Text

Forwards Resumes & Independence Review File,In Response to NRC Request for Info on Qualifications of Engineers Assigned to Design Verification Reviews.Encl Demonstrates Util Compliance W/Reviewer Independence Criteria
	ML17277A417
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	01/13/1983
From:	Bouchey G; WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:	Schwencer A; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	GO2-83-20, NUDOCS 8301310114
	Download: ML17277A417 (127)
	v • d • e

)

1 REGULATORY Ihr. ORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYS (RIDS)

I

/ ACLESSION '+BR:8301310110 OOC,DATE: 83/01/13 NOTARIZED:

NO DOCKET ¹ FACIE:50'307 NPPSS Nuclear Project~

Unit 2~ Hashington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH,NAME ~L AUTHOR AFFILIATION BOUCHEY,G,D, 4

Nashington Pub)ic Power Supply System RECIP,NAh1E RECIPIENT AFFILIATION SCHWA'ENCER i A, Licensing Branch 2

SUBJECT:

Forwag.ds resumes L independence r eview fi le~ in response to NRC request for info on qualifications of engineers assigned to design ver 1 f ication reviews',Encl demonstrates util compliance w/reviewer independence criter ia, DISTRIBUTION CODE:

ZZZZS COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

I

/

TITLE: * * *

4 III

" S P

E C I A L D I S

T R I 0 U

T I 0

N C

O D

E

+

NDTEs.~r e gLL L4.&k.

RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME COPIES LTTR ENCL r

r r

r

//

i/

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:

LTTR Q ENCL

A rc'g l)~,

.'-,>>XS~i.

t >"

e IXI>>X~l: >TA~>. )1

<11'lI>>I "~k t:

~~'r<o'0

') r l ILJ 1

~(i~ f ~ 0 r ric'fs~'d q 6 4 f n<j q f l') <<,')'$ t

'llLa9 l '->gy "

,',1+$ 1 r5,j Jg 1

)fan Q(,~l /

)I'~

~;~ leuc,'

I <<o~j

~

> sg'I

~ r <<~<>

i>>>I,T,~I >I i 4<

ii,l <<I "<I J i~<

<<ll,)flf~g 3

t. n ) e~n ~)J f 1

~

'~ ),"~<)I(l~ ] j,")A

'C E k' 6 c',ef 1,3 'i i I, ~h<<,iiT>>i4

~ ). g ~ < I[i l<g,Jc)

~"l'<<>.')13 J>1

.-,.< )J li> i,I<,'

I ign.> ):> s nr i ~ >

1 r t

~ r v')a,ayn

>t>n'> ~~)>>nr

~.

c.">

c~ "sa

.',"a<.:va,~ ):'f.) y1',<~.1c".

c~'ivr~r~a6

.,qe.~or~>>>~>

tt>

en<>r )r~prl.r tr'~;i

<<~>> c~tnr rr $ u

~~1 'a P~ngn'.~ii lanJ.;.w p'r v'~

n~>roc>>yr i r c sv n~ r<! ~<>>

~ 0 f 1'O'I r ~',.1

'l3nnf'In~)'1',).')f3 r

'I9 ~~ r9n') x,o

)9l>f f [ llP~>'0

~ 3>L~s J

>a<

'<T ly~) >vI t )

$ >'I ti

$ 1'-) lip

~3>>X a

> ~ill v'<>I I(j'AIHFrg>"l

'1 I I

lp

gn studi'es, tncluding mocR;,up of Rot'cell to dergonstrqte remote welding, drop test of radieacttye waste cani;ster end desi'gn of remote grapple.

March 1975 to Februar

-2977 - Atlantic Richfield Hanford Company Plant Engineer Design of equipment for radi'oactiye waste handling systems, including remotely operated hqist, update of old design fop remote pipe connectors, radtoacti've waste sample heat treatment

system, and sampling system for hot cell tank..
December 3.973, to Februar 3.975 - Warn tndustries Design Engineer - Responsi'ble for design, performance testing, cost benefit analysi,s, and failure analysis of winch and hoist components..
PRANZ J.
MARKOWSKI j
ASME, MSME, 20 years engineering experiench.
o Thirteen years in safety and licensing analysis and plant system design analysis.
o Four years in stress and hydraulic control system analysis.
o Three years in measurement and analysis of vibrations on machine foundations and buildings.,
o Member of American Society of Mechanical Engineers, American Nuclear
Society, and registered Professional
Engineer, State of Pennsylvania.
~E November 1979 to Present - Washington Public Power Supply System Principal Engineer - On WNP-2, reviewed FSAR changes and design calculations, provided technical support in designated areas (ATAS, Station Blackout).
Modeled plant control systems using RETRAN.
Performed reliability analysis (fault tr ee approach) of heat removal systems.
For WNP-3, reviewed process and instrumentation diagrams for selected plant systems, reviewed reliability evaluation for the auxiliary feedwater system.
Par ticipated in IEEE working group on the Probabilistic Safety Goal.
A ril 1977 to November 2979 - Exxon Nuclear Company Senior Engineer in Plant Transient Analysis group.
Performed Appendix K
blowdown analysis on Big Rock Point with RECAP code.
Performed plant transient analyses for various fuel reloads for PWR and BWR plants.
Februar 1970 to A ril 1977 - Westinghouse, Advanced Reactor Division Senior Engineer in Safety Analysis Group - Performed plant transient analysis for licensing of the FFTF and CRBR.
Analysis included CRBR steam generator models and sodium level control system for J-Module steam generators.
Published papaers on modeling of CRBR pump variable speed fluid coupling and on FFTF plant response to primary loop pipe breaks.
Contributed to development of thermal hydraulic modeling for FFTF plant mode.
Performed some control system analysis, both time and frequency response (Bode Plot approach).
Januar 1968 to Februar 1970 - Boeing, Commercial Airplane Division Engineer in Mechanical Systems group - Performed an'alysis of landing gear walking vibrations.
Modeled 747 and 737 hydraulic control systems on analog computer.
Au ust 1965 to December 1967 - VFW-Fokker (airplane manufacturer)
Bremen, W. Germany Engineer in Structural Dynamics - Analyzed ground looping stability of VAK-161 (YSTOL fighter plane).
Januar 1962 to Jul 1965 - Institute for Mechanical Vibrations, Berlin, W.
Germany Graduate student at the Tech. University of Berlin, West Germany - As member of vibration measurement
team, performed measurements and contributed to analysis for vibration abatement projects on machine foundations, industrial buildings and a church tower.
r+
u)
JEFFERSON TRAVIS PERSON r
BSEE; EIT Washington; three years professional experience.
~E Jul 1981 to Present - Washington Public Power Supply System Engineer - One of a small group involved in producing Electrical Wiring Diagrams for WNP-2 systems using information from A/E and contractor construction draw-ings.
Responsible to monitor the electrical design of 14 WNP-2 systems.
Lead engineer for one WNP-2 system, responsible for coordinating other discipline engineers in the review of the systems design.
Jul 1979 to Ha 1981 -
EGSG Idaho Inc.
Engineer - Redesigned motor systems of secondary acid pumps on a nuclear reactor after electricians found previous design faulty.
Saved company
$50,000 per day by having new system designed and operational by scheduled, start-up date.
Con-.
ducted study on l3.8 KY and 480 V system supplying power to a nuclear reactor to find out if the voltage transi'ents observed on the power system were cause to delay a reactor test.
Found that observed transients were normal to the system and the test was done on time.
Found and corrected errors in the design of a glass forming pilot plant before construction began.
Saved down
'ime and operational problems that would have occurred if system had been built to original design.
f
'I
W. I.
EDWARDS Twenty-four years of engineering and managerial experience in instru-mentation and control engineering.
Nine years of experience in pressurized water reactor instrumentation and control design experience.
o Registered professional engineer in California.
o Currently on Instrument Society of America Standards Review Board.
Harch 1974 to Present - Westinghouse Offshore Power Systems Hanager of control systems engineering responsible for the design of instru-mentation and control systems-for floating nuclear power reactors.
Senior engineer involved in electrical and control system design for offshore reactors.'ctober 1964 to Harch 1974 - Westinghouse Astronuclear Laboratory Senior engineer and the manager for instrumentation, control, and data systems for the nuclear reactor propulsion experiments at the Nevada Test Site.
Januar 1959" to Harch 1974 -
Law< ence Radiation Laboratory
'I Electronic control and analog systems for nuclear ram jet and nuclear reactor experiments.
'ICHAEL A. MIHALIC
BSME, 14 years experience in structural engineering from initial design through final erection.
Ten years experience as an engi'neer.
~E May 1982 - Present - Washington Public Power Supply System Senior Engineer - Current duties are design reverification of selec'ted piping systems and components, design of new piping systems and standards development for Owner/AE transition and post turnover activites.
February 1979 - May 1982 - Pittsburgh-Des Moi.nes Corporation Engineer - Hired as a Project Engineer primarily for nuclear work (ASME Section III) involving containment vessels, containment liners, along with various other fabricated steel structures associated with nuclear power plants.
Responsible for the preparation of all designs and design drawings, specifications, stress reports and the engineering follow-up of the fabrication and erection processes.
Primary duty was in field-at WNP-2 site at Hanford, Washington.
Specific duties included responsibility for the engineering follow-up of the erection of the steel containment vessel and all attachments to it, along with fabrication and erection of steel structures and.piping systems.
Responsible for the design of field changes, resolution of problem areas, material control and customer interface.
The duties required a working knowledge of steel and weld design, stress analysis, fabrication/erection techniques, and the ability to write material and process procedures.
Promoted to Site Engineering Manager in April 1981, responsible for the activities of eight project engineers and five draftsmen at the WNP-2 site.
December 1972 to Februar 1979 - Westinghouse Electric Engineer - Primary duties were the design, an'alysis, procurement, and field erection follow-up of structural steel supports and restraints for the Reactor Coolant System equipment in PWR nuclear plants.
The duties required a working knowledge of steel
design, analysis techniques, steel fabrication, and the ability to interface with steel.fabricators (contract negotiations through final delivery), other Westinghouse groups plus the customer liaison.
.The design and analysis of the equipment supports and pipe whip restraints were done in accordance with ASME Section III, Subsection NF.
Embedment design and analysis were also performed:in most contracts.
A detailed stress report was prepared upon finalization of the design and upon receipt of final loads.
Experienced in the following computer languages and programs:
FORTRAN, STRUDL, WECAN, NASTRAN and GOGO.
Initially hired as a technician, promoted to engineer in March 1975.
I
'h
ROY L. HElD
BSHE, 21 years experience in design analysis and test evaluation of fluid/
mechanical systems i,n nuclear power plant projects.
Ex erience:
1974 to Present - l<ashington Public Power Supply System Principal Engineer, Systems Engi'neering Provide system design
reViews, fluid/mecliantcal systems engi,neering, thermodynami.c/hydrali,c analysis and licensing support to project engineering staff of the Supply System nuclear plants under constructi:on.
1970 to 1974 - Mesttnghouse Electric Corporation-Senior Engineer, Systems Follow and Operation - Provide engineering and technical support required'y customer utilities, and their architect-engineers during the desi'gn, contruction and testing of emergency core cooling and reactor auxi ltary systems.
Also had complete responsibility for. system field follow of the Nesttnghouse applied systems'uring construction of two 3250 HEI westinghouse PHRs located at Zion, Illinois.
1969 to 1970 - Douglas Uni,ted Nuclear, Inc.
Engineer, N-Reactor Nechantcal Engineering - Provi,de. engi'neering and technical support requi'red for maintenance, opera6on and modiftcations of N-Reactor auxtltary system.
1961 to 1969. - General Electri'c Company/Douglas RJnited Nuclear
Engineer, Testi'ng and Irradi'ation Services Engi;neer'ing - Responqible for the design. installation, modification and technical support of in-reactor test faci'lities used to provtde speciol i'rradiati'on servtces, water treatment and corrosion studies for government, educational institutions and private industry.
C.
C.
PATEL>>
BSEE; 15 years professional experience.
Ex erience:
March 1982 to Present - Washington Public Power supply System Engineer - Provi,de electrical input to system engineers in taking oyer WNP-2 systems from Burns and Roe.
Proyide desi'gn input to the dreftslgqn for preparation of electrical wiring di'agrams.
October 1980 to March 3.982 - General Electric Nuclear EneJgy Business.
Operation Engineer - Processed and reViewed all Chapter 7 and 8 NRC/Customer questions/
response for Grand Gulf, LaSalle, Kuo Shen, Clinton, Laguna Verde, Susquehanna, Hanford, Perry and River Bend Projects.
Developed new instrumentation and control concepts including equipment qualification in support of new NRC customer requirements peF IEEE-323, 344 and NUREG-0588.
Completed the PGCC NED0-10466-A, Addenda 2 which was issued to NRC in time.
October 1979 to Se tember 1980 - Quadrex Corporation (NSC)
Engineer - Reviewed the Control and Instrumentation of General Electric -BWR 4/5/6 projects; Reactor Protection
System, AC -and DC Power Systems, Electrical Auxiliary Systems; using various IEE's, NRC Regulatory Guides and the Code of Federal Regulations (10CFR, etc.).
Updated the Quality Assurance procedures for the LaSalle Project.
Prep'ared the "Licensing Commitment Tracking System" for Palo Verde, Perry, and Grand Gulf Nuclear Power Stations.
Februar 1968 to Se tember 1979 - State Electricity Board - Orissa, India Engineer - Designed and analyzed electrical power distribution systems.
Developed schematic diagrargs for major power distributiOn systems.
Coordinated; character-ized and tested relays used in power distri'bution systems.
Specified and selected electr ic motors, transformers
-and generators,
I
\\ ~
JAMES MICHAEL CURREN BSEE; MBA; EIT Washington; seven years professional experience.
November 1981 - Present - Washington Public Power Supply System Engineer - Perform I8C systems design review and technical turn-oyer documentation for WNP-1/4, 2, and 3/5.
Presently inyolyed in prepaping power ascentiqn test procedures for WNP-2.
Februar 1976 - November 1981 - Atlantic Richfield Hanford/Rockwell Hanford Operations Design and Installation Engineer - Responsible for the complete electrical and instrument installation design for the entire sub-critical California Multiplier Reactor Core and delayed neutr on counter laboratory analysis system project.
Tasks included design and installation'f the computer and data analysis
system, computer automated measurement and control (CAMAC) instrumentation, nuclear reactor radiation detection and core control systems, pn'eumatic trans-fer system, process instrumentation, power and miscellaneous electrical control, safety and security systems.
Plant and Facilities Design and Installation Engineer - Installation designs of new power, facilities instrumentation and process control, interlock, safety, lighting, and security systems in the Rockwell Hanford area nuclear waste management facilities.
Extensive use of the Nation Electrical
Code, and various IEEE electrical, electronic, CAMAC, and instrumentation codes.
March 1979 to Se tember 1979 - Power Engineering Company/Nuclear Technical Services Engineer on Assignment to Bangqr Naval Submarine Base - Electrical engineering design of powep systems i.nstrumentatl.qn, area power sys;tems, building fire protection and control systems, lightning protection, and procedural-operational-electvical analysis on very large machinery cranes..
Ma 1975 - Februar 1929. - Self Employed - Non-Techni'col November 3.923 - A ril 1975 - Boeing Aerospace Company Engineer - Responsi,ble for all data analysis performance testi,ng qnd trouble shooting on the AWACS electrical power system mock-up, also i,ncluded testing and design work. wi'th the'power systems control and protection circuits.
L
R. J.
COONEY A total of thirty-two years of electric power, instrum trumentation and control experience in the electrical utility in ustry.
o Registered professional engineer in New York, y,
k New Jersey, and Florida.
o Served for six years on IEEE nuclear power g
en ineering standards e
4 d
committee an cur ren y a tl working group chairman of subcommittee of that committee.
Au ust 1972 to,Present
- Westinghouse Offshore Power Systems trol En ineering - Responsible for managing Chief Engineer-Electrical and Con ro g
n in the design of all electrical, instrumentation and con ro sys ar ower lant.
Duties also involved interacting wst e
ission and -the U. S.
Coast Guard in preparation of fo th flo t 1
1 t
1 t o S
d l>censing o umentatson o
e as a technical witness on several items raise y sn floating nuclear plant appl-ication ASLB public hearings.
June 1964 to Au us t 1972 - Westinghouse Electric Corp. Atomic Power Department (Presently, Water. Reactor Divisons) n 1
mana er of Electr ical Contro'1 Systems for Was res onsible for electric power Westinghouse pressurized water reactors.
Was response e
systems design for a 1 Westsngho y p use turnke lants
Ginna, n san oi H. B. Robinson, Point Beach, etc.)
and was response e
o p
systems including process computer systems for Westinghouse nuclear s
earn supply systems during this period.
June 1950 to June 1964 - Ebasco Services, Inc.
sitions including principal electrical engineer involved tt d
o td
'th d
this time eriod also included approximately four years of startup i
n of fossil-fired generating stations an a
t t systems at generating sites during testing of electrical and instrumen a
son sy the later stages of construction.
O.
E. L. VOGEDING Twenty-eight years of experience in nuclear reactor control and protection systems engineering and seismic qualification; BSEE.
o Registered professional engineer in Pennsylvania.
Ex erience:
December 1979 to Present
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Water Reactor Divisions Lead engineer responsibility for equipment seismic qualification effort of group including formulation of test plans',
placing purchase orders for seismic tests, scheduling of tests,.reviewing seismic test data, and writing of qualification test reports.
Also responsible for all environ-mental qualification effort on solid state protection system, switchgear, and control-board mounted components.
November 1976 to December 1979 - Westinghouse Electric Corporation Lead engineer in the IKC group for the SCE Seismic Requalification Program.,
Had lead engineer responsibility for all seismic testing of Class 1E electrical equipment for NSSS.
Also.had.,l,ead,engineer responsibility for
,'~ ~p,procurement.:af.
So'1.:id'tate 'Pro/ection.'.P jsteips.,jijd jNjcilgar, Instrumentation Systems.
Februar 1969 to November 1976 - Westinghouse Electric Corporation Responsible for procurement of part length and full length Rod Control
Systems, Solid State Protection
Systems, and Rod Position Indication Systems.
Also had lead engineer responsibility for all seismic testing of Class lE safety-related electrical equipment.
November 1965 to Februar 1969 - Westinghouse Electric Corporation Responsible for the design, development, and 'procurement of Rod Control and Rod Position Indication Systems and Radiation Monitoring Systems.
GENE L.
WALDKOETTER Thirty years of instrumentation experience in the nuclear industry, including 15 years of I8C design activities on nuclear reactor projects, familiar with R.G.s, NUREGS and IEEE standards, and registered professional engineer (electrical) in Washington state.
Ex erience:
October 1973 to Present - Washington Public Power Supply System Principal Engineer - Responsible for broad range of I&C design activites for plant instrumentation on WNP-3,/4.
Scope involves control room panel design with all human factors and operational considerations, computer
systems, safety systems, radiati'on monitoring, as well,.as the more traditional measurement
'and "control hardware.
Provided technical support to licensing activities during both PSAR and FSAR reviews, and by. affecting design changes to conform to regulatory changes, especi'ally post-TNI upgrades.
Served for one year as contract administrator f'r the HSSS contract (B8W). concurrent with IEC assignments.
June 1966 to Se tember 2973 - Westinghouse/Battelle-Northwest Senior Engineer - Responsible for conceptual design of control room and plant computer systems on FFTF.
Parttcipated in task force efforts to establish overall instrumentation requirements for the FFTF and provided cost estimates for all instrumentati'on.
Provided technical direction of a project team to buy and program the plant computer system.
October 1964 to Ma 1966 - Battelle-Northwest/General Electric Engineer:-,Completed'esign, purchase
.and checkout of a computer. system to control a dual-stage mass spectrometer.
Also completed design and construction of a multiplexer system to support a Reactor Containment Systems Experiment project.
Au ust 1956 to Se tember 1964 - General Electric Company Engineer - Completed variety of nondestructive testing assignments involving the application of ultrasonic and Eddy Current systems to nuclear fuel production.
Project team leader for several
systems, wrote maintenance manuals and conducted craft training.
October 1951 - Jul l956 - General Electric Engineer/Craftsman
- General instrument maintenance
- both laboratory and process.
One year as engineer and four-years as craftsman.
ATTACHMENT 3 INDEPENDENCE REVIEW FILE
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
August 26, 1982 J.
R.
Honekamp, Technical Specialist (387)
D. L. Whitcomb, Technology (420)
4. g, bake~
CONFIRMATION OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE WNP-2 REVERIFICATION REVIEWS SDE-DLW-82-07 I NT E ROFF ICE MEMO.RAND tj M Distribution:
CI EDC WNP-1/4 WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM gg EDC WNP.2 91 7B 0 EDC WNP-3/5 CI Adnun F11e GL Gelhaus RB Glascocw 0
LT Harrold 570 PK Shen 580 DC Timmons 901A YM Yatabe 410 DLW/File/lb
Reference:
IOM, J.
R.
Honekamp to L. T. Harrold and G. L. Gelhaus, Criteria for Assessing the Independence of the Technical Personnel Assigned to the WNP-2 Reverification Reviews, dated June 30, 1982.
The referenced memo requested that personnel involved in design reverification reviews confirm in writing that each individual meets the independence criteri a established for this activity.
Attachment 1 is a list of names of the personnel presently assigned to this activity.
A copy of the confirmations signed by each of the persons presently assigned to the review activities, Attachment 2, is enclosed for your review.
You should note that each signed confirmation signifies whether a backup resume was required to support the confirmation statement.
Attachment 3 is provided as supporting information regarding each individual's work experience and background.
This information was reviewed and the need for a backup resume was identified for two of the fourteen individuals assigned to the design reverification program.
The resumes for these two individuals are attached to their statements.
I wi 11 retain the original copy of the confirmation statements, resumes and other backup information in my file for audit purposes.
Attachments 1,
2 and 3 will be revised if personnel assignments are changed.
Accordingly, you will be kept informed.
DLW/arg Attachments:
1) Design Reverification Team Members
2) Confirmation Statements and Resumes
3) Experience and Background Summary WP 102 R2
ej INTEROFFICE M EMORANDU M SDE-DLW-82'-08 Distribution:
C3 EDC WNP-1/4 Kl EDC WNP-2 917Y 0 EDC WNP-3/5 0 Admin File GL Gethau RB Glassco~c~
280 LT Harrold 570 PK Shen 580 DC Timmins 901A Yatabe 410 W/file/lb WASHINGTONPUBLIC POWER SUPPLY'SYSTEM Date:
September 10, 1982 J.
R.
Honekamp, Technical Specialist (387)
From:
Subject:
Reference:
D. L. Whitcomb, Technology (420)
JM S.C.
DL CONFIRMATION OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE WNP-2 REVERIFICATION REVIEWS--REVISION 1
IOfl, SDE-DLW-82-07, D. L. Whitcomb to J.
R.
Honekamp, Rev.
0 same
subject, dated August 26, 1982.
Attached are three (3) memos clarifying the work experience summaries for J.
R.
Cole, C.
C. Patel, and D. T. Thonn transmitted to you via the reference IOM.
In addition, attached are 1) a revised Team Member List, 2) an-independency state-
ment, and 3) an update of the Experience and Background Summary Information, which adds J.
F. Gorman to the reverification effort.
J.
F.
Gorman will replace M. R.
Compton as the I8C member to the HPCS team.
The information enclosed with this IOM should replace and/or be added to the infor-mation provided in the reference IOM.
The clarification statements should be attached to the independency statements for each individual.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
DLW/arg Attachments:
1). Clarification Memos (3)
2) Revised Team Member List (1)
3) Independency Statement (1)
4) Revised Experience and Background Summary Information (1)
WP.102 R2
I
Attachment I DESIGN REVERIFICATION TEAM MEMBERS Name J.
R. Cole M. R.
Compton J.
M. Curren R. L. Heid J.
M. Henderson T.
H. Keheley P. J.
Macbeth F. J.
Markowski M. A. Mihalic C.
C. Patel J.
T. Person A. B. Rafer D. T. Thonn D. L. Whitcomb Rev.
1 DESIGN REVERIFICATION TEAN HEHBERS Name
. J.
R ~ Cole H.
R.
Compton (Terminated 9/17/82)
J.
H. Curren J.
F.
Gorman R. L. Heid J.
H. Henderson T.
H. Keheley P. J.
Hacbeth F. J.
Harkowski H. A. Mihalic C.
C. Patel J.
T. Person A. B: Rafer
..D. T. Thonn D. L. Mhitcomb
Attachment 2
CONFIRMATION STATEMENTS AND RESUMES
0 I
I
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE WNP-2 DESIGN REVERIFICATION REVIEWS The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members) shall meet the following criteria:
1.
Present Em lo ent Employee of.-the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-'onsibility for the design of WNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to directing and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall, for the purpose of the design review function, report to Technology.
2'.
Previous Em lo ment If previous employment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility for WNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment shall satisfy the. following criteria:
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for WNP-2; or b.,
The scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work performed by the firm in question; or
c. If the individual wi 11 be.reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform. the original design work; was not the immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer o7 the original design work (partici pation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
I
'age 2
3.
Prior Involvement b
Su 1
S stem Em lo ees in the Develo ment of the l'(NP-2 Desi n
The Supply System involvement in the development of the MNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, partici pation in owner groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-
fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site contractors.
However,.in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design of MNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engineer, Review.Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Committee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the NNP-2 design and provide a written confirmation that their prior involvement does not conflict with.the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above:
In this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, Main-
tenance, equal.ity Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishing the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the above. statements and confirm that-I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply System Employee any prior involvement.does not conflict with paragraph 2 AC; J.R.
Cole l/ga /Sz (Date)
G.LE Gelhaus g //o /gz.
(Date)
,Back up Resume Required'.
~(yes)
(no)
RESUME
~ jACK R.
COLE Ex eri ence january 1981 - Present Mashington Public Power Supply System Nuclear Projects MNP-1,. 2, and 3
Corporate Engineering, Richland Office Senior Engineer.- Engineering Mechanics Group Responsible for review of Architect/Engineers (AE's) piping and pipe support design activities for technical
adequacy, and compliance with.
ASME codes, project design specifications, and engineering procedures.,
Oeveloped company piping design capabili'ty using HANGIT'design optimi-zation program and ADLPIPE analysis prooram.
Optimized AE piping designs using HANGIT program and demonstrated to AE's the application of. the program to company orojects for cos't 'savings.
March 1978 - November 1980 Wright-Schuchart-Harbor;
Richland, Washington'uclear Project WNP-2 Senior. Engineer - Equipment Responsible for. providing engineering direction to craft'or installa-tion, testing and mai ntenance of nuclear power plant equipment, pip-
ing, and hangers.,
Redesigned small bore piping and pipe supports using project approved methods.
Provided detailed instruction to craft =or installation and testing of equipment per the contract specifictions and manufacturer's instructions.
February 1977 - March 1978 Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland ~lashington
( ormerly Atlantic Richfield Hanford Company)
Engineer Responsible for desi gn, fabrication and testi ng of hardware to support conceptual design studies.
Tasks. included mock-up of hot cell to dem-onstrate remote uelding, drop test of radioactive waste caniste.
and design of remote grapple.
a
klarch 1975 - February 1977 Atlantic Richfield Hanford Company, Richland; Mashington Plant Engineer Responsible for design of equipment for rad'ioactive waste handling systems.
Designs included remotely operated
hoist, update of old design for remote pipe connectors',
radioactive waste sample-heat treatment
system, and sampling system for hot cell tank..
December 1971 - February 1975 MARH Industries, Hilwaukie, Oregon Design Engineer Responsible for design,.
performance testing, cost benefit analysis, and failure analysis. of winch-and hoist components.
Education:
B.S. Mechanical Engineering Oregon State University, August 1971 Graduate Studies Business Administration University of Mashington, September 1976 to iune 1978 Professional Licenses:
Registered Professional Engineer.
State, of Mashington Clearances:
OOE g Inactive
RESUME JACK R.
COLE The purpose of this paragraph is to explain my role in the WP-2 design during my tenure with Wright-Schuchart-Harbor.
During my work as a field piping engineer (March 1978 to September 1979) it was my responsibility to assist the craft in installation of small bore piping designs.
Part of this task required me to revise piping and support designs which could not be installed in the field.
To accomplish this task, I used the project approved small bore design, guide and standard support designs.
My design work originally was to have been verified by the company office design group.
Oue io changes in the 215'contract, design verifi-cation became the responsibility of Gjlbert Commonwealth.
I
~4 C
0
0 e
f N. T E R 0 F F l C E M E M 0 R A N 0 0 Vi WASHINGTONPUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM Dete: September 3,
1982 To: Dave Whitcomb From: Jack Cole
Subject:
DESIGN REVERIFICATION OF WNP-2 Distribution:
0 EDC WNP-1/4 C3 EDC WNP-2 0 EDC WNP-3/5 C3 Admin File G
Gelha s
+DM Bosi
~/g~
JR Cole.
AF Kupinski JRC/lb RSS Chrono File
Reference:
None The purpose of this memo is to further clarify my role at Wright-Schuchart-Harbor during the period from March 1978 to September 1979.
The role of field engineer, on the 215 contract, was to take designs from the small bore design organization and assist in the installation of the original design.
If'ield interferences were encountered the field engineer would modify the original design to fit field conditions.
The purpose of the field revisions was to speed installation of small pipe.
Design modifi-cations were then transmitted to the small bore design group for approval/
revision of field modifications and design calculations.
Prior to as building of most small bore piping Gilbert Commonwealth was assigned the responsibility for design/verification of all small bore designs that had been generated by the 215 contract small pipe group.
Therefore, generation of design calculations for field engineering changes became Gilbert/Commonwealth responsibility for the purpose of design re-verification.
I was not'esponsible for design calculations on the original 215 small pipe design and I played no part in determining if the.installed piping had adequate design margin.
JRC:jpt WP 102 R2
r>
1
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE WNP-2 DESIGN REYERIFICATION REVIEWS The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members) shall meet the following criteria:
1..
Present.
Em lo ment Employee of the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of WNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to'irecting and performing the design review's (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall, for the purpose of the. design review function; report to Technology.
2.
Previous Em lo ment If previous employment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility for WNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment shall satisfy the following criteria:
E a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for WNP-2; or b.
The scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work'performed by'the firm in question; or
c. If the individual will be reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employed by.that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for
'the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform. the original design work; was not the immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (participation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
I t
Page 2
3.
Prior Involvement b
Su 1
.S stem Em lo ees in the Development of the WNP-2 Oesian The Supply System involvement in the development of the WNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, participation in owner groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site co'ntractors.
However, in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design. of WNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings. Review Committee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the WNP-2 design and provide a..written confirmation that their prior involvement does not conflict with.the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above.. 'n this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, Main-
tenance, guality Level and Fire Protection.classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishing the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the above statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply System Employee any prior involvement does not conflict with paragraph 2.C; M.R.
Compt n
9 /3~o 8'z.
(Date)
G.L. Gelhaus
$'//o /5 Z (Date)
Sack up Resume Required'.
(yes)
~(no)
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE-INDEPENDENCE OF THE, TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE MNP-2 DESIGN REYERIFICATION REYIEMS The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members) shall meet the following criteria:
1 Present Em lo ment Employee of.-the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of MNP-2 facilities, systems, or components Technical personnel assigned to directing and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall,
~
for the purpose of'he design review function, report to Technology.
2.
Previous Em lo ment If previous employment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility for WNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment shall satisfy the. following criteria:
a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for MNP-2; or b..
The scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an desi gn work performed by the firm in question; or 1
c., If the individual will be reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his
- supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform the original design work; was.not the immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-processhecker or reviewer of the original design work (participation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization.will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
Page 2
3.
Prior Involvement b
Su Dl S stem Emplo ees in the Develo ment of the MNP-2 Desi n
The Supply System involvement in the development of the MNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, participation in owner groups, technical reviews of design documents,
(}A reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, th'e responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and=site contractors.
However,.in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design of MNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Ehgineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Committee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the MNP-2 design and provide a written confirInation that thei r prior involvement does not conflict with the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above; In this context, prior involvement'n specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, Main-:":
tenance, equality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishing the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the-above statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply System Employee any prior involvement.does not conflict with paragraph 2.C; M.J
. Curren j /~z/
(Date)
G.L. Gelhaus S./~n/K2 (Date)
Back up Resume Required:
(yes)
X (no)
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE MNP-2. DESIGN REYERIFICATION REYIEMS The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members) shall meet the following criteria:
1 Present Emolo ent Employee of the Supply. System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of MNP-2 facilities, systems, or components..
Technical personnel assigned to directing and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall, for. the purpose of the design review function,, report to. Technology.
2.
Previous Emolo ent If previous employment included job assignments. with a firm that did have design responsibility for MNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment"shal.l satisfy the. following criteria:
a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for, MNP-2;. or b.
The scope of the design to be. reviewed by the individual does not incIude
~an design work performed by the firm i'n question; or
c. If the'ndividual will be reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was emp'loyed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design'everification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform the original design. work; was not'he immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (participation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
0 I (
l
,J
'L
Page 2
"LC 3.
Prior Involvement b
Suopl S stem Emplo ees in the Development of the NNP-2 Desi n
The Supply System involvement in the development of the MNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, participation in owner grouos, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In'lmost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been, delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component vendors, and site contractors.
However, in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly-involved in. elements of the design of MNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engine r, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Committee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the. MNP-.Z design and provide:a'ritten confirmation that their prior involvement does not conflict with"the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above.
In this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, Main-'enance, equality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, e'tc.,
is. not considered to be "establishing the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the above statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as. a Supply -System Employee any prior involvement, does not.conflict with paragraph 2.C.
.VZ'
/6/Zg (Date)
G.L., Gelhaus 8 /~~/d z (Date)
Back up Resume Required:
(yes)
K (no)
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE MNP-2 DESIGN REVERIFICATION REVIEMS The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members) shall meet the following criteria:
1.
Present Emplo ment revsous Emolo ment
\\
If previous employment included job assignments'ith a firm that did have design responsibility for MNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment shall satisfy the. following criteria:
t a.
Not employed by the firm in. question during the time period when that firm performed design work for MNP-2; or b.
The scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work performed by the firm in question; or i
c. If the individual will be.reviewing
~an design work performed by the.
firm in question during the period when he was employed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform the original design work; was not the immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (participation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
Employee of' -the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of MNP-2 i'acilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to di recting and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall,
~
for the purpose of the design review function, report to Technology.
2.
P
Page 2
3.
Prior Involvement b
Su 1
S stem Em lo ees in the Develo ment of the MNP-2 Desi n
The Supply System involvement in the development of the MNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, participation in, owner groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site contractors.
However, in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design of MNP-2.
Therefare, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Coomittee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the PNP-2 design and provide a written confirmation that thei r prior involvement does not conflict with the four criteria listed under 2.c., above.'n this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, l1ain-
tenance, guality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishing the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the above statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply System Employee any prior involvement.does not conflict with paragraph 2.C; T.
. Keheley
~/~/~z (Date)
G.L. Gelhaus (Date) 8ack up Resume Required:
(yes)
~(no)
0 l~
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE WNP-2 DESIGN REYERIFICATION REVIEWS The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or'rocess the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members) shall meet the following criteria:
1.
Present Employment Employee of the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of WNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to directing and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall; for the purpose of the design review function, report to Technology.
2.
Previous Em lo ment If previous employment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility for WNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, th individual's prior employment shall satisfy the following criteria:
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for WNP-2; or
b.
The scope of the desi,gn to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work performed by the firm in question; or
c. If the individual will be revi'ewing anv design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employed by that firm,
~"-'
.written evaluation shill be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform the original design work; was not the immediate supervisor of the person who did perform che original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (partici pation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews)
~
I
1 Page 2
3.
Prior Ihvolvement b
Su 1
S stem Em lo ees in the Develo ment of the WNP-2 Desi n
P The Supply System involvement in the development of the MNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner
=
requirements, partici pation in owner groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development o
the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site contractors.
However, in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design of llNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Coranittee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the MNP-2 design and provide a written confirmation that their,prior involvement does not conflict with the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above.
In this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, t4ain-
tenance, (equality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishing the detailed design inputs."
I have read the above statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a SUpply System Employee any prior involvement does
.not conflict with paragraph 2.C.
P E
~// /EA (Date)
G.L. Gelhaus
/
/
(Date)
Back up Resume Required:
(yes)
X,(no)
I l
4
4 CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE MNP-2 DESIGN REVERIFICATION REVIEHS The technical personnel assioned to direct, perform the design reviews, or=
process the-findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team memb'ers, and Findings Review Committee members) shall meet the following criteria:
1.
Present Em lo ment Employee of..the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of MNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to directing and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall,
~
for the purpose of the design review function, report to.Technology.
2.
Previous Emolo ment If previous employment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility for MNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment shall satisfy
+he, following criteria:
a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for lNP-2; or b.
The. scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work performed by the firm in question; or
\\
c. If the'ndividual will be.reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the indi,vidual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform the original design work; was not the immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (partici pation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
~
E
}
\\ t
Page 2
3.
Prior Involvement b
Su@pl S stem Em lo ees in the Develo 'ment of the MNP-2 Desi n
The Supply System involvement in the development of the WNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, participation in owner groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component vendors,'nd'site contractors.
However,.in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design of WNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Ehgineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Fi'ndings Review Comni'ttee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the WNP-2 design and provide a..written confirmation that thei r prior involvement does not conflict with.the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above:
In this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, Main-
tenance, guality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishing the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the above. statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply System Employee any prior involvement does not conflict with paragraph 2.C;
,d~
l.
J.M.
Henderson
~/~2/ Fz.
(Date)
G.L. Gelhaus
~.//> /d'~
(Date)
,Back up Resume Required:
(yes) g (no)
I I'
~
i 4
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED 'fOTHE MNP-2 DESIGN REVERIFICATION REVIEWS The technical personnel assigned to direct, per form the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members) shall meet the following criteria:
1.
~
Present Em lo ment Employee of.-the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of WNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to di recti ng and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall, for the purpose of the design review function, report to.Technology.
2.
Previous Emolo ment If previous employment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility for MNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment shall satis;y
+he. following criteria:
a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for WNP-2; or b.
The scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work performed by the firm in question; or c.
If the individual will be reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that, the individual did not perform the original design work; was.not he immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (participation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
'I ~
~
I
~
Page 2
3.
Prior Involvement b
Su 1
S stem Em lo ees in the Develo ment of the NNP-2 Desi n
The Supply System involvement in the development of the MNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, participation in owner groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site contractors.
However,.in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design of WNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Committee member shall review their prior involvement in the development ot the MNP-2 design and provide a written confirmation that thei r prior involvement does not conflict with the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above:
In this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, Main-
tenance, guality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishin<j the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the above statements and confi rm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply System Employee any prior involvement.does not conflict with paragraph 2.C; P.J.
Macbeth (Date)
G.L. Gelhaus (Date)
Back up Resume Required'.
(yes)
~(no)
I
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE WNP-2 DESIGN REVERIFICATION REVIEWS The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members) shall meet the following criteria:
l.
Present Em lo ment for the purpose of 2'.
Previous Emolo ment Employee of.-the Supply System or an organization that,has not had res-ponsibility for the design of WNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to dir ecting and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leade'r, Review Team members) shall, the design review function, report to Technology.
If previous employment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility f'r MNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment shall. satisfy the. following criteria:
4 a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for WNP-2; or b.
The scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work performed by the firm in question; or
c. If the individual will be -reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employ'ed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms. for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform the original design work; was -not the immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (participation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
h fj
Page 2
3.
Prior Involvement b
Su 1
S stem Em lo ees in the Develo ment of the WNP-2 Desi n
The Supply System involvement in the development of the WNP-2 design has been primarily i n the areas.of program management, specification of owner requirements, participation in owner groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of. the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site coritractors.
However, in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design of WNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engineer,,
Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Cormittee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the l<NP-2 design and provide asar itten confirmation that their prior involvement'does not conflict with the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above.
In this context, prior involvement in.
specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, Hain-
tenance, equality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishing~
the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the above statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply System Employee any prior, involvement, does not conflict with paragraph 2.C; F.J Harkowski ZZS46 E
/
/
(Date)
G.L. Gelhaus (Date)
Back up Resume Required".
(yes)
+(no)
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE QF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE i'lNP-2 DESIGN REVERIFICATION REYIEl<S The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Coranittee members) shall meet the following criteria:
1.
Present Em lo ent Employee of the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of WNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to'irecting and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall, for the purpose of the design review function; report to Technology.
2.
Previous Em lo ment If previous emp'loyment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility for MNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment shall satisfy the. following criteria:
a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for MNP-2; or b.
The scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work'performed by'the firm in question; or
c. If the individual will be reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employed by that firm,,
a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform. the original design work; was not the immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (participation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
I 4
Page 2
'3.
Prior Involvement b
Su 1
S stem Em lo ees in the Oevelo ment of the WNP-2 Desi n
The Supply System involvement in the development of the WNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requi rements, partici pation in owner groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site contractors.
However,.in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design. of WNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Committee member shall review their prior
'nvolvement in the development of the WNP-2 design and provide a.written confi rmation that their prior involvement does not conflict with the four criteria listed under 2:c., above:
In this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA; ISI, Main-
tenance, equality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishing the deta'iled design. inputs."
I have read the above statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply System Employee any prior involvement.does not confli'ct with paragraph 2.C; M. Mihalic 7.
/3o/ SZ, (Date)
G.L. Gelhaus
/D /~Z (Date)
.Back up Resume Required:
~(yes)
(no)
AI 0
RESUME MICHAEL A. MIHALIC 4370, Norris St.
Richland, WA 99352 (509) 627-5163 AcCe:
Forty (40)
Years Ex erience:
14 Birth Date:
March ll, 1942 Marital Status:
Married Social Securit No.:
211-30-6520 Health:
Excellent
~fli1 i d:
Education:
d:
U.S.A.F., April 1962 to April 1966, Honorable Discharge B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh (Attended college while working, graduated May 1978)
May 1982 - Present Washington Public Power Supply System 3000 George Washington Way
Richland, WA 99352 Feb.
1979 May 1982 PDM Corporation Neville Island Pittsburgh, PA.
Dec.
1972 - Feb.
1979 Westinghouse Electric Nuclear Energy Systems Monroeville, PA Dec.
1967 - ~ Dec.
1972 Green Engineering Co.
Sewickley, PA
'April 1966 - Dec.
1967 Bethlehem Steel Company Leetsdale, PA Summar of Work Current Emolo er:
May 1982 - Present:
Work experience has been in the structural engineering field from initial design through final, erection.
Senior Engineer wi.th Washington Public Power Supply System (Utility for nuclear power plants WNP-1 thru WNP-5).
Current duties are design reverification of selected piping systems and components, design of new piping systems and standards development for Owner/AE transistation and post turnover act-ivities.
U
H.A.'ihalic Page Number Two RESUME Feb.
1979 to Hay, 1982 Dec.
1972 to Feb.
1979 Project Engineer with Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corporation.
Hired as a Project Engineer primarily for nuclear work (ASHE Sect. III) involving containment
vessels, containment liners, along with "
various other fabricated steel, structures associated with nuclear power plants.
Responsible for the preparation of all designs and design drawings, specifications, stress reports and the engineer-ing follow of the fabrication and erection processes.
Primary duty was in the field at WNP-2'ite in Hanford, Washington.
Spec-ific duties included responsibility for the engineering follow-up of the erection 'of the steel containment vessel and all attach-ments to it, along with fabrication and erection of steel struct-ures and piping-systems.'esponsible for the design of field changes,,resolution of. problem areas, material control ayd customer interface.
The duties required'a working knowledge of steel and weld design, stress
analysis, fabrication/erection techniques, and the ability to write material and process pro-cedures.
Title was Site Engineering
Manager, responsible for activities of eight Project Engineers and five draftsmen.
Engineer with Westinghouse Electric Company, Nuclear Energy System.
Primary duties were the design, analysis, procurement, and field erection follow of structural steel supports and restraints for the Reactor Coolant System equipment in PWR nuclear plants.
The duties required a working know'ledge of steel
design, analysis techniques, steel fabrication, and the ability to interface with steel fabricators (contract negotia-tions through final delivery), other Westinghouse
groups, plus customer liason.
The design and analysis of the equipment supports and pipe whip restraints were done in accordance with ASHE Section III, subsection NF.
Embedment design and analysis were also performed in most contracts.
A detailed stress report was prepared upon finalization of the design and upon receipt of final loads.
Experienced in the following computer languages and programs:
FORTRAN, STRUDL, WECAN, NASTRAN and COGO.
Dec.
1967 to Dec.
1972 April 1966 to Dec.
1967 Worked as a Technician/Draftsman with Green Engineering Co.
Primary duties were the preparation of design drawings for bridges and commercial buildings.
The period also included 18 months spent in the field performing in-depth inspections of bridges.
Draftsman with Bethlehem Steel Company.
Primary duties were as a structural steel detailer, preparing geometric calculations and layouts for steel transmission towers.
Initially hired as a technician, promoted to engineer in
March, 1975.
g.g, Nina&
'DE-MAM-'82-0l
) N T E R 0 F F I C E' E M 0 R A N 0 0 M Di.~buti..:
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM Date:
July 30, 1982 To:
D.L. Whitcomb pram:
N.A. Niha'lic bnc.~ "aa.s~
C3 EDC WNP-1/4 C3 EDC WNP-2 C3 EDC WNP-3I5 C3 Admin File GL Gelhaus MAM/lb
Subject:
CONFIRMING INDEPENDENCE FOR WNP-2 REVERIFICATION REVIEW
Reference:
Interoffice memo, dated 07/23/82, D.L.. Whitcomb to Design ReverificationTeam Members In addition to Attachment 1 (signed Independency Statement.)
and Attachment 2
(Current Resume) the following is added for clarification due to my being em-ployed by the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corporation (PDM):
1.
PDM's design responsibility for the system I am involved with (RHR-Suppression Pool Cooling Node) is limited to design and analysis of the Primary Contain-ment Shell penetrations and stiffening (x32, x35, x47 and x48)..
While I was involved on a limited basis,,in their analysis, they are part of the Primary Containment Shell and are not associated with the analysis of the RHR system (other than transferring, loads to the. shell).
PDM also has design responsi-bilities for the three (3)
RHR Spray Headers; but I was not involved in their design nor are they part of the RHR System being reverified.
2.
My responsibilities at WNP-2, as PDM Site Engineering
Manager, were limited to fabrication, erection and suggested design changes where PDM had design author-ity.
PDM fabricated and erected the suction and discharge piping for the RHR Suppression Pool Cooling Mode but Burns and Roe had design responsibility.
Should you require additional information or clarification, please advise.
MAM:jpt'ttachments x 2 Concurrence
.(G. L. Gelhaus)
(Date) wp.1 ok Ra
I
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE WNP-2 DESIGN REVERIFICATION REVIEWS The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead. Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members) shall meet the following criteria:
l.
Present Em lo ment Employee of..the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of WNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to directing and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall, for the purpose of the design review function, report to Technology.
P Z.
Previous Emolo ment If previous employment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility for MNP-2 facilities, components, or systems; the individual's prior employment shal,l satisfy the. following criteria:
a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for WNP-2; or b.
The scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work performed by the firm in question; or
c. If the individual will be reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform the original design work; was not the. immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original.
design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (partici pation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
4
Page 2
3.
Prior Involvement b Su 1
S stem Em lo ees in the Develo ment of the HNP-2 Desion The Supply System involvement in the development of the HNP-2 design has been p'rimarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, participation in. owner groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site co'ntractors.
However, in a few cases and/ot for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design of HNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Comittee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the HNP-2 design and provide a written confirmation that thei r prior involvement does not conflict with.the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above:
In this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, Main-
tenance, guality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishing the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the above statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply System Employee any prior involvement, does not conflict with paragraph 2.C; C
. Patel I MIX'
/ Q7/ g~
(Date)
G.L. Gelhaus g /la /~z (Date)
Back up Resume Required; (yes)
~(oo)
h
SDE-CCP-82-02 I'IIITERGFFtCE* MEM'0.RAN00M D tribt'o:
To:
From:
Subject:
WASHINGTONPUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM September 1,
1982 D. L. Whitcomb(~p+~)
~
CLARIFICATION OF BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE D EDC WNP-1/4 0 EDC WNP-2 Cl EDC WNP-3/5 CI Admin File V Basu ffi~-
GL Gelhaus-Chrono/File CCP/lb
Reference:
NOne.
This is to inform you that:
(a) With my last employer, GE, San Jose, I was the Licensing Lead Chapter Engineer for Chapters 7
( I&C) and 8 (Electrical Power) during the period October 1980 to triarch 1982.
I was responsible for reviewing these chapter s from licensing
aspects, including NRC questions and responses, for all GE projects including MNP-2; and (b) I was not involved in design of WNP-2 NSSS or any other system.
CPP/arg WP 102 AR
t
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEl ASSIGNED TO THE MNP-2 DESIGN REVERIFICATION REVIE1!S The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members} shall meet the following cri teria:-
1.
Pres'ent Em lo ment Employee of. the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of MNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to directing and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall,
~
for the purpose of the design review function, report to Technology.
2.
Previous Em lo ment If previous employment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility for MNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment shall satisfy the, following criteria:.
a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for MNP-2; or b.
The scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work performed by the firm in question; or
c. If the individual will be.reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employ'ed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform the original design work; was not the immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (partici pation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
Page 2
3.
Prior Involvement bv Svppl S stem Emplo ees in the Oevelo ment of the MNP-2 Oesi n
The Supply System involvement in the development of the MNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, participation in owner groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work. including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site contractors.
However, in a few cases. and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design. of MNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Committee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the IlNP-2 design and provide a,.written confi rmation that their prior involvement does not conflict with.the four criteria listed under 2.c., above.'n this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requi rements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, tlain-
tenance, guality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishin<) the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the above statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply System Employee any prior involvement does not conflict with paragraph 2.C; J..
Person:
gi27il (Oate)
G.L. Gelhaus dye~/z~
(Oate)
Back up Resume Required
-.(yes)
~(nu)
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED =TO THE l'NP-2 DESIGN REVERIFICATION REYIEHS The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members) shall meet the following criteria:
1.
Present Em lo ment Employee of..the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of MNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to directing and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall.
~
for the purpose of the design review function, report to Technology.
2.
Previous Em lo ment If previous employment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility for MNP-2 facilities, components, or. systems, the individual's prior employment shall satisfy the. following criteria:
a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for MNP-2; or b.'he scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work performed by the firm in question; or
\\
'I c.. If the individual will be.reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform the original design work; was.not the immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (participation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization'ill not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
I I
l
Page 2
3.
Prior Involvement b
Su 1
S stem Em lo ees in the Develo ment of the
'llNP-2 Desi n
The Supply System involvement in the development of the MNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, partici pation in owner
groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site cohtractors.
However, in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design" of. WNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews-as Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Committee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the MNP-2 design and provide a written
.confirmation that their prior involvement does not conflict with the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above.-
In this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as Al ARA, ISI, Main-
tenance, guality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is not considered to be "establishing the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the above statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply'Syste'm Employee any prior involvement.does not conflict with paragraph 2.C; A. Rafer
7) zfy $ P (Date).
G.L. Gelhaus (Date)
Back up Resume Required".
(yes)
~(no)
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE lrlNP-2 DESIGN REVERIFICATION REVIEWS The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead'Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review: Coranittee members) shall meet the following cri teria:
1.
Present Em lo ent Employee of the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibilityty for the design of MNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to'- directing and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall, for the purpose of the design review function, report to Technology.
2.
Previous Em lo ment If previous employment included job assignments with a firm that did have design responsibility for WNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment shall satisfy the following criteria:
a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for MNP-2; or b.
The scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does'ot include
~an design work performed by the firm in question; or
c. If the individual will be reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform the original design work; was not the immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the original design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (participation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will noi disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
a J
C 1'
1 Page 2
3.
Prior Involvement"b Su 1
S stem Em lo ees in the Development of the The Supply System involvement in the development of the WNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, participation in owner
groups, technical-reviews of desi gn documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed.design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site contractors'owever, in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design of WNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Coranittee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of the WNP-2 design and provide a written confirmation that their prior involvement does not conflict with the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above.
Zn this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, Main-
tenance, guality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is. not considered to be "establishinrJ the detailed designs inputs."
I have read the above statements and confirm that' meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply System Employee any prior involvement does not conflict with paragraph 2.G.
8/@i 8 i (Date)
G ~ L ~ Gelhaus
~ / l~/ d'z (Date)
Back up Resume Required:
'(yes)
X (no)
SDE-DTT-82-09 l N T E R 0 F F t C E M E M'0.R A N 0 U M D. tabb uo:
To:
Fromt
Subject:
WASHINGTONPUBLIC POWER SUPPLYSYSTEM September 2,
1982 D. L. Whitcomb D. T. Thonn DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAYi INDEPENDENCE OF TECHNICAL PERSONNEL STATEMENT 0 EDC WNP-1/4 CI EDC WNP-2 CI EDC WNP-3/5 Admin File N Basu/
GL Gelhaus
- Chrono DTT/1 b
Reference:
None.
Ny nuclear plant design experience with the General Electric Company (GE) occured prior to 1966 when GE was the prime contractor for design and operation of the AEC Plutonium production plants at Hanford.
The division of GE which performed the AEC Prime Contract at Hanford was entirely separate from the division which designs and supplies commercial nuclear power plants.
DTT/arg WP 102 R2
A E
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE TECHNICAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO-THE MNP-2. DESIGN REVERIFICATION REVIEMS The technical personnel assigned to direct, perform the design reviews, or process the findings from the reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leaders, Review Team members, and Findings Review Committee members) shal'l meet the following cri teria:
1.
Present Em lo ment Employee of.-the Supply System or an organization that has not had res-ponsibility for the design of MNP-2 facilities, systems, or components.
Technical personnel assigned to directing and performing the design reviews (Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team members) shall, for the purpose of the design review function, report to Technology.
2.
Previous Em lo ent If previous employment included job assignments'ith a firm that did have design responsibility for MNP-2 facilities, components, or systems, the individual's prior employment shall satisfy
+he, following criteria:
a.
Not employed by the firm in question during the time period when that firm performed design work for MNP-2; or b.
c The scope of the design to be reviewed by the individual does not include
~an design work performed by the firm in question; or
'I If the individual will be.reviewing
~an design work performed by the firm in question during the period when he was employed by that firm, a written evaluation shall be prepared by the individual and his supervisor for the Design Reverification Review which confirms for the work being reviewed that the individual did not perform the original design work; was not the. immediate supervisor of the person who did perform the original design work; did not establish the detailed design inputs for the origina1 design work; and was not the "in-process" checker or reviewer of the original design work (participation in "other" reviews which are not part of the required "in-process" check/review by the responsible design organization will not disqualify the individual for the reverification reviews).
I C
C l
I 1'
Page 2
3.
Prior Involvement b
Su 1
S stem Em lo ees in the Develo ment of the The Supply System involvement in the development of the llNP-2 design has been primarily in the areas of program management, specification of owner requirements, participation in owner groups, technical reviews of design documents, gA reviews and audits, and preparation of licensing documents.
In almost all cases, the responsibility for performing the original design work including development of the detailed design inputs and design veri-fication has been delegated to the A-E, NSSS vendor, component
vendors, and site contractors.
However, in a few cases and/or for limited time
periods, some Supply System personnel were directly involved in elements of the design of MNP-2.
Therefore, all Supply System personnel assigned to the reverification reviews as Lead Engineer, Review Team Leader, Review Team member, or Findings Review Committee member shall review their prior involvement in the development of.the lNP-2 design and provide a written confirmation that their prior involvement-does not conflict with.the four criteria listed under 2.c.,
above.
In this context, prior involvement in specifying owner requirements in broad areas such as ALARA, ISI, Main-
tenance, equality Level and Fire Protection classification
schemes, etc.,
is noi considered to be "establishing] the detailed design. inputs."
I have read the above statements and confirm that I meet the independency criteria stated and as a Supply, System Employee any prior involvement,does not conflict with paragraph 2.C.
A.f.
D.L. Whitcomb 7 /<<6/82 (Date)
G.L. Gel haus g /~/~ gZ (Date)
Hack up Resume Required'.
(yes)
~(no)
Attachment 3
EXPERIENCE AND BACKGROUND
SUMMARY
INFORMATION i
Name y Heid
Education I
BSME Em lo ezs Years WPPSS Westinghouse UiiII Nature of'ork System performance and component evaluation and design, applica-tion of components, preparatior of specifications.
Thermal hydraulic system desigr.
and perfozmance analyzsis, engr troubleshooting of Westinghouse systems'n PWR's.
Same as Westinghouse Bill Kelso Tom Keheley
Bill Roberts Dennis Myers Karin Pickett BS Ch E BS Eng.
Phys I M.S. N.E PhD NE+
WPPSS ARCHO Hanford WPPSS Ecodyne I
Babcock h Wilson I
U.S.
Navy WPPSS ARCHO Westinghouse I
WPPSS Ford Bacon Davis (A/E)
I I
I Bechtel (SFPD) I Sandia Corp.
wppss 1'4 I
1 I'
I 1 1/2l I
1 1/2I 8
I I
Field design modifications (fue racks), refueling flcor comple-
tion, HVAC desian.
Mechanical nuclear design, full scope.
Mechanical system design, full scope.
Mechanical system review, per-formance evaluation,
design, licensing.
Heat'xchanger design.
Steam oenerator des'gn.
Lead ELT - Operations in Nuclea Navy.
Water Chemistry,. health physics, criticality testing an staztup testing.
Water chemistry, corrosion,
coatings, system, performance evaluation.
Water chemistry, corrosion,
coatings, etc.
Same as ARCHO.
System performance evaluation, system design, licensing, TWG representative.
Radiation exoosure and health effects evaluation, cooling water system design and testing.
System design safety analysis, testing.
Enviromental testing.
Licensing, system analysis, steam cycle evaluation, engr.
resolution of construction problems.
Design Reverification Team Member
C
Education Emolo ers
-Years Nature of Work B n Ngo Frank Owen Certified Health Physicist Franz Markowski *
(PE.
Penn)
I BS~E B.S.
Ch E BSME WPPSS UNj:
WPPSS Exxon I
Westinghouse I
Boeing I
I VFW (C~rmany) 2 l/21 I
7 l/2I I
2 l/2I I
2 l/2I Licensing system analysis, HVAC system resolution of construction problems.
Shielding, monitoring system
design, dose calculations, radiological programs.
'ealth physics shielding, radia-tion effects, dose calculations, release evaluation standazd and procedures preparation.
Same as UNI (Government Con-tractor change).
Reliability and availability evaluation, system evaluation, licensing.
Plant technical analysis on PWR and BWR (FSAR Ch 15).
Plant transiant and system design analysis.
Design of hydraulic control systems on aircraft.
System stability analysis for aircraft.
l Macbeth."
B.S Physics
'WPPSS 3 mos.
Radioactive waste system design and evaluation, conceptial design of alt. methods.
David Whitcomb *
(PE, Wash)
M.S.
Nuc Phys.
PhD N.E.
I BS Ch E
PhD Ch E Ford Bacon Ec Davis (A/E)
INEL WPPSS DUN/UNI I
7 Conceptial design of alternate methods of nuclear waste treat-ment and handling.
Engineering support of waste management operations, licensing and vendor qualification.
Plant operations technical specification preparation system design evaluation, licensing plant operating procedures, pro-gram manager technical support center.
Heat transfer, fluid flow, LOCA
analysis, ECCS testing, plant operations technical specifica-tion director, design analysis.
Design Reverification Team Member
fs v
S E
1 ~
Name Education Emolovers Years iVature of Work
-'::-.'aron Compton
Hark Henderson
Michael Curren
Daljit Hand WPPSS
~ B.S. Physics
[ Gra'd.
Study-
~ Comp. Sci.
~Battelle-
~Northwest I
I~Battelle-
~Northwest WPPSS I
~Westinghouse-
~Hanford Co.
( B.S. N.E.
BSEE WPPSS Power 8 Con-Rockwell Han-Iford/Atlantic trois.
MBA-Ffinance I
~Quantitative
~Methods, Inte Inational Business Rlchfs el d Hanford Co.
l~Power Engineer-
~ing Company 4
Boeing Aero-
~space Company Supply System BSEE DCM (India)
IPSEB (India)
I (Conceptual design and specifi-
)cation of Emergency Data
[System.
)Specification, design review,
)design problem resolution, (acceptance
testing, and startup
]of WNP-1 Training Simulator
[Progl am
[Specification of WNPl-P~
~Process Computer.
~Specification of Supply System
~Power Plant Operating Informa-
~tion Data base.
~Design, testing and startup of
~hardware and software for com-
[puter based data acquisition
~display, and control systems.
~Technical editor and proposal
~writer.
I J IBiC Design Engineer.
~Lead Test Engineer, Sodium
~Loop Safety Facility.
Pre-
~pared detailed test and design
~requirements for in-reactor
~test program; directed irradi-
~ation and post'-test examina-
~tion work.
I~I8C Design Engineer.
~Security enhancement; com-
~plete electrical and instru-
~ment installation design for
~sub-critical Californium Multi-
~plier Reactor core and delayed
~neutron counter laboratory
~analysis system project.
~Plant 8 Facilities Design an'd LInstallation Engineer.
~Electrical engineering design tof power systems instrumenta-.
~tion, area power systems, bui ld-
~ing fire protection and con-
~trol systems.
~Control System projects and electrical power systems.
Electrical Wiring Diagram and electrical design modification.
~Fault calculations, modificatm
,design for.etectrical systems.
iDeslgn modiiscations substa-Ition 8 transmission iines.
I 6 mos
~
6 mos.
2 mos.
I
Des i gn Reverification. Team Member
l
Name Education I
Emolo ers Years Nature of Work Cheta Patel
IBSEE" I 2 mos.
11/2yr ISupply System IE Iquadrex I
I 1 yr il'I Il sState Electnciily
" IBoard, India 10 yrs IElectrical Hiring Diagram and IElectrical Design Modification IReview licensing issues and for'm-lulate position.
lgesigo of electrical systems for lnuclear plants.
I IDesign of electrical systems for lpower plants.
S Adol fo Rafer *
(PE)
IBSME I
IBSME ISupply System IArgonne Nat.
Lail I'IPhilippine Nat.
lind.
I iSupply System IPDM 1
mo.
7 rs.
I y
ASME code design of Nuclear Equi:
lment 13 yrs3Process facility civis/structura Idesign I
1 mo.
I 3 yrs. ISit'e engineering manager for Icontainment modifications.
Doug Scott Jack Cole
IBSME IBSME I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I lÃestinghouse I 6 I
ISupply System I 2 IHright, Schucharjt, IHarbor ISupply System I 2 I
jHarn Industries I
3 lRockwell I
3
',Mright, Schuharil 3
',Harbor yrs. IPi ping support design for Mestin Ihouse PMR's.
yrs. IPi pe support design and evaiuatit I
yrs. IPiping and hanger design for ITrojan Nuclear Station.
Iil I
li tl I
yrs. IPiping and hanger design and leval uation.
yr s. IMinch product design; yrs. IResearch engineer-yrs. INuclear piping design.
Design Reverification Team t'Ember
C E
I Ecfucation Em lo ers Years I
Nature of Work
, '.)Dave Thonn
Jeff Person
~
(E.I.T. Mash)
Moy Basu (PE, Wash.
& NY)
J.
Frank Gorman (PE, Wash.)
I BSEE I Supply System IARHCO I ITT/Hanford GE I BSEE ISupply System I'
I EG8G Idaho I MSEE ISupply System IMBA (in pro-I Igress; degreeI Iexpected ISummer 82)
IEbasco I
IIKuljian IIBridge
& Roof, I Indi a IMAMC, Indi a IBSEE - 1962 ISupply System I
I I
I IIAssociated IEngineers I
I 9
5 15 I Technical evaluation of A/E I electrical system design, tech.
I consultant to projects, broad Iscope A/E Design review.
IEngineering for operations of Ipower supp'ly systems for nuclear Ipower plants designed modifica-Ition.
ISame as ARHCO'Design of electrical systems Ifor nuclear plants and related Ifaci 1ities.
IIElectrical wiring diagram and Ielectrical system design modi-Ification.
IDesign of systems for low and Imedium voltage distribution Ipower apparatus control', vol-Itage transient studies, load Istudies.
I IDesign review of A/E electrical I system desi gn; techni cal con-Isultant.to projects, lead tech-Inical reviewer for assigned IChapter 8 sections for Licens-Iing issues.
Recent increase in Iresponsibility includes super-Ivision of other engineers in IEE/I&C groups.
ISystem design of WNP-3 electri-Ical systems'reparation of'specifiction, bid evaluation Iand administration of contracts.
ISystem design of power plants I(electrical)
ISame as Kuljian I
ISame as Kuljian IITechnical evaluation and appro-Ival of A/E prepared equipment I and construction specifications.
ITechnical support for construc-Ition and test and Startup.
IDesign, technical assistance
)for backfit installation and Itesting oil fired boiler or Ilightoff system.
I Design Reverification Team Member
0 J
4 V
L'
Name
~J.
Frank Gorman Education I
Em lo ers
.) UNI, Inc.
~ Boeing j Aerospace Years Nature of Work
'J
~Technical support to plant
~ operations, design modifica-
~tions, design data acquisition
~ systems and circuit design.
4k
~Data acquisition system design, loperation, test engineer.
4 1
4 I

ML17277A417

Contents

Text

SUBJECT:

Subject:

Reference:

Subject:

Reference:

Subject:

Reference:

Subject:

Reference:

Subject:

Reference:

Subject:

Reference:

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML17277A417

Text

SUBJECT:

Subject:

Reference:

Subject:

Reference:

Subject:

Reference:

Subject:

Reference:

Subject:

Reference:

Subject:

Reference:

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search