ML17305B344
| ML17305B344 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 01/16/1991 |
| From: | Yuhas G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Conway W ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17305B345 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9102040050 | |
| Download: ML17305B344 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000528/1990055
Text
~y,A RECy~
Docket Nos. 50-528,
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COIVIMISSION
REGION V
1450 MARIALANE,SUITE 210
WALNUTCREEK, CALIFORNIA94596
50-529 and 5)k/I0t
JAN
Arizona Public Service
Company
P. 0.
Box 53999, Station
9012
Phoenix, Arizona 85072-3999
Attention: Mr. William F.
Conway
.
Executive Vice President,
Nuclear
r
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NRC INSPECTION REPORT
NO. 50-528,
529
8d
330/90"55
OF
PALO VERDE UNITS 1,
2 AND 3
This letter refers to a routine inspection
conducted
by Mr. L.
C.
Carson II
aTId observed
by-Mr.
G.
P.
Yuhas, of this office on December
17 throuah 21,
1990
-of activities authorized
by NRC License
Nos.
and
Co the discussions
of our findings held by Mr. Carson with Mr.
G.
R.
Overbeck and other members of your staff at conclusion of the inspection.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed
inspection
report.
Within these
areas,
the inspection consisted of selective
examinations of procedures
and representative
records,
interviews with
personnel,
and observations
by the inspector.
'Based
on the results of this inspection, certain of your'ctivities appear to
be in violation of NRC requirements,
as, speci'fied in the enclosed
Notice of
Violation (Notice).
One violation of 10 CFR 20.102
was not cited because
the
criteria specified in 10 CFR 2, Appendix C, Section
V. A. of the Enforcement
Policy were satisfied.
The apparent violation of 10 CFR 20.103 as set forth
in the Notice seems to indicate
a weakness
exists in your air sampling
and
internal exposure
assessment
program.
You are re9uired to respond this letter and should follow the instructions
specified
1n the enclosed
Notice when preparinq your response.
In your
response,
you should documeht the'pecific act)ons
taken
and any additional
actions you plan to prevent recurrence.
After reviewing your response
to this
'Notice, including your proposed corrective actions
and the results of future
inspections,
the
NRC will determine whether further
NRC enforcement action is
necessary
to ensure
compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790(a),
a copy of this letter and the enclosure
will be placed in the
NRC Public Document
Room.
The response
directed by this letter and the accompanying
Notice are not
subject to the clearance
procedures
of the Office of Management
and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,
PL 96-511.
~ A
9foaoaooso
9>o>>65~8
ADOCK 05000
8
-2-
Should you have
any questions
concerning this inspection,
we will be glad to
discuss
them with you.
\\
V
Sincerely,
Q. P.
Gregory
.
uhas,
Chief
Reactor
Ra iologscal Protection
Branch
Enclosures:
A. Notice of Violation (Appendix A)
B. Inspection Report Nos. 50-528/90-55,
50-529/90-55
and 50-530/90-55
cc w/enclosure:
Mr. 0. Hark DeMichele,
Hr. James
M. Levine,
Mr. Jack
N. Bailey,
Mr,. E.
C.
Simpson
Mr. Blaine E. Balfard,
Mr. Thomas
R. Bradish,
Hr. Robert
W. Page,
Hr. Arthur C. Gehr, Esq., Snell
8 Wilmer
Mr. Al Gutterman,
Newman
8 Holtzinger P.
C.
Hr. Charles
R. Kocher, Esq., Assistant Council,
Mr. James
A. Boeletto, Esq.,
(same
address
as Mr. Kocher)
Hr. Charles
B. Brinkman, Combustion Engineering,
Inc.
Hr. Charles Tedford, Director, Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency
Chairman,
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
Mr. John
W. Norman, Chief, Arizona Corporation
Commission
0
0
A3
JAN
1 6
1991
bcc w/enclosures:
docket file
Resident Inspector
Project Inspector
G.
Cook
A. Johnson
B. Faulkenberry
J. Martin
M. Tenbrook,. '
bcc w/o enclosure
8:
J. Zollicoffer
M. Smith
N. Mestern
REGION V/dot
GYuhas
z/i4/sx
E
/
NO
YE
/
YE
/
NO
/
NO
>'i
I
l
0