ML17299A484
| ML17299A484 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 07/29/1985 |
| From: | Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| ANPP-33117-EEVB, NUDOCS 8508120418 | |
| Download: ML17299A484 (4) | |
Text
AECElVEO Arizona Nuclear Power Project P.o. BOX 52034
~
PHOENIX, ARIZONA85072-2034
~85'ilt 30 AH 8:
39'r.
John B. Martin, Regional Administrator Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V
1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5368 July 29, 1985 ANPP-33118ECf@5f kUB
Subject:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Stat'ion (PVNGS)
Units 1, 2, and 3
Docket Nos.
STN 50-528 (License No. NPF-41)/529/530 Proposed Change to PVNGS FSAR Chapter 17 File:
85-056-026'.1.01.10
Dear Mr. Martin:
In accordance with 10CFR 50.55(f),
ANPP is submitting a proposed change to the PVNGS FSAR Section 17".1B for your review and approval.
The proposed change is to FSAR Section 17.1B.7 and the affected FSAR page is attached and the proposed change identified with a change bar.
It is ANPP's intent that this change is to be administrative in nature to allow the procurement, during the construction
- phase, from vendors approved by ANPP in accordance with the requirement described in FSAR Section 17.2.
This change will delete duplication of effort between ANPP and Bechtel Power Corporation during the transition from the construction phase to the operational phase.
Both FSAR Sections 17.1B and 17.2 are NRC approved programs and meet the requirements of 10CFR 50 Appendix B and the regulatory guidance committed to in FSAR Section 1.8.
ANPP believes this is sufficient justification for your approval of the proposed change.
If you should have any questions concerning this matter, please con'tact Mr. W. F. Quinn of my staff.
Very truly
- ours, EEVB/WFQ/KLM Attachment E. E.
Van Brunt, Jr.
Executive Vice President Project Director cc:
R. P.
Zimmerman E. A. Licitra A. C. Gehr USNRC Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
8508120418 850729 PDR ADOCK 05000528 P
H
~
h
)
h
PVNGS FSAR ATTACHMENT BECHTEL QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION current status of vendor documents and copies of applicable vendor documents are formally transmitted to the construction site with provision for receipt acknowledgement.
The Project Construction organization at the jobsite employs standard prescribed procedures for control of the distribution of approved drawings, specifications, and other documents.
These procedures include provisions for field receipt, review and'istribution of approved documents and for appropriate marking or destruction of obsolete documents.
The transmittal of drawings and specifications is controlled in accordance with procedures which include provisions to prevent inadvertent use of obsolete or superseded documents.
Documents such as instructions, procedures, specifications,
- drawings, procurement documents, inspection plans, inspection
- records, supplier manuals, nonconformance reports, supplier deviation disposition requests, corrective action reports, memoranda and correspondence are included in document control.
A's part of their quality verification inspection program, field QC t
ensures that construction work is not performed if current approved design documents are not available.
Control of documents in the engineering and construction offices are regularly audited by project QA personnel.
17.1B ~ 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES Procurement related activities for the construction phase shall be in accordance with the program described herein, or as described in section 17.2.
17.1B.7.1 Su lier Evaluation and Selection Records of currently acceptable suppliers and subcontractors are maintained by procurement.
These records identify suppliers and subcontractors who have demonstrated their conformance to the applicable criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix B, and their ability to provide quality
- material, equipment, or services, or have been established as acceptable by previous survey or audit.
February 1984 17.1B-51 Amendment 12
0 0
I(
n III