ML17313A753
| ML17313A753 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 01/11/1999 |
| From: | James M. Levine ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 102-04230-JML-S, 102-4230-JML-S, GL-97-01, GL-97-1, NUDOCS 9901210363 | |
| Download: ML17313A753 (9) | |
Text
CATEGORY 1 REGULAT RY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIO SYSTEM (RXDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9901210363 DOC.DATE: 99/01/11 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:STN-.50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Arizona Publi 05000528 STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Arizona Publi 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 3, Arizona Publi 05000530 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION LEVINE,J.M.
Arizona Public Service Co.
(formerly Arizona Nuclear Power RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Records Management Branch (Document Control Desk)
C
SUBJECT:
Provides response to RAX re GL 97-01, "Degradation of CRDM/
CEDM Nozzles
& Other Vessel Closure Head Penetrations."
Ltr A
& associated encl do not make any commitments to NRC.
T DISTRIBUTION CODE:
A075D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: GL-97-01 Degraduation of Control Rod Drive Mechanism
& 0th r Vessel NOTES: STANDARDIZED PLANT Standardized plant.
Standardized plant.
05000526 05000529 0500053%
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD4-2 LA PDl-1/HAROLD,J INTERNAL:
LE CENTER RES EMMEB EXTERNAL: NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
0 1
1 1
1 1
1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD4-2'D FIELDS,M NRR/DE/EMCB RGNo
~
~
COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 3
3 1
1 NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROE DESK (DCD)
ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 11 ENCL 10
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station James M. L'evirte
'enior Vice President Nuclear TEL (602) 393-5300 FAX(602)393.6077 Mail Station 7602 P.O. Box 52034 Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Station P1-37 Washington, DC 20555 102-04230-JML/SAB/RMW January 11, 1999 Reference 1: Letter from David J. Modeen, Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), to Mr. Gus C. Lainas, NRC, "Responses to NRC Requests for Additional Information on Generic Letter 97-01", dated December 11, 1998.
Dear Sirs:
Subject:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Units 1, 2, and 3 Docket Nos. STN 50-528/529/530
Response
to Request for Additional Information Regarding Generic Letter 97-01, "Degradation of CRDM/CEDM Nozzles and Other Vessel Closure Head Penetrations".
The Enclosure to this letter provides the additional information regarding Generic Letter 97-01, "Degradation of CRDM/CEDM Nozzles and Other Vessel Closure Head Penetrations", for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station that was requested in your letter to Arizona Public Service Company (APS) dated September 4, 1998.
This letter and the associated enclosure do not make any commitments to the NRC.
l Please contact Mr. Scott Bauer at (602) 393-5978 if you have any questions or would like additional information regarding this matter.
Sincerely, Enclosure JML/SAB/RMW/rlh cc:
E. W. Merschoff M. B. Fields J. H. Moorman 9'ttOi2i036G 990iii PDR ADQCK 05000528 P
f
~,4 a
s,p + ~ y(gl 4l gt
~'a
~
as L ~'y 4
. <IP t
e V
yp,~, ~~o y vw,~yam go, o-~ g< ~
4 It.
il 11&
4 d
,(
~
Og
ENCLOSURE Response to Request forAdditional Information Regarding Generic Letter 97-01, "Degradation of CRDM/CEDM Nozzle and Other Vessel Closure Head Penetrations".
y a
y s
yy""(
Ik a
II y
II
~NRC R t
Designate which crack susceptibility model is being endorsed for the assessment of CEDM penetration nozzles at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (PVNGS).
Indicate how the susceptibility model being endorsed relates to the CEOG's integrated program for assessing the CEDM penetration nozzles at ABB-CE designed plants, and whether or not the design of the susceptibility model is consistent with the contents of Topical Report CE NPSD-1085.
If the ABB-CE's PITM model is being endorsed for the assessment of CEDM penetration nozzles at PVNGS, address items a. through e. that follow.
If the Dominion Engineering susceptibility model is being endorsed for the assessment of CEDM penetration nozzles at PVNGS, address the items f. through i. that follow.
If the PITM models are bein endorsed for the assessment of our CEDM enetration nozzles:
Provide an expanded discussion and additional details describing how the time-to-failure model in the PITM relates to the PITM's time-to-initiation model.
In particular, include an expanded discussion of how the PITM model relates growth of postulated flaws to the time-to-initiation model, and how the two aspects relate to each other and to the probability of failure methodology.
b.
Provide the latest PITM susceptibility ranking of CEDM penetration nozzles, and ifapplicable of the vessel head instrumentation nozzles at PVNGS relative to the rankings of those at the other CEOG member plants.
c.
Provide a description of how the PITM model for assessing postulated flaws in vessel head penetration nozzles was bench-marked, and list and discuss the standards the models were bench-marked against.
.d.
Provide any additional information regarding how the model will be refined to allow the input of plant-specific inspection data into the model's analysis methodology.
e.
Describe how the variability in the product forms, material specifications, and heat treatments used to fabricate each CEDM penetration nozzle at the GEOG member utilities are addressed in the PITM model.
E I, +II g ~
E 'I II I, g
h t
~ II
~
II.
I E
II 1 I l.
I III S
h h
lf the susce tibilit model develo ed b Dominion En ineerin is bein endorsed for the assessment of our CEDM enetration nozzles:
Provide a description of how the various product forms, material specifications, and heat treatments used to fabricate each CEDM penetration nozzle at the GEOG member utilities are handled in the Dominion Engineering susceptibility model.
g.
Provide any additional information, if available, regarding how the model will be refined to allow the input of plant-specific inspection data into the model's analysis methodology.
Describe how the Dominion Engineering crack initiation and crack growth models for assessing postulated flaws in vessel head penetration nozzles were bench-marked, and a listing and discussion of the standards the models were bench-marked against.
Provide the latest model susceptibility rankings of CEDM penetration nozzles in GEOG member plants based on the results of the, Dominion Engineering susceptibility model analyses of these CEDM and ICI nozzles.
APS Res onse APS participated in an industry effort that was coordinated by NEI to develop a generic response to the NRC's requests for additional information regarding Generic Letter 97-01.
The generic responses that were developed through this effort were provided to the NRC in Reference 1.
Therefore, the APS response to the above requested information will refer to the appropriate enclosures of Reference 1.
The first paragraph of the requested information requires certain information regarding the crack susceptibility model that is being endorsed for the assessment of CEDM penetration nozzles at PVNGS.
This information is provided in Enclosure 4 of Reference
- 1. Since the endorsed model is the EPRI model, which was developed from the Dominion Engineering model, items a. through e. of the requested information are not applicable.
The responses to items f. through i. are as follows:
Item f:
Refer to Enclosure 2, Question 1, Response 1.a, of Reference 1.
Item g:
Item h:
Refer to Enclosure 2, Question 3, Response 3.a, of Reference 1.
Refer to Enclosure 2, Question 2, Response 2.a, of Reference 1.
Item I:
Refer to Enclosure 2, Question 4, Response 4, of Reference 1.
o
~
(y EP
'll~ Q~
k