ML17261A942

Forwards Insp Rept 50-244/89-80 on 890925-1004.Weaknesses Identified

ML17261A942
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	02/02/1990
From:	Gallo R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:	Mccredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
Shared Package
ML17261A943	List: ML17261A942 ML17261A944
References
NUDOCS 9002140183
Download: ML17261A942 (3)

See also: IR 05000244/1989080

Text

ype RECT,

0

lv

Clo

"."j

kg**4

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

, REGION

I

475 ALLENDALEROAD

KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA19406

Docket No. 50-244

K8

2 SSO

Rochester

Gas

and Electric Corporation

ATTN:

Mr. Robert C.'cCredy

General

Manager,

Nuclear Production

49 East Avenue

Rochester,

New York

14649

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

INSPECTION NO ~ 50-244/89-80

During the period of September,

25 through October 4,

1989, the

NRC conducted

an announced

team inspection of the emergency

procedures

used by the operators

at the Ginna Nuclear Power

Station.

At the conclusion of the inspection,

the preliminary findings

were discussed

with those

members of your staff identified in'he

enclosed report.

Within the context of this report, the term

emergency

procedures

includes

the'Emergency

Operating Procedures

(EOPs),

Abnormal Procedures

(APs), Zcpxipment Restoration.

Procedures

(ERs),

and all referenced

procedures.

The overall assessment,

by the inspection

team, is that the

emergency

procedures

at Ginna Station, with minor modifications

as indicated in the enclosed report,

are an example of a well

designed

program that has been properly implemented.

The

procedures

were well written and the operators

were able to

utilize the procedures

during the simulator observations.

Attachment

5 to the enclosed

inspection report summarizes

the

weaknesses

identified relative to the emergency procedures.

You

are requested

to respond to the identified weaknesses

within

sixty days of receipt of this letter.

The response

requested

by this letter is not subject to the

clearance

procedures

of the Office of Management

and Budget as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980,

PL 96-511.

In accordance

with 10CFR2.790 of the Commissionis regulations,

a

copy of this letter and its enclosure will be placed in the

NRC

Public'Document

Room.

yO(I2>g(>$ 83

$ OO

O

~

Should you have

any questions

regarding this inspection,

please

contact

me at 215/337-5291.

Sincerely,

ROSepT v. G~LLO

Robert

M. Gallo, Chief

Operations

Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosure:

Inspection Report No. 50-244/89-80

w/Attachments

1, 2, 3,

4 and

5

cc w/Enclosure

and Attachments

1, 2, 3,

4 and 5:

Harry H. Voigt, Esquire

Central Records

(4 copies)

Director,

Power Division

N. S. Perry,

NRC Senior Resident Inspector

Public Document

Room

(PDR)

Local Public Document

Room

(LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center

(NSIC)

State of New York, Department of Law

State of New York

bcc w/Enclosure

and Attachments

1, 2, 3,

4 and 5:

Management Assistant,

DRMA (w/o enclosure)

Region I Docket

Room (w/concurrences)

R.

M. Gallo,

DRS

P.

W. Eselgroth,

PWR

J.

R. Johnsoni

DRP

E.

C. McCabe,

DRP

R. J. Bores,

DRSS

S. F.

Shankman,

NRR

B.

S. Norris,

DRS

L. E. Briggs,

DRS

F.

P. Bonnett,

DRS

C.

M. Meeker,

GOMEZ

B. A. Paramore,

SAIC

G.

S. Gallettir

NRR

bcc w/o Enclosure:

Management Assistant,

DRMA (w/o enclosure)

Norris

RI/DR

oth

2/2, /90

0

I/DRS

2i90