ML17299A558

Forwards FSAR Changes to Chapter 17,including Clarification of Intent of Sections 17.1A.1.2.5.2 & 17.1A.6 & Shifting Ncr Validation as Job Responsibility from QA & Qc.Changes Will Be Made in Next FSAR Update

ML17299A558
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde
Issue date:	08/30/1985
From:	Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To:	Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
ANPP-33311-EEVB, NUDOCS 8509050034
Download: ML17299A558 (19)

Text

REGULATORY FORMATION DISTRIBUTION SY EM (RIDS) t)

ACCESSION NBR ~ 850905003 l DOC ~ DATE 85/08/30 NOTARIZED YES DOCKET' FACIL:STN-50-529 Palo Verde Nuclear Stationi Unit 2i Arizona Publi 05000529 STN-50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Station~ Unit 3~ Arizona Publi 0500053o AUTH'AME AUTHOR AFFILIATION VAN BRUNT'~E.E ~ Arizona Nucl ear Power Project (former 1 y Arizona Publ i c Serv RECIP.NAME,

• RECIPIENT AFFILIATION KNIG HTON g G e I<. Licensing Br anch 3

SUBJECT:

Forwards FSAR changes to Chapter 17~including clarification of intent of Sections 17,14.1 2.5 2 8 17,1A 6 8, shi f ting NCR

~ ~ ~

validation as job responsibility from QA L QC Changes" will

~

be made in next FSAR update, DISTRIBUTION CODE: B001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE; TITLE: Licensing Submittal: PSAR/FSAR Amdts L Related Correspondence,.

NOTES:Standardized plant, 05000529 Standardized plant, 05000530 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL NRR/DL/ADI 1 0 NRR LB3 BC 1 0 NRR LB3 LA 1 0 LICITRA,E 01 1 1 INTERNAL; ACRS 41 6 ADM/LFMB 1 0, ELD/HDS3 0 IE FILE 1 1 IE/DEPER/EPB 36 1 IE/DQAVT/QAB21 1 1 NRR ROErM ~ L 1 1 NRR/DE/AEAB 1 0 NRR/DE/CEB 11 1 1 NRR/DE/EHEB 1 1 NRR/DE/EQB 13 2 2 NRR/DE/GB 28 2 2 NRR/DE/MEB 18 1 1 NRR/DF/MTEB 17 1 NRR/DE/SAB 24 1 1 NRR/DE/SGEB 25 1 1 NRR/DHFS/HFEBAO 1 1 NRR/DHFS/LQB 32 1 1 NRR/DHFS/PSRB 1 1 NRR/DL/SSPB 1 0 NRR/DS I/AEB 26 1 1 NRR/DSI/ASB 1 NRR/DSI/CPB 10 1 1 NRR/DSI/CSB 09 1 1 NRR/DSI/ICSB 16 1 1 NRR/DS I/METB 12 1 1 NRR/DS I/PSB 19 1 1 N " RAB 22 1 1 NRR/DSI/RSB 23 1 1 04 1 1 RGN5 3 3 RM/ AMI/MI0 1 0 EXTERNAL: 24X BNL (AMDTS ONI Y) 1 1 DMB/DSS (AMDTS) LPDR 03 1 1 NRC PDR 02 NSIC 05 1 1 PNI- GRUELpR TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 52 ENCL

l It, i I

h

.. ~ . ~ ~

0 0 b

'h

Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.o, BOX 52034 e PHOENIX, ARIZONA85072-2034 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation August 30, 1985 Attention: Mr. George M. Knighton, Chief ANPP-33311-EEVB/JKO Licensing Branch 3 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Subject:

Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS)

Units 2 and 3 Changes to PVNGS FSAR (Chapter 17)

Docket Nos. STN-50-529/530 File: 85-056-026'.1.01.10

Dear Mr. Knighton:

Attached for your review on PVNGS Units 2 arid 3 are FSAR changes to Chapter 17.

These changes involve: (1) responsibility for the development and maintenance of the classification of Safety Related items from PVNGS Engineering Department to ANPP Engineering Department; (2) clarification of the intent of Sections 17.1A.1.2.5.2 and 17.1A.6; (3) shifting NCR validati'on as a job responsibility from QA to QC.

Me believe these changes to be justified'because: (1) this change al'igns the FSAR and ANPP policy; ('2) clarification was necessary 'due to the review of the last amendment; (3) the same amount of validation will take place for NCR's.

For PVNGS Unit 1, safety reviews and evaluations have been completed for implementation of these changes in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR 50.59.

The safety reviews and evaluations have determined that there are no unreviewed safety questions involved with these changes. These changes will be included in the next FSAR update.

If you have any questions concerning these changes, please contact William Quinn of my staff.

Very truly yours n i~4 888&8 <<>34 850830 E E Van Brunt Jr PDR "A ADOCK 05000829 l,l Executive Vice President PDR Project Director EEVB/JKO/slh Attachment cc: E. A. Licitra M. Ley R. P. Zimmerman P00l A. C. Gehr

STATE OP ARIZONA )

) ss0 COUNTY OP MARICOPA)

I, Edwin E. Van Brunt, Jr., represent that I am Executive Vice President, Arizona Nuclear Power Project, that the foregoing document has been signed by me on behalf of Arizona Public Service Company with full authority to'o so, that I have read such document and know its contents, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements made therein are true.

t RV~ n v44 Edwin E. Van Brunt, r

Jr.

Sworn to before me this D0 day of 1985

'I otary Public My 'Commi'ssion C"

Expires:

( I M Commlsslon Ex lres Anrll 6. 1987

0 b

'I 0

G. t3. Knighton Changers to PVNGS (Chapter AWPP- 333] 1 Page 3 bcc: D. B. Karner J. G. Haynes R. M. Butler W. E. Ide W. F. Quinn T. F. Quan LCTS Coordinator M. A. Jones K. W. Gross J. R. Bynum J. Orlowski A. J. McCabe J. D. Houchen S. Shapiro C. F. Ferguson SARCN Nos. 2013, 2031, 2037

C P

'I i I

PVN(DS F SAR 1

QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING THE OPERATIONS PHASE 17.2.2.7 A licabilit of Codes Standards and Re ulator Guides The Operations Quality Assurance Pro'gram has been developed, to the extent practical, in accordance with approved NRC Regulatory Guides and ANSI Standards. The requirements for the Operations 'Quality Assurance Program are described in table 17.2-1. Implementation of those requirements for specific quality-related activities is the responsibility of those who are responsible for the activity. Prior to receipt of an Operating License for the PVNGS, changes'o conformance with those Quality Assur-12 ance Standards and Guides identified in table 17.2-1 must be reviewed and accepted by the Director, Corporate QA/QC.

After receipt of an Operating License for the PVNGS, changes to the requirements described in table 17.2-1 must be reviewed in accordance with the requirements of the Technical Speci-4 fications. Such changes wi'll be accepted by the Corporate Quality Assurance Department, prior to implementation.

4 17.2.2.8 Safet -Related Structures S stems and Com onents Cont'rolled b the Pro ram Table 3.2- 1 identifies the safety-related structures, systems, and components to which the'Operations Quality Assurance Program appli'es. Certain components or parts within the identified envelopes may not be safety-related. Such components or parts will not be identified as safety-related in the detailed list described in the paragraph below.

Amendment. 14 17.2-24 February 1985

,4 ~

PVNG8 F SAR QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING THE OPERATIONS PHASE The structures, systems, and components listed in table 3.2-1 are further broken down to identify systems and components to which the Operations Quality Assurance Program applies. The classification of safety-related items is developed and maintained by the pW/ P~6&jl7cccccqg Engineering Department.

Prior to receipt of an Operating License for the PVNGS, changes to table 3.2-1 must be reviewed and accepted by the Director, Corporate QA/QC and the Director, Technical Services.

After receipt of an Operating License for the PVNGS, changes to table 3.2- 1 must be reviewed in accordance with the requirements of. the Technical Specifications.

Such changes will be accepted by the Corporate Quality Assurance Department prior to implementation.

17.2.2.9 Su liers and Contractors APS requires contractors and suppliers of equipment, materials, and services which could affect the quality

~

of safety-related structures, systems, and components or who perform quality-related activities to establish and implement QA programs. These QA programs shall include provisions. which are consistent with the Operations Quality Assurance Program. Alternatively.

they may be required to perform work in accordance with APS approved procedures. APS responsibilities with respect to these programs will be exercised through review of their QA programs, monitoring verification or audit, as appropriate, by the Corporate Quality Assurance Department to assure compliance with the procurement document and applicable sections of 10CFR Part 50, Appendix B.

~

February 1985 17.2-25 Amendment 14

I

~

e

~

I PVNGS FSAR Qp8 >oa)

'I QUALlTY ASSURANCE H. Review changes to Bechtel's prequalified bidders list and provide concurrence as deemed appropriate.

The APS Corporate QA Department is organized into departments as shown in the organization chart in figure 17.2-1.

Responsibilities of the APS Corporate QA Department include quality assurance functions relating to engineering, design, procurement and construction of PVNGS. Therefore, these APS Corporate QA departments are described below.

\

17.1A.1.2.5.1 Qualit S stems and En ineering ~ The Quality Systems and Engineering Department, through the Quality Systems and Engineering Manag'er, has the responsibility to assist the Director, Corporate QA/QC in the implementation of the APS QA Program. The Qua1ity Systems and Engineering Manager reports directly to the Director, Corporate QA/QC. He is responsible to:

A. Develop, maintain, issue, review and/or control programs and 'procedures required for the implementation of the APS QA Program/

including the Operations Quality Assurance Criteria Manual, and the APS Quality Assurance Manual for Design and Construction; B. Review quality documents as necessary for incorpora-tion and adequacy of quality requirements.

" 17 'A.1 2.5.2

~ procurement Qualit De artment ~ Tne pro'-'urement Quality Department, through the Procurement Quality Manager, has the responsibility to assist F'THE the Director, Corporate QA/QC in the implementation of the APS QA Program by monitoring the procurement activities of Bechtel and Combustion Engineering'he Procurement Quality Manager reports directly to the Director,

/

Corporate QA/QC~ ~monitoring or auditing procurement, receiving>

inspection and storage act'ivities.

Peg p CK)&t 6'nl= i I i'eS "n "PP.Q",SO.~~ ~

ggg d t ~3 "Q>&Ri.'STY.>YANIJAGe0

~ e I

~ "I February 1985 17'A-7 'Amendment 14 "j, [>2 n

ke

~r PVNGS FSAR

>AÃ- BcB )

QUALITY ASSURANCE Bechtel and CE documents are -identified in sections 17.1B and 17.1C, respectively.

17 ~ 1Ae6 DOCUMENT CONTROL APS QA Program requires that organizations with responsi-bility for documents which prescribe activities affecting quality establish .and implement document control measures. The procedures which have been established by APS to implement the requirements for document control are identified in the APS QA manual. These procedures identify the format and content requirements for documents; the responsibilities for preparation, .

review, approval and revision to documents; the document identi-fication systems used by APS; the measures to control issuance and distribution, receipt, filing and storage, use and dis-position. Documents include drawings; design specifications, calculations, engineering studies, vendor data, test procedures, design criteria, Q-List, PSAR/FSAR and QA programs and procedures.

The procedures which have been established by Bechtel and CE to implement the requirements for document control are described in sections 17.1B and 17.1C.

The Director, Corporate QA/QC is responsible for the maintenance,

.74, issuance and control of the APS QA Manuals The Director, Corporate QA/QC is also responsible for the issuance of instructions which. delineate the performance, of actiyit'ies by "APS Corporate QA personnel. l I

• The Director, Technical Services is responsible for the prepara-14 tion of document control procedures. for the Technical Services Departments, where there is responsibility for the issuance, P

review, and/or acceptance of documents. Q

)f ~ vga t ,'t'a'f" p~> ' , 1 =' vt't >r'> "+ ~ ; fa tQ'pr These 14( Amendment 14 17.'lA-32 February 1985 K,yips'f vp 5ild e ~.&~%~ca,R,k.>i~ aaM 4 ~dsf

C;i I

INSERT f

Such activities include review and comment on design documents issued by Bechtel; review and comment on procurement documents prepared by Bechtel; review and omment on field design and procurement documents; review of acceptance and

)ualification test procedures; review and comment on construction plans; and review and comment on changes to previously accepted documents.

PVNGS FSAR BECHTEL QUALITY ASSURMCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION In order to assure that the quality program is sufficiently addressed, 'the PQAM's duties and responsibilities for the pVNGs include:

A. Review and approval o f:

~ Material requisitions and specifications for purchase orders and subcontracts

~ .Subcontractors'A programs and manuals o . Bid evaluations/selection of project approved suppliers o Purchase orders and subcontracts o 'elected single-line drawings and P&IDs

~ Vendor inspection planning

~ Construction work plans and procedures o . Site inspection planning Review for .reportability and. concurrence of nonconformance descriptions and dispositions B. Coordinate the establishment. of the project quality program C. Overall surveillance of the project, quality program and coordination of its implementation D. Coordinate project, quality-related activities of engineering, procurement, and construction and provide necessary interface during audits or inspections by off-project entities of M&QS, ANI, NRC or regulatory agencies E. Surveillance and audit of project quality-related functions and advise management of the status of program implementation Amendment 12 17. 1B-20 February 1984 t

l

/II~ >>

, PVNGS FSAR BECHTEL QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION The proj'ect construction team includes: Superintendents who are in direct charge of th craft; Fi,e3.4 Engineers.who per-form field engineering,~an provide techno.cal guldan64 includ-ing in-process control inspection'of construction work; field P procurement personnel who are responsible for purchase of field procured items and control of materials prior to release for construction; the Field Contracts Administrator who coordinates activities in field subcontracts; the Project. QA Engineer, assigned by and administratively and technically responsible to the Project: QA Manager, who is responsible for coordinating the QA progr'am; and Field QC Engineers, assigned by and administra-tively and technically responsible to the Chief Construction QC Engineer. The Field QC Engineers are responsible for the field QC program, including performance of all quality verification inspection. 'ield QC is coordinated by the Project Field .

Construction Manager. Figure 17.1B-10 shows the organization

)P of the proje'ct construction team.

32 Field QC is the responsibility of the Project QC Engineer whose responsibilities include:

A. Perform all jobsite quality verification inspection B.'repare jobsite-QC documentation and maintain construc-tion QC records C. Perform surveillance of mQScontractors'uality programs and review of subcontractor's quality verification documentation ip D. Provide technical direction to testing laboratories and inspection subcontractors E. Administer the nonconforming material control systems, and verify acceptance of rework and repairs in accor-dance with nonconformance dispositions; F. .Review supplier quality verification documentation package(s) for completeness and traceability to .the item(s)

~~

qy.)<'Ja+e Aorl conk'natic.e cepc

~us.lip Clnss "Q.",

Amendment l2 17. 1B-24 -February 1984 il 'I

>>, ~ z.', '( i'm,)>>';y.s,":>>>>.:>>>>r'~(>> "ir<w>>', ',,1>>.<'-.

. 0 $w'p"'.~>>,j .g'~ sy

li f

0 I

t

-f "k