ML17275B019
| ML17275B019 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 05/01/1981 |
| From: | WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17275B018 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8105050708 | |
| Download: ML17275B019 (92) | |
Text
17.1 UALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION INTRODUCTION There are four PrinciPal ParticiPants in WNP-2 design and construction quality programs. They are the Owner, Washington Public Power Supply System; the Architect Engineer (AE), Burns and Roe, Inc.; the Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) Supplier, General Electric Company; and the Construction Manager (CM), Bechtel Power Corporation.
e The Supply System, as the Owner and licensee, has overall responsi-bility for assuring that the plant is designed and constructed in accord with approved gA programs. The Supply System WNP-2 Project gA organization provides management overview of the other elements of the site gA programs.'ection 17.1.1 describes the Supply System WNP-2 guality Assurance Program.
~ Burns and Roe, Inc. provides Architect Engineer and related services for WNP-2. Section 17.1.2 describes the Burns and Roe guality Assurance Program.
~ The General Electric Company provides NSSS design, fabrication, and erection/construction services for WNP-2. Section 17.1.3 describes the GE guality Assurance Program.
e The Bechtel Power Corporation provides construction management services for WNP-2. This service consists primarily of direction and coordination of site contractor activities and incIudes related gA/gC services. Section 17.1.4 describes the Bechtel guality Assurance Program.
e 8~ 65050'F 08
17.1.1
~ ~ WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM UALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM INTRODUCTION The Washington Public Power Supply System (Supply System or WPPSS) has implemented a guality Assurance Program (gA Program) for the design, procurement, and construction of WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 2 (WNP-2).
This gA Program has been implemented in accordance with requirements of Appendix B to 10CFR50. The applicable requirements of Appendix B, 10CFR50 are applied to those items classified as WPPSS guality Class I due to their relationship to a nuclear safety function.
As the license applicant, the Supply System is responsible for the plant.
Therefore, the Supply System WNP-2 gA Program and its implementation has been structured to assure that design, procurement, and construction activities are accomplished in accordance with sound engineering princi-ples and practices. Systems, components, and structures that are safety-related, in the context of 10CFR20, 10CFR50, and 10CFR100, are required to be designed, specified, fabricated, installed, and tested in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, codes, standards, specifications, i..',
and procedures.
The description of the Supply System WNP-2 Design and Construction gA Program which follows is of the program as it currently exists. This program evolved from the original quality program which first appeared in Appendix D.O of the PSAR.'he changes involved in this evolution process include: NRC requested changes; updates in organization responsibilities and authorities; and the incorporation of new requirements.
0
(
17.1.1.1 ORGANIZATION o
The Supply System Managing Director is responsible to the Board of Directors for the overall management of Supply System activities, including the establishment and implementation of policies. The Managing Director resolves issues involving quality brought to his attention because of failure to reach resolution at lower levels of management. Overall Supply System organization is shown on Figure 17.1.1-1.
The guality Assur ance Director is responsible and accountable to the Managing Director to develop, administer, and assess the implementation of the Supply System Corporate guality Assurance Program. Included in this responsibility are auditing functions performed on the Supply System WNP-2 quality affecting activities; audits, surveillance or surveys of suppliers of material, equip-ment, or services for the WNP-2 Project. The quality Assurance Director has stop work authority. He prov>des for the review of the status and adequacy of the WNP-2 gA Program on an annual basis.
The Director of Nuclear Safety is responsible and accountable to the Managing Director to develop and administer Licensing, Operational Nuclear Safety, and Design and Nuclear Safety Assessment activities in support of the Project.
The WNP-2 Program Director, as shown on the WNP-2 Project Organizational Chart, Figure 17.'l.1-2, has overall. responsibility and authority for all WNP-2 Project activities. He resolves WNP-2 issues involving quality brought to his attention because of failure to reach resolution at lower levels of WNP-2 management. He is assisted by the Project Manager, the Plant Manager, and the Project guality Assurance Manager.
The Supply System Project Manager is responsible for WNP-2 design and con-struction and provides direction for Construction., Manager (Bechtel) and the Architect-Engineer (Burns 8 Roe) activities, as shown on the Organizational Chart, Figure 17.1.1-3. The Architect-Engineer and Construction Manager Organizations are shown on Figures 17.1.1-4 and 17.1.1-5, respectively.
l ) ~
FIGURE 17.1.1-1 SUPPLY SYSTEM ORGANIZATION OHART '.
MANAGING DIRECTOR DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR NUCLEAR SAFETY INTERNAL AUDIT-DIRECTOR ING MANAGER QUALITY ASSISTANT TO ASSURANCE THE MANAGING DIRECTOR DIRECTOR WNP 1/4 PROGRAH WNP. 2 PROGRAM WNP 3/5 PROGRAM POWER GENERATION DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC AFFAIRS CONTRACTS 8 ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION MATERIALS MANAGE- TREASURER DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR MENT DIRECTOR
l FIGURE 17.1.1-2 SUPPLY SYSTEM HNP-2 ORGANIZATION. CHART WNP-2 HPPSS; P)OGRAH DIRECTOR EXE CUTIVE ASS lSTANT CONTROLLER ONNGE CONTROL SUPPORT SERVICES QUAL ITY ASSURANCE PROJECT HANAGER PLANT f'jANAGER
l $
1
SUPPLY SYSTEM FIGURE 17.1.1-3 WNP-2 PROJECT HANAGEHENT ORGANIZATION CIIART PROJECT MANAGER CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING STARTUP HANAGEHENT jURNOYER Burns and Roe Bechtel Engineering Construction Management
BURNS AND ROE, INC.
WNP-2 ORGANIZATION CHART FIGURE 17.1.1-4 PROJECT DIRECTOR B&R SITE MANAGER
~
HOME OFFICE PROJ. ENGINE- RICHLAND QA MANAGER SITE ERING MANAGER ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ASST. MANAGER DESIGN/
DRAFTING
FIGURE 17.1.1-5 BECHTEL lNP-2 ORGANIZATION CHART BECHTEL HNP-2 PROJECT MANAGER I
CO I
SITE PROJECT COST 5 QUALITY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SCHEDULE ASSURANCE QUALITY CONTROL Legend:
coordination
The manager of each WNP-2 department or organization, as well as the manager of each Supply System home office support organization, is responsible for:
~ Identifying those activities within his organization which are quality related.
e Establishing and clearly defining the duties and responsi-bilities of personnel within his organization who execute those quality related activities.
~ Assuring that quality related activities are accomplished by qualified personnel in accordance with- approved procedures, as required.
, The principal WNP-2 project organizations are shown on Figures 17.1.1-2 and 17.1.1-3. A listing of the primary quality related functions follows:
~gi T Th h y T Tgh bh to the, Project Manager and is responsible for:
~ Identifying all engineering requirements required to accomplish project requirements and goals.
~ Establishing organizations to acquire and allocate resources for implementation of engineering functions iq accordance with an integrated project schedule.
~ Coordinating and controlling engineering performance to the project schedule.
~ Providing technical support/evaluation services to gA.
~ Assuring adequacy and engineering document compliance to technical commitments.
e Supporting project licensing activities.
~ Coordinating with Deputy Project Managers for Construction and startup and Project Department Managers as required to meet project goals.
Construction - The Deputy Project Manager-Construction is accountable to the Project Manager and is responsible for the Supply System Construction Management activities. The Supply System Construction Management group will monitor or conduct management surveillance of the Construction Manage-ment Contractor and Site Contractors to:
~ Evaluate the Construction Management Contractor and Site Contractor performance, and Construction Management Con-tractor'erformance reporting systems.
~ Ensure that the Construction Management Contractor guality Program is effectively implemented.
e Ensure that an adequate construction safety program is maintained.
e Expedite delivery of Supply System furnished equipment and material.
~ Concur with and monitor the Construction Contractor integrated schedule for compliance to milestones and overall project schedule.
~ Direct the activities of the Construction Management Contractor, when required.
~Startu - The Deputy Project Nanager for Startup is accountable to the Project Manager and is responsible for:
~ Managing the activities of test groups during the testing phase of the project.
~ The development, monitoring, analysis, and approval of plans, schedules, and procedures for testing plant systems and components.
~ Coordinating with Deputy Project Managers, Construction, and Engineering on the identification and solution of startup problems requiring Engineering and/or Construction resolution.
~ Serving as a member of the Plant Operations Comnittee (POC) for all matters related to the Plant Test Program.
~ Implementing a safe, efficient, and adequate test program in accordance with the requirements of the Test and Startup Program Manual.
~ Preparing and approving Test and Startup instructions.
Startup activities are conducted in accordance with the Operational guality Assurance Program, topical report WPPSS-(A-004, as referenced in Chapter 17.2.
S stems Turnover - The Deputy Project Manager for Systems Turnover is accountable to the Project Manager and is responsible for:
~ Managing special activities to expedite completion of the SINP-2 Project.
e Providing support to expedite resolution of outstanding concerns/problems.
~ Performing reverification/review of prior work, as required.
~ Performing evaluations to assure the adequacy of management systems used to control continuing work.
. A - Th tlNP-2 P 'l ii y A accountable to the Program Director and is responsible N g for:
~ Administration of the guality Assurance Department to develop and verify site implementation of the 1)NP-2 Project guality Assurance Program.
~ Interfacing with Engineering to,determine whether a nonconform-ing condition, existing on any safety-related activity, is re-portable under the requirements of 10CFR50.55{e) or 10CFR21.
~ Representing guality Assurance during NRC audits, inspections, meetings, and presentations.
~ Reviewing Project audit reports, nonconformances, and corrective actions to determine trends that may be detrimental to quality.
o :.Requiring stop work on those activities that do not conform to the requirements of the guality Assurance Program.
o; Auditing, surveilling, and evaluating the adequacy of the Architect Engineer's, the NSSS Contractor's, and Construction Management Contractor's guality Assurance Programs, and the adequacy of the implementation of these programs.
f
~ Providing for evaluation of the adequacy of Supply System home office quality related activities which support the HNP-2 Project.
o Performing audits and surveillance of Construction Management Contractor and Burns 5 Roe Engineering to assure that activities affecting quality are performed in accordance with the require-ments specified in the contract documents.
o Assuring identification of nonconformances and that steps are taken to stop the nonconforming activity, to assure the nonconformance is documented,and that resolution is imple-mented in a timely and effective manner.
~ Administration and implementation of the Operational guality Assurance Program during the test and start up phase, prior to issuance of operation license.
17.1.1.2 EQUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Washington Public Power Supply System has established and implemented a guality Assurance Program for the design, procurement, and construction phase of the WNP-2 facility. The gA Program is based on the assignment of quality classifications which impose applicable quality requirements to structures, systems, and components.
The WPPSS guality Assurance Program and the supporting procedures and instructions comply with the requirements of Appendix B to 10CFR Part 50 "guality Assurance Criteria for'uclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants" and applicable Regulatory Guides as specified in Appendix C.3 of the FSAR.
The Supply System's design and construction activities at WNP-2 are per-formed in accordance with the policies established by the HPPSS gA Program Manual for Oesign and Construction.
The WNP-2 Project Management Instructions (PMI) Manual delineates the responsibilities of and interfaces between project organizations.
t Each project organization is responsible for developing and using implementing procedures/instructions for their assigned functions.
guality Assurance Instructions, Project Procurement Manuals, and other procedures or instructions pertinent to specific departmental functions describe the measures used to implement the provisions of the programs.
The Supply System guality Assurance Manager assigned to the WNP-2 Project is responsible for establishing and administering the WNP-2 guality Assurance policies, goals, and objectives of the guality Assurance Program and verifying adequate implementation.
The WNP-2 guality Assurance personnel have the authority and responsibility to perform the necessary actions, including provisions for stop work authority, to accomplish their assignments.
To assure that WNP-2 Project personnel who perform quality related activities are cognizant of the quality requirements, they are provided training and indoctrination as prescribed by the Project Training Program. The initial indoctrination includes discussions as to the purpose of applicable codes and standards'and familiarization with Appendix 8, 10CFR Parts 50, 50.55(e),
and 10CFR Part 21. The training phase includes instructions on the Project gA policies and instructions on specific quality activities directly related to individual job functions. Personnel whose activities require specific qualifications such as nondestructive testing, audit,=inspection, and test-ing are suitably evaluated, trained as appropriate, and certified.
Training sessions are on ongoing activity and are appropriately documented.
Nondestructive test, audit, test, and inspection personnel qualifi-cation records are maintained.
The WNP-2 guality Assurance Program is audited on a regular basis by the Home Office Supply System Audit Section.
I Contractors who perform safety related work include the Architect-Engineer, NSSS Supplier, and Construction Manager. These contractors are required to establish and implement gA Programs consistent with the applicable requirements of 10CFR Part 50, Appendix B. These programs are reviewed for adequacy by MNP-2 Project personnel. The Architect-Engineer, NSSS Supplier, and Construction Management Contractor. quality related functions are controlled in accordance with the programs described in Section 17.1.2, 17.1.3, and 17.1.4, respectively.
17.1.1.3
~ ~ ~ DESIGN CONTROL Burns and Roe, as Architect Engineer, is responsible for specifying the overall design of the project, except that General Electric is responsible for design of the NSSS System. Design by other Project Organizations (contractors) is performed in accordance with an approved gA Program. The details of the Burns and Roe and GE WNP-2 gA Programs are described in Sections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3 herein, respectively.
Design control is performed by project organizations in accordance with approved procedures and/or instructions.
Design input, such as design bases, performance requirements, regula-tory requirements, appropriate quality standards, and industry codes and standards are properly identified, documented, and translated into design documents, such as drawings and specifications.
Procedures describe the controls established for the review, approval, release, distribution, and revision of design documents involving design interfaces.
Changes in design, including field changes, and the reason for changes, are documented, controlled, and reviewed in accordance with measures commensurate with those applied to the original activity.
) I 17.1.1.4
~ ~ ~ PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL Procurement of material, equipment, and services for the Project is accomplished through procurement specifications, contracts, or purchase orders which are prepared, reviewed, and approved by cognizant personnel.
Procedures requi.re that procurement documents incorporate the applicable quality assurance, regulatory code, and design requirements. The procure-ment documents require that bidders submit a guality Assurance Program or plan describing their policies, procedures, and systems to be utilized in the control" of quality throughout the applicable phases of production, from design to final shipment, erection, or installation.
Procurement documents provide requirements for suppliers to submit or make available for review applicable documents such as drawings, specifications, procedures, instructions, inspection and test records, and quality assur-ance records to the Project for review and/or approval.
Procurement documents require suppliers to provide measures for retention, control, and maintenance of their guality Assurance records. Procurement documents specify the appropriate records to be delivered to the Project prior to or with delivery.
Procurement documents require suppliers to provide right of access to their facilities, procedures, and records for inspection and audit by Project personnel. Procurement documents issued after January 1978 require the supplier to establish measures for reporting 10CFR Part 21 reportable deficiencies and disposition of nonconformances from procurement document I
requirements. Procurement documents require that the supplier retain the responsibility for monitoring and evaluating their subtier suppliers'er-formance to specified requirements. Procurement documents for spare or replacement items are subject to requirements equivalent to those estab-lished for the original procurement.
Changes and revisions to procurement documents are subject to the same or equivalent review/approval requirements as the original document.
17.1.1,.5 INSTRUCTIONS,
~ ~ ~ PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS Activities affecting quality are described in procedures, instruc-tions, and drawings and the activities are conducted in accordance with these documents.
Procedures, instructions, and drawings include adequate quantitative and qualitative acceptance criteria to ascertain that the prescribed activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.
Procedures, instructions, and drawings are subject to review to assure that applicable codes, standards, and acceptance/rejection criteria are included.
17.1.1.
~ ~ ~ 6 DOCUMENT CONTROL A document control system is implemented by the Project. The require-ments assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed, approved and released in a timely manner to the locations where the activity is being performed. The Project prepares procedures, instructions, and drawings as necessary to assure that activities such as design, procure-ment, manufacturing, construction and installation, testing, inspection, auditing, calibration, and special processes are adequately prescribed F
and the necessary quality requirements are stated. Changes to these documents require review and/or approval commensurate to that performed on the original document.
Contractors/subcontractors involved in activities affecting quality are required to establish measures for document control which satisfy project requirements.
Changes to specifications and drawings require approval of the cognizant Engineering personnel. As required by Procurement Documents, changes to supplier and contractor drawings and procedures are reviewed and approved by the Project Organization. Changes to documents such as specifications and drawings are indicated by a revision, change order, or equivalent documented methods.
Project drawings and specifications, supplier and contractor drawings, current revisions, addenda, changes in design and engineering change notices are released in a controlled manner.
I I I To preclude the inadvertent use of obsolete or superseded documents, a Project drawing/specification status report is periodically issued.
These reports indicate the current revision to Architect-Engineer drawings and specifications and related changes, addenda, and design and engineer-ing change notices. Site contractors are required to establish measures to assure that obsolete or superseded documents are controlled to prevent their inadvertent use.,
17.1.1.7
~ ~ ~ CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, E(UIPMENT, AND SERVICES Prior to award of contract, guality Assurance, Engineering, and other personnel, as required, perform an evaluation of accepted bids to determine the supplier's capability to meet procurement requirements.
The evaluation may consist of a direct survey of the prospective supplier's facility and personnel or, a review and evaluation of the implementation of his quality assurance program, or evaluation of the supplier's history of providing satisfactory products to the project, or evaluation of the supplier's current records supported by objective evidence.
Surveillance of suppliers, as required, during fabrication, inspection, testing, and shipment of materials, equipment, and components is per-formed to provide assurance that material, equipment, and services con-form to procurement document requirements. Surveillances are conducted by qualified personnel in accordance with established plans and to procedures that identify the attributes or processes to be witnessed and/or verified and the acceptance criteria. Those items which are simple and standard in design, manufacture, and test, or where quality characteristics can be verified by standard inspections or tests after delivery, are accepted during receiving inspection with no source sur-veillance. Receiving inspection is performed in accordance with written procedures or instructions.
) k Measures are established to provide for delivery of documentation from the supplier to the site, prior to or with delivery. These documents provide objective evidence:
~ That the items conform to the procurement quality requirements such as specifications, codes, and standards.
~ That the required tests, examinations, and inspections have been performed.
~ That nonconformances have been dispositioned as required.
~ i 17.1.1.8 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIAL, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS Measures are established to identify and control materials, parts, and components including partially completed subassemblies.. Requirements for identification and traceability are determined during initiation of design documents and are specified in procurement specifications and on drawings.
These measures require that items important to the safety, of the Project are identified in a manner (i.e., heat/lot number, part number, serial number, etc.) that can be traced to the appropriate documentation, or group of documents, such as drawings, specifications, purchase orders, material certifications, etc. The identification is maintained and veri-fied, as required, throughout fabrication, installation and use of the item.
Implementation of these measures are accomplished by the responsible con-tractors in accordance with approved procedures.
Verification that items are properly identified is performed during vendor surveillance and receiving inspection activities.
During receipt inspection material, parts, and components are identified as acceptable or unacceptable. Where practicable, unacceptable items are physically segregated from acceptable items. Items identified as unaccept-able may be released for installation provided the following conditions are met.
I ~ ~
~ Traceability and identification is maintained.
o The item cari be brought to an acceptable condition without damage to associated equipment or structures.
~ Controls are established to assure retrievability and, when applicable, limit the use of the item.
~ > ~
17 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES Measures are established, for the procedural control of special 4
processes that require interim in-process controls in addition to final inspection and/or examination to assure achievement of re-quired quality. Examples of these processes are coating/plating, heat treating, w'elding material cleaning and nondestructive testing (NDT).
Special processes are controlled and are perfomed by qualified person-nel using procedures and equipment qualified in accordance with appli-cable codes, standards, and specifications. Special processes are.
delineated in the procurement documents which require that the appli-cable contractors submit procedures for review and approval.
Procurement documents require that qualification of procedures, person-nel, and equipment involved with special processes be established, kept current, and maintained on file.
17.1.1.10
~ ~ ~ INSPECTION Measures are established to assure that an inspection program is
'planned and scheduled.
Equipment manufacturers, installers, and constructors are required by procurement documents to perform the inspection necessary to verify that items conform to established criteria. Procurement documents also require that inspection activities are performed in accordance with documented instructions, procedures, and drawings, as applicable.
Measures are implemented to assure that inspections and/or tests are performed on work operations as necessary to verify quality, that per-sonnel performing inspections are independent of the individual or group performing the activity being inspected and are qualified to the require-ments of the applicable codes, standards, and company programs. Records of certification of qualification are maintained in a current status.
Inspection planning provides measures to identify mandatory inspection hold points for contractor inspection personnel. Where appropriate, procedures, instructions, and checklists used in performing inspections, include as a minimum:
~ Identification of characteristics and activities to be inspected.
~ Identification of the individuals or groups responsible for inspection.
~ Acceptance/rejection criteria.
~ Inspection method.
~ Inspection reports attesting to the completion of inspection and the identity of the inspector or data recorded.
I 5 ) s l
I The inspection program provides that modification, repairs, and replacements are inspected in accordance with the original design and inspection requirements or acceptable alternatives.
Construction inspection, and receiving inspection at the Project Site is performed by Construction Management Contractor guality Control and/or installing contractor guality Control personnel for those activities within the scope of their responsibility. Construction Management Contractor A
guality Control personnel perform receiving inspection functions on project supplied material, parts and components. Construction Management
.'.guality Assurance personnel perform surveillance/audit functions on these activities to assure compliance with project requirements.
I The Supply System Project guality Assurance performs surveillance/
audit. functions on the preceding activities.
17.1.1.11
~ ~ TEST CONTROL A test program is established to specify the requirements and to provide for identification of the testing necessary. to demonstrate that structures, systems, and components perform satisfactorily in service.
Testing as addressed in this section pertains to tests performed on prepurchased equipment and materials and, tests performed by the con-tractors on installed equipment, components, structures, and systems.
The necessary testing requirements are specified in written procedures which incorporate or reference the acceptance limits contained in 1
design and;.,procurement documents and provide that:
1
~ Ca~librated test instrumentation and equipment is ay'ailable.
o Tests are performed under suitable environmental conditions with adequate 'test methods.
~ Tests are conducted by appropriately trained and qualified personnel.
~ Items which are modified, repaired, and replaced are tested in accordance with the same requirements which were applied to the original items or an approved alternate.
o Test results are documented and evaluated to assure that test requirements have been satisfied.
~
17.1.1.12
~ ~ ~ CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT Measures are established to assure that tools, guages, instruments, and other measuring and testing devices are identified, controlled, adjusted, and calibrated at intervals necessary to maintain accuracy within specified limits.
Suppliers and site contractors whose activities are quality affecting are required to implement control of measuring and test equipment in accordance with approved procedures. These procedures contain provisions that:
~ Devices are adjusted and calibrated at prescribed intervals against certified standards having valid relationships to nationally recognized standards, or, if no national standard exists, the basis for calibration is documented.
~ Measuring and test equipment is calibrated at specific intervals based on the required accuracy, purpose, extent of use, stability characteristics, and other conditions affecting measurement control.
~ Measuring and test equipment, is calibrated against reference standards. Records are maintained and equipment adequately identified to indicate calibration status and usage.
~ L I
~ When measuring and test equipment is found to be out of cali-bration, written procedures describe provisions for documenting and evaluating the validity of previous inspections and tests and, for repeating the original inspection or test using cali-brated equipment where necessary to establish acceptability of suspect items.
~ Supplier and contractor procedures are reviewed and approved prior to starting work.
) ~ )
A'.1.1.13 HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING Measures are established to control the handling, storage, shipping, cleaning, and preservation of material and equipment to prevent damage or deterioration. Appropriate procedures are prepared in accordance with design specification requirements and manufacturer's instructions to provide for special handling, storage, maintenance, cleaning, and preservation. These activities are accomplished in accordance with approved procedures or instructions.
Where required, procedures address requirements for special pro-tective environments such as inert gas atmosphere, moisure content levels, and temperature levels and require that:
~ Procurement documents establish requirements for handling, shipping, storage, preservation, and maintenance.
~ Items are stored in accordance with their classifications as delineated in Project instructions.
~ Storage areas are monitored to assure that the required storage integrity is maintained.
I 17.1.1.14 INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS Measures are established to indicate that inspections and tests per-formed on structures, systems, and components are known throughout fabrication, installation, and test. i Indicators such as tags, stamps, labels, travelers, or other suitable means are utilized to indicate the status of the item. Where required, structures, systems, and components such as valves, switches, electrical, and rotating equip-ment are tagged or locked out to prevent inadvertant use.
Project Organizations and contractors involved in inspection, test, and operation of equipment, components, and systems are required to prepare and implement procedures for the control of these items and activities.
Procedures include requirements that specified inspections and tests are performed, that application and removal of status indicators are controlled, that bypassing of quality affecting tests and inspections are controlled, and that systems containing inoperative, malfunctioning or nonconforming items, structures, or components are identified and controlled to prevent inadvertant operation.
17.1.1.15
~ ~ ~ NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS Measures are established for the control of material, parts, components, or services that do not conform to specified requirements.
To prevent inadvertent use or-installation, the guality Assurance Pro-grams of the Project Organization, site contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers establish control for, identification, documentation, segre-gation, review, disposition, and notification to affected organizations of non-conforming materials, parts, components, or services.
Written procedures contain provisions:
~ For the handling, processing, and dispositioning of nonconform-ing materials, parts, components, or services.
I o For the identity of the individuals or groups with the authority and responsibility for the review, disposition and approval of nonconforming items.
~ That nonconforming items are identified as such, by the appro-priate status indicator and are physically segregated where practical from acceptable items until dispositioned.
~ That rework or. repair of 'nonconforming items be subject to the same, or an equal test or'inspection as was original'ly imposed, or an approved alternate, and the inspection, testing, rework and/or repair activities are documented.
e That nonconformance resports are reviewed for potential 10CFR50.
55(e) and Part 21 reportability.
o For identification and control of conditional released items.
e That measures are established in procurement documents to require off site vendors and suppliers to include their non-conformance reports, which deviate from procurement documents, as a part of their guality Assurance records.
~ That site contractors and subcontractors document deviations from contract requirements, and nonconformances. dispositioned "use-as-is" or "repair" are submitted to the project for review and/or concurrence.
Construction management Contractor '=
guality Assurance's responsible for the review of these nonconformance reports to ascertain that they have been dispositioned, approved, and closed out.
Reviews include trend studies, corrective action adequacy, and reporting to appropriate levels of management.
The Architect-Engineer is responsible to provide acceptance of disposition, or when applicable, provides disposition of nonconformances.
17.1.1.16
~ ~ ~ CORRECTIVE ACTION Measures are established to provide for the prompt identification, evaluation, and correction of conditions adverse to quality such as no'nconformances, failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material, and equipment.
The guality Assurance programs for the project organization, off-site vendors and suppliers, on-site contractors and subcontractors are required to establish provisions:
~ That corrective action is implemented in accordance with procedures.
~ That corrective action for significant conditions adverse to quality identify the cause and include actions to preclude recurrence.
o That follow-up is performed to verify implementation and close out of corrective action.
e That for significant conditions adverse to quality, the cause and the corrective action taken are reported to cognizant management levels.
~ That Corrective Action Reports are reviewed for potential 10CFR50.55(e) and Part 21 reportability.
17.1. l. 17 EQUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS Measures are established to assure that suffic to provide documentary evidence of the quality affecting quality.
guality Assurance records include:
e Test logs.
~ Results of reviews of inspection, tests, analysis.
~ Surveillance and audit documents.
~ gualification of personnel, procedures, a
~: jDrawings, as-built drawings, and specific
~ Procurement documents.
e Calibration procedures and reports.
~ Nonconformance and corrective t ac son repor Inspect>on and test records contain as applicable.
~ Type of inspection, test, or examination.
~ Identity of inspector or data recorded.
~ Date and results of inspection/test.
~ Acceptability.
e Action taken relative to deficienies noted.
~ Identification with the applicable item or ~
Suppliers, vendors, and contractors are required to furnish guality Assurance records prior to or on delivery of equipment, supplies, stru'ctures, or systems, or retain them if required by contr actual agreement.
Procedures are established and contain provisions for the identification of'ndividuals or groups responsible for record transmittals, retention, and maintenance, and provisions for assuring that records are identifiable and retrievable.
Record storage facilities are constructed, located, and secured to prevent destruction by fire, flooding, theft, and deterioration by extremes in temperature and humidity.
17.1.1.18 AUDITS Measures are established to provide a system for conducting audits to verify compliance with all aspects of the (}uality Assurance Program and to determine the effectiveness of the program.
I The Project Organizations and principal contractors have established and implemented an audit system. The system assures that the necessary audit functions are performed to pre-established written procedures or checklists, in a planned and systematic manner, and are conducted by trained and qualified personnel who do not have direct responsibility in the areas being audited.
The audit system provides for external audits to be performed, as appropriate, by the Home Office, Project Organization, and principal contractors on their suppliers, vendors, and contractors, and internal audits to be performed within each organization.
Audits are planned and scheduled on the basis of the status and safety importance of the activities being performed. They are initiated early enough and performed at regular intervals to assure the quality assur-ance program is .effectively implemented during design, procurement, manufacture, construction, and installation.
Audits are documented and reviewed with the level of management responsible for the area audited and, where required,, follow-up action including re-audit of the deficient areas is performed.
Audit data is evaluated and the results are reported to management for review and assessment.
The Supply System WNP-2 quality affecting activities are audited on a scheduled basis by the Supply System home office audit group.
l The 'Burns and V
17.1.2 Roe'ncog Quality Assurance Program 17.1.2.1 Introduction The Burns and Roe, inc. {B&R) Quality Assurance Program for the Washington Public Power Supply System {WPPSS) Nuclear Project No. 2 (WNP-2) has evolved during the design'-. and construction of WNP-
- 2. The original B&R Quality Assurance Program (QAP) was described in the Atomic Energy Commis-sion accepted Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR) for WNP-2, Appendix D.O. This QAP was .
implemented until February, 1978, when WPPSS assumed responsibility for Construction Manage-ment, Site Quality Assurance and Vendor Surveil-lance of selected prepurchased equipment con-tracts. The B&R Quality Assurance Program imple-mented during this phase of the WNP-2 PSAR Devi-ation Request No. 15 WP. In this phase, B&R was responsible for the Architect-Engineer scope of the engineering and design of WNP-2 and provided experienced Quality Assurance personnel to carry out the Supply System's assumed responsibilities.
On June 1, 1981 B&R will implement their Quality Assurance Topical Report, B&ROE-COM4-1-NP-2A, approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with documented exceptions for the B&R Engineering and Design and procurement activities for WNP-2.
- 17. 1. 2. 2 The B&R Quality Assurance Topical Report The Quality Assurance Program for WNP-2 to be implemented by B&R on June 1, -1981 will be based on the B&R Quality Assurance Topical Report with documented exceptions, WNP-2 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) commitments, WPPSS direction and the B&R contractural responsibilities for the design and construction of WNP-2. The B&R responsibili-ties for the WNP-2 Project are Engineering and Design, and procurement activities for assigned prepurchased equipment contracts. The exceptions to the Quality Assurance Topical Report are iden-tified in the. following subparagraphs.
- 17. 1. 2. 3 Exceptions to the B&R Quality Assurance Topical Report 17.1.2.3.1 Chapter I Organization Paragraph 4.1;2 The B&R WNP-2 Project Organization chart is shown as Figure 17.1.1-4.
Paragraph 4.3 Construction Management is not within B&R scope of services.
Chapter II- Quality Assurance Program Paragraph 2.1 The USNRC Regulatory Guides applicable to WNP-2 are identified in Appendix C.3 of the WNP-2 FSAR.
Paragraph 4.6 Under the BGR WNP-2 Quality Assurance Program, satisfactory accomplishment of the following quality affecting functions shall be verified:
The design process is accomplished in accordance with established pro-cedures Specifications contain appropriate quality requirements For those prepurchased equipment contracts for which Burns and Roe performs the vendor surveillance function:
~ Contractors'uality assurance programs and procedures are ade-quate.
~ Nonconformances are identified and dispositions provided.
~ Material receiving, inspection and storage functions are per-formed in accordance with estab-lished procedures.
Surveillance of the activities per-formed by Contractors whose sole function is to provide engineering and design services.
Audits of the quality affecting activ-ities described above are performed on a scheduled basis.
Chapter III - Design Control.
Paragraph 2.1 Regulatory Guide 1.64, Revision 0 is the basis for the Burns and Roe design control program.
Paragraph 4.1 The detailed design effort is based only on an approved project criteria document.
Paragraph 5.
B8R design verification procedures were not implemented since the Construction Permit for MNP-2 predates the issue of Regulatory Guide 1.64. Designs issued by BSR were independently reviewed in the design control process against the approved project criteria document, which embodies the essential elements of an ANSI N45.
2.11, Revision 1, Draft 3 checklist.
Additional design veri.fications are now being implemented on a sampl*ing of previously issued safety system designs by the performance of special design reviews following established procedures which use checklists based on ANSI N45.2.11 criteria.
88R procedures for design control are bieng upgraded to assure that future issued designs are verified in accordance with procedures that contain an ANSI N45.2.11, Revision 1, Draft 3, equivalent checklist.
Both of the above actions are voluntary commitments beyond commitments made in the PSAR for the B&R scope of engineering and design.
Chapter IV - Procurement Document Control Paragraph 3.4 Records to be retained, controlled and maintained by a supplier are not identified in the specification.
c The appropriate commercial requirements are established by WPPSS and/or B&R and may be incorporated during the initial preparation of the technical specifi-cation. WPPSS prepares the potential bidders list.
Paragraph 5.
Award is determined by WPPSS using the bid evaluation prepared by B&R-Paragraph 6.
Technical specifications are not normal-ly conformed. When technical specifica-tions are conformed, the changes are reviewed and approved in accordance with the same procedure used for the original technical specification.
Paragraph 7.
Later procurement of. spare or replace-ment parts shall be to the original or improved technical requirements with inposition of either the original or the latest Quality Assurance requirements.
Chapter V Instructions, Procedures and Drawings Paragraph 2.2 Burns and Roe review of Quality Assurance plans required by procurement documents is limited to those prepurchased contracts for which Burns and Roe performs the vendor surveillance function.
Paragraph 2.5 Burns and Roe verification of the imple-mentation of instructions, procedures and drawing programs is limited to those prepurchased contracts for which Burns and Roe performs the vendor surveillance function.
l ~ P I~
0, Chapter VI "- Document Control Paragraph 2-1 The BSR NNP-2 Quality Assurance Program in regard to document control does not govern the following:
Procurement documents, except for prepurchased equipment contracts for which BaR performs the vendor surveillance function.
e Quality Assurance plans, except for the BaR Quality Assurance Plan and the quality assurance plans prepared by prepurchased equipment contracts for which BaR performs the vendor surveillance function.
Contractor manufactuiing, inspection
, and testing procedures, except, for those prepared by prepurchased equip-ment contracts for which BGR performs the vendor surveillance function.
Construction and operational test procedures.
Nonconformance reports, except for those prepared by prepurchased equip-ment contracts for which B&R performs the vendor surveillance function.
Paragraph 2.3 Changes to documents listed in paragraph 2.1 may be made and implemented'rior to the official revision of the document provided an advance change system exists and is controlled by approved project in-struction and/or procedures.
Paragraph 2.6 and 2.7 Burns and Roe verification of Contractor's document control programs is limited to those prepurchased contracts for which Burns and Roe performs the vendor surveil-lance function.
( "t I Chapter VII -Control of purchased Material, Equipment and Services.
Paragraph 3..
Recommended bidder lists are not prepared by B&R.
Paragraph 4.2 Quality Assurance audits are performed after contract award.
Paragraph 4.3 Recommendations for award are made by pioject management to WPPSS and WPPSS approves and makes the award.
Paragraph 4.4 Records of B&R bid evaluations and recommendation are only maintained by B&R for the su p plier selection process.
Paragraph 5. and 6.0 Surveillance plans are approved by the Manager of Vendor Surveillance and are subject to Project Quality Assurance review.
Paragraph 6.3 and 7.
Not applicable to Burns and Roe WNP-2 Quality Assurance Program.
Chapter VIII Identification and Control of Material Parts and Components Paragraph 2.1 Verification of identification of compo-nents, assemblies and subassemblies is performed by Burns and Roe only on pre-purchased contracts for which Burns and Roe performs a final inspection prior to shipment.
- 17. l. 2. 3. 9 Chapter IX - Control of Special Processes Paragraph 2.5 and 2.6 Only when performing the function of vendor surveillance on prepurchased contracts does Burns and Roe evaluate and verify a Contractor's special pro-cess control program.
17.1.2.3.10 'hapter X Inspection Paragraph 2.1 The applicability of USNRC Regulatory Guides is as committed in Appendix C.3 of the WNP-2 FSAR. Mandatory hold points for prepurchased contracts are established after contract award and are contained in the Vendor Surveil-lance Plan for each Contract.
Paragraph 2.4 Verification of contractor inspection program imp 1 ementa tion is per fo rmed only when B&R is responsible for the vendor surveillance function.
17.1.2.3.11 Chapter XI Test Control Paragraph 2.1 The applicability of USNRC Regulatory Guides are as committed in Appendix C.3 of the WNP-2 FSAR.
Paragraph 2.6 Verification of the implementation of a Contractor's test control program is per-formed by Burns and Roe only for prepur-chased contracts when Burns and 'Roe per- "
forms the vendor surveillance function.
17.1.2.3.12 Chapter XII Control of Measuring and Test Equipment:
Paragraph 2.3 Construction contractor programs for the control of measuring and test equipment are subject to engineering review and approval by B&R.
Paragraph 2.4 Verification of the implementation <<
Contractor programs for the control of measuring and test equipment is per-formed by Burns and Roe only for p<<-
purchased contracts when Burns and Roe performs the vendor surveillance function.
Chapter XIII Handling, Storage and Shipping Paragraph 2 3 Construction contractor programs for the handling, storage and shipping are sub-ject to engineering review and approval by B&R.
Paragraph 2.4 Not aPPlicable to B&R NNP-2 Quality Assurance Program.
Paragraph 2.5, 2.6 and 2.7 These requirements are applicable,to those prepurchased contracts for which B&R perform the vendor surveillance function.
Paragraph 2.8 Verification of the implementation of Contractor programs for handling, stor-age and shipping is,;performed by Burns and Roe only for prepurchased contracts when Burns and Roe performs the vendor surveillance function.
Chapter XIV Inspection, Test, and Operating Status Paragraph 2.3 Not applicable to B&R WNP-2 Quality Assurance Program.
Paragraph 2.4 Construction contractqr programs for inspection, test, and operating status are subject to engineering review and approval by B&R.
Paragraph 2.5 Verification of the implementation of Contractor inspection and operating status programs is performed by Burns and Roe only for prepurchased contracts when Burns and Roe performs the vendor suiveillance function.
Chapter XV Nonconforming Materials, Parts, or Components Paragraph 2.2 Nonconformance reports issued on the WNP-2 Project are analyzed or Quality trends by WPPSS and the results are issued by WPPSS. Nonconformance reports are not included in final data packages.
forwarded to B&R.
Paragraph 2.3 Construction Contractor programs for control of nonconformance reports are subject to engineering review and approval by B&R.
Paragraph 2.4 All nonconformance reports require engi-neering review and approval by B&R. Such dispositioned nonconformance reports must be concurred in by the B&R Quality Assurance Manager or'esignated Quality Assurance Engineers for prepurchased contracts for which B&R performs the vendor surveillance function.
Paragraph 2.5 Not applicable to the B&'R WNP-2 Quality Assurance Program.
Chapter XVI Corrective Action No deviations Chapter XVII Quality Assurance Records No deviations
Chapter XVIII Audits Paragraph 2.10 Not applicable to B&R WNP-2 Quality Assurance Program.
Paragraph 2.11 The audit program on material and equip-ment suppliers applies only to those pre-purchased contracts for which Burns and Roe performs the vendor surveillance fun-tion.
WNP-2 FSAR 17.1-% GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY EQUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM The applicable guality Assurance Program (gAP) and detailed procedures for the Hanford-2 nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) and fuel have evolved during the design and construction phases of the Hanford-2 plant. The or iginal General Electric (GE) program for Hanford-2 was implemented in 1968 and is described in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR), Appendix D.O. The program at that time was in accordance with the Nuclear Energy Division (NED) quality objectives for safety and reliable systems and components as set forth in the "Blue Book" issued August 20, 1968. On'ctober 1, 1969, the "Blue Book" was replaced with the "Green Book", Revision 0, which incorporated the intent of the then "Proposed Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) guality Assurance (gA) Criteria."
The "Green Book" has proceeded through several revisions since 1969.
The latest revision is NED0-11209-04A, dated March,'978. Table 17.1-1 is a matrix showing the entire evolutionary process which the GE program has undergone since August 1968 and identifies related NRC and industry standards that were applied. The actual version in effect at any point in time controlled the gA measures applied to Hanford-2 by GE for work when it was initiated, consistent with any necessary contractual adjustments to update from the 1970 base date of the contract with the Washington Public Power Supply System. For example, any work initiated after March 1978, applies the criteria represented by "Green Book", (NEDO 11209-04A).
Note that those portions dealing with the Standard Reactor Island (STRIDE) are not applicable to Hanford-2 in that Hanford-2 is not provided a STRIDE by GE.
In so far as the NSSS is concerned, GE positions and commitments to Regulatory Guides and ANSI Standards as made in the applicable revisions of NEDO-11209 take precedence over the positions and commitments des-cribed in the FSAR Chapter 3.
TABLE 17.1-1 GEttERAL ELECTRIC UALlTY ASSURAttCE EVOLUTIOttARY PROCESS ttED Quail ty Intent of Intent of AEC Date of Objectives- Proposed 10CFR50 Reg. ASIDE QA Related Effective- Safe fi Reliable Guide Reg. Guide ness S stems h Cpm onents AEC QA Criteria Appendix 0 dt d~t 10CFR50 AttSI tt55.2 2.2II OEP I h AttSI Stds.
8/20/68 Blue Book 10/1/69 Green Book Rev. 0 5/1/70 Green Book Rev. 1 9/15/71 Green Book Rev. 2 6/1/72 . Green Book Rev. 3 3/1/73 Green Book Rev. 4 (NEDO 11209) t5/7/74 Green Book Rev. 5 x x (ttEDO 11209-01) 12/12/75 Green Book X X (REDO 11209-02) i 11/76 Green Book X f (ttEDO 11209-03A) 3/31/78 Green Book X X (ttEDO 11209-04A)
.~
17.1.4 BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION UALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 17.1.4.1 Quali Assurance To ical Re rt The Bechtel Quality Assurance Program Plan for use by the Bechtel Power Corporation during Construction Management and System Comple-tion of Washington Public Power Supply System (Supply System) 17.1.4. 2 Sco of
~
Project RP 2 is described in the NRC approved Bechtel Topical Report BQ-TDP-1, Rev. 3A, Bechtel Qualit Assurance P Nuclear Re Plants.
nsibilit am for
&is section describes Bechtel responsibilities for providing quality-related services in Construction Management and Systems Conpletion to the Supply System on the WNP 2 Project. The scope of respon-sibility differs free that indicated in BQ-TOP-1 in that Bechtel does not provide p~enent services, and does not function as the responsible design engineering organization. Therefore, t?nse provisions in KYIOP-1 associated with design engineering, and procurement services do not apply.
Bechtel will have an Engineering Management group under the direction of the Project Engineering Manager. This group will provide manage@ant staff support capability to the Supply System.
engineer-'ng Engineering personnel will assist in developing the scope and relative priority of renau~g engineering activities and will interface with Supply System licensing personnel. Bechtel may perform engineering design assignments on a task basis. Such design tasks will neet design requirenants established by the Architect/Engineer (Burns a Roe) and will be performed to the applicable requirements of BQ-K)p-l.
Bechtel will perform construction in the comoletion of systems/
structures/ccaponents as assigned by the Supply System, provided by the Supply System.
utilizing'aterials Construction Managenent provisions for quality-related services incluDe:
o Receiving including receipt inspection of Supply System purchased items o Storage and maintenance of Supply System purchased items
~ Contractor/vendor QA. docurrentation review, retention and turnover to the Supply System o Review and approval of on site contractor quality-related Procedures and Manuals
~~
\ y J 0
o ~QC audit and sux~llance inspection over on-site contractor activities e Administration of the project proc'or controlling nonconforming items e Administration of the project prcx~m for control of design docunents 17.1.4.3 Project Unique
~
Plication to BQ-TOP-l, Rev. 3A Introduction with Page 2 Replace Regulatory ~ 1.58 (August 1973)
Regulatory Guide 1.58, Rev. 1 (Septenher 1980) .
Introduction Page 2 Add RecpQatoxy Guide 1.146 "Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit. Personnel for Nuclear Poorer Plants (Rev. 0, 1978)".
Section 1 OBEQGZATION Subsection 1.51. Page 10 Add Subsection 1.5.1 with Attachnent 1.
~ Section 1 ORGANIZATION Subsection 1.5.2 Page 10 Replace Subsection 1.5.2 with Attachment 2.
~ Section 1 ORGtQGZRPION Subsection 1.5.4 Page 11 Replace Subsection 1.5.4 with Attachment 3.
Section 2 .QUALITY ASKHQNCE PROGRAM (Sub Paragraphs 2 and 4), Page 23 change Regulatory Guide 1.58 (August 1973) to Regulatory Guide 1.58 Rev. 1 (September 1980)
Section 2 QUALITY ASSURAKZ PROGRAM (Sub Paragraph 3) Page 23 change ANSI N45.2.12 to ANSI N45.2.23
~ Change "Project Engineer" to "Project Engineering Manager" thxoughout.
Table 1 "Bechtel Quality Pxogram Cocunents" Page 57'and 58 A9d to Table 1 the Project Docutnents shown on Attachment 4.
Add Fig. Bechtel Projects,Managenent Organization Attachment 5.
15 X ~
Add Fig. Quality Assurance/Quality Contxol Organization Attachment 6.
16 Appendix A Bechtel Position on QA NRC Regulatory Guides and ANSI standards delete 5th paragraph (A-7) on page A-1; delete pages A-7 thxu A-13 en'.
Appendix B Division Quality Policies, scope, and relationship to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B Add Project Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual as shown by Attachment 7.
ATIPZHMENT 1 The Manager of Projects (Fig. 15) is the senior Bechtel representative assigned to the WNp 2 project. The Manager of projects reports to the Division Manager of Project Operations and Services, and is responsible for providing overall project direction to assure the consistent and coordinated application of Bechtel policies and skills for the benefit of the WNP 2 Project. 'Ihe Manager of Project's s'taff includes a Deputy Manager of Projects and other managers to coordinate activities in labor relations, the quality program and admini-strative services.
~ 4 l The SFPD QA Manager (SFHD) is independent of the other managers within the division and has the authority to carry out the responsibilities listed below in directing the Division Quality Assurance Program. He is assisted by a staff of Quality Assurance Managers (SFHO)-Audit assigned to functional areas of Pxogram, Training, Project Qh, and (as sheen.in figure 12). The SFPD QA, Manager's (SFHD) functions for the WNP 2 Pxoject include:
~,Provide technical guidance and concurrence for the WNP 2 Project Quality Assurance Pxogram for conformance with the r~eaents of 10CFR50 Appendix B.
o Formulate and approve Division Quality Assurance Department Procedures which define responsibilities, authority and functions of SFPD home office staff Quality Assurance DeparI~t personnel.
Review and concur with the KP 2 PQAM and revisions.
~ Maintain an awareness of WNP 2 project status, thxough manageaant audit. and day to day contact with the Manager of Quality, and provide assistance to the Manager of Quality to assure tim ly and effective implenentation of 'the WNP 2 quality assurance program.
o Formulate and conduct management QK audits to assure ccmpliance implementing procedures and to identify the need for corrective action and
~ty with the WNP 2 Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual (NQAM) and initiate, problems; identify recamend, cco~te or provide solutions; and verify implementation of solutions and corrective actions e Provide and maintain a qualified and suitably trained staff of Quality Assurance Engineers to carry out required project and staff functions. Assign Quality Assurance Engineer (s) to the WNP 2 project and provide them with administrative direction through the QA Manager Projects (SFHQ).
o Formulate and impleneht programs to provide indoctrination and training of Quality Assurance Department Personnel to assure that suitable proficiency is maintained.
e Fxcm information supplied by the Manager of Quality, provide quarterly reports to the Division Manager and Manager of.,Quality Assurance; evaluating the status and adequacy of the WNP-BPC quality assurance program, and advising of any problems requiring pxogram revision or special attention including recarrrendations for corrective actions.
At least annually, a meeting is held with the Division Manager (SFHO) and his staff on the subject of status and adequacy of the Division QA Program. The Manager of Quality participates in this meeting to cover the status and adequacy of the WNP 2 QA program.
MANAS& OF QJALZZY The Manager of Quality receives administrative, technical, and project direction, fran the Manager of Projects, and is responsible for the project and technical direction of the WNP 2 quality assurance program. The Manager of Quality receives technical guidance for QA and QC fram the SFPD QA Manager (SFHO) and Chief Construction Quality Contxol Engineer(SFHO) respectively. He is assisted by, and provides project and technical direction to the Project Quality Assurance Engineer and Project Construction Quality Contxol Engineer. 'Fig. 16) 'Ibe Manager of Quality is independent of the other line managers within the Project Managenent organization and has the authority to carry out the responsibilities listed below in directing the Quality Assurance. Program including authority to stop work or contxol further processing. The Manager of Quality's functions incluch:
~ Pxovide technical and project direction to Quality Assurance Engineers assigned to the Supply System Projects.
~ Formulate and approve, after review and concurrence by the SFPD QA Manager (SFHO) the Supply System Projects SAR and Quality Assurance ~ams as defined in the Supply System Projects Nuclear Quality Assurance Manuals (NQAM's). The NQAM's shall be in conformance with the requireaents of 10CFR50, Appendix B, the TPO Quality ~am Policy Manual, and the appropriate Project SAR.
~ Formulate and approve, after review and concurrence by the SFPD QA Manager (SFHO) the revisions to the Supply System Projects SAR's and NQAM's.
Coordinate revisions to implementing procedures to improve effectiveness of the quality assurance program and update the program.
~ Formulate and approve, after review and concurrence by. the SFPD QA Manager (SFHO) the Project Quality Assurance Department Procedures and revisions for Supply System Projects which define responsibilities, authority and functions of Supply System Projects Quality Assurance personnel.
~ Review quality related procedures and manuals prepared by centralized support functions outside of the Division (e.g., Procureaent, C 6 S, M s QS) to verify conformance with requireaents of the Supply System Projects NQAM's and approve, through the Manager of Quality Assurance BPC, for use as part of the quality assurance program on the Supply System Projects.
~ Maintain an awareness of project status, thxough contact with the Manager of Projects,,'nd assure tiae1y and effective implementation of the quality assurance program.
e Direct the perfoxmance of pxoject audits to assure compliance with Supply System Projects NQM's and implenenting procedures, and to identify quality problems; identify the need. for corrective action and initiate, xecczmand, coordinate or provide solutions; and verify implementation of solutions and corrective actions.
~ Pxovide quarterly reports to the SFPD QA Manager (SFHO) evaluating the status and adequacy of the Supply System Projects quality assurance 'pxogram and advising of any problems requiring pxogram revision or special attention, including recaaaendations for correc-tive actions.
~ Paview Division standard criteria for specifying quality assurance program requirenents applicable to contractors and subcontractors, and approve for use on the Supply System Projects.
e Coordinate the Quality Assurance and Quality Contxol functions for the Supply System Projects with the Division groups having quality functions, and with groups outside the Division having quality functions, e.g., M & QS, C & S, and PSQD.,
' 'C ATZACHMEÃZ 3 D1VISION CGNSZHUCTION The Manager of Division Construction provides technical and admin-istrative direction of the Construction Department personnel. The Manager of Division Construction (SFHO) is assisted by Construction Managers (SFHO), Chief Constxuction Engineers (SFHD), where assigned, and the Chief Construction Quality Control Engineer (SFHO),
Construction Managers, (SFHO) are responsible for the management and technical direction of assigned projects, and for assuring that construction projects are provided with appropriate personnel and are following prescribed division practices and procedures for conduct of construction activities. Chief Construction Engineers (SFHO) are responsible for providing division stanchrd work procedures to the projects.
Formal quality verification inspection and on-site contractor sur.
veillance inspection activities performed by Bechtel are the respon-sibility of Construction Quality Control. The Chief Constxuction Quality Contxol Engineer (SFHO) is responsible for providing adauni-strative direction to the Constxuction Quality Control Engineers assigned to the WNP 2 Project. The Chief Construction Quality Control Engineer'< functions include:
~ Provides administrative direction,.to the Project Construction Quality Control Engineer.
1
~ Assigns quality contxol engineers to the project.
o Assists with the training and qualification of consU~on quality contxol engineers.
~ Provides technical guidance to the Manager of Quality for the preparation of quality control procedures and instructions.
ATTACHHENT 4 NNP 2 PK01KT QUMZTY 'PROGRAM 'DOCUMMS ORIGINATING BEVEL FOR QA POLICY AND AVZHORIZING AUTHORITY PROGRAM RHQUIREMEKIS APPROVAL NNP 2 Project QA SFPD QA Manager (SFHO) Manager of Quality program policy.
Nuclear Quality Engineer Quality Based on Division policy as contained in SFPD Standard NQAM Assurance Manual (NQAM)
MV 2 Project QA SFPD QA Manager (SFR)) Manager of Procedures for conduc Project QA Engineer Quality Project QA activities
~ Manual (PQAM)
NNP 2 Project Project QA Engineer Manager of Responsibilities and Construction Construction Quality procedures for construc-Quality tion QC activities I
Control Manual (OGCM)
NNP 2 Project Field Project QA. Engineer Chief Construc- Responsibilities and Construction Engineer tion Engineer reguixenents for construc-Procedures (SFHO) tion site activities NNP 2 Manager of Codes Manager of Quality, President BPC Policies and procedures Bechtel Quality and Standards and SFPD QA Manager & appropriate for overall Bechtel Program Assurance Manual (SFHO) authorized code applicable to ASME work ASME Nuclear inspection agency
~nents Engineering Dept. Project Engineer- Project QA Engineer SFPD Engineering Responsibilities and Project Instxuc- ing Manager Manager requirements for tions engineering departments activities
ATTACI{MENT DIYISIOH PROJECT OPEAnTIOHS 5 SERVICES tlnttnG R SFPO IIOHE OFFICE MHP-2 I'/0 PROJECTS HnttnGEA OF PROJECTS DEPUTY.
IthHnGER OF PROJECTS PROJECT LABOR thhHnGER OF tlntlnCI:A OF PROJECT tlnHnGER LATI Ot(S llhtlhGER UNIT 2 RE QUhL I TY SERYICI:S U!!ITS I/O
-RESPONS tllLE FOA TEClltllCnL l PIUI )I:CT 01AECTIOH
~ @ AESPOHSIllLE fOR TECIIHICnL cul DANCE hND COORDI ttnTIOH PlloJECT l>l flECT10tl l COORDIHhTIOH
-0 ~ holt!HIS TI'.nTI YE COHTAOI.
BECHTEL PROJECTS MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION Figure 15
ATTACHMENT 6 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL ORGANIZATION SFPD SFPD Chief Constructio QA t1ANAGER Quality Control (SFHO ) Engineer (SFHO) t1ANAGER OF QUALITY PROJECT PROJECT QUALITY COtlSTRUCTI Ott ASSL'RAtlCE QUALITY CONTROL ENGI tlEER EtlGI t{EER LEGEND AND IIOTE N01E: The SFPD OA Manager (SFHO) is responsible for performing management QA audits of the PROJECT AND TECliNICAL DIRECTIOtl NNP-'8 . Project Quali ty Assurance/Quality Control TECHNI CAL GUIDA,'lCE AND COORDI tlATION Organization
~~ADt11 NI STRATI VE D IRECTIOtl Figure 16
4 MTAQ APPENDIX D DIVISICII QIAIPITY PGI PIC IES KOPE htfD P P I REI ATICIISII P
'IQ 10 CPlt 50, l'3>PI2lDIX II II.I'-2 .)CUAI ()UAI.IIY AR'Aft)ht)CE Ifhtx)AL 0
M H
SAN rnwfCIRu PIXYt DIVISIDtf
))
)
8 )
0 '0 4 ~ )
t)
O >)
)g PO
)E 0
0 0 A 66 U>
)O IOCYBSO Arp. 8 EUILIFCT 1234567 81234567891 123451212345678 123456789 tel. SZCrrms 0 I OBGhtf I ZATIOW ~~ 4 ~~~~~4~4 pUAI.ITY ASSURnt)CE f>ROGRAH OO 4~
DESIGH Cot)T))OI, IV PIIUCUREREIIT IRCUUEIIT CUIITRUL V IUUlllllCIIUIIU.PIPCEUIIPRU.
AtlD DRAHll)GS Vl DOC))t)L't)T Cot)TRO1.
VII COtlTlK)f. l)r I'URCI)ASED HATERlht ~
E9UIPHEI)TP AWU SERVICES ~4 VII I IDF))TIYICATIOW ht)D COWTBOf OY HATCBIAIBP I'ARTS nt)D COHrf)t)Ett'tG IX 00))TRof. DY sraxfnL rex:Yeses X ItlSrECTIUW Xl Tk ST CONT)K>L XI I cx)t)TRDL <8 Hl:nsUBtuG *tu)
TM~T EQUII'tlf',tlT XI I I lint)DLIt)G, 8')Xdth>PH nt)U Still'f'IWS XIV lt)Srtx I'lt)W> TES')'i ))rokhTI)k>
STATUS XV Wot)COtlYOR)It)to HFVrl:ltlhl., rnkT f)R ctNrot)Ewrg XVI Ct)f(ktx:TIVI: AC",i'f>>W Xvtl gunwale nssU nt)GL kt,)x:t<f)s
<<Vttl nUUITS