ML17312B265
| ML17312B265 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 02/13/1997 |
| From: | Thomas C NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9703030333 | |
| Download: ML17312B265 (8) | |
Text
ply REQ0 (4
+'
Cy 0O t~
tA0
+
~O
++*++
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON> D.C. 20R~001 February 13, 1997 LICENSEE:
Arizona Public Service Company FACILITY:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
1 The NRC staff met with a representative of the Arizona Public Service Company (APS) on January 24, 1997, at NRC Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss security issues at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS).
The following individuals attended the meeting:
LeHoine (Jay)
Cunningham, NRC Richard
- Rosano, NRC Charles
- Thomas, NRC Angie Krainik, APS The licensee stated that in its submittal to the NRC, it ip requesting NRC'.~s approval to add a safeguards repository vault in the D Administration Building.
The staff stated that NRC's approval was not required, and a formal letter on this topic would be issued shortly.
It was later determin'ed that the letter was issued on January 16, 1997.
The licensee stated that it had submitted Revisions 40 and 41 to its Security Plan to Region IV.
Although several staff issues were resolved and incorporated into Revision 40, 8 to 10 outstanding issues required additional information.
The Region IV staff had previously reviewed the additional information regarding the staff concerns, which were incorporated and submitted as Revision 41 to its Security Plan.
The NRR staff stated that it was currently reviewing Revisions 40 and 41.
The differences between 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p) requirements were briefly discussed.
The NRC staff stated that the 10 CFR 50.90 process requires a safety evaluation and an amendment.
Changes to licensee security.
programs under 10 CFR 50.54(p) do not require a safety evaluation or NRC approval.
The staff briefly discussed Generic Letter (GL) 95-08, "10 CFR 50.54(p)
Process for Changes to Security Plans Without Prior NRC Approval,"
which gave suggestions on how the utilities could resolve security issues under 10 CFR 50.54(p).
The licensee stated that it had incorporated the methodology in GL 95-08 in the preparation of Revisions 40 and 41 to its Security Plan.
03OQ50 9703030333 9702'L3 PDR ADCICK 05000528 F
t'
~ 4 Id I I I
)I The vehicle barrier system (VBS),rule and unresolved issues were briefly discussed.
The discussion pertain'ed to the unresolved issues that were discussed with PVNGS staff in the.VBS exit meeting held at the Palo Verde site.
The staff stated thatadditional information was required in order to address PVNGS's unresolved issues.
'The licensee stated th'at it would submit its analysis and justifications to, resolve:the staff concerns.
d I
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Charles R.
- Thomas, Project Manager Project Directorate IV-2 Division of Reactor Projects III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.
STN 50-528, STN 50-529",
and STN 50-530 cc:
See next page DISTR I BUTION;
~dd I Docket File PUBLIC ACRS PDIB-2 Reading OGC
~E-mai1 F. Hiraglia (FJH)
A. Thadani (ACT)
J.
Roe (JWR)
E.
Adensam (EGAl)
W. Bateman (WHB)
J. Clifford (JWC)
C. Thomas, (CRT)
E. Peyton, (ESP)
E. Jordan, (JKR)
R.
Zimmerman, (RPZ)
H. Drouin, (MXD)
D. Kirsch, (DFK)
DOCUMENT NAME:
PV12497.HTS OFC PD IV-2/PM PD IV-2/PH DIV-2/LA DATE CThomas:y 2/ Z/97 JCliffo 2/ I/97 E eyt n
1
<97 LC nn ham 2/
97 OFFICIAL RECORDaBOPY 1
EI a
I ll h
P>
1 III'I il J
i The vehicle barrier system (VBS) rule and unresolved issues were briefly discussed.
The discussion pertained to the unresolved issues that were discussed with PVNGS staff in the VBS exit meeting held at the Palo Verde site.
The staff stated that additional information was required in order to address PVNGS's unresolved issues.
The licensee stated that it would submit its analysis and justifications to resolve the staff concerns.
Docket Nos.
STN 50-528, STN 50-529, and STN 50-530 cc:
See next page harles R.
- homas, Project Nanager Project Directorate IV-2 Division of Reactor Projects III/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
~
~
CC:
Mr. Steve Olea Arizona Corporation Commission 1200 W. Washington Street
- Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Douglas Kent Porter Senior Counsel Southern California Edison Company Law Department, Generation Resources P.O.
Box 800
- Rosemead, California 91770 Senior Resident Inspector USNRC P. 0.
Box 40 Buckeye, Arizona 85326 Regional Administrator, Region IV U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Harris Tower & Pavillion 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, Texas 76011-8064
- Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTN:
Chairman 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor.
- Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Mr. Aubrey V. Godwin, Director Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency 4814 South 40 Street
'Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Ms. Angela K. Krainik, Manager Nuclear Licensing Arizona Public Service Company P.O.
Box 52034
- Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 Mr. John C. Horne, Vice President Power Supply Palo Verde Services 2025 N. Third Street, Suite 220
- Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Mr. Robert Burt Los Angeles Department of Water
& Power Southern California Public Power Authority 111 North Hope Street, Room 1255-B Mr. David Summers Public Service Company of New Mexico 414.Silver SW, ¹0604 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 Mr. Bob Bledsoe Southern California Edison Company 14300 Mesa
- Road, Drop D41-SONGS San Clemente, California 92672 Mr. Robert Henry Salt River Project 6504 East Thomas Road Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 Terry Bassham, Esq.
General Counsel El Paso Electric Company 123 W. Mills El Paso, Texas 79901 Mr. James M. Levine Executive Vice President, Nuclear Arizona Public Service Company Post Office Box 53999
- Phoenix, Arizona 85072-3999
A I