

ROED

RGN4

FILE

01

NRC

PDR

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

1

1.

1

1

1

1

1

1

N

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS

DESK

(DCD)

ON EXTENSION 415-2083

OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATIONi CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CO

T CONTROL

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES

REQUIRED:

LTTR

10

ENCL

10

4

e

Og

hR R80

+op*+

UNITEDSTATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION

REGION Iv

611 RYAN PLAZADRIVE, SUITE 400

ARUNGTON, TEXAS76011~

Iylarch 3,

1999

EA 98-382

James

M. Levine, Senior Vice

President, Nuclear

Arizona Public Service Company

P.O. Box 53999

Phoenix, Arizona 85072-3999

SUBJECT:

REVISION TO NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-528/98-14; 50-529/98-14;

50-530/98-14

Dear Mr. Levine:

This refers to NRC Inspection Report 50-528/98-14; 50-529/98-14; 50-530/98-14, issued on

August 28, 1998. This inspection report was the subject of a predecisional enforcement

conference on September

14, 1998, and a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil

Penalty was forwarded to you on December 21, 1998. By letter dated January 13, 1999,

Arizona Public Service Company responded to the Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition

of Civil Penalty by agreeing to the violations and paying the civil penalty.

During the predecisional enforcement conference, you provided us with a markup of the

inspection report with written comments.

This document is included in Enclosure 1.

We have reviewed your comments and have revised the inspection report where appropdate for

accuracy and clarification. These revisions do not affect the overall conclusions of the

inspection that were provided to you in our December 21, 1998, letter, nor do they affect the

results of the predecisional enforcement conference.

A summary of our review of each

comment is included in Enclosure 2 and the revised inspection report is provided in

Enclosure 3. Changes in the report are indicated by revision bars in the right margin. Please

replace the original inspection report with the enclosed revision.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of

Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures willbe placed in the NRC's Public

Document Room.

9903090f2i

9'70303

PDR

ADOCK OS000528

6

PDR

li

ll

I

4

~

f

I

I

Arizona Public Service Company

-2-

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we willbe pleased to discuss them with

you.

Sincerely,

>wdC;

Arthur T. Howell III, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos.:

50-528; 50-529; 50-530

License Nos.: NPF-41; NPF-51; NPF-74

Enclosures:

1. Arizona Public Service Company

NRC Inspection Report Markup and Comments

2. NRC Review of Arizona Public Service Company

NRC Inspection Report Markup Comments

3. Revised NRC Inspection Report

50-528/98-14; 50-529/98-14; 50-530/98-14

cc w/enclosures:

Mr. Steve Olea

Arizona Corporation Commission

1200 W. Washington Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Douglas K. Porter, Senior Counsel

Southern California Edison Company

Law Department, Generation Resources

P.O. Box 800

Rosemead,

California 91770

Chairman

Maricopa County Board of Supervisors,

301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor

Phoenix, Arizona 85003

Aubrey V. Godwin, Director

Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency

4814 South 40 Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85040

Arizona Public Service Company

Angela K. Krainik, Manager

Nuclear Licensing

Arizona Public Service Company

P.O. Box 52034

Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034

John C. Horne, Vice, President

Power Supply

El Paso Electric Company.

2025 N. Third Street, Suite 220

Phoenix, Arizona 85004

Terry Bassham,

Esq.

General Counsel

El Paso Electric Company

123 W. Mills

El Paso, Texas

79901

Mr. John W. Schumann

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

Southern California Public Power Authority

P.O. Box 51111, Room 1255-C

Los Angeles, California 90051-0100

Mr. David Summers

Public Service Company of New Mexico

414 Silver SW, ¹1 206

Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

Mr. Brian Katz

Southern California Edison Company

14300 Mesa Road, Drop D41-SONGS

San Clemente, California 92672

Mr. Robert Henry

Salt River Project

6504 East Thomas Road

Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

i

Arizona Public Service Company

-4-

bcc to DCD (I

5)

bcc distrib. by RIV

Regional Administrator

Resident Inspector

DRS Director

DRS Deputy Director

DRP Director

DRS-PSB

Branch Chief (DRP/D)

MIS System

Project Engineer (DRP/D)

RIV File

Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

W. Brown, RC

J. Lieberman, OE (0-7H5)

OE:EA File (0-7H5)

G. Sanborn, EO

DOCUMENT NAME: RA PNPV814REV.RLB

To receive co

of document, Indicate In box: "C" = Co

without enclosures

"E = Co

with enclosures

N

= No co

RIV:Rl:EMB

O'EMB

E

D:DRS

RLB

ate r/Im

2II /99

DPower

2/W/99

ATHowel

~/99

OFFICIALRECORD COPY '

t 0

(I

lf

j

ENCLOSURE 1

ARIZONAPUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY

NRC INSPECTION REPORT MARKUPAND COMMENTS

+

8/28/98

ENCLOSURE

1

NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-528/98-14; 50-529/98-14; 50430/98-14

F

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION

REGION IV

'611 RYAN PLAZADRIVE, SUITE 400

ARLINGTON,TEXAS

August 28, 1998

EA 9&382

James M. Levine, Senior

Vice'resident,

Nuclear

Arizona Public Service Company

P.O. Box 53999

Phoenix, Arizona 85072-3999

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-528/98-14; 50-529/98-14; 50-530/98-14

Dear Mr, Levine:

From May 26 through July 21, 1998, a special inspection was conducted at your Palo Verde Nuclear

Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, reactor facilities in response to your identification of degraded

performance capabilities of the high-pressure safety injection system. Additional inwffice review was

conducted following the onsite portion of the inspection and an exit meeting was conducted on July

21, 1998. The enclosed report presents the scope and results of that inspection.

Based on the results of the inspection, four apparent violations were identified and are being

considered for escalated enforcement action in accordance with the "General Statement of Policy

and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions" {Enforcement Policy), NUREG-1600, Revision 1.

These apparent violations involve: 1) one apparent violation with two examples of Technical Specification 3.5.2 for operating Units 1 and 2 with an inoperable high-pressure safety injection

system flowpath for greater than the allowed outage time; 2) one apparent violation with three

examples of Technical Specification 3.0.3 for having both trains of the high-pressure safety injection

system (Units 1 and 2) inoperable without initiating actions to shut down the plant; 3) one apparent

violation with five examples of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, "Corrective Action,"for not

promptly identifying and not promptly correcting problems with the high-pressure safety injection

pump discharge check valves; and 4) one apparent violation with two examples of Technical Specification 6.8.1 for not making required control room log entries. Accordingly, no Notice of

Violation is presently being issued for these inspection findings. In addition, please be advised that

the number and characterization of apparent violations described in the enclosed report may change

as a result of further NRC review.

An open predecisional enforcement conference to discuss these apparent violations has been

scheduled for September

14, 1998, at 9 a.m. (CDT) in the Region IVoffice. The decision to hold a

predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has determined that violations

have occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. This conference is being held

I

Cj.

~

Arizona Public Service Company

-2-

to obtain additional information to enable the NRC to make an enforcement decision, such as a

common understanding of the facts, root causes,

missed opportunities to identify the apparent

violations sooner, corrective actions, significance of the issues, and the need for lasting and effective

corrective action.

The predecisional enforcement conference willprovide an opportunity for you to point out any errors

in our inspection rep'ort and for you to provide any information concerning your perspectives on 1)

the severity of the violations, 2) the application of the factors that the NRC considers when it

determines the amount of a civil penalty that may be assessed

in accordance with Section VI.B.2 of

the Enforcement Policy, and 3) any other application of the Enforcement Policy to this case,

including the exercise of discretion in accordance with Section Vll.

In addition, during the predecisional enforcement conference, we would like you to address:

1 ) the adequacy of your operating experience assessment

program to identify the applicability of

operating experience and to properly assess

industry or in-house information on the operation of

your facilities; 2) the adequacy of your inservice testing program to determine check valve

operability; 3) efforts to improve operator logkeeping practices; 4) the evaluation of the as-found

degraded condition of the high-pressure safety injection system with respect to conformance to the

emergency core cooling system acceptance

criteria of 10 CFR 50 46; and 5) the justification that a

failure of an emergency diesel generator to continue running at some point during its mission time

should not be considered the most limiting single failure consideration. With respect to item 4), to the

extent that this evaluation used assumptions and inputs that were different from those that were in

effect prior to the discovery of the condition, we request that you specifically identify these

differences and discuss the bases for them.

You will be advised by separate correspondence

of the results of our deliberations on this matter. No

response regarding these apparent violations is required at this time.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we willbe pleased to discuss them with

you.

Sincerely,

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos.: 50-528; 50-529; 50-530

License Nos.: NPF-41; NPF-51; NPF-74

J ~

I

Arizona Public Service Company

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report

50-528/98-1 4; 50-529/98-1 4; 50-530/98-14

cc w/enclosure:

Mr. Steve Olea

Arizona Corporation Commission

1200 W. Washington Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85007

'ouglas

K. Porter, Senior Counsel

Southern California Edison Company

Law Department, Generation Resources

P.O. Box 800

Rosemead,

California 91770

Chairman

Maricopa County Board of Supervisors

301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor

Phoenix, Arizona 85003

Aubrey V. Godwin, Director

~

~

~

Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency

4814 South 40 Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85040

Angela K. Krainik, Manager

Nuclear Licensing

Arizona Public Service Company

P.O. Box 52034

Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034

John C. Horne, Vice President

Power Supply

El Paso Electric Company

2025 N. Third Street, Suite 220

Phoenix, Arizona 85004

Terry Bassham,

Esq.

General Counsel

El Paso Electric Company

123 W. Mills

El Paso, Texas 79901

) ~

I

Arizona Public Service Company

Mr. Robert Burt

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

Southern California Public Power Authority

111 North Hope Street, Room 1255-B

Los Angeles, California 90051

Mr. David Summers

Public Service Company of New Mexico

414 Silver SW,'¹1206

Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

Mr. Brian Katz

Southern California Edison Company

14300 Mesa Road, Drop D41-SONGS

San Clemente, California 92672

Mr. Robert Henry

Salt River Project

6504 East Thomas Road

Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

I ~

jl