ML17305A612

Responds to Generic Ltr 90-01, Request for Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory Impact Survey. Survey Based on Person Estimates & Not Review of Records

ML17305A612
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde
Issue date:	03/16/1990
From:	Conway W ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
161-02979-WFC-J, 161-2979-WFC-J, GL-90-01, GL-90-1, NUDOCS 9003280036
Download: ML17305A612 (24)

Text

ACCELERATED D %lUBUTION DEMON TION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9003280036 DOC.DATE: 90/03/16 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Arizona Publi 05000528 STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Arizona Publi 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Station, Unit 3,.Arizona Publi 05000530 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CONWAY,W.F.

Arizona Public Service Co.

(formerly Arizona Nuclear

Power, RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)-

R

SUBJECT:

Responds to Generic Ltr 90-01, "Request for Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory Impact Survey."

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

AOOID COPIES RECEIVED: LTR I

ENCL C

, SIZE:

TITLE: OR Submittal:

General Distribution NOTES Standardized plant.

Standardized plant.

/

05000528 05000529

,A 05000530 D

RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 LA PETERSON,S.

INTERNAL: ACRS NRR/DOEA/OTSB11 NRR/DST/SELB 8D NRR/DST/SRXB 8E EXTERNAL: LPDR NSIC NOTES'OPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 5

5 6

6 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

0 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD5 PD NRR/DET/ECMB 9H NRR/DST 8E2 NRR/DST/SICB 7E NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS1 RES/DSIR/EIB NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

D R

D S

D NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEl CONTACI'HE,DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME'FROMDISTRIBUTION S

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR 28.

ENCL, 26

C y

~

~

e I

f~

V, Pp J

~

1

~ ~

~

"w

~

I'l<~

s'>

~

Arizona Public Service Company P.O. BOX 53999

~

PHOENIX. ARIZONA85072<999 WILLIAMF. CONWAY EXECUTIVEVICEPRESIDENT NUCLEAR 161-02979-WFC/JM(}

March 16, 1990 Docket Nos.

STN 50-528/529/530 Document Control Desk U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

'ail Station Pl-37 Washington, D.

C.

20555

Reference:

Letter from Z. T. Pate, INPO to K. M. Carr, NRC dated February 7,

1990,

Subject:

"Clarification of Generic Letter 90-01"

Subject:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)

Units 1, 2, and 3

Generic Letter 90-01, "Request For Voluntary Participation In NRC Regulatory Impact Survey" File:

90-056-026 Attached is the Arizona Public Service Company (APS) response to the NRC Regulatory Survey.

The departments responsible for each of the areas listed in item 1 of the General Instructions provided the information to the survey.

The responsible department provided estimates of their own involvement and estimates of other departments that were significantly involved with the inspection or audit.

This survey was based on personal estimates and not a review of records.

Also per the referenced INPO letter, INPO "assist" visits and "self-assessments" have not been included in the survey.

If there are any questions, please contact A. C. Rogers of my staff at (602) 340-4041.

Sincerely, WFC/JMQ/j le Attachment cc:

T. L. Chan S.

R. Peterson D.

H.

Coe A. H. Gutterman J.

B. Martin J. Colvin, NUMARC 9003280036 900316 PDR ADOCK 06000528 P

O'M'.

4l

\\ '

II

'I~

~ti'

~ I I'i

/

Cues

!onna] re

~neet.

~

~

/,

o spa Q a, or o

a Iua i on NRC Team InsPections J

2..

Sased on actual exoerienc over the past several

years, about how often is this, activity conduc ed?

4 Team inspections er year 3.

Operations/Construction areas covered:

Primari I o erations, maintenance and desi n

4.

Extent of the ac ivity (how many people, for how long)

" typical team, inspection consists of 9 inspectors who are on site for 14 working days Approximate. percentage os totaI time (on an. annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in item:i.

a.

Plant Department Heads )0() man-hrs.

(number per person/yr.

b.

Plant Manager 160 man-hrs.

(number per person/yr.

c.

Corporate Department Heads 100 man-h('number per person/yr.

d.

Corp'orate vice Presidents 160 man-'hr(number per person/y'r e.

Chief Nuclear Officer 160 man-hrs/yr.

involved) 66 involved) 3 involved) 1'1 involved) f.

Supervisors 48 man-hrs (number involved)157 pH apartment/yr.

II ig(

)

M<..

II

~

ss rv ~ > '

+

<(

e ~

w st ~

~ vs s(

Il~ i'v

~

s s

~ 4 I i w

~

~ e Ques-.jonnajre sneer.

1 Type o

jnspec:ion, audi: or evaluatj on:

ai nl and He do r

j n

2.

8ased on ac ual experience over the past several

years, about how often is this activity conducted?

36 Re ional/Head uarters Ins ections per ear lus continuous covera e

b 3 Resident Ins ectors 3.

Operations/Construction areas covered:,

AT1.

hases of o eration of nt rimaril o eration, maintenance and en ineering 4.

Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

A tyPical Re ional/Headquarters inspection consists of 1 inspector..

who is onsite for sev'en workiiig days plus continuous coverage by 3 resident inspectors.

5.

Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following:managers must spend in direct involvement before, during,,

and in response to the activity described in Item 81.

a ~

b.

C.

d.

e.

Plant Department Heads140 man h<<

(number p~~p rson/yr.

Plant Hanager~aan hrs..":,

(number per person/yr Corporate Department Headsl00 man-hdnumber per person/yr.

Corp'orate Yice presidents500 man-hr(number per person/yr.

Chief Huclear Officer 400 man-hr/yr.

involved) involved) 3 involved) ll involved) 3 f.

Supervisors 40 man-hrs.

per plepartment/yr.

(number involved) )DY

• 200: man-hrs based on not having a plant director.

With a plant director estimates.are 150 man-hrs/person/yr.

~I i+[

~ I

NRC Reoula tory Impact Sur" Oues-ionna>re nee~

l.

Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:

INPO Plant and Cor,.orate Evaluations 2.

Based on actual experience over the gast several

years, about how often is this activity conducted?

Every 2 -

1S months 3.

Operations/Construction areas covered:

Per Generic Letter instructions thi s is not needed for this type of inspection (INPO Evaluations) 4.

Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

Plant Evaluation:

20 -30 INPO eo le for 2 weeks Corporate Evaluation:

5 - 10 INPO peo le for 1 week 5.

Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item:l.

a 0 b.

c d.

e.

49 3

10 3

Plant Oepartment Heads 60 man-hrs.

(number involved) person/inspection Plant Manager60 man-hrs.

(number involved) person/inspection Corporate Department Heads 60 man-hr(number involved.)

person/inspection Corporate Vice Presidents 40 man-hrs(number involved) person/inspection

.Chief Huclear Officer40 man-hrs inspection Supervisors 60 man-hrs (number involved)106

~apartment/inspection

i+[

s'DQ gssr

~ <<1 a! O~~v j-O > ~~

csv~ ~ ~ so V Cuesta>onra>re

>neer

ype of irspect on, a dit or evaluat on

Insurers ANI 2.

Based on actual experience over the past several

years, about how often is this activity conducted?

A roximatel 5 ins ections er ear lus continous ressure s stems and'achiner (PSM cover aae.

3.

Operations/Construction areas covered:

Pro ert -(Fire Protection and Material Handlin );

Liabilit (includes all as ects)

Boiler and Machinery 4.

Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

ANI InsPectio ns typically consists of 1 inspector who is onsite for 4 days.

Further PSM consists of continuous on-site coverage by 2'nspectors.

5.

Approximate percentage

.of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers mu'st spend, in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item 81.

a.

Plant Department Heads 20 man-hrs (number involved) 55 person/yr.

b.

Plant Manager 20.man-hrs (number involved) 3 person/yr.

c.

Corporate Department Heads 10 man-hr(number involved) person/yi d.

Corp'orate Yice Presidents 10 man-hr(number involved) 3

.person/hr.

e.

Chief Huclear Officer 10 man-hr/yr.

f.

SuPervisors 5 man-hrs.

per department/yr.

(number involved)157

0

~i

"""" "-4"ulatorv imoa. Sur vev Ouesz>onn~>re Type of inspe

-.ion, audit or evaluation:

EPA 2.

8ased on actual experienc over the pas severaI

years, about how often is this activity conducted?

6 inspections oer ear b

Miarico a County Health Department, Arizona De artmen't of Environmental ualit 5 Arizona Department oT"Mater..Resources.

3.

Operations/Construction are s covered:

Air ollution sources landfill operation, hazardous waste manacements round>>ater ollution sources and evaporation pond dam safety 4.

Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

Normially 1 or 2 people for 1 day or less per inspection.

5.

Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direc-. involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item rl.

a.

Plant Departmeot.Heads 3 man-hrs.

(number involved) 2 person/yr b.

Plant Manager N/A c.

Corporate Department Heads 30 man-hr(number involved) 3 person/yr d.

Corp'orate Vice Presidents H/A'number.involved) e.

Chiei Nuclear O==icer H/A f.

Supervisors 580 man-hrs.

~apartment/yr..

(number involved) 5

YPC Reaulaiorv Imoac-. Svr'.

v Quest>onna>re

>ne

~

l.

Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:

.OSHA '(Annual elevator'ompliance or emoloyee complaint) 2.

Based on actual experience over the pas several

years, about how often is this activity conducted?

Annually for elevator ins ections; Approximately 18 - 24 months for corn liance/corn laint ins ections 3.

Operations/Construction areas covered:

Elevator insoections:

Uni.ts 1, 2, 3, Mater Reclamation Facility, Annex, Technical Su ort Center 8

the Marehouse.

Compliance/Complaint inspections:

any area on site 4.

Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

Elevator inspections:

1 on site el'evator inspector and 1 state inspector for approximately up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> per elevator annually (16 elevators)

Compliance/Complaint Inspections:

1 State inspector 5.

Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following.managers must spend in direct involvemen before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item 81.

a.

Plant Oepartment Heads8 amnhr /ysr (number involved) 1 b.

Plant Manager N/A.

c.

Corporate Oepartment Heads H/A

'(number involved) d..

Corp'orate Vice Presidents N/A'number involved) e.

Chief Hue)ear Officer H/A f.

Supervi sors 132 man-hrs/yr*

ZJ man-hrs/yr8 (number involved) 1 Elevator inspections Compliance/Complaint inspections

i+[

~

Y

Ques;:orna.sre bneet Type o= insp

tion, a dt or evaluation:

DQT 2.

Based on actual exoerience over tho past several

years, about how 0 ien is this activity conducted?

2 audits er year 3.

Operations/Construction areas covered:

0/A 4.

Extent of the acti.vity, (how many people, for how long) 2 NRC ins ectors for 3 days 5.

Approximate percen age of total time (on an annual basis) which he following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item Zl.

a.

Plant Department Heads H/A (number involved) b.

c Plant Manager Corporate Department Heads "f Corp'orate Yice Presiden's (number involved)

(number involved) e.

Chief Huclear Officer f.

Supervisors 30 man-hrs.

per.son/yr.

(number involved)

4l 4l

i l<RC Re u,latorv Imoa"t ~urv Gues-.ionnaire

<nee-,

Type of inspeczion, audit or evaluation:

State/Local Authorities (Conformance to state re ulations) 2.

Based on actual experience over the past several

years, about how oaten is this activity conducted'?

2 inspections er year b 'Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency and the Food and Dru Administration 3.

Operations/Construction areas covered:

Radiation practices 4.

Extent of the activity (how many people, for how iona) 1 inspector from Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency and 2 inspectors from Food'nd Drug Administration for 1 day 5.

Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following manage.s must spend in direct involvement before, durina.,

and in response to the activity described in Item 81.

a.

Pl ant Department Heads 8/A b.

P)ant Manager N/A c.

Corporate Department Heads N/A d.

Corp'orate Yice Presiaents N/A e.

Chief NucIear Of,"icer, N/A (number involved)

(number involved)

(number invo1ved) f.

Supervisors 16..man-hours/yr (number,involved) 1

P r

iNRC Regulatory Impact Survey Oueszionna> re knee Type of i.nspection, audi or evaluation:

NRC Required gA Audits.

.2.

Based on actua'1 experience over the.past several;,years, about how often is thi's activity conducted?

A roximatel 30 audits, er ear 3.

Operations/Construction areas covered:

N/A 4..

Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

Approximately. 4 people per audit for 3 weeks 5.

Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item :l.

a ~

b.

c ~

d.

e.

Plant 0epartment Headsl00 man-h'rs (number person/yr Plant Manager 50,man-hrs (number person/yr Corporate Oepartment Heads 50 man-hr(number person/yr Corp'orate Vice Presidents 100 man-hr(number person/yr Chief'uc1 ear Officer 100.man-hr/yr involved) ll involved) 3 involved) 5 involved) a f.

Supervisors 17,256 man-hrs department/yr (number involved) 10

4l 0>

r P

s.;(..;cpu) a Grv

",oac: Survey Ques ~ronne> re knees (ype oT j nspect>on, Labor audit or evaluation:

Other (De artment of 2.

Based on actual expe.ience over the.past several

years, about how often is this activity conducted?

3 times per year 3.

Operations/Construction areas covered:

Employee Concerns

- usually related to terminations 4.

Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 1 Department of Labor inspector onsite for

.1 - 2 days 5.

Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in.direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item 81.

a.

Plant Department Heads40 man-hrs/yr (number involved) 1 b.

Plant Manager H/A c.

Corporate Department Heads H/A (number involved) d.

Corp'orate Ylce Presidents]j dealt-hrs(number involved)~

yr.

e.

Chief Nuclear Of=ic r N/A f.

Supervisors 20 man-hrs person/yr (number invol.ved) 2*

• There are no supervisors in the group only manager and engineers

II 1

Oi

, ~

I t