ML17303A267
| ML17303A267 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde |
| Issue date: | 01/20/1987 |
| From: | Haynes J ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| ANPP-39764-JGH, NUDOCS 8702090006 | |
| Download: ML17303A267 (7) | |
Text
REQULATORllPORNATION DISTRIBUTION S'+EN (RIDS>
,.)ACCESSION NBR: 8702090006 DOC. DATE: 87/01/20 NOTARIZED:
NO DOCKET FACIL:STN-50-528 Palo Verde Nuclear Station>
Unit 1> Arizona Pub li 05000528 STN-50-.529 Pal o Verde Nuc lear Stati on>
Unit'> Arizona Pub li 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuc lear Station>
Unit 3. Arizona Pub 1 i 05000530 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION HAYNES> J. C.
Arizona Nuclear Power Prospect (formerly Arizona Public Serv REC IP. NAME RECIPl'ENT AFFILIATION MARTIN>J. B.
Region 5> OFfice of-Director
SUBJECT:
Forwards> For review 5 approval> changes to FSAR Section
- 17. 2 to allow util to qualify vendors not holding ASME quality sos certificate as NCA-3800 matl suppli ers. Evaluation will assess compliance w/ASME Code Section III NCA-3800.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
IEASD COPIES RECEIVED:LTRj ENCL g SIZE:
TITLE: 50. 54. a. 3 8c 50. 55. f. 3 Change to SAR GA Program NOTES: Standardized plant. M. Davis> NRR: 1CM.
Standardized plant. M. Davis> NRR: 1Cg.
Standardized plant. M. Davis> NRR: 1Cg.
05000528 0500052c>>
05000530 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PWR-B PD7 LA COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
0 RECIP IENT ID CODE/NAMF-LICITRA> E COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 INTERNAL: ACRS IE/DGAVT/GAB REl~E 01 10 0
1 1
1 1
1 ADM/LFMB IE/FILE RQN5 02 1
0 1
1 1
EXTERNAL: DMB/DSS NRC PDR NOTES:
1 1
1 1
1 LPDR TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 22 ENCL 10
l
Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.o. BOX 52034
~,
PHOENIX, ARIZONA85072-2034 January 20, 1987 ANPP-39764-'GH/PGN/98.05 Mr. John B. Martin, Regional Administrator Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V
1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5368
Subject:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Units 1, 2 and 3
Docket Nos.
STN 50-528 (License NPF-41)
STN 50-529 (License NPF-51)
STN 50-530 Proposed Changes to PVNGS FSAR Cha'pter 17 File: 87-A-005-419.05 87-A-056-026 ITl gJlil
Dear Mr. Martin:
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(a) and 50.55(f),
ANPP is submitting a 'roposed change to the PVNGS FSAR Section 17.2 for your review and acceptance.
This change allows ANPP to qualify vendors not holding ASME Quality Systems Certi-
- ficates, as NCA-3800 Material Suppliers for PVNGS.
Specifically,'t will allow
- ANPP, as owner/operator, to evaluate ASME Material Suppliers, not holding a Quality Systems Certificate, for inclusion on the ANPP approved vendors list.
Evaluation will assess programmatic compliance to ASME Section III NCA-3800 requirements.
The ANPP Quality Assurance Program will still be auditing material suppliers for their Quality Assurance Program.
The same acceptance criteria i.e.,
ASME Section IIIwill apply.
If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr.
W.
F. Quinn of my staff.
Very truly yours, 87020'7IOOOb 870120 PDR ADOCK 05000528 P
PDR J.
G. Haynes Vice President Nuclear Production JGH/JKR/rw Attachment cc; 0.
M. De Michele E.
E.
Van Brunt, Jr.
R.
P.
Zimmerman E.
A. Licitra A. C. Gehr U.S.
NRC Document Control Desk xC 'f3 If)
0 0
Il
PVNGS FSAR QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING THE OPERATIONS PHASE 98SI Contracts and Purchasing, Technical Services, Corporate Quality Assurance, Nuclear Operations and/or authorized agent that will J
include technical and quality assurance evaluation as appropriate.
The evaluation of the potential vendor is based on one or more of the following:
14 14 A.
The vendor's capability to comply with the elements of 10CFRSO.
Appendix B. that are applicable to the type of item or service to be provided as defined in the procurement document.
[4 B..
A review of APS'istory and/or APS authorized agent's history with the vendor including previous records and performance evaluation for items or services similar to the ones being procured.
14 C.
>eau~>~
D Qg~
A survey of the vendor's facility and QA program to determine his capability to supply a product which meets the design.
manufacturing and quality assurance requirements.
Surveys> mehx~ third parties such as CASE.
may be used for this purpose.
When third party surveys are used, documentation shall be maintained to identify the survey used >nd provide evidence of review of the survey and.its results by the APS Corporate QA Department.
The Vendor'e capability to perform work in accordance with procedures approved by APS.
14 The results of this vendor evaluation will be documented and the evaluation for the successful bidder maintained in accordance with section 17.2.17.
)4 When the procurement document specifies that acceptance will be based on a measurement, inspection, or test that is capable of verifying essential characteristics of the item.
a vendor evaluation is not required.
)4 February 19S5 17.2-41 Amendment 14
~
4~&
1'I I'