ML17271A312

ES-201-2

ML17271A312
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	08/21/2017
From:	Walton R NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	Exelon Generation Co
Walton R
Shared Package
ML17068A434	List: ML17271A310 ML17271A312 ML17271A316 ML17271A325 ML17271A327 ML17271A333 ML17271A341
References
SVPLTR 17-0022
Download: ML17271A312 (1)

Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Dresden Generating Station Date of Exam in alion'. 8121 1 17 lnitials Item Task Description a b* c*'

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N 11- gsf (l'T\

4 W b. Assess u,hether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with if R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled i$tr I

¿- gvt T

T

c. Assess vrtrether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions' or topics. rP E d. Assess whether the justificatlons for deselected or rejected l(A statsnents are appropriate. $\0 Kû\N N

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover he required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major 9 -s S transients.

I M b. Assess vrrnether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and pp U mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without com exam , and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at P L

A least one scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the that scenarios will not be repeated on days.

T o c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in 4

Section D.5, "specific lnstructions for the'Simulator Operating Test,'of ES-301 (including l Rt overlap).

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed

¿-

W among the safety functions as on the form.

A (2) Task repetition from the last tto RC the limits specified on the form { \'

L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the K (4) The number of new or modified tasks mee on the form.

T (5) The number of altemate-path, low-power, emergency, and controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R o b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

U (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form' U n G (2) At least one task is new or sgnificantly modified. $,l\

H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of 4 N applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days' Fr\

4. a. Assess whether plant-specifc priorities (including probabil istic risk assessment and individual <t w \$

plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G E b. Assess wlrether the 10 CFR 55.41 , 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate' 1

hp t\l N

c. Ensure that 1(A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. - f (!v E

R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.

¿- s i\},te A

L . Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. 9 ûÅu

f. Assess vlhether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). N û"'w pate,

a. Author

(-ø tl/ztln

b. Facility Reviewer (.) V.ay- O

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 512 [?oL?

d. NRC Supervisor f,i," '/¿i->

. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.