ML17275B183

Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Emergency Preparedness Plan.Evacuation Study Used Unacceptable Methodology & Was Deficient.Response Requested by 811002

ML17275B183
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	08/06/1981
From:	Tedesco R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Ferguson R WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
References
NUDOCS 8108190282
Download: ML17275B183 (6)

Text

'

+aust 6,;1661 Distribution Pocket File DEisenhut/R.

Purple ASchwencer RAuluck MService RTedesco RVollmer THurley st'em FPagano FKantor A~

PHartfseld, MPA keenan OELD IaE (3) bcc:

ACRS (16)

TERA NRC PDR L PDR, NSIC TIC Docket No. 50397 To maintain our licensing rev'iew schedule for the WNP-2 FSAR, we will need responses to the enclosed request by October 2, 1981. If you cannot meet this date, please inform us within seven days after receipt of this letter of the date you plan to submit your responses so that we may review our schedule for any necessary changes.

Please contact R. Auluck, Licensing Project Manager, if you desire any discussion or clarification of the enclosed request.

= Sincere'Iy,

~@tuQ sigII~ b>

~bo+ < Tedesco

. Robert L, Tedesco.

Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing Washington Public Supply Sy ATTN:

Mr. R. L. Ferguson Managing Director 30OO George Washington Hay Richland, Mashington 99352

Dear Mr. Ferguson:

RLbf.

GU Sub]ect:

REOVEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - 14NP-2 EMERGENCY'3 gUG g 7 jg9)e

- 8 PREPAREDNESS PLAN As a result of our review of.the evacuation study in the Emerge Pr eparedness Plan in Amendment 15 to IlNP-2 FSAR, we find that w "E

additional information listed in the enclosure.

The evacuation st was reviewed against the guidance given in Appendix 4 to NVREG-0654/

FEf%-REP-I, Revision 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency

Response

Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants."

In general, our review found that the evacuation study used an unacceptable methodology and was deficient in many areas.

Enclosure; As stated cc:

See next page 8i081'sId282 Bi080bl PDR ADOCK 05000397 t

F PIDR OFFICE/

SURNAMEII 0

~ ~ 60

~ ~

, RAuluc

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~

0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0%0'

~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 04 ~ ~ ~ ~

DATE0 NRG FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 LB>

ASchwe er 8/

.261..

A F'

~ ~ ~ ~

RTedesco Ri~ JR]

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USOPO1 I931-335-960

r IUU ~

~

Jl Pl I

~

~

I I'P I.

UU I

I 4

~ I r

'I I~ >> TVI l I~

I f

4

, ""- MC Ul~

.I >> I ew g>

'I P

I P>>

I

~ I

~,

~

~

4)UPU 4* Iv)>II>

~

~VV 4 'I 4~

,iC8'+

~ y+>>g

~ ~

Ul ~ I'

'I l4 t ~ "~ >4

~ 4 UU>a)4 I UU V~

IU 4>4>4=

IU

~

~ M k

Nr. R. L. Ferguson Managing Director Washington Public Power Supply System P. 0.

Box 968 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Mashington 99352 ccs:

Nicholas Reynolds, Esq.

Debevoise 8 Liberman 1200 Seventeenth

Street, N.

M.

Mashington, D. C.

20036 Richard g. guigley, Esq.

Washington Public Power Supply System P. 0.

Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Nicholas Lewis, Chairman Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council 820 East Fifth Avenue Olympis, Washington 98504 Hr. Albert D. Toth Resident Inspector/WPPSS-2 NPS

.c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0.

Box 69

Richland, Washington 99352 Roger Nelson, Licensing Manager Washington Public Power Supply System P. 0.

Box 968

Richland, Washington 99352 Hr. 0.

K. Earle, Project Licensing Supervisor Burns and Roe, Incorporated 601 Williams Boulevard

Richland, Washington 99352

1

. 432.17

. 432.18

.."..432.19 432.20 432.21 432.22 432;23 432.24 432.25 Provide a map similar to Figure 3 of NUREG-0654 Rev.

1 indicating evacuation roadway network.

Provide roadway capacities and characteristics by roadway s'egment format similar to Table 1 of NUREG-0654 Rev. 1.

Use volume/capacity technique to calculate delay times on evacuation roadway network.

Use a reduced capacity for estimating evacuation times under adverse conditions.

Estimate preparation and confirmation times.

~" ~

Report results in format sipilar to Table 2 of NUREG-0654 Rev. 1.

Identify potential bottleneck locations that may require special traffic control.

~d 0

Have draft report reviewed,"by local and state agencies and provide -'

copies of their comments.

Provide a thorough explanation of methodologies and assumptions

~

used in the analysis.

I 1