ML17261A893
| ML17261A893 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1989 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17261A892 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8903160302 | |
| Download: ML17261A893 (2) | |
Text
~ra~ REGS(
~C Wp O~
,,(y j'. 4'y
%p*~0 i
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO. 32 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO.
DPR-18 ROCHESTEP, OAS Il ELECTRIC CORPORATION R.
E.
GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLA[i'T DOCKET NO. 50-244
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated October 10,
- 1988, and supplemented December
?,", 1988, the Rochester Gas 5 Electric Corporation (the licensee) proposed changes to Appendix A of the operating license for the R.
E.
Ginna Nuclear Power Stat'.on.
The proposed changes affect Section 6.0, and reflect new titles given to key managerial positions, with the single exception of an addition'al board
- member, Maintenance Planning/Schedulinq
- Marager, appointed to the Plant Opera-tions Review Committee (PORC).
The staff has reviewed the submittal anc'.
has prepared the fo>>owing evaluation.
2.0 EVALUATION The revised Technical Specification addresses t:,tie changes for the corporate positions hav'ng responsibility for overall plant safety, ard modification of the PORC mer.bership.
Specifically, the following changes are:
(1)
Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering or Vice President, Electric ard Steam Production to Vice President, Production and Engineerino.
(P..'raininq Coordinator
+o Division Training Manaqer since this positior-now includes maintaining a retraining and replacemen.
program.
(3)
Shift Foreman to Shift Supervisor, which includes maintaining the key to the locked doors in high radiation areas.
(4)
The Plant Health Physicist to a plant Health Physicist since several individuals
- nop, have tl e title of Health Physicist.
(5)
Superintendent, Ginna Production, and Station Superintendent arE'eplaced by the positior; of Plant Manager, Ginr a Station; except that the position of Superintendent, Ginna Production continues as Chairman of the Plant Operations Peview Committee (PORC).
The Plant I'.anager, Ginna Station shall have the responsibility for overall onsite operations.
(6)
Addition of +he position of Maintenance Plannino/Schedulino Manager as a
member of the PORC.
8903$ 60 g 0'50002 302 8903o 44.
Po~
PDO PD P
This amendment does not involve a significant reduction in the margins of safety.
The revision does not'in any way alter RGAE's commitment to maintaining a
management structure that contributes to the safe operation and maintenance of Ginna Station.
A single corporate officer (!,ice President) is responsible for plant safety and will communicate and direct the lines of authority and responsibility for safe nuclear plant operation.
This officer continues to report directly to the President.
A single individual is responsible for overall safe unit operation and maintenance (Plant Nanager).
The staff has determined that the proposed changes in the technical specifications are acceptable since there are no changes to the functions or responsibilities of the affected management positions and the PORC board.
- 3. 0 ENVIRONS!ENTAL CONSIDERATION This amendment involves a change-to recordkeeping reporting or administrative procedures or requirements.
Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for cateqorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 5].22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(h},
no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection w'.th the issuance of this amendment.
4.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission made a proposed determination that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, which was published in the Federal Register on November 2,
!.988 (53FR44255) and republished on February 1,
!.989 (54 FR 5175).
The Commission consulted with the State of New York.
No public comments were
- received, and the State of New York did not have any comments.
On the basis of the consideration-discussed
- above, the staff concludes that (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public wil.l not be endangered by operation in the proposed
- manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or tn the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributors:
C. Stahle, D. Solorio Dated:
March 8, 1989