ML17271A363

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ES-301-4
ML17271A363
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/21/2017
From: Walton R
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Walton R
Shared Package
ML17068A433 List:
References
Download: ML17271A363 (1)


Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Qualitv Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Dresden Station Date of Exam:8121117 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 I 3 Test No.: 2017-301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES lnitials a

b*

cn

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

/

p

$\\t

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

7 gt(t

!\\J'W

3. Each event desoiption consists of the following:

o the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated o

the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event o

the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew o

the expected operator actions (by shift position) o the event termination point (if applicable)

/

0( Kril

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

$p

\\t\\^)

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

/

tç/

\\vJ 6.

lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indlcates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

/

ul

$\\t\\l)

7. The simulator modeling is not altered I

6l RIVJ 8.

/

(

g. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301

/

ut Rlt\\^J

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

/

{

K$

1'l, The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3

/

ûtl

\\v

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

of transients and events specified

/

0rl R\\\\V]

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

? t/

KrIs

14. the level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

a tu(

RÑ\\i Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes 1,

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1t211 7 lrl P\\t

2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4t4t4 4 $l R\\tt/

3.

Major transients (1-2) 2t212 4

p R\\tU

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 21213 v /

yv, Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions I per scenario set) 1t211

? tr/

t'{rü)

6.

Preidentified critical tasks ( 2) 2t614

//. tt(

M\\

. The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

  1. An indepéndent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.