ML17311A667

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 90,70 & 61 to Licenses NPF-41,NPF-51 & NPF-74,respectively
ML17311A667
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 02/14/1995
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML17311A665 List:
References
NUDOCS 9502220175
Download: ML17311A667 (10)


Text

1PR REGS

+

0 Cy oO I

p 9

+0 qO

++*++

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR.REGULATORY COMM!SSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 90 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-41 MENDMENT NO.

77 TO FACILITY OPERATING ICENSE NO. NPF-51 AND AMENDMENT NO.

61 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-74 ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY ET AL.

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS.

1 2

AND 3 DOCKET NOS.

STN 50-528 STN 50-529 AND STN 50-530

1. 0 INTRODUCTION By letter dated November 20,
1992, as supplemented by letters dated October 22,
1993, and November 30, 1994, Arizona Public Service Company (APS or the l,icensee) submitted a request for changes to the Technical Specifications (TS) for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 (Appendix A to Facility Operating License Nos.

NPF-41, NPF-51, and NPF-74, respectively).

The Arizona Public Service Company submitted this request on behalf of itself, the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Southern California Edison

Company, El Paso Electric Company, Public Service Company of New Mexico, Los Angeles Department of Water and
Power, and Southern California Public Power Authority.

The proposed changes would revise TS 3.2. 1 and 3.2.4 and the associated Bases for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS), Units 1, 2, and 3.

These amendments would increase the time limit that the core operating limit supervisory system (COLSS) may be out of service before the action requirements based on the more restrictive core protection calculator (CPC) limits apply.

The proposed amendments would also differentiate the actions required for operating with and without the COLSS.

The October 22,

1993, and November 30, 1994, letters responded to the staff's March 16, 1993, request for additional information.

These supplemental letters provided certain revised TS pages for clarification purposes and did not change the original no significant hazards determination.

2. 0 DISCUSSION The COLSS and the CPCs provide two different methods of monitoring the core power distribution.

The COLSS and CPCs that monitor the core power distribution are.capable of verifying that the departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) and the linear heat r ate (LHR) do not exceed their limits.

9502220175 950214 t

PDR ADGCK 05000528 P

PORE

lg

.a Oi

that the proposed changes to TS 3.2.1 and 3.2.4 and the associated Bases are acceptable.

4. 0 STATE CONSULTATION In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Arizona State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendments.

The State official had no comments.

5. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION The amendments change a requirement with respect to the installation or use of a faci.lity component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and change surveillance requirements.

The NRC staff has determined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released

offsite, and that there is no significant incr ease in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.

The Commission has previously issued a

proposed finding that the amendments involve no significant hazards considera-

tion, and there has been no public comment on such finding (58 FR 591).

Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibilitycriteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).

Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.

6. 0 CONCLUSION The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed
above, that (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed
manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and'ecurity or to the health and safety of the public.

Principal Contributors:

L. Tran J.

Luehman Date:

February 14, 1995

7

~:

Ik

'sj C

l>

lQTg~ p 8MOOOSO MDDQV 30

/0,'XZ096 08ZOZZZ096

$>enzqag pagep uol Ten Len3 EWadeS e

UI pauleguoo sl.

Sguawpuawe aug go uolgenLena pageLaa s,uolsslwwog BIU (t65 83 89) S66I '9 <~enueC:83LSI938 1V83033 ul a>lkou LeWIUISO akeQ suol.geol.gl.oadS, Leal.uqoay aug PBSI.Aaa skuawpuawe BRL

Ol-BdN Pue

?S-BdN III'-BdN soN asua>l 1 Ul>e~a 0 Xl.LPei I9 Pue

'1L '06 soN guawpuawV 966l 'N <~en~qag

agep anal.goagg3 566(

01 <~en~qa3

avuenssl.

yo ageQ

'pal.Ldde aq q.snw (sgdg) scope LnoLeo uol.qoagozd aaoo aug uo paseq SHwl L B~Aopksaa avow aug aaogaq swnoll y og snot I woag (SS10g) wagsES Ewoslnaadns gi.wl.L 6ul.gewado aaoo aqua cog awI.g anal.novas-go-gno aLqeMoLLe algg aseaADUL PLnoM sfuawpuawe alfJ

sguawpuawe go uol.g l.aosap gal.aa

'066I

'OE'aqwa~oN Pue

'S66I

'ZZ ~aqok>0 Palep s"BWXBL Eg paguawaLddns se

'Z66I

'OZ aaqwanoN,:sq.uawpuawe cog Uol.ge3I.L e $ 0 ageQ euozl.aV gunog e ovl.aeH g pue Z

I sgl.ufl uol.gegS ul.gewauaD aeaLonN apaah oLed Ogg-pg NiS pue 6ZS-09 NJ.S 8ZS-05 NIS.soN ga)laoQ l.e 4B ue wog aalhaaS olLqnd euozlaV (CI058H QNV 'ZIOSSH 'I?098H

'SON 3VL)

S3SN33Il BNILV83dO ALIlI3V3 Ol SLN3HQN3HV 30 30NNSSI 30 30IlON 30IION 83 Al)I33NI8 NI NOILV3I18Ad 803 IS3llt)38 uo I.ge Ln6B8 aogoea8 gaea LonN go ao ggO gI/III sgaaCoad aogoea8. go uot.si.nl.Q Z-AI agewogoaal.Q graf'oid aa6eueH goaCoad col.uaS

'uel.LOH 3 uel.~a

u3CBnS

~ H083

~OWeulp~oo3

<LLO4S

-'Ol HflQNV80H3H 966i 'f7i EJenJqag LOODSSQR 'O'0 'NOLONIHSVM NalSSINllNOO AHOJVlll938 BV31OAN SBLVLS OBLINA o+

G+

tll OV V

ling 0

l)gg~ gal+

r~

t

If 7h

~ >

Sholly Coordinator February 14, 1995 No significant hazards consideration comments received:

No.

Local Public Document Room location:

Phoenix Public L'ibrary, 12 East HcDowell Road,

Phoenix, Arizona 85004 D:16>TR>ISO%M:

ocket Fi ea ing Fi1 e BHol i an LTran DFoster-Curseen Sholly Coordinator (Orig+1)

OGC (15B18)

DOCUHENT NAHE:

PV985011.BWI OFFICE DRPW'A

~~

PDIV-2 P

PDIV-2/PH NANE DATE DFoster-Curseen LTran:

I 99 i /s

/'l>

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY BHolian

0 Cl L

Sholly Coordinator February 14, 1995 No significant hazards consideration comments received:

No.

Local Public Document Room location:

'Phoenix Publ.ic Library, 12 East McDowell Road,

Phoenix, Arizona 85004 DISTRIBUTION:

Docket File PDIV-'

Reading File BHol i an LTran DFoster-Curseen Sholly Coordinator (Orig+1)

OGC (15B18)

DOCUMENT NAME:

PV985011.BWI OFFICE DRPW LA

~~

PDIV-2 P

PDIV-2 PM NANE DATE LTran:

DFoster-Curseen

/39 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY BHolian

0

.~r 4

~

I'.,

~ g