ML17300A939

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Status of Actions Taken to Correct Items Noted in Notice of Violation Re Insp Repts 50-529/86-33 & 50-530/86-27.Distribution List Being Developed to Indicate Organization Responsible to Take Further Action
ML17300A939
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 06/19/1987
From: Van Brunt E
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
102-00421-EEVB, 102-421-EEVB, NUDOCS 8706300067
Download: ML17300A939 (6)


Text

DOCKET 4i 05000528'5000530 REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTR IBUTION SYSTEM

( R IDS )

57.

ACCFSSIQN NBR: 870o300067 DOC. DATE: M/06/iV NOTARIZED:

NQ FACIL:STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Station>

Unit 2> Arizona Publi STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Stations Unit 3> Arizona Publi AUTH. NAME,.

AUTHOR AFFILIATIQN VAN BRUNT'. E Arizona Nuclear Power Prospect (formerly Arizona Public Serv RECIP. NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Contr ol Branch (Document Conte ol Desk )

SUBJECT:

Forwards status of actions taken to correct items noted in notice of violation re Insp Repts 50 529/86 33 50 530/86-27. Distri but i on 1 ist being devel oped to indi cate organization responsible to take further action.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IEOiD COPIES RECEIVED: LTR /

ENCL Q SIZE:

TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-lnsp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES: Standar di zed plant. M. Davis> NRR: 1Cg.

Standardi z ed plan". M. Davi s~ NRR: iCg.

0500052~<

05000530 REC IP IENT ID CODE/NAYiE PD5 PD DAVIS: Yi CQP IES LTTR ENCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME LICITRAiE CQP IES LTTP. ENCL INTERNAL:

ACRS DEDRQ NRR ROEi Yi. L NRR/DREP /EP8 NRR/DRIS OIR OGC/Hl?Si RES DEFY GI 2

2 i

i i

i AEQD ENF LIEBERMAN NRR/DOEA DIR NRR/DREP/RPB NRR/ MAS/ILRB REG IL ILE Oi EXTERNAL:

LPDR NSIC i

1 NRC PDR NOTES:

TOTAL NUMBER OF CQP IES REQUIRED:

LTTR 25 ENCL 25

(

C

Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.O. 8OX 52034

~

PHOENIX. ARIZONA85072-2034 June 19, 1987 102-00421-EEVB/TDS NRC Document Control Desk U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.

C.

20555

Subject:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)

Unit 2 Docket No.

STN 50-529 (License NPF-51)

Notice of Violation.

50-529/86-33-09, 50-529/86-33-12 50-529/86-33-13 File:

87-001-493

Reference:

(1) Letter from D ~ F. Kirsch (NRC) to E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.

(ANPP),

dated March 13, 1987, NRC Inspection Reports 50-529/86-33 and 50-530/86-27 (2) 102-00342-EEVB/TDS, dated April 13, 1987 Reference (1) transmitted Notice of Violations to the ANPP.

Reference (2) provided ANPP's response to the violations.

Included within the response was a status of actions taken to various items noted within the inspection report.

Item 5 contained in Attachment B of Reference (2) stated that the item would be discussed with the NRC inspector to clarify the commitment.

The status of the item would then be provided based on the results of the discussion.

Attached is the status of that item.

EEVB/TDS:kj Attachment Very truly you F-K E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.

Executive Vice President Project Director cc:

J.

G.

L. F.

R. P.

E. A.

A. C.

J.

B.

Haynes Miller Zimmerman Licitra Gehr Martin U

(w/attachment)

(w/attachment)

(w/attachment)

(w/attachment )

(w/attachment)

(w/attachment) 8706300067 8706i9 PDR ADOCK 05000528 8

PDR

f

NRC Document Cont Palo Verde Nuclea nerating Station 102-00421-EEVB/TD Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT ITEM:

ing procedures so that EER non-technical resolutions have the idgified corrective actions assigned to the appropriate d 1rtment manager (50-529/86-33-03).

RESPONSE

Aelephone conversation was held between Mr. R.

C. Barr of the NRC various members of the ANPP staff on May 27, 1987, to clarify s concern.

The following action is being taken in response to e concern.

perations Engineering is currently developing a distribution ist which will indicate the organization that is responsible to ake further action.

3he manager of the organization that is affected by the disposition will then be sent the disposition for their evaluation of necessary

actions, as required.

The EER will not be tracked by engineering since it is incumbent upon the affected organization to develop actions to resolve a concern.

The dispositioned EER will continue to be sent to the initiator.

It is expected that the procedure will be modified to reflect this change by July 30, 1987.

t l

(