ML17309A234

Responds to Re Comments on Draft SEPs XV-2,XV-12, XV-16,XV-17 & XV-20.Detailed Calculations for Each Topic Not Necessary.Revised Exclusion Area Boundary Doses Encl

ML17309A234
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	03/03/1982
From:	Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Maier J ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
References
TASK-15-02, TASK-15-12, TASK-15-16, TASK-15-17, TASK-15-2, TASK-15-20, TASK-RR LSO5-82-03-017, LSO5-82-3-17, NUDOCS 8203050424
Download: ML17309A234 (5)

Text

March 03, 1982 Docket No. 50-244 LS05-82-03-017 Mr. John E. Maier, Vice President Electric and Steam Production Rochester Gas 8 Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649 fb ~

>+C'Q)y...

s IQpg

)g l'S lis'SllIIg~,

8P~

2 S'I~C

'@S'I 8

Dear Mr. Maier:

0>

SUBJECT:

GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - FINAL SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT FOR SEP TOPICS XV-2, SPECTRUM OF STEAM SYSTEM PIPING FAILURES; XV-12, ROD EJECTION ACCIDENTS; XV-16, FAILURE OF SMALL LINES CARRYING PRIMARY COOLANT OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT; XV-17, STEAM GENERATOR,TUBE FAILURE; AND XV-20, FUEL DAMAGING ACCIDENT INSIDE AND OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT Your letter (Maier to Crutchfield) dated November 4, 1981, transmitted comments on the subject draft SER's XV-2, XV-.12, XV-16 XV-17 and XV-20.

That letter>stated that the Ginna Technical Specifications will be re-.

)

vised to incorporate provisions to ensure iodine spike limits will not be exceeded (the integrated assessment phase will be the vehicle to accomplish this modification).

In addition your letter requested the NRC staff's technical assessments on the subject topics be revised to include the details of'he calculations, and also noted a lower atmospheric diffusion coefficient should be used in the dose calculation, A<A OAlQ. ~

HO I,

OO 03IA

, AIO It has been concluded that it is not necessary to provide the detailed calcul'ations for each topic because the methods employed are contained in the Standard Review Plans that are referenced in each topic evaluation, In addition, all input and assumptions are included in the same evaluaoo

iion,

]os)

~~ ~$

The lower atmospheric diffusion coefficient reduces the doses at t e exclusion area boundary for all topics, but not sufficiently to change R"~'ny of the staff's original conclusions, The attached table is a summary p

4~)'f the revised doses for each topic.,

Therefore, the final disposition of sEP Topics xV-.2, xV-12, xV 16, xY 17, and xV-20, remain os transjIIitted to you in our September 24, 1981 letter, except as modified by the attached dose table.

88QIsslnfnrmatj

!)tl be a basic input'n the integrated assess!sent, DCrutchfield GL inas Sincerely,

'V/82

$/g/82 Ol<

NO

ICE/

I@A OC[ 'AMEP Ijleel dk'E B:

~ ~

~

~ ~

~

o

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

GC 1

a

~ ~

Sopo

~ o ~ o ~ o ~ oo ~ ~ oooo ~

2

/82

...l.../...

~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~

o

tchfield, C

etars-BraIIe

~4eensing---

Dennis M,

C

'OperatfIIg-R

~94v~sion-o f'.

S

DL WRussell H

OQ AIA IQ Q s

(/I)r/I/

~Q ioo ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~

2(gli 2

I/tTEf M 318 (1080) NRCM 0240

~

0FF ICIAL R ECO R D COPY

ef

~ f4too

~ ~ ogo ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o o o ~ ~

ssMe OR 5'5 PM

~ o ~ ~ o ~ o

~ ~ ~

~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

o ~ o JL ns USGPO! 1981~&980

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

~

~ ~ ~S

~

S ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

@.. 0 QQ i l ".

Mr. John E. Maier CC Harry H. Voigt, Esquire

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby and MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.

W.

Sui te 1100 Washington, D. C.

20036 Mr. Michael Slade 12 Trailwood Circle Rochester, New York 14618 Ez'ra Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental, Protection Bureau New York State Department'f Law 2

World

'Trade Center New York, New York 10047 Resident Inspector R. E. Ginna Plant c/o U. S.

NRC 1503 Lake Road

Ontario, New York 14519 Director, Bureau of Nuclear Operations State of New York Energy Office Agency Building 2

'mpire S'tate Plaza

Albany, New York 12223 Rochester Public Library 115 South Avenue Rochester, New York 14604 I

Supervisor of the Town of Ontario 107 Ridge Road West

'Ontario, New York 14519 Dr.

Emmeth A. Luebke Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Dr. Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing 'Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

~..<<f.; rP U. S. Environmental. Protection Agency Region II Office

-ATTN:

Regional Radiation Representative 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10007

. Herbert Grossman, Esq.,

Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Ronald C. Haynes, Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region I Office o'f Inspection and Enforcement 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

Table

'evised Exclusion Area Boundary Doses RE Ginna.Systematic Evaluation Program all doses in@em y,p-XY-2 Case Equilibrium Iodine TS Spike Iodine (50 PCi/gm) 1% failed fuel Thyroid Dose 10 15 62 Whole Body Dose XY-12.

Equilibrium Iodine TS and 10% fuel failure 103

. XY-16 10 XV-17 Equilibrium Iodine TS Standard TS Iodine

.70 24 XV-19 Al 1 assumptions of July 31, 1981 memo ra ndum 130 3

XV-20 100 hrs cooling no filters

..7 days cooling no filters 100 hrs cooling 5(5 filters for elemental iodine 96 73 62