ML17298A235
| ML17298A235 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1983 |
| From: | Sternberg D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Eckhardt J, Narbut P, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17298A236 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8303140546 | |
| Download: ML17298A235 (4) | |
Text
Docket Nos. 50-528 50"529 50-530
~EQPXL5gypg Memorandum for:
T. Young, Jr.,
RV P. Narbut, RV J. Eckhardt, RV H. North, RV
- 0. Shackleton, 01 P. Johnson, RV G. Piorelli, RV G. Johnston L. Vorderbrueggen, RV E. Licitra, NRR Prom:
Subject:
D. M. Sternberg, Chief Reactor Projects Branch No. 1, RV Data Package, SALP Board Review of Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2 and 3
M Members of the Palo Verde SALP Board are herewith provided a
SALP data package to be used in preparing performance analyses of the various functional areas.
This package includes excerpts of the 'NRC Manual Chapter
- 0516, a summary of licensee activities and summaries of inspections, enforcement actions, 50.'55(e): reports and other pertinent data related to the SALP period (July 1, 1981 through February 28, 1983).
Based upon review of the enclosed material,,
the resul,ts of inspections and your observations of licensee performa'nce during the above interval, you are requested= to prepare a performance,'analysis for each 'assigned
- area, following the format, of NRC Appendix i0516,~ Part VI,Section IV.
Note that each performance analysi's'should have three Subsections!
(1)
Punctional Area Analysis, (2) Conclusion'ahd,,(3)
Boa'rd,.Recommendations (regarding NRC actions, if appropriate).,
Each board members'shall use RV Porm 106 or 107 (attached) to apply-the evaluation criteria of MC 0516 to each functional area.
A category'rating should be 'made for each.
evaluation criterion that is applicable before arrivin'g at an-overall category for a functional area.
Your completed Porm 106 or, 107 should be submitted with your functional area performance analysis.
It is anticipated that the performance analysis for each section should be one half to one page (in final typed form).
Responsibilities for the preparation of the draft performance analysis are assigned as follows:
RV Tolbert/dot S ernberg Crews 3/Q /83 3/+83 3/ CP3 8303140546 830308 PDR ADOCK 05000528 G
~ol,
E ~
'V 4
t k
1)
'ha I,'
E>>
~
I k
t,l l
j.
I j
0 erations Functional Area 1.
Plant Operations (Preoperational Testing)
Fiorelli/G..Johnston/
P. Johnson 2.
Radiological Controls 3.
Maintenance North Fiorelli/G. Johnston/
P. Johnson 4.
Surveillance 5 ~
Fire Protection 6.
Security and Safeguards 8.
Refueling Const'ruction Functional Area 1.
Soils and Foundations N/A N/A.
N/A N/A N/A Res onsible Narbut/Vorderbrueggen/
Eckhardt 2.
Containment and Other Safety Related Structures II II tI 3.
Piping Systems and Supports 4.
Safety Related Components 5.
Support Systems ll II II II II II 1I I1 II 6.
Electrical Power Supply and Distribution 1I tl tl 7.
Instrumentation and Controls 8.
Licensing Activities II II II Licitra The individuals listed above should consult with others involved in inspection of the functional area during the SALP period.
Each draft performance analysis should be provided to P.
Narbut no later than Friday March 1 8,
19 83 so that a compiled draft can be provided t o the SALP Board.
The Board will convene in the Region V conference room at 8 : 00 a. m. April 13,
19 83.
Enclosures:
1.
SALP Data Package 2.
RV Form 106 3.
RV Form 107 bcc:
RSB/Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Distributed by RV Arthur C.
Gehr Resident Inspector D.
M. Sternberg, Chief Reactor Projects Branch No.
1
l 1E d
t 48 I