ML17306A897
| ML17306A897 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 08/12/1992 |
| From: | Murley T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Colapinto D KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO, P.C. (FORMERLY KOHN & ASSOCIA |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17306A898 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#392-13166 2.206, NUDOCS 9208190269 | |
| Download: ML17306A897 (10) | |
Text
Docket Nos. 50-528, 50-529 and 50-530 David K. Colapinto, Esq.
- Kohn, Kohn 5 Colapinto, P.C.
517 Florida Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20001
Dear Hr. Colapinto:
gust 12, 1992 I
am providing you with the Final Director's Decision responding to certain allegations raised in the Petition of Hay 22, 1990, filed pursuant to 10 CFR Section 2.206 by you on behalf of Hrs. Linda E. Mitchell (Petitioner).
In particular, I
am addressing the allegations of wrongdoing on the part of Arizona Public Service Company (APS) regarding NRC inspections of emergency lighting and fire protection at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.
I previously addressed technical aspects of the Petitioner's concerns in a Partial Director's Decision forwarded to you with my letter of October 31, 1990.
I have also enclosed a copy of the notice of this Final Director's Decision that has been filed with the Office of the Federal Register for publication.
Sincerely, Original signed,bp,'homas E> Hurlers Thomas E. Hurley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
~lP 9208190269 92dBi2 PDR ADOCK 05000528 PDR
Enclosures:
-, ;;:- -')Ii)"pg.tIt;mlII"-F~>
DISTRIBUTION:
g iSCme See next page
- See Previous Concurrence I have denied your request for action pursuant to 10 CFR Section 2.206 for the reasons set forth in the enclosed Final Director's Decision.
A copy of the Decision will be referred to the Secretary of the Commission for the Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR Section 2.206(c).
As provided by this regulation, the Decision will constitute the final action of the Commission 25 days after the date of issuance of the Decision unless the Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the Decision within that time.
OFC LA PDV Tech Ed.*
AD45/DRPW D/DRPW NAME DFoster DATE I
l~ 92 Wrammell 92 uay
/92 JHain 06 29 92 HVir iNf 8/g 92 BBo 4P g a /92 OFC RNGV D/0 OGC D/OI ADP/NR'D/N NAME i@
e m
J ieberm n
BHayes JPar FMi gl'a T ur 1 ey DATE S/
/92 C
6 92
/
92 e/
c GE Il /
/GE F//
/GE
/ ~2 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCUNENT NANE:
GT5488 r0
I E
I~
I EE'P I
I 1't W
ii IE r
~
David K. Colapinto, Esq.
2.296 9
d d ~A.
992 DISTRIBUTION:
/Docket Fi'les 50=528,. 50=52 NRC
& Local PDRs EDO ¹0005488 EDO Reading File THurley/FMiraglia, 12G18
- JPartlow, 12G18 BBoger HVirgilio Tguay DFoster CTrammell KThompson
- CCater, 16H21
- HMalsch, 15B18 w/incoming JGoldberg, 15B18 ASLBP
- SBurns, OCAA ACRS (10)
P315 RZimmerman, RV
- BClayton, (EDO¹0005488)
- TGibbons, (EDO¹0005488) 9, and 50-530 7
g ip
David K. Colapinto, Esq.
6 6
d" d DISTRIBUTION:
EDocket Files 50=528;. 50=529,,and 50;530~
NRC
& Local PDRs
'EDO ¹0005488 EDO Reading File THurley/FHiraglia, 12G18
- JPartlow, 12G18 BBoger
': HVirgilio Tguay DFoster CTrammell KThompson
'NRR Hail Room (EDO¹0005488)
PDV 'Reading Fil e JTaylor VYanez (2) P-223
- CCater, 16H21
- MMalsch, 15B18 w/incoming JGoldberg, 15B18 ASLBP
- SBurns, OCAA ACRS (10)
P315 RZimmerman, RV
- BClayton, (EDO¹0005488)
- TGibbons, (EDO¹0005488) 61 1
l 66 6
6
Docket Nos.
50-528, 50-529 and 50-530 David K. Colapinto, Esq.
- Kohn, Kohn
& Colapinto, P.C.
517 Florida Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20001
Dear Hr. Colapinto:
AU@'lz ed' am providing you with the Final Director's Decision responding to certain allegations raised in the Petition of May 22, 1990, filed pursuant to 10 CFR Section 2.206 by you on behalf of Hrs. Linda E. Mitchell (Petitioner).
In particular, I
am addressing the allegations of wrongdoing on the part of Arizona Public Service Company (APS) regarding NRC inspections of emergency lighting and fire protection at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.
I previously addressed technical aspects of the Petitioner's concerns in a Partial Director's Decision forwarded to you with my letter of October 31, 1990.
I have denied your request for action pursuant to 10 CFR Section 2.206 for the reasons set forth in the enclosed Final Director's Decision.
A copy of the Decision will be referred to the Secretary of the Commission for the Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR Section 2.206(c).
As provided by this regulation, the Decision will constitute the final action of the Commission 25 days after the date of issuance of the Decision unless the Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the Decision within that time.
I have also enclosed a copy of the notice of this Final Director's Decision that has been filed with the Office of the Federal Register for publication.
Sincerely, Original signed bx Thomas Z, bhu3@g Thomas E, Hurley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
- 1. Final Director's Decision
- 2. Notice DISTRIBUTION:
See next page
- See Previous Concurrence OFC LA/PDV Tech Ed.*
AD45/DRPW D/DRPW DFoster
/ammell uay JHain HVir iNf BBo A DATE 3 />" 92
/ "./92
/92 06/29/92
~/7/92 g e /92 OFC NAME RNGV ik e>myn D/0 J ieberm n
OGC D/OI 'DP/NR BHayes JPar DD N
FMi gl'a T urley DATE 2/92 C /6 /92 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY/
/92
+/
92 a/ /
/92 Fll 92 DOCUMENT NAME:
GT5488 t/4 '~
/ ~2
~p,g AEgII(
Wp Oj I
0O
+>>*+~
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 August 12, 1992 Docket Nos.
50-528, 50-529 and 50-530 David K. Colapinto, Esq.
- Kohn, Kohn
& Colapinto, P.C.
517 Florida Avenue, N.W, Washington, D.C.
20001
Dear Hr. Colapinto:
I am providing you with the Final Director's Decision responding to certain allegations raised in the Petition of Hay 22, 1990, filed pursuant to 10 CFR Section 2,206 by you on behalf of Hrs. Linda E. Hitchell (Petitioner).
In particular, I
am addressing the allegations of wrongdoing on the part of Arizona Public Service Company (APS) regarding NRC inspections of emergency lighting and fire protection at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.
I previously addressed technical aspects of the Petitioner's concerns in a Partial Director's Decision forwarded to you with my letter of October 31, 1990.
I have denied your request for action pursuant to 10 CFR Section 2.206 for the reasons set forth in the enclosed Final Director's Decision.
A copy of the Decision will be referred to the Secretary of the Commission for the Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR Section 2.206(c).
As provided by this regulation, the Decision will constitute the final action of the Commission 25 days after the date of issuance of the Decision unless the Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the Decision within that time.
I have also enclosed a copy of the notice of this Final Director's Decision that has been filed with the Office of the Federal Register for publication.
Sincerely,
Enclosures:
- 1. Final Director's Decision
- 2. Notice Thomas E. Hurley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation