ML17263A886
| ML17263A886 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 12/13/1994 |
| From: | Joyner J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17263A887 | List: |
| References | |
| EA-94-254, NUDOCS 9412280193 | |
| Download: ML17263A886 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000244/1994028
Text
REGULATORY VQ%%QPNREd1%SLSBTION
SYSTEM (RIDS)
.Ji- ACCESSION NBR:9412280193
DOC.DATE: 94/12/13
NOTARIZED: NO
DOCKET
CIL:50-244 Robert
Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester
G
05000244
TH.NAME
AUTHOR AFFILIATION
YNER,J.H.
Region
1 '(Post
820201)
RECIP.NAME
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
MECREDY,R.C.
Rochester
Gas
a Electric Corp.
SUBJECT:
Forwards insp rept 50-244/94-28
on 941121-22.Informs
that
enforcement
conference
to discuss
apparent violations
scheduled for 941220 in Region I ofc.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
IE15D
COPIES
RECEIVED:LTR
ENCL
SIZE:
TITLE: Fitness for Duty Program Inspection Report
P
NOTES:License
Exp date in accordance
with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).
05000244
Q
RECIPIENT
ID CODE/NAME
PD1-3
INTERNAL.~E CENTER
02
NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
EXTERNAL: NOAC
COPIES
LTTR ENCL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
RECIPIENT
ID CODE/NAME
JOHNSON,A
NRR/DRSS/RSGB
RGN1
FILE
01
NRC PDR "
COPIES
LTTR ENCL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
D
u
N
i"POTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIEi'ITS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE O'ASTE! COYTACTTHEDOCL'MEiTCONTROL
DESk, ROOM P1.37 (EXT, SN-20S3
) TO ELIMIYATEO'OUR NAME FROII
DIS I'RIBUTIOYLISTS I OR DOCUMEYTS 5'OU DOY'1 NLED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES
REQUIRED:
LTTR
8
ENCL
8
December
13,
1994
Dr. Robert
C. Mecredy
Vice President,
Ginna Nuclear Production
Rochester
Gas
and Electric Corporation
89 East Avenue
Rochester,
NY
14649
SUBJECT:
NRC INSPECTION NO. 50-244/94-28
Dear Dr. Mecredy:
This letter refers to the reactive,
November 21-22,
1994, fitness-for-duty
inspection at the
R.
E. Ginna Nuclear
Power Plant by Mr. E.
B. King of this
office.
The activities inspected
were those authorized
by
NRC License
No.
A discussion of our preliminary findings was held by Mr. King with
you and other members of your staff at the end of the inspection.
The inspection
was conducted
because
of concerns
generated
by ou} in-office
review of your report of a positive drug test in the case of a security shift
supervisor.
Areas
examined in this inspection
are important to public health
and safety,
and are described
in the enclosed
NRC Region I Inspection Report.
The inspection consisted of interviews with personnel
and selective
examinations of procedures
and representative
records.
This inspection
found that, in general,
adequate
programs
were in place for
the detection of drugs
and alcohol in the workplace.
However, it appeared
that random testing for drugs
and alcohol
was not being conducted
in a
statistically random
and unpredictable
manner,
and that all persons
subject to
testing did not have
an equal probability of being tested.
This appears
to
have violated
NRC requirements
as set forth in 10 CFR 26 Section 26.24(a)(2).
An enforcement
conference to discuss this apparent violation is scheduled for
December
20,
1994, at 10:00 a.m.,
in the Region I office.
The decision to
hold
an enforcement
conference
does not mean that the
NRC has determined that
a violation has occurred or that enforcement
action will be taken.
The
purposes
of this conference
are to discuss
the apparent violation, its causes
and safety significance; to provide you the opportunity to point out any
errors in our understanding
of the apparent violation; and to provide
an
opportunity for you to present your proposed corrective actions.
In addition,
the enforcement
conference is an opportunity for you to provide any
information concerning your perspectives
on the severity of the apparent
violation, the application of the factors that the
NRC considers
when it
determines
the
amount of a civil penalty that
may be assessed
in accordance
with Section VI.B.2 of the Enforcement
Policy',
and
any other application of
B763~
9412280193
941213
ADOCK 05000244
9
~;)5
tl
Dr.
R.
C. Hecredy
the Enforcement Policy to this case,
including
exercise of discretion in
accordance
with Section VII.
You will be advised
by separate
correspondence
of the result of our deliberations
on this matter after the conference.
No
written response
regarding the apparent violation is required at this time.
Thank you for your cooperation
in this matter.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By:
Richard R. Keimig
James
H. Joyner,
Chief
Facilities Radiological Safety
and Safeguards
Branch
Division of Radiation Safety
and Safeguards
Docket No. 50-244
Enclosure:
NRC Region I Inspection
Report
No. 50-244/94-28
cc w/encl:
.
R. Smith, Senior Vice President,
Production
and Engineering
Central
Records
(5 copies)
Director,
Energy
and Water Division
State of New York, Department of Law
N. Reynolds,
Esquire
State of New York,
SLO Designee
OFFlGNL RECQRD CQPV
Dr.
R.
C. Mecredy
Distribution w encl:
Region I Docket
Room (with concurrences)
W. Lazarus,
S. Stewart,
M. Oprendek,
PUBLIC
Nuclear Safety Information Center
(NSIC)
K. Abraham,
PAO (2)
NRC Resident
Inspector
D. Holody,
J. Joustra,
K. Smith,
RC
Distribution w encl
(VIA E-MAIL):
A. Johnson,
PM,
W. Dean,
OEDO
W. Butler,
M. Shannon,
ILPB
M. Campion,
ORA
DOCUMENT NAME:
G:iFRSSB.GRPiIR9428.GI2
To recolve s copy of this document, lndlcste In the box:
C" ~ Copy
out sttschment/enclosure
"E
~ Copy vnth sttschment/enclosure
"N
~ No copy
OFFICE
NAME
DATE
RI: DRSS
Kin
12/l3'4
RI:DRSS
McCabe
12 &
RI:DRSS
Joyner
12 lS
9
OFFICIAL RECORD
COPY