ML17265A681
| ML17265A681 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 06/17/1999 |
| From: | Vissing G NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17265A682 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-GTECI-A-46, REF-GTECI-SC, TASK-A-46, TASK-OR TAC-M69449, NUDOCS 9906220233 | |
| Download: ML17265A681 (5) | |
Text
Dr. Robert C. Mecredy Vice President, Nuclear ovations Rochester Gas and Elect~corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, NY 14649 Dune 17, 1999.'UBJECT:
PLANT-SPECIFIC SAFETY EVALUATIONREPORT FOR USI A-46 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATIONAT THE R. E. GINNANUCLEAR POWER PLANT (TAC NO.
M69449)
Dear Dr. Mecredy:
Enclosed is the staff's safety evaluation (SE) of the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation's USI A-46 implementation program at Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (Ginna).
The USI A-46 program at Ginna was established in response to Generic Letter (GL) 87-02 through a 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter. The NRC staff concludes that the USI A-46 implementation program for the Ginna has, in general, met the purpose and intent of the criteria in GIP-2 and the staff's supplemental safety evaluation No. 2 for the resolution of USI A-46. The staff has determined that your corrective actions and completed physical modifications for resolution of outliers will result in safety enhancements and, as a result, provide sufficient basis to close the USI A-46 review at the facility. The staff also concludes that your implementation program to resolve USI A-46 at the facility has adequately addressed the purpose of the 10 CFR 50.54(f) request.
Your activities related to the USI A-46 implementation are subject to NRC inspection.
This completes the staff review of the USI A-46 program for Ginna under TAC No. M69449.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Guy S. Vissing, Senior Project Manager, Section 1
Project Directorate I
Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-244
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
+Docket FIQe VV PUBLIC PDI-1 R/F S. Bajwa S. Little G. Vissing n go]
A. Lee D. Trimble R. Wessman J. MA E. Imbro R. Rothman OGC G. Gallentti ACRS R. Pelton R. Scholl (e-mail SE)
M. Evans M. Oprendek, RGN-I DOCUMENT NAME: AASEM69449.WPD To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:
"C" - Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" - Copy with attachment/enclosure "II" - No copy OFFICE DATE PDI -I/PH GVissing:lcc 06//
/99 PDI-1/LA SLittle 06/I
/99 PDI-1/SC SBajwa 06/
/99 06/
/99 OFFICIAL RECORD C PY
'P'F06220233 9'706% 7 PDR ADQCK 05000244 P
PDR'
~
j
Dr. Robert C. Mecredy Vice President, Nuclear ~rations Rochester Gas and Elect7FCorporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, NY 14649 June 17, 1999
SUBJECT:
PLANT-SPECIFIC SAFETY EVALUATIONREPORT FOR USI A-46 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATIONAT THE R. E. GINNANUCLEAR POWER PLANT (TAC NO.
M69449)
Dear Dr. Mecredy:
Enclosed is the staff's safety evaluation (SE) of the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation's USI A-46 implementation program at Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (Ginna).
The USI A-46 program at Ginna was established in response to Generic Letter (GL) 87-02 through a 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter. The NRC staff concludes that the USI A-46 implementation program for the Ginna has, in general, met the purpose and intent of the criteria in GIP-2 and the staff's supplemental safety evaluation No. 2 for the resolution of USI A-46. The staff has determined that your corrective actions and completed physical modifications for resolution of outliers will result in safety enhancements and, as a result, provide sufficient basis to close the USI A-46 review at the facility. The staff also concludes that your implementation program to resolve USI A-46 at the facilityhas adequately addressed the purpose of the 10 CFR 50.54(f) request.
Your activities related to the USI A-46 implementation are subject to NRC inspection.
This completes the staff review of the USI A-46 program for Ginna under, TAC No. M69449.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Docket No. 50-244
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: See next page Guy S. Vissing, Senior Project Manager, Section 1
Project Directorate I
Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION'ocket File PUBLIC PDI-1 R/F S. Bajwa S. Little G. Vissing A. Lee J. MA R. Rothman G. Gallentti R. Pelton M. Evans D. Trimble R. Wessman E. Imbro OGC ACRS R. Scholl (e-mail SE)
M. Oprendek, RGN-I DOCUMENTNAME: AASEM69449.WPD To receive a copy of this document.
indicate in the box:
"C" - Copy without attachment/enclosure "E - Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" - No copy OFFICE DATE PDI-I/PH GVissing:icc 06//
/99 PDI-1/LA SLittle 06/I
/99 PDI-1/SC SBajwa 06/
/99 06/
/99 OFFICIALRECORD C PY
~PR RE00
~o Op I
0 D Q
~O
++**+
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 3une 17, 1999 Dr. Robert C. Mecredy Vice President, Nuclear Operations Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, NY 14649
SUBJECT:
PLANT-SPECIFIC SAFETY EVALUATIONREPORT FOR USI A-46 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATIONATTHE R. E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (TAC NO.
M69449)
Dear Dr. Mecredy:
Enclosed is the staff's safety evaluation (SE) of the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation's USI A-46 implementation program at Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (Ginna).
The USI A-46 program at Ginna was established in response to Generic Letter (GL) 87-02 through a 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter. The NRC staff concludes that the USI A-46 implementation program for the Ginna has, in general, met the purpose and intent of the criteria in GIP-2 and the staff's supplemental safety evaluation No. 2 for the resolution of USI A-46. The staff has determined that your corrective actions and completed physical modifications for resolution of outliers will result in safety enhancements and, as a result, provide sufficient basis to close the USI A-46 review at the facility. The staff also concludes that your implementation program to resolve USI A-46 at the facilityhas adequately addressed the purpose of the 10 CFR 50.54(f) request.
Your activities related to the USI A-46 implementation are subject to NRC inspection.
This completes the staff review of the USI A-46 program for Ginna under TAC No. M69449.
Sincerely, Guy S. Vissing, Senior Project Manager, Section 1
Project Directorate I
Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-244
Enclosure:
Safety. Evaluation cc w/encl: See next page
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Peter D. Drysdale, Sr. Resident Inspector R.E. Ginna Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1503 Lake Road Ontario, NY 14519 Regional Administrator, Region I
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale. Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. F. William Valentino, President New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority Corporate Plaza West 286 Washington Avenue Extension Albany, NY 12203-6399 Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Lalw 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 Nicholas S. Reynolds Winston 8 Strawn 1400 S Street N.W.
Washington, DC 20005-3502 Ms. Thelma Wideman, Director Wayne County Emergency Management Office Wayne County Emergency Operations Center 7336 Route 31 Lyons, NY 14489 Ms. Mary Louise Meisenzahl Administrator, Monroe County Office of Emergency Preparedness 111 West Falls Road, Room 11 Rochester, NY 14620 Mr. Paul Eddy New York State Department of Public Service 3 Empire State Plaza, 10th Floor Albany, NY 12223