ML17308A253
| ML17308A253 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 08/07/1986 |
| From: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Harris K FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17308A254 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8608120362 | |
| Download: ML17308A253 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000335/1986008
Text
r
~R Iltgyr
fpO
.
++*++
UNITEDSTATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON. O. C. 20555
August 7,
1986
Docket Nos.
50-335
and
50-389
Florida Power and Light Company
St. Lucie Nuclear Site
ATTN:
Mr. K. Harris
Site Vice President
Post Office Box 128
Fort Pierre,
Florida 33454
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
INSPECTION NOS. 50-335/86-08;
50-389/86-07
Enclosed is the report of the
team inspection
conducted
by Mr. G. T. Hubbard
and other
NRC representatives
on March 31 - April 4, 1986, at the St. Lucie
Nuclear Site of activities authorized
by
NRC License
and NFP-16.
The
team's findings were discussed
with you and
members of your staff at the
conclusion of the inspection.
The inspection
reviewed your implementation of
a program as required
by 10 CFR 50.49 for establishing
and maintaining the
qualification of electric equipment within the scope of 10 CFR 50.49.
within
these
areas,
the inspection consisted of examinations of selected
procedures
and records,
interviews with personnel,
and observations
by the inspectors.
The inspection
determined
that you have
implemented
a program to meet
the
requirments of 10 CFR 50.49 except for certain deficiencies identified in the
enclosed
inspection report.
Seven of the deficiencies,
summarized
in Appendix A,
are classified
as Potential
Enforcement/Unresolved
Items (PE/UIs)
and will be
referred to the
NRC Region II Office for further action.
One deficiency involves
failure to establish qualification for internal wiring in Limitorque operators.
Another PE/UI deals with failure to have auditable
documentation
to support
equipment qualification.
The remaining five PE/UIs resulted
from failure to
provide adequate
documentation
to support qualification of specific components.
Adequate
documentation
to support qualification for these five components
was
provided
by the end of the inspection,
except for the PE/UI dealing with General
.cable.
Nine additional
concerns
are classified
as
Open Item, and
a future
NRC inspection
will review your actions
concerning
them.
Details of the deficiencies
and con-
cerns
are discussed
in the inspection report.
8608120362
860807
ADOCK 05000335
G
i
Florida Power
5 Light Company
-2-
August 7,
1986
It is understood
from a telephone
conversation
between your Hr.
G.
Regal
and
Nr. U. Potapovs,
IE, during the week of April 14,
1986 that the following had
been accomplished
at St. Lucie.
Unqualified ITT-TFF wire in valve operator
1-MV-09-9 was replaced
with qualified wiring the day the inspection
ended.
An operability analysis relative to unqualified wires in Limitorque
valve operators
in Unit
1 was in place the morning of April 7, 1986.
Documentation
to support qualification of General
cable
was in place
the morning of April 7, 1986.
Schedules
were established
to address
other deficiencies
and concerns
identified during the inspection.
Review of the activities
described
above indicates that your corrective actions
on the deficiencies
and concerns identified during the inspection
are in progress;
however,
you should continue to pursue your corrective actions
and not delay
them pending either
a future
NRC inspection or further action by the
NRC Region
II Office.
h'e are available
to discuss
any questions
you have concerning this inspection.
Robert
F. Heishman,
Chief
Vendor Program Branch
Division of guali ty Assurance,
Vendor
and Technical Training Center
Programs
Office of Inspection
and Enforcement
Enclosures:
l.
Appendix A-Potential
Enforcement/Unresolved
Items
2.
Inspection
Report
Nos. 50-335/86-08;
59-389/86-07
Florida Power
5 Light Company
3
August 7,
1986
DISTRIBUTION:
VPB Reading
DQAVT Reading
RStarostecki
BGrimes
HMilier
RHeishman
UPotapovs
GHubbard
RMoist
RWi lson
SAlexander
AGibson, RII
TConlon, RII
HBibb, RII
SElrod, RII
ARuff, RII
DJackson,
INEL
MYost, INEL
JGrossman,
FWyant,
Region II, DR
- See previous
page for concurrences.
VPB:DQAVT
SC/VPB'DQAVT
BC/VPB:DQAVT
GHubbard:tt*
UPotapovs*.
ei
hman
08/06/86
08/06/86
/
/86
RII
TConlon*
08/06/86
APPENDIX A
Potential
Enforcement/Unresolved
I tems
As
a result of the equipment qualification (Eg) inspection
on Parch
31 - April 4,
1986,
the following items
have
been referred
to
NRC Region II as Potential
Enforcement/Unresolved
Items (paragraph
references
are to detailed portions of
the inspection report).
1.
Contrary to paragraph (f) of 10 CFR 50.49, at the time of the inspec-
tion, Florida Power
and Light (FPSL) did not adequately
demonstrate
qualification of internal wiring in Limitorque valve operators.
(Para-
graph 4.D.(2)(b), Item 50-335/86-08-07;
50-389/86-07-05.)
2.
Contrary to paragraphs
{f) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49
and Section
S. 1
of NUREG-0588, at the time of the inspection,
FP&L did not adequately
demonstrate
qualification of General
cable
because
of failure to
demonstrate
the thermal qualified life of the cable in an air envi-
ronment.
(Paragraph
4.D.(2)(a),
Item 50-335/86-08-06.)
3.
6.
7.
Contrary to paragraph (j) of 10 CFR 50.49,
FPSL did not maintain its
qualification documentation
in an audi table form.
Contrary to paragraphs
(f) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49
and Section
5. 1 of
NUREG-0588, at the start of the inspection,
FPSL did not adequately
demonstrate qualification of Victoreen radiation detectors
because
of failure to demonstrate
the detectors'bility to wi thstand
a design
basis
accident
{DBA).
(Paragraph 4.D.(2){c), Item 50-335/86-08-10.)
Contrary to paragraph (f) of 10 CFR 50.49, at the start of the inspec-
tion,
FPEL did not adequately
demonstrate
qualifi.cation of RDF
resistance
temperature
detectors
because
of failure to demonstrate
the qualified life of the
RTV sealant
used in the detectors.
(Para-
graph 4.D.(2)(d), Item 50-389/86-07-07.)
Contrary to paragraph (f) of 10 CFR 50.49, at the start of the inspec-
tion,
FPSL did not adequately
demonstrate qualification of Garrett
because
of failure to provide data
to support stated
qualified life valves,
post-DBA operability times,
and s~milar~ ty
between
tested
and installed equipment.
{Paragraph 4.D.{2)(e),
Item- 50-389/86-07-08.)
Contrary to paragraph
(d) of 10 CFR 50.49, at the time of the
inspection,
FPSL did not include
GE Vulkene SIS or Raychem Flamtrol
cable
on its
Eg Lists for Units
1 and 2, respectively,
when they
were used
in
EQ applications
in the plant.
(Paragraph
4.C.,
Item
50-335/86-08-04;
50-389/86-07-03.)