ML17305B209

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Updated Info Re Evaluation of Fire Protection Sys Equipment Schedule for Completed Selected Actions
ML17305B209
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 11/13/1990
From: Conway W
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
161-03585-WFC-R, 161-3585-WFC-R, NUDOCS 9011290188
Download: ML17305B209 (8)


Text

I ACC:ELERATED STtuBUTION DEMON+RATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR: 9011290188 DOC. DATE: 90/11/13 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Arizona Publi 05000528 STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Arizona Publi 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit.3, Arizona Publi 05000530 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CONWAY,W.F.

Arizona Public Service Co.

(formerly Arizona Nuclear Power RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MARTIN,J.B.

Region 5 (Post 820201)

SUBJECT:

Submits updated info re evaluation of fire protection sys equipment schedule for completed selected actions.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IEOID COPIES RECEIVED:LTR g ENCL g SIZE:

TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES:STANDARDIZED PLANT Standardized plant.

Standardized plant.

D

/

05000528 05000529 A

05000530 D

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 PD TRAMMELL,C.

INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/DEIIB DEDRO NRR SHANKMAN,S NRR/DREP/PEPB9D NRR/DST/DIR 8E2 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS1 RGN5 FILE 01 EXTERNAL: EG &G/BRYCE,J. H.

NSIC NOTES:

COPIES LTTR ENCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PETERSON,S.

AEOD AEOD/TPAB NRR MORISSEAU1D NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10 NRR/DRIS/DIR NRR/PMAS/ILRB12 OE DIR NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 D

D NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!'CONTACTTHE DOCUMENT CONTROL'ESK, ROOi! Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROiV DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUb,!ENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 25 ENCL D

D

0 i

I

Arizona'Public Se'rvice Company -.-- "-"

c",

P.O. BOX 53999

~

PHOENIX. ARIZONA85072-3999 WILLIAMF. CONWAY

'EXECUTIVEVICEPRESIDENT NUCLEAR 161-03585-'WFC/RAB November 13, 1990 Mr. John B. Martin Regional Admini;strator, Region V U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5368

References:

A)

Letter to J.

B. Martin,

NRC, from W.

F.

Conway, APS, dated July 20 1990.

Subject:

Evaluation of Fire Protection System Equipment (161-03349).

B)

Letter to J.

B. Martin, NRC, from W.

F.

Conway, APS, dated August 1,

1990.

Subject:

Response

to NRC Inspection Report Nos.

50-528/90-25, 50-529/90-25, 50-530/90-25; Safe Shutdown Emergency Lighting (161-03373).

C)

Letter to J.

B. Martin,

NRC, from W.

F.

Conway, APS, dated August 3, 1990.

Subject:

Submittal of Emergency Lighting Independent Review - Impell Study (161-03382).

Dear Mr. Martin:

Subj'ect: Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station

'(PVNGS)

Unit 1, 2, and 3

Updated Information Related to Evaluation of Fire Protection System Equipment Schedule for Completed of Selected Actions File:

90-019-026; 90-056-026 As provided in Re'ference A, APS informed the NRC in Section VI - Corrective

Actions, of its intent to revise the PVNGS.Quality Assurance Program requirements for fire protection by November 15, 1990.

The purpose of this letter is to advise the NRC that.APS will be unable to meet this schedule.

Following several weeks of effort

,to complete an evaluation of the application of quality assurance cri;teria for fire protection, APS has been unable to meet'he interim milestone date of September 30,

1990, mentioned in Reference A. The current schedule indicates this effort will be completed by November 15,
1990, allowing the revised Quality Assurance Program requirements for fire protection to be completed by December 31, 1990.

90ll290188 9LI1118 PD~'GOCK 0:=.000528 FDC jg o I

Qi l

Mr. John B. Martin Regional Administrator, Region V V. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page Two Due to the large 'volume of work required to completely address the. open issues, it has become apparent that the effort will require more time than originally estimated.

APS began an effort to develop a comprehensive listing of open items and commitments soon after completion of our response to Inspection Report Numbers 50-528/90-25, 50-529/90-25 and 50-530/90-25 as documented in Reference B.

The listing of action items was derived, in part, from the following:

1)

Recent regulatory correspondence (since January, 1990) related to emergency lighting or fire protection, 2) several internal documents identifying open questions or concerns related to emergency lighting or fire protection, and 3) the ABB/Impell Corporation Emergency Lighting Study Report (Reference C).

Identification of over 200 action items resulted from this review.

A number of these items are related to the evaluation of Quality Assurance Program applicability to fire protection system equipment.

The effort to address these action items has been estimated to require approximately 20,000 manhours.

APS management then established a dedicated, multi-disciplined team with a full-time project manager, as well as consulting assistance from ABB/Impell Corporation.

This team was assigned to develop a detailed. plan and schedule to address all open action items.

The schedule developed by this team indicates that the actions required. to evaluate fire protection quality assurance requirements willnot be completed until November 15, 1990.

These actions will support development of a revised Quality Assurance Program for fire protection by December 31,

1990, for submittal to the NRC for review.

Currently, the multi-disciplined fire protection system review team has completed approximately 20% of the open actions.

The actions are being addressed based on their priority to establish quality assurance applicability decisions, resolution of fire protection equipment concerns and closure of open concerns related to application of design criteria.

Reviews to date have.not indicated any additional operability or safety concerns not previously identified (Reference A).

The multi-disciplined review team will address all open items prior to being disbanded.

The fact that no additional safety or operability concerns have been identified gives APS confidence that operation under the Justifications for Continued Operation, documented in Reference A, continues to be valid and acceptable.

0

Mr. John B'. Martin Regional Administrator', Region V Page Three This.provides additional confidence that continued operation remains justified.

In addition, applicable.compensatory measures as identified in Reference A, or subsequently identified, will remain in effect until full compliance with quality assurance program requirements are achieved.

Sincerely,,

WFC/RAB/pmm CC:

Document Control Desk D. H.

Coe A. C. Gehr A. H. Gutterman

i) 0 l