ML17299A600
| ML17299A600 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 08/29/1985 |
| From: | Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| ANPP-33290-EEVB, NUDOCS 8509160330 | |
| Download: ML17299A600 (7) | |
Text
RECBYEO NBC Arizona Nuclear Power Project 34 pg f I8 P.o. BOX 52034
~
PHOENIX, ARIZONA85072-2034 I%5 qEgp fk V M,E Mr. John B. Martin, Regional Administrator Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V
1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5368 August 29, 1985 ANPP-33290-EEVB/JKO
Subject:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)
Units 2 and 3
Docket Nos.
STN 50-529/530 Change to PVNGS FSAR Chapter 17 File:
85-056-026 G.l.01.10
Dear Mr. Martin:
In accordance with 10CFR 50.55(f),
ANPP is submitting a change to the PVNGS FSAR Section 17.1B.1.6 for your information.
The affected FSAR pages are attached.
This change deletes nonconformance report (NCR) validations as a job responsibility of the project Quality Assurance Manager and adds quality class "Q" NCR validation as a job responsibility of the project Quality Control Engineer.
NCR validation for non-"Q" quality class is a job responsibility of the field engineer.
The validation of NCR's by Quality Control Supervision in, lieu of Quality Assurance Engineering is considered a quality program enhancement.
This change will insure that the condition description on NCR's is adequately defined prior to Engineering/Quality Assurance review for potential reportability.
The change does not diminish the effectiveness of the quality program because the NCR's will still receive the same amount of validation.
The responsibility is being shifted from Quality Assurance to Quality Control, but shifting this responsibility will not decrease safety.
< '.85O'9160iiO 85OS29,.~
'PDR
'ADOCK 05000529I A,.
PDR I
h
~i
t J.,B. Martin
, " Change to PVNGS FSAR Chapter 17 ANPP-33290 Page 2
This is, therefore, being transmitted for your information. If you have any further questions, please contact Mr. W. F. Quinn of my staff.
Very truly yours, E. E.
Van Brunt, Jr.
Executive Vice President Project Director EEVB/JKO/slh Attachment cc:
R. P.
Zimmerman E. A. Licitra A. C. Gehr USNRC Document Control Desk, Washington, D. C.,
STATE OF ARIZONA
)
)
sate COUNTY OF MARICOPA)
I I,
Edwin E.
Van Brunt, Jr.,
represent that I am Executive Vice President, Arizona Nuclear Power Project, that the foregoing document has been signed by me on behalf of Arizona Public Service Company with full authority to do so, that I have read such document and know its contents, and that to, the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements made therein aretrue.'dwin E.
Van Brunt, Jr.
Sworn to before me thin~+
day of
, 1985.
Notary Public My Commission ~Expires:
~
) I'l C
1 +
~
I lil 1
I 1
wg ly II II, gY,"
5 o
Ig,
~
+>> 8c>a7 PVNGS FSAR BECHTEL QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION V
In order to assure that the quality program is sufficiently addressed, the PQAM's duties and.responsibilities for the PVNGS include:
A.
Review and 'approval of:
o Material requisitions and specifications for purchase orders and subcontracts o
Subcontractors'A programs and manuals o
Bid evaluations/selection of project approved suppliers Purchase orders and subcontracts I
Selected single-line drawings and P&IDs Vendor inspection planning o
Construction work plans and procedures o
Site inspection planning o
Review for reportability and concurrence of nonconformance descriptions and dispositions B.
Coordinate the establishment of the project quality pro gr'am C.
Overall surveillance of the project quality program and P
coordination of its implementation D.
E.
Coordinate project quality-related activities of engineering, procurement, and construction and provide necessary interface during audits or inspections by off-project entities of MBQS, ANI, NRC or regulatory agencies Surveillance and audit of project quality-related
. functions and advise management of the status of program implementation Amendment 12 17.1B-20 February 1984
PVNGS FSAR BECHTEL QUALITY ASSURANCE DU ING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
(
- The project construction team includes:
Superintendents who are in direct charge of the craft; Field Engineers who per-~an&
form field engineerinqgand provide echnical idanc'h incTud- ('~ -g ing in-process control inspection of construction work; field procurement personnel who. are responsible for purchase of field procured items and control of materials prior to release for construction; -the Field Contracts Administrator who coordinates activities in field subcontracts; the Project QA Engineer, assign'ed by and administratively and technically responsible to the Project QA Manager, who is responsible for coordinating the QA program; and Field QC Engineers, assigned by and administra-tively and technically responsible to the Chief Construction QC Engineer.
The Field QC Engineers are'esponsible for the field QC program, including performance of all quality verification inspection.
Field QC is coordinated by the Project, Field Construction Manager.
Figure 17.1B-10 shows the organization of the project, construction team.
Field whose A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
QC is the responsibility of the Project QC Engineer responsibilities include:
Perform all jobsite quality verification inspection Prepare jobsite QC documentation and maintain construc-tion QC records Perform surveillance of subcontractors'uality programs and review of subcontractor's quality verification documentation
= Provide technical'irection to testing laboratories and inspection subcontractors Administer the nonconforming material control systems, and verify acceptance of rework and repairs in accor-dance with nonconformance dispositions.
Review supplier quality verification documentation package(s) for completeness and traceability to the item(s)
Amendment 12 February 1984
~>;J +e
~onto G~~.~ ~~o.~@
n~ltg C'inss "Q",
17.1B-24