ML17305B543
| ML17305B543 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 05/13/1991 |
| From: | Yuhas G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Conway W ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17305B544 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9105300129 | |
| Download: ML17305B543 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000528/1991016
Text
c p,R REGS~
(4
Po
Cy
P'l
O
)f**y4
Docket Nos.
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMIVllSSION
REGION V
1450 MARIALANE,SUITE 210
WALNUTCREEK, CALIFORNIA94596
h<AY
1
3
1991
'0-528,
50-529,
and 50-530
Arizona Nuclear. Power Project
P.
0.
Box 52034
Phoenix,
85072-2034
Attention:
Mr.
W.
F.
Conway
Executive Vice President
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NRC INSPECTION
REPORT
NO. 50-528/91-16,
50-529/91-16
AND 50-530/91-16
OF ARIZONA NUCLEAR POWER
PROJECT
(ANPP)
This letter refers to the routine inspection
conducted
by Mr.
M. Cillis of
this office on April 8-12,
1991.
The inspection included
a review of
activities authorized for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station
(PVNGS), Units
1, 2,
and 3.
At the conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were discussed
with those
members of your staff identified in the enclosed
report.
Areas
examined during this inspection
are described
in the enclosed
inspection
report.
Within these
areas,
the inspection consisted
of selective
examinations
of procedures
and representative
records,
interviews with
personnel,
and observations
by the inspector.
Based
on the results of this inspection,
one of your activities appeared
to be
in violation of NRC requirements,
as specified in the enclosed
Notice of
Violation (Notice).
The violation, involving an unposted
~eems to indicate
a weakness
in assessing
the radiological
impact of an
operational
decision.
Although Section 2.201 requires
you to submit to this office, within 20 days
of your receipt of this Notice,
a written statement
of explanation,
we note
that this violation had been corrected
and those actions
were reviewed during
this=inspection.
Therefore,
no response; with respect to this matter is
required.
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,
" a copy of
this letter and its enclosure will be placed in the
NRC Public Document
Room
Should you have
any questions
concerning this inspection,
we will be glad to
discuss
them with you.
Sincerely
Reactor
Radi ol ogi cal Protecti on Branc h
9105300129
910513
ADOCK 05000528
8
e
Enclosure:
Inspection
Report Nos. 50-528/91-16,
50-529/91-16,
and 50-530/91-16
cc w/enclosure:
Hr. 0. Hark DeMichele,
Hr.
James
M. Levine,
Hr. Jack
N. Bailey,
Mr.
E.
C.
Simpson,
Mr. Blaine
E. Ballard,
Hr.
Thomas
R. Bradish,
Hr. Robert
W.
Page,
Mr. Arthur
C. Gehr,
Esq.,
Snell
8 Wilmer
Mr. Al Gutterman,
Newman
8 Holtzinger
P.
C.
Mr. James
A. Boeletto,
Esq., Assistant Council,
Mr. Charles
B. Brinkman,
Combustion Engineering,
Inc.
Mr. Charles
Tedford
Director, Arizona Radiation Regulatory
Agency
Chairman,
Maricopa 0ounty Board of Supervisors
Mr. Steve
M. Olea, Chief, Arizona Corporation
Commission
Ignacio
R. Troncoso,
El
Paso Electric Company
Roy P.
Lessy, Jr.,
Esq., Akin, Gump, Strauss,
Hauer
and Feld
Bradley
W. Jones,
Esq., Akin, Gump, Strauss,
Hauer
and Feld
1
l
I
f
t
(
bcc w/encl osure:
docket file-
G.
Cook A. Johnson
B. Faulkenberry
J. Martin
Resident
Inspector
Project Inspector
bcc w/o enclosure:
J. Zollicoffer
M. Smith
REGION Vjane
gg&:t+
MCi 1 1 is
A Johnson
GPYuhls
5/g3/91
5/P/91
5/~/91
YES '
NO
] YES /
NO
]
ES /
NO
[
ES /
NO